Table of Contents
Introduction: The Quiet Exodus
The city is still a web of slumbering lights as Alex stands on the hill, the pre-dawn air sharp and clean.
This is his cathedral, this quiet overlook.
There is no altar, no priest, no hymnbook.
There is only the slow blush of light on the horizon and a feeling that swells in his chest—a profound and silent communion.
This is a practice he has cultivated, a ritual of “looking inward or centering” himself that has replaced the formal, structured worship of his past.1
Here, he feels a “deep sense of wonder about the universe,” a feeling more authentic and resonant than any sermon he ever heard.2
This personal, unstructured moment of reverence is not an anomaly; it is a quiet testament to one of the most significant, yet often unheralded, cultural shifts of our time.
Alex is part of a vast and growing demographic, a quiet exodus from the pews into a spiritual landscape defined by personal experience rather than institutional doctrine.
They are the “Spiritual But Not Religious” (SBNR), and they represent a formidable presence in modern society.
In the United States, an estimated 22% of adults now identify as SBNR.1
This group is not a fringe element; it is a substantial segment of the population, outnumbering those who describe themselves as “religious but not spiritual” (10%) and matching the share of those who are “neither spiritual nor religious” (21%).3
This movement is unfolding against a backdrop of declining religious affiliation across the West.
The percentage of religiously unaffiliated Americans, or “nones,” has surged from 16% in 2006 to 27% today, while the number of committed monthly churchgoers has been nearly halved in just two decades.5
It is within this widening space, left by the receding tide of organized religion, that new, unchurched spiritualities like Alex’s are taking root and flourishing.
This is the story of that journey—a passage from the deconstruction of an inherited faith to the deliberate reconstruction of a personal, resilient, and authentic spirituality.
Through the narrative of one individual’s odyssey, we can begin to map the complex sociological, psychological, and philosophical forces that are reshaping the very meaning of belief in the 21st century.
Alex’s story is a lens through which we can explore a transformation that is at once deeply personal and profoundly universal, charting a course from the hollowed-out certainties of the past toward a new, unwritten future of faith.
Part I: The Cracks in the Foundation – A Crisis of Faith
The departure from organized religion is rarely a clean break.
It is more often a slow erosion, the gradual appearance of hairline fractures in a foundation once thought to be immutable.
For many, like Alex, the process begins not with a thunderous declaration of disbelief, but with a quiet, persistent hum of internal conflict—a growing dissonance between the world as it is taught and the world as it is lived.
This section explores that process of disillusionment, tracing the journey from the internal landscape of doubt to the external pressures that finally cause the structure to crumble.
Subsection 1.1: The Weight of Doctrine and the Pain of Dissonance
Alex’s spiritual upbringing was built on solid ground, or so it seemed.
Raised in a conservative Christian tradition, he was handed a world with clear lines and absolute certainties.7
There was comfort in the rules, a sense of security in knowing one’s place in a divinely ordered cosmos.
Yet, beneath this surface of certainty, an unease began to grow.
It was a feeling of profound “cognitive dissonance,” the disorienting psychological stress that occurs when one’s deeply held beliefs clash with one’s actions or observations of the world.8
For Alex, this wasn’t a mere intellectual puzzle; it was an emotional and spiritual schism that manifested as a constant, low-grade anxiety.
The doctrines that were meant to provide comfort began to feel like a burden.
He carried the “weight of guilt and sin” for thoughts and feelings that seemed natural, and the ever-present threat of hell, a concept drilled into him since childhood, became a source of deep-seated fear rather than a motivator for righteousness.7
Personal narratives from others who have walked this path echo this experience, describing it not in the sterile language of psychology but with the visceral vocabulary of personal trauma.
They speak of “grieving,” of feeling like their world has been “turned upside down,” of a painful “divorce from religion”.7
The experience feels like having an integral part of oneself “ripped out”.12
This emotional toll reveals a crucial truth about deconversion: it is rarely a simple intellectual disagreement with doctrine.
It is, more fundamentally, the painful endpoint of a prolonged state of cognitive dissonance.
The internal conflict becomes so great that the psychological cost of maintaining the belief system outweighs the comfort it once provided.
The cracks that form in the foundation are not just logical fallacies discovered in scripture; they are emotional fault lines running through the very core of one’s identity.
The pain of leaving, therefore, is the pain of an entire worldview, an entire self-concept, beginning to collapse.
This is why the process is so often characterized by a profound sense of grief and loss; it is akin to mourning the death of a former self and the God that self believed in.10
Subsection 1.2: The Four Horsemen of Deconversion: The External Triggers
While the seeds of doubt were sown within Alex’s own mind, their growth was accelerated by a confluence of external factors.
His personal journey of disillusionment maps almost perfectly onto the four primary motivations for leaving organized religion identified by researchers in psychology and sociology.8
These triggers did not act in isolation; rather, they formed an interconnected feedback loop, where a failure in one area exposed a weakness in another, leading to a cascading collapse of faith in the institution itself.
The first trigger was Cultural Stagnation.
As Alex grew older, his worldview became more progressive, shaped by a broader exposure to the world and its diversity.
He found himself increasingly at odds with his church’s conservative stances on social issues, particularly its views on LGBTQ+ rights and gender equality.8
This is a common experience for many who leave, especially younger individuals who feel their religious institutions are failing to evolve with a changing society.1
This initial disagreement on values acted as a catalyst, prompting him to look more critically at the institution’s moral authority.
This critical gaze led him directly to the second trigger: Institutional Hypocrisy and Trauma.
He began to notice a stark contrast between the church’s proclamations of morality and its actions.
News of clergy sex abuse scandals, financial mismanagement, and the political maneuvering of religious leaders created a deep sense of betrayal.14
While he was not a direct victim of abuse, he felt a growing sense of complicity in a system that had demonstrably harmed others, a feeling shared by many “protesting dissenters” who consciously break away due to such negative experiences.9
With his trust in the institution severely eroded, its ability to provide spiritual comfort was fatally weakened.
This set the stage for the third trigger: Insufficient Answers to Suffering.
When a close friend was diagnosed with a terminal illness, the theological explanations offered by his church—that it was part of God’s mysterious plan, a test of faith, or a consequence of a fallen world—felt not just inadequate but “theologically thin” and emotionally cruel.8
The “just-world” belief system he had been taught—the idea that good things happen to good people and bad things to bad people—shattered against the brutal reality of unmerited suffering.
The platitudes that were once a source of comfort now sounded hollow, a sign of the institution’s profound failure to grapple with the deepest questions of human existence.
This cascade of disillusionment culminated in the fourth trigger: The Problematic Label.
The very terms “religious” and “evangelical” had become, in his mind and in the broader culture, entangled with a specific political identity that he could not and would not endorse.8
The label itself became a source of cognitive dissonance, a brand he no longer wished to be associated with.
It was not one issue, but the systemic failure of the entire framework that made his continued participation untenable.
The break was no longer a matter of if, but when.
Subsection 1.3: The Agony of the Unbecoming
The final separation from his church was not a moment of triumphant liberation, but one of profound and terrifying loss.
In walking away from the institution, Alex was walking away from his entire social structure, his primary community, and the very identity that had defined him for his entire life.10
One personal narrative captures this feeling perfectly, describing the sensation of being “aimlessly floating through nothing”.11
This experience of “disillusionment” is not merely disappointment; it is a “serious illness of the soul,” a period of intense grief for the loss of innocence, the loss of community, and the loss of a relationship with a divine being once implicitly trusted.10
Psychologically, this is a transitory phase, the disorienting space between a well-known past self and a new, completely undefined future self.
It is a period fraught with a complex cocktail of emotions: anxiety about the future, shame over past beliefs, anger at the institution for its perceived betrayals, and a deep, aching sadness.13
The initial sense of “freedom” from the strictures of religion is often overshadowed by a powerful feeling of existential vertigo.
The structure of religion, even when it felt oppressive, provided a comprehensive framework for reality—a moral code, a social network, a narrative of meaning, and answers to life’s biggest questions.20
Its sudden removal leaves a void that is both terrifying and, paradoxically, necessary for new growth.
This experience is not a sign of failure but a critical and unavoidable stage in the journey.
The act of leaving is not simply about shedding a set of beliefs; it is about stepping into an existential wilderness, a space devoid of pre-drawn maps.
Personal accounts describe this feeling as being akin to a “divorce” or having “nothing solid underneath”.10
This void, as painful as it is, serves a crucial purpose.
It forces the individual to confront the fundamental questions of meaning, purpose, and identity entirely on their own terms.
This emptiness becomes the fertile, albeit fallow, ground upon which a new, more authentic paradigm can eventually be built.
The agony of the unbecoming is the necessary prelude to the work of reconstruction.
Part II: The Wilderness – Navigating a World Without Walls
Having crossed the threshold out of organized religion, the seeker enters a vast and uncharted territory.
This is the wilderness—a space of immense freedom but also of profound challenges.
Here, without the walls of doctrine or the signposts of tradition, the journey of faith becomes a solitary and often bewildering trek.
This section explores the practical and philosophical difficulties of this self-guided path, from the struggle to define one’s new identity to the loneliness of a quest undertaken without a map or a congregation.
Subsection 2.1: The “Spiritual Wanderlust”: In Search of a Label
Now adrift from his religious moorings, Alex finds himself in a state of existential ambiguity.
He doesn’t identify as an atheist—the belief in a higher power, however abstract, persists.
Yet the popular moniker for his position, “spiritual but not religious,” feels vague, a catch-all phrase fraught with imprecision.22
He is a “dissenter,” one who has consciously left his tradition due to a combination of negative personal experiences and principled objections.16
But as he begins to explore this new landscape, he encounters others who wear the SBNR label for entirely different reasons, forcing him to navigate a complex and varied terrain of belief.
Sociological research, particularly the work of Linda Mercadante, helps to deconstruct the monolithic SBNR category, revealing it to be an umbrella term for several distinct spiritual postures.16
Beyond the
Dissenters like Alex, there are the Casuals, for whom spirituality is a functional, therapeutic tool to be used “as-needed” for stress relief or personal well-being, rather than an organizing principle of their lives.16
Then there are the
Explorers, individuals with a “spiritual wanderlust” who move from one practice to another—from meditation to tarot to neo-pagan rituals—driven by an “unsatisfied curiosity” and a comfort with a destination-less journey.16
Finally, there are the
Seekers, who are actively looking for a new spiritual home, a community and a belief system to which they can commit, often exploring more progressive institutions like Unitarian Universalist congregations.23
This typology reveals that the SBNR journey is not a single, linear path but a dynamic landscape of diverse motivations.
Alex’s own journey reflects this complexity.
He begins as a “Protesting Dissenter,” defined by what he has rejected.
He may then transition into a phase of being an “Explorer,” sampling various philosophies and practices to see what resonates.
This process highlights the inherent challenge of the SBNR path: without a pre-defined route, the individual must navigate these different modes of being, constructing a coherent identity from a wide array of options.
This understanding refutes the simplistic critique, often leveled by representatives of organized religion, that all SBNR individuals are merely “lazy” or “casual” in their beliefs.16
For many, particularly the Dissenters and the Seekers, the path is a serious, deliberate, and often arduous quest for a truth that can be authentically lived.
Subsection 2.2: The Critic’s Gaze and the Risk of Superficiality
As Alex forges his new path, he becomes acutely aware of the criticisms leveled against it, both from external voices and from his own internal doubts.
He wrestles with the charge that he is simply “cherry-picking” the most palatable parts of religion, taking the comfort without the commitment, the spirituality without the sacrifice.24
He worries that his newfound freedom might devolve into a form of “spiritual narcissism,” a self-centered preoccupation with his own feelings and experiences.25
These concerns mirror the primary critiques of the SBNR phenomenon from religious leaders and scholars.
One major criticism is that SBNR is a byproduct of a secular consumer culture, where spirituality is treated as a commodity to be curated and consumed according to personal taste, rather than a tradition to be inherited and served.16
This leads to the charge of
individualism and laziness, with critics like Jesuit priest James Martin arguing that spirituality without religion can become a “self-centered complacency divorced from the wisdom of a community”.16
It is seen as an avoidance of the responsibilities and accountability that come with belonging to a collective tradition.26
A further, more profound critique points to the risk of superficiality.
Classical mysticism and deep spiritual practice within the world’s major religions require immense discipline, sustained dedication, and often forms of asceticism and humility.16
In contrast, the SBNR path can encourage a casual “dabbling” in spiritual practices that lacks rigor and fails to reorient one’s life in a meaningful way, leading sociologist Robert Wuthnow to label such forms of mysticism “shallow and inauthentic”.16
Compounding this is the concern over
mental health.
Some studies have suggested a correlation between spirituality practiced outside a religious framework and a vulnerability to mental health disorders, possibly due to the lack of communal support and established coping mechanisms that religions often provide.26
These criticisms illuminate the central tension of the SBNR experience: the fundamental trade-off between institutional structure and individual freedom.
Established religions, for all their flaws, offer a deep well of accumulated wisdom, a “body of spiritual wisdom” that provides roots, accountability, and a shared vocabulary for growth.20
The SBNR path, in rejecting this structure, gains “individual freedom, autonomy, and an experimental approach”.16
Yet this freedom comes with significant risks—the potential for shallowness, the trap of self-absorption, and the isolation of being a spiritual island.
This poses the core existential challenge for the SBNR individual, a question that Alex must now answer for himself: How does one build a spiritual life that is both authentic to the self and deeply connected to something larger than the self? How can one be both free and rooted? The remainder of his journey is an attempt to solve this very puzzle.
Subsection 2.3: The Loneliness of the Long-Distance Seeker
The theoretical challenges of the SBNR path quickly manifest as practical, day-to-day struggles.
The absence of institutional scaffolding places the entire weight of spiritual development squarely on the individual’s shoulders, a burden that is at once empowering and utterly exhausting.
Alex soon discovers that being his own spiritual guide is a monumental task.
The most immediate and palpable challenge is a profound sense of loneliness.
He misses the effortless, built-in community of his former church—the weekly gatherings, the shared rituals, the network of people who understood his worldview without explanation.27
Now, his journey is a solitary one, and finding like-minded individuals who understand the nuances of his deconstruction and reconstruction feels nearly impossible.28
This isolation is a common theme in the narratives of those on a self-guided spiritual path.
Compounding the loneliness is the problem of information overload.
Without a prescribed curriculum or a trusted clergy to filter information, Alex is inundated with a dizzying array of options.
Books on Eastern philosophy, podcasts on mindfulness, blogs on neo-paganism, workshops on energy healing—the spiritual marketplace is vast and overwhelming.29
This abundance of choice, while liberating, can also lead to confusion and a kind of spiritual paralysis.
How does one build a coherent system from such disparate parts?
This leads to the third major challenge: doubt and a lack of motivation.
In a religious structure, commitment is reinforced through regular services, community expectations, and a shared calendar of holy days.
Alone, Alex finds it difficult to maintain consistent practice.
Doubt, a natural part of any spiritual journey, becomes a more formidable obstacle without a community or mentor to offer perspective and encouragement.28
He must constantly battle his own inertia, laziness, and the temptation to let his spiritual life atrophy in the face of life’s daily demands.27
This solitary journey also requires him to confront his own unresolved psychological issues—past traumas, patterns of negative thinking, and the resistance of his own ego—without the support systems that a healthy religious community might provide.19
The freedom of the SBNR path, therefore, comes at the high price of immense personal responsibility.
The individual must become their own theologian, curriculum designer, spiritual director, and community organizer.
This reality starkly refutes the criticism that the SBNR stance is one of “laziness.” It is, in fact, a demanding, entrepreneurial approach to faith—a construction project undertaken without a blueprint, where the seeker must be both architect and builder of their own spiritual home.
Part III: The Epiphany – A New Kind of Revelation
After a long period of wandering in the existential wilderness—feeling lost, lonely, and disconnected—the journey takes a pivotal turn.
For Alex, as for many who are spiritual but not religious, the breakthrough does not come in the form of a supernatural vision or a divine voice from the heavens.
Instead, the epiphany is an immanent experience, a series of profound moments of connection that fundamentally reframe his understanding of God, spirituality, and his place in the cosmos.
It is a revelation found not by looking up to a distant heaven, but by looking more deeply into the world right in front of him.
Subsection 3.1: Revelation in the Cathedral of Nature
Struggling with the weight of his unstructured spiritual quest, Alex seeks solace in the one place that has always felt uncomplicated: the outdoors.
He drives to a nearby state park and begins to hike, his mind a tangle of doubt and frustration.
But as he moves deeper into the forest, something begins to shift.
The noise in his head is gradually replaced by the sound of wind in the pines, the crunch of leaves underfoot, the distant call of a bird.
He stops at a clearing, looking up through a canopy of ancient trees to the vast, open sky.
In that moment, a feeling of overwhelming awe washes over him.
It is a sense of profound connection, a feeling of being a small but integral part of a vast, living, breathing system.
This is his sanctuary.
This is his church.
This experience, a cornerstone of the SBNR journey for many, is what can be termed eco-spirituality.
For those who have become disillusioned with man-made religious institutions, nature often becomes the primary space for encountering the sacred.
Research confirms that nature is a uniquely potent source of spiritual experience, capable of fostering powerful feelings of awe, reverence, and self-transcendence—the sense of dissolving the boundaries of the small self and merging with something larger.32
A 2023 Pew Research study found that connecting with nature is a primary spiritual practice for the SBNR demographic; 59% consider it essential to their spirituality, and a striking 71% believe that spirits or spiritual energies can reside in natural elements like mountains, rivers, and trees.1
Unlike a church, a synagogue, or a mosque, nature comes with no dogma, no creed, no institutional hierarchy.
The “sermon” is the direct, unmediated experience itself—the grounding feeling of bare feet on the earth, the quieting of the anxious mind amidst the calm of the wilderness, the intuitive sense of being part of an intricate, interconnected web of life.33
This embodied experience engages the whole being, moving beyond the confines of logical, doctrinal reasoning.34
For Alex, this is a monumental breakthrough.
Nature provides a powerful solution to the SBNR dilemma.
It offers the profound sense of connection to “something bigger” that he lost when he left his religion, but it does so without the institutional baggage, human hypocrisy, and rigid doctrines that caused his initial departure.
It is a revelation rooted not in a supernatural story, but in the tangible, material reality of the world itself.
Subsection 3.2: The Cosmic Perspective: Spirituality in the Language of Science
Alex’s epiphany in the forest sparks a new kind of curiosity.
The feeling of awe he experienced among the trees feels deeply connected to the wonder he feels when contemplating the stars.
This leads him to the writings of scientists and science communicators like Carl Sagan, and he makes a startling discovery: the grand narrative of science can evoke the very same feelings of reverence and spirituality.
The story of the universe—a 13.8 billion-year saga of cosmic evolution from the Big Bang to the formation of galaxies, stars, planets, and life—becomes for him a new sacred text.
This perspective, that science can be a profound source of spirituality, offers a powerful bridge for the modern seeker.
Figures like Sagan and Albert Einstein argued that science, far from being an enemy of spirituality, is perhaps its most authentic expression in the modern age.
“Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality,” Sagan famously wrote.35
Einstein believed that the path to “genuine religiosity” lay not in “blind faith” but in the “striving after rational knowledge”.35
From this viewpoint, science and spirituality are not opposing forces but two complementary modes of inquiry into the fundamental nature of reality.
One looks outward through experimentation and observation, while the other looks inward through introspection and direct experience; both are quests for truth.36
This framework is revolutionary for someone like Alex.
One of the primary reasons people leave organized religion is the perceived conflict between ancient religious texts and modern scientific understanding.14
This creates a deep cognitive dissonance for the educated, rational individual.
A science-based spirituality resolves this conflict.
It allows one to embrace a sense of the sacred, of awe, and of connection to something magnificent and larger than oneself without having to suspend critical thinking or accept supernatural claims that contradict empirical evidence.
The “revelation” is not found in a single holy book, but in the ongoing discoveries of cosmology, quantum physics, biology, and neuroscience.
For Alex, this is the final piece of the puzzle.
It unites the emotional, intuitive awe he felt in the cathedral of nature with a rational, intellectual framework that makes sense of that feeling.
His heart and his mind are no longer at war.
He has found a way to be spiritual that is fully compatible with his understanding of the modern world.
Part IV: The Reconstruction – Building a Personal Paradigm
The epiphany, born from experiences in nature and insights from science, marks the end of aimless wandering and the beginning of conscious creation.
Having found a new source of revelation, Alex now embarks on the deliberate and meticulous process of reconstruction.
This is the work of building a new spiritual and ethical framework for his life—a personal paradigm that is both intellectually coherent and emotionally resonant.
It involves redefining his concept of the divine, crafting a moral compass independent of religious authority, and finally, finding a new kind of community in which to live out his transformed faith.
Subsection 4.1: Redefining the Divine: From Theism to a New Theology
The first and most fundamental task of reconstruction is to move beyond simply not believing in the God of his childhood and to actively define what he does believe.
The vague notion of a “higher power or spiritual force,” which 73% of SBNR individuals espouse, must be given philosophical shape and substance.1
Alex begins to explore alternative theological frameworks that can accommodate his new, immanent understanding of the divine.
He starts by clarifying what he has left behind: Theism, the belief in a personal, transcendent God who exists separate from the universe and intervenes in its affairs.38
This is the model of the Abrahamic religions, the all-powerful, all-knowing deity he was taught to worship, and the very concept that no longer aligns with his experience of the world.
He then considers Deism, a philosophy born of the Enlightenment that posits a creator God who designed the universe and its natural laws but then stepped back, allowing it to run on its own without interference.38
This model appeals to his rational side, aligning with a view of a lawful, ordered cosmos.
God is transcendent, the great architect, but not immanent or involved.
While intellectually tidy, this vision can feel cold and distant, failing to account for the powerful feeling of connection and presence he experienced in nature.
This leads him to his final destination: Pantheism.
This is the belief that the universe and the divine are one and the same; God is wholly immanent, not a being separate from creation but the very fabric of creation itself.
“All which exists is God”.39
This worldview resonates perfectly with his epiphanies.
The sacred is not in a heaven above, but is present in the intricate patterns of a snowflake, the life cycle of a star, the evolutionary drive of a species, and the neurological wonder of consciousness.
The SBNR tendency to believe that spirits or spiritual energies can reside in nature, animals, and even objects is a powerful, intuitive expression of a pantheistic worldview.1
For Alex, adopting a pantheistic perspective is not an abstract philosophical exercise; it is the act of giving a name and a coherent structure to the felt truth he discovered in the wilderness.
It intellectualizes his emotional and experiential journey, solidifying the foundation of his new paradigm.
Subsection 4.2: An Ethic for the Unchurched: Crafting a Moral Compass
With his theological framework solidifying around a pantheistic view of a sacred, interconnected universe, Alex confronts the next critical question: morality.
If ethics are not derived from the divine commandments of a theistic God, what is their source? How does one live a good life without a holy book to provide the rules? He discovers that, far from leading to moral nihilism, leaving religion opens the door to a rich and robust landscape of secular ethical philosophy.
He first finds a grounding in Humanism.
This life stance posits that morality is not handed down from on high, but is derived from human faculties: reason, empathy, and a shared desire to live in a flourishing, compassionate society.41
Its core tenet is often a version of the “Golden Rule”—treat others as you would wish to be treated—a principle that predates most major world religions.41
Humanism provides the “why” for his new ethical code: to work for the betterment of humanity and the planet, to find meaning in relationships and service, and to base his actions on a foundation of compassion rather than a fear of divine punishment.43
While Humanism provides the compassionate foundation, he finds the practical toolkit for living out this ethic in modern Stoicism.
This ancient Greek philosophy, experiencing a powerful resurgence today, teaches the art of resilience in a chaotic world.45
Its central practice is the “dichotomy of control”: learning to differentiate between what we can control (our own thoughts, judgments, and actions) and what we cannot (everything else).
By focusing his energy only on his own responses, Alex learns to cultivate inner peace and virtue regardless of external circumstances.46
This is not about suppressing emotion, but about rationally evaluating one’s impressions to avoid being ruled by fear, anger, or anxiety.
Furthermore, the classical Stoic concept of the
Logos—a universal, rational, and providential force that is immanent in all of nature—dovetails perfectly with his pantheistic leanings, suggesting that to live virtuously is to live in harmony with the rational order of the cosmos itself.47
By combining these two philosophies, Alex constructs a moral system that is both robust and flexible.
Humanism provides the outward-facing ethic of compassion and social responsibility, while Stoicism provides the inward-facing ethic of personal resilience and self-mastery.
He has successfully re-grounded his morality, shifting from a deontological system based on obedience to divine rules to a virtue-based system founded on human reason, empathy, and the pursuit of a flourishing life.
This becomes his unchurched alternative to the Ten Commandments.
Subsection 4.3: A Portrait of the Modern Believer (Data Synthesis)
As Alex reflects on the beliefs and practices that now define his spiritual life, he has a final, validating realization: his journey, which felt so intensely personal and unique, has led him to a place occupied by millions.
His seemingly idiosyncratic worldview is, in fact, the hallmark of a large and measurable demographic.
The rich data collected by institutions like the Pew Research Center paints a detailed portrait of the SBNR individual, anchoring Alex’s personal narrative in a broader sociological reality.
The core beliefs of this group are a fascinating blend of traditional spirituality and new-paradigm thinking.
An overwhelming majority of SBNRs believe in a soul or spirit (89%) and in the existence of something spiritual beyond the natural world (88%).1
However, their conception of this spiritual reality diverges sharply from traditional religion.
They are far more likely to believe that spiritual energies can reside in nature (71%) and animals (78%), and to embrace the idea of reincarnation (43% believe it is probably or definitely true).1
Their spiritual practices reflect this shift away from institutional forms of worship.
Instead of church attendance, their primary practices are internal and experiential: a majority (58%) regularly spend time “looking inward or centering themselves” for connection, and many use meditation (28%) and time in nature as core spiritual disciplines.1
Their sacred objects are also different; they are more likely to own crystals (25%) or have a spiritual tattoo (15%) than to possess a cross (21%).1
Perhaps the most telling statistic, the one that perfectly encapsulates Alex’s entire journey, relates to their personal spiritual trajectory.
A majority of SBNRs (59%) report that they have become less religious over the course of their lives.
At the same time, nearly half (49%) report that they have become more spiritual.1
This single data point captures the essence of the SBNR phenomenon: it is not a story of faith being lost, but of faith being transformed.
To crystallize these differences, a direct comparison is illuminating:
Table 1: The Spiritual but Not Religious vs. The Religious American: A Comparative Profile
| Attribute | Spiritual but Not Religious (SBNR) | Religious Americans | Source Snippets |
| Prevalence | 22% of U.S. Adults | 58% (48% are both S&R) | 1 |
| Core Belief in God | 20% believe in God of the Bible; 73% believe in “another higher power” | 82% believe in God of the Bible | 1 |
| Belief in Afterlife | 54% believe in Heaven; 43% believe in Reincarnation | 93% believe in Heaven; 24% believe in Reincarnation | 1 |
| Spirits in Nature | 71% believe spirits can reside in mountains, rivers, trees | 45% believe this | 1 |
| Primary Spiritual Practice | 58% look inward/center themselves for connection | 62% involved in a religious community | 1 |
| Key Spiritual Object | 25% own crystals for spiritual purposes | 51% own a cross | 1 |
| View of Religion | 38% say religion does more harm than good | 7% say this | 1 |
| Personal Change | 59% have become less religious; 49% have become more spiritual | (Data not directly comparable) | 1 |
This data provides the empirical backbone to the narrative.
It confirms that Alex is not an outlier but a representative of a significant cultural cohort, one that is actively forging a new spiritual path defined by immanence, personal experience, and a rejection of traditional religious authority.
Subsection 4.4: The New Sanctuaries: Finding Community After Church
Having meticulously constructed a personal belief system, Alex confronts the final and perhaps most difficult piece of the reconstruction puzzle: community.
He has a philosophy and a practice, but he lacks a congregation.
He still feels the pull of a fundamental human need for connection, for a “tribe” with whom to share the journey, yet he remains deeply wary of the institutional structures he left behind.49
The question is no longer
what to believe, but with whom.
This “community gap” is a defining challenge for the SBNR population, who are far less likely to be involved in a religious community than their religious counterparts (11% vs. 62%).1
Personal accounts are filled with a longing for the regular meetups, shared rituals, and like-minded discussions that a church can provide.51
However, the solution to this problem is emerging not from a single, centralized movement, but from a decentralized ecosystem of “micro-communities” that are organized around shared interests and practices rather than shared dogma.
The need for community, historically fulfilled by religion, is now being met by a diverse and growing array of secular and semi-secular groups.
Alex begins to find his people not in a church basement, but in a yoga studio, on a group hike, in a meditation circle, and within online forums dedicated to Stoic philosophy.49
These new sanctuaries offer many of the same benefits as a traditional religious community—accountability, a sense of purpose, and deep social connection—but without the prerequisite of doctrinal uniformity.49
The common bond is a shared
activity or interest, which allows for spiritual connection to flourish alongside a diversity of individual beliefs.
This model perfectly suits the SBNR ethos of valuing individual freedom and an experimental approach to spirituality.
For some, more structured but non-doctrinal organizations like Unitarian Universalist churches or Pagan groups can also provide a comfortable spiritual home.24
This shift reflects a broader cultural trend away from communities based on creed or geography and toward those based on affinity.
For Alex, this is the practical solution to the loneliness that plagued him in the wilderness.
He doesn’t need to find one big community that believes exactly as he does; he can build a rich social and spiritual life by weaving together connections from multiple, smaller, interest-based groups.
Conclusion: The Future of Faith
The first light of dawn spills over the horizon, bathing the city below in a soft, ethereal glow.
Alex stands on the hill, the same spot where his journey of exploration began, but he is a different man.
The turmoil of deconstruction has given way to the quiet confidence of a faith that is truly his own.
The gnawing ache of loneliness has been soothed by connections forged in shared passions, not prescribed beliefs.
He is no longer lost in the wilderness; he has cultivated a garden there.
His belief in God—a God he now finds in the elegant laws of physics, the resilience of a forest, and the depths of his own consciousness—is stronger and more profound than ever before, precisely because it was not inherited in a pew but forged in the crucible of doubt and personal experience.
Alex’s journey, from the suffocating certainty of his youth to the authentic, self-authored spirituality of his present, is a microcosm of a powerful evolutionary shift in the landscape of Western belief.
The rise of the “Spiritual But Not Religious” is not, as some critics contend, the end of faith or a descent into lazy narcissism.
Rather, it signals a profound transformation in the very nature of faith itself.
It represents a fundamental transition from a model of belief predicated on submission to external, institutional authority to one founded on the sovereignty of internal, direct experience.
This path is undeniably arduous.
It demands a level of self-reliance that can be daunting, forcing the individual to become their own theologian, ethicist, and guide.
It is a journey fraught with the perils of isolation, the confusion of infinite choice, and the immense responsibility of creating meaning from scratch.
Yet, it is in overcoming these very challenges that a new kind of spiritual resilience is born.
The “unchurched believer,” in charting a course through this new territory, may well be mapping the future of what it means to have faith in a world that has outgrown its old answers but has not lost its deep and abiding hunger for connection, meaning, and a sense of the sacred.
Works cited
- 5. Who are ‘spiritual but not religious’ Americans? – Pew Research Center, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2023/12/07/who-are-spiritual-but-not-religious-americans/
- Spirituality Among Americans | Pew Research Center, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2023/12/07/spirituality-among-americans/
- 14. Spiritual and religious self-descriptions – Pew Research Center, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2025/02/26/spiritual-and-religious-self-descriptions/
- Pew Research: 1 in 5 Americans Identify as “Spiritual but Not Religious”, accessed August 11, 2025, https://answersingenesis.org/culture/americans-spiritual-but-not-religious/
- Religion and Congregations in a Time of Social and Political Upheaval – PRRI, accessed August 11, 2025, https://prri.org/research/religion-and-congregations-in-a-time-of-social-and-political-upheaval/
- Signs of Decline & Hope Among Key Metrics of Faith – Barna Group, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.barna.com/research/changing-state-of-the-church/
- My Spectacular Divorce from Religion – an honest essay about my experiences with religious trauma – Inherited Salt, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.inheritedsalt.com/journal/my-spectacular-divorce-from-religion
- Why People Quit Religion—and How They Find Meaning…, accessed August 11, 2025, https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/why_people_quit_religion_and_how_they_find_meaning_again
- Speaking of Psychology: Why people quit religion, with Daryl Van Tongeren, PhD, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.apa.org/news/podcasts/speaking-of-psychology/leaving-religion
- Leaving the faith: please tell me it gets better. I need some success stories. – Reddit, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Deconstruction/comments/1fcd49e/leaving_the_faith_please_tell_me_it_gets_better_i/
- Leaving Church, Keeping Faith. What happened after I left my church… | by Esme Roh – Medium, accessed August 11, 2025, https://medium.com/backyard-theology/leaving-church-keeping-faith-e942fdaba265
- What did it FEEL like to leave your religion? : r/atheism – Reddit, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/17cemf6/what_did_it_feel_like_to_leave_your_religion/
- How to thrive after leaving your religion | Psyche Guides, accessed August 11, 2025, https://psyche.co/guides/how-to-thrive-after-leaving-your-religion-and-emerge-stronger
- Why are so many young people leaving organized religion? – Reddit, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/religion/comments/1jtitu2/why_are_so_many_young_people_leaving_organized/
- Church Disillusionment & Wise Counselor – FaithGateway, accessed August 11, 2025, https://faithgateway.com/blogs/christian-books/church-disillusionment-wise-counselor
- Spiritual but not religious – Wikipedia, accessed August 11, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiritual_but_not_religious
- Did any of you leave suddenly? In an epiphany moment of “wow I hate this I’m leaving” that didn’t involve a faith crisis at all? : r/exmormon – Reddit, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/exmormon/comments/15omnru/did_any_of_you_leave_suddenly_in_an_epiphany/
- Disillusioned with Faith | YCFC, accessed August 11, 2025, https://faith.yale.edu/media/disillusioned-with-faith
- The Spiritual Awakening Process and 16 Difficulties You Will Face, accessed August 11, 2025, https://christinebreese007spirituality.medium.com/the-spiritual-awakening-process-and-15-difficulties-you-will-face-f06875c60904
- Spiritual but not religious – Diocese of San Angelo, accessed August 11, 2025, https://sanangelodiocese.org/news/spiritual-but-not-religious
- Why are Americans increasingly leaving religion behind? – The Beacon, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.thewilkesbeacon.com/opinion/2024/02/14/why-are-americans-increasingly-leaving-religion-behind/
- Spiritual But Not Religious – Ben Casnocha, accessed August 11, 2025, https://casnocha.com/2009/04/spiritual-but-not-religious.html
- Spiritual but not religious: knowing the types, avoiding the traps | OUPblog, accessed August 11, 2025, https://blog.oup.com/2014/03/spiritual-but-not-religious-sbnr-types-traps/
- “Spiritual but not Religious” | The Pluralism Project, accessed August 11, 2025, https://pluralism.org/spiritual-but-not-religious
- Spiritual but not religious? Leading Buddhist magazine takes a hard look at what that means, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.getreligion.org/getreligion/2017/2/7/spiritual-but-not-religious-a-buddhist-magazine-wrestles-with-just-what-that-means
- Spiritual, but not religious? A dangerous mix | Mark Vernon | The Guardian, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2013/jan/09/spiritual-but-not-religious-dangerous-mix
- Challenges on the Spiritual Path – Reddit, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/spirituality/comments/ziupea/challenges_on_the_spiritual_path/
- 8 Common Challenges in a Single Adult’s Spiritual Journey and How to Overcome Them, accessed August 11, 2025, https://tfoministries.org/spiritual-journey-challenges
- The top 3 challenges of a spiritual journey (and how to handle them) – Connect One Marketing, accessed August 11, 2025, https://connectonemarketing.com/2022/06/09/the-top-3-challenges-of-a-spiritual-journey/
- Doubt (Samshaya): The Third Obstacle to Spiritual Practice – Awakening Self, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.awakeningself.com/doubt-samshaya-the-third-obstacle-to-spiritual-practice/
- Navigating Spiritual Challenges: A Guide to Overcoming Obstacles – Darpan Foundation, accessed August 11, 2025, https://darpanfoundation.com/blog/navigating-spiritual-challenges-a-guide-to-overcoming-obstacles/
- Influence of nature on spirituality and cognition: an examination of short-term exposure through video clips, accessed August 11, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12127365/
- The Connection Between Spirituality and Nature | by Shelly Stern – Medium, accessed August 11, 2025, https://medium.com/@HolisticLifestyleGuide/the-connection-between-spirituality-and-nature-a067718d4a5f
- Nature Spirituality: connecting nature and spirituality – Living in Becoming, accessed August 11, 2025, https://livinginbecoming.com/nature-spirituality/
- Why Carl Sagan believed science is a source of spirituality – Big Think, accessed August 11, 2025, https://bigthink.com/thinking/why-carl-sagan-believed-that-science-is-a-source-of-spirituality/
- Can Science be the source of spirituality? : r/Meditation – Reddit, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Meditation/comments/1bfgnm2/can_science_be_the_source_of_spirituality/
- Science and god | Spiritual truths | Power of meditation – Science and Spirituality, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.sos.org/articles/spiritual-growth/relationship-between-science-and-spirituality
- Four main beliefs about the nature of God: Deism, Panentheism …, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.theosophical.org/files/events/MahatmaLetters/About_God.pdf
- What are the differences with deism? : r/pantheism – Reddit, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/pantheism/comments/1bv9qup/what_are_the_differences_with_deism/
- en.wikipedia.org, accessed August 11, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheism#:~:text=Pantheism%20can%20include%20the%20belief,parts%20of%20a%20sole%20deity.
- Non-religious Beliefs – Humanists UK, accessed August 11, 2025, https://humanists.uk/humanism/humanism-today/non-religious-beliefs/
- What is Humanism? – The Spiritual Naturalist Society, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.snsociety.org/sn-academy/philosophy-wisdom/traditions-introductory/what-is-humanism/
- Contemporary Humanism and Spirituality, Part 1 | Psychology Today, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/evolution-the-self/201306/contemporary-humanism-and-spirituality-part-1
- Spirituality from a humanist perspective – Andrew Copson, accessed August 11, 2025, https://andrewcopson.com/2021/07/spirituality-from-a-humanist-perspective/
- Exploring Ancient Philosophies in Modern Spirituality – Universal Life Church, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.ulc.org/ulc-blog/exploring-ancient-philosophies-in-modern-spirituality
- Joy Among the Stoics – Desiring God, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.desiringgod.org/articles/joy-among-the-stoics
- Is any of the stoic philosophy centered around spirituality or theism? : r/Stoicism – Reddit, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Stoicism/comments/10p8tg1/is_any_of_the_stoic_philosophy_centered_around/
- Stoicism Is a Spiritual Way of Life, accessed August 11, 2025, https://traditionalstoicism.com/stoicism-is-a-spiritual-way-of-life/
- Finding Community Outside of Religion – Sonima, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.sonima.com/meditation/finding-community/
- What are some ways I can I be spiritual but not religious? I am institutionally suspicious and wary of those who call themselves ‘Christian,’ so going to church is really not an option. – Quora, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.quora.com/What-are-some-ways-I-can-I-be-spiritual-but-not-religious-I-am-institutionally-suspicious-and-wary-of-those-who-call-themselves-Christian-so-going-to-church-is-really-not-an-option
- Spiritual but not religious … where to find community? : r/AskWomenOver30 – Reddit, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskWomenOver30/comments/1g0mz59/spiritual_but_not_religious_where_to_find/
- Spirituality groups – Meetup, accessed August 11, 2025, https://www.meetup.com/topics/spiritual-but-not-religious/
