The Reading Cure: How I Rebuilt My Mind in an Age of Digital Decay

Introduction: The Unraveling

I still remember the precise moment the fog became undeniable.

I was standing at a lectern, presenting a new framework on cognitive load to a room full of my peers—fellow cognitive scientists.

Halfway through a sentence explaining a foundational concept, a concept I had built my own research upon, the name of the key researcher vanished from my mind.

It wasn’t just a momentary lapse; it was a void.

My brain, the very organ I had dedicated my life to understanding, felt like a stranger’s house where I couldn’t find the light switch.

The silence stretched.

A colleague in the front row, a friend, mouthed the name to me, and I stumbled on, but the damage was done.

The quiet confidence I once had in my own intellect had fractured.

This wasn’t an isolated incident.

In the preceding months, I had noticed a creeping mental decay.

My attention span, once capable of dissecting dense academic papers for hours, was now shattered into tiny, restless fragments.

I would open a research article and, within minutes, find myself mindlessly scrolling through news feeds or checking email for the fifth time in an hour.

My memory, once a reliable archive, felt porous.

I’d forget key details from meetings, struggle to recall plot points from a show I’d just watched, and constantly reread paragraphs, the words sliding off my consciousness like rain on a windshield.

I was living in a state of perpetual cognitive fog, a condition some now call “brain rot”—a sense of mental slowness and fragmentation that felt profoundly alien and deeply alarming.¹

As a scientist, my first instinct was to find a data-driven solution.

I was a knowledge worker, drowning in information yet feeling intellectually starved.

The irony was suffocating.

I turned to the solutions the modern world offered, downloading a suite of popular brain training apps.

I diligently played the games, matching patterns, memorizing sequences, and tracking my scores.

For a while, I was hopeful.

My performance in the games improved, the graphs trended upward, and the apps showered me with digital praise.

But the gains were illusory.

I became an expert at the specific tasks within the apps, yet my ability to focus on a complex manuscript, to hold a long and nuanced conversation, or to simply feel mentally sharp in the real world remained stubbornly degraded.⁴

The quick fix, the tech-forward solution, was a mirage.

It was a painful lesson: the very digital environment that had fragmented my mind was now selling me a digital “cure” that failed to address the root of the disease.

Part I: The Digital Deluge and the Mirage of the Quick Fix

Anatomy of a Scattered Mind: The Neurological Cost of Always On

My personal experience of mental decline was not a unique pathology; it was a symptom of a widespread environmental condition.

The modern digital world, with its promise of infinite connectivity and information, was exacting a heavy neurological price.

I realized that to solve my problem, I first had to diagnose it with scientific precision.

The “brain fog” I felt was the subjective experience of several well-documented neurological phenomena.

The first is cognitive overload.

The human brain has a finite capacity for processing information at any given moment.⁶

The digital ecosystem, however, presents an infinite stream of stimuli—emails, notifications, breaking news, social media updates.

This relentless deluge overwhelms the brain’s natural filtering mechanisms.

Neuroscientist Daniel Levitin’s work highlights that this state of constant distraction and the indecision it forces upon us—what to click, what to read, what to ignore—wreaks havoc on our perceptual systems, causing stress and decision fatigue.⁶

Compounding this is the effect of chronic multitasking.

My typical workday, which I had once considered productive, was a perfect storm of cognitive degradation.

Juggling multiple browser tabs, responding to instant messages while writing a report, and glancing at my phone during a video call wasn’t true multitasking.

It was rapid, inefficient task-switching.

This behavior is metabolically expensive for the brain.

It has been found to deplete the brain’s supply of glucose and increase the production of the stress hormone cortisol and the fight-or-flight hormone adrenaline.⁶

This constant state of overstimulation and stress actively disrupts the very processes of focus and memory formation I was struggling with.¹

Finally, the cultural term “brain rot” has emerged as a surprisingly apt descriptor for the consequences of overexposure to the shallow, repetitive, and hyper-stimulating content that dominates many online platforms.²

This is not just about feeling tired; it’s about measurable cognitive deficits.

Research links this digital overconsumption to a trifecta of impairments:

• Distorted Memory: The constant influx of information and notifications prevents the deep processing required for long-term memory consolidation. This leads to deficits in working memory, which is crucial for all forms of learning.²
• Fragmented Attention: The rapid-fire nature of social media feeds trains the brain for superficial engagement, eroding the capacity for sustained, deep focus.²
• Impaired Problem-Solving: A growing reliance on digital tools for quick answers can diminish cognitive flexibility and the willingness to engage in deep, analytical thinking, fostering a preference for instant gratification over effortful problem-solving.²

The architecture of these platforms, built on dopamine-driven feedback loops, is designed to keep us engaged, creating a cycle of cognitive depletion.²

I wasn’t just tired; my brain’s fundamental operating system was being rewired for distraction.

The Empty Promise of Brain Games: Why the Quick Fix Fails

My own failed experiment with brain training apps was a personal data point in a much larger scientific consensus.

The allure of these apps is powerful: they promise a simple, gamified path to a sharper mind.

Yet, the overwhelming body of independent scientific evidence reveals that these promises are largely hollow.

The central flaw in the logic of most brain training programs is a well-established psychological principle known as “far transfer.” The concept is simple: will training on one specific task (like a memory game) improve your performance on a different, unrelated real-world task (like remembering your grocery list or the key points of a meeting)? For the most part, the answer is No.⁴

You get better at the game itself—a phenomenon called “near transfer”—but those skills rarely generalize to broader cognitive abilities.

As cognitive psychologist Thomas Redick notes, “You can practice something repeatedly, and you are going to get better at that thing.

That part is pretty indisputable.

Where I have been skeptical…

is the sort of further reaching claims”.⁸

This isn’t a new problem; psychologist Edward Thorndike demonstrated this lack of transfer over a century ago.⁸

Beyond this fundamental issue, the research field supporting brain training is plagued with methodological problems.

Many studies are weakened by:

• Expectation Bias: Unlike in rigorous drug trials, participants in brain training studies know they are supposed to be improving their minds, which can lead to a powerful placebo effect and biased self-reporting.⁸
• Reliance on Subjective Measures: A 2022 meta-analysis found that while users often reported feeling sharper, these subjective benefits largely vanished when objective cognitive tests were used instead.⁸
• Cherry-Picking Data and Funding Bias: There is significant concern that companies selectively publish positive results and that studies funded by the app developers themselves are more likely to produce favorable outcomes.⁸

This disconnect between marketing and science has not gone unnoticed by regulators.

In 2016, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) levied a significant fine against Lumos Labs, the creator of Lumosity, for making unsupported claims that its games could delay age-related cognitive decline and protect against conditions like Alzheimer’s disease.⁴

This regulatory action underscores a critical truth: the brain training industry was selling a product whose advertised benefits were not supported by robust scientific evidence.

My journey with these apps had led me to a dead end.

I had tried to use a tool of the digital age to fix a problem created by the digital age, only to discover that the tool was part of the problem—a superficial distraction masquerading as a profound solution.

Table 1: Scientific Consensus on Brain Training App Efficacy
Marketing Claim	Scientific Finding	Key Evidence & Critique	Supporting Sources
Improves general intelligence (IQ) and broad cognitive function.	No evidence of “far transfer.”	Gains are highly specific to the trained tasks. Multiple meta-analyses show no significant improvement in unrelated cognitive abilities or real-world functioning.	4
Prevents or delays Alzheimer’s and age-related dementia.	Claims are unsubstantiated and have been legally challenged.	The FTC fined major app developers for deceptive advertising regarding these claims. While cognitive engagement is protective, there’s no proof these specific apps offer unique benefits.	4
Enhances real-world skills like memory, attention, and focus.	Improvements are primarily subjective or limited to “near transfer.”	Objective cognitive tests often show no significant improvement compared to control groups. Users get better at the games, not necessarily at life.	8
Based on rigorous, proven neuroscience.	Research is often methodologically flawed.	Many studies suffer from small sample sizes, lack of proper control groups, expectation bias (placebo effect), and potential funding bias from the app companies themselves.	8

Part II: The Architect’s Epiphany: Uncovering the Brain’s Blueprint

Frustrated with the digital mirage, I felt a pull to return to my roots as a scientist—to abandon the fads and revisit the foundational truths of my field.

I pushed aside the apps and opened the classic texts on the neuroscience of literacy.

It was there, in the well-worn pages of research by pioneers like Sally Shaywitz, that I found my turning point.

It came in the form of a simple, yet profoundly counter-intuitive, fact: the human brain is not naturally hardwired for reading.¹¹

This discovery was electrifying.

Unlike spoken language or vision, for which our brains have evolved dedicated, innate systems, reading is a human invention.

It is a technology that is only a few thousand years old.

To learn to read, the brain must perform a remarkable act of self-construction.

It must create entirely new neural circuits by “recycling” and connecting regions that evolved for other purposes, such as object recognition (the occipito-temporal pathway) and processing spoken sounds (the parieto-temporal pathway).¹¹

Suddenly, everything clicked into place.

The very difficulty of reading, its unnaturalness, was not a bug; it was its single greatest feature.

This was the source of its power.

This led to my epiphany, the central analogy that would guide my recovery: reading is not merely an activity; it is an act of Neuro-Architecture.

I began to visualize the process.

The act of deep, sustained reading is like the slow, deliberate, and complex process of designing and constructing a magnificent cathedral.

• Laying the Foundation: Learning to decode letters and sounds is like digging deep and pouring the concrete foundations—an arduous but essential first step.
• Erecting the Pillars: Building a vocabulary and understanding grammar and syntax is like raising the massive stone pillars that will support the entire structure.
• Creating the Connections: Following a complex narrative or a dense argument—integrating characters, plot, themes, and ideas across hundreds of pages—is like constructing the intricate vaulted ceilings and flying buttresses that connect every part of the building into a coherent, stable whole.

This process is demanding.

It requires sustained attention, deep focus, and active imagination.

The result, however, is a mental structure of immense strength, complexity, and resilience.

In stark contrast, the modern digital experience I had been immersed in was like the mass production of cheap, prefabricated sheds.

It is fast, easy, and requires little effort.

You can scroll through endless feeds, consuming bite-sized pieces of information that provide a fleeting sense of engagement.

But these activities build nothing of substance.

They create no deep foundations, no strong pillars, no lasting connections.

They are flimsy structures that offer no shelter from the storms of cognitive demand and collapse under the slightest intellectual pressure.

This analogy gave me a new framework.

My mind wasn’t broken; its architecture had been neglected and degraded by poor-quality materials and shoddy construction methods.

The solution was not to find a better app to patch the holes.

The solution was to become an architect again—to pick up the timeless tools of reading and begin the slow, rewarding work of rebuilding my mental cathedral, stone by stone.

Part III: The Blueprint for a Resilient Mind: How Reading Rebuilds the Brain

Armed with this new understanding, I delved into the contemporary research, seeking the hard evidence for my “Neuro-Architecture” model.

I found a wealth of studies, particularly from the world of neuroimaging, that provided a detailed blueprint of how reading actively reconstructs the brain, making it more robust, resilient, and humane.

Laying the Foundation: Forging New Neural Pathways

The idea that reading physically changes the brain is not a metaphor; it is a demonstrable biological fact.

The architectural work is visible on brain scans, revealing changes in both structure and function.

First, there are structural changes.

Just as a well-built cathedral uses dense, high-quality stone, the act of reading appears to increase the density of our neural matter.

Studies have found that better reading performance is associated with increased gray matter volume—the tissue containing most of the brain’s neuronal cell bodies—in critical regions like the left superior temporal cortex, an area involved in higher-level cognitive processing.¹²

This suggests that the cognitive exercise of reading leads to a more robust physical brain structure.

Even more compelling is the evidence for changes in functional connectivity—the “wiring” of the cathedral.

A landmark fMRI study published in the journal Brain Connectivity provided a stunning window into this process.¹³

Researchers had participants undergo daily resting-state fMRI scans for 19 consecutive days.

For nine of those days, the participants read a portion of a novel each evening.

The results were remarkable.

On the mornings after reading, there were significant, measurable increases in the connectivity between different brain regions.

These changes were not fleeting; they persisted for several days after the participants had finished the novel, suggesting a lasting reorganization of the brain’s networks.¹³

The changes were concentrated in key areas.

Short-term increases in connectivity were centered in the left angular gyrus, a critical hub for language processing and integrating information.¹³

But there were also long-term changes in the bilateral somatosensory cortex, the part of the brain that processes physical sensations.

This phenomenon, termed “embodied semantics,” suggests that when we read, our brains are not just processing abstract symbols; they are simulating the physical and emotional experiences of the characters, effectively placing us in their shoes.¹³

This is the brain actively building new, sophisticated pathways to deepen its understanding of the world.

Further evidence comes from studies on reading intervention.

Research shows that for individuals with reading difficulties, targeted reading practice can retune and strengthen the connections within the brain’s reading network, demonstrating that these neural pathways are highly plastic and can be intentionally improved through effortful practice.¹⁴

Reading, it turns out, is a powerful tool for neurological renovation.

Table 2: Summary of fMRI Findings on Reading a Novel and Brain Connectivity
Effect Type	Key Brain Regions Affected	Observed Change	Duration of Effect	Implied Function / “Architectural” Role
Short-Term	Left Angular / Supramarginal Gyri	Significant increase in resting-state connectivity.	Peaked during reading period; decayed over several days post-reading.	Strengthening the “Command Center”: Enhancing hubs for language comprehension, perspective-taking, and story integration.
Short-Term	Right Posterior Temporal Gyrus	Increased connectivity to hubs involved in comprehension.	Sustained during reading; sharp decline post-reading.	Improving Cross-Hemispheric Communication: Building more robust connections between language and spatial/emotional processing centers.
Long-Term	Bilateral Somatosensory Cortex	Increased connectivity that remained elevated above baseline.	Persisted for at least 5 days after finishing the novel.	“Embodied Semantics” / The Human Blueprint: Physically wiring the brain to simulate the sensory and motor experiences of others, fostering deep empathy.

Source: Based on findings from Berns et al., 2013 ¹³

Building the Cognitive Fortress: Cognitive Reserve and Lifelong Resilience

Beyond forging new pathways, the architectural work of reading also builds a powerful defense system for the mind: Cognitive Reserve (CR).

This is one of the most important concepts in the neuroscience of aging.

CR refers to the brain’s ability to maintain its function and withstand the effects of age-related changes or neuropathology, such as the plaques and tangles associated with Alzheimer’s disease.¹⁶

Think of it this way: two individuals could have the same degree of physical brain damage, but the person with a higher cognitive reserve will show far fewer symptoms of dementia and cognitive decline.

Their brain is more resilient, more flexible, and better able to compensate for the damage.

Reading is a primary method for building this reserve.

The complex mental operations required—decoding, comprehension, inference, visualization, memory—create a denser, more richly connected, and more efficient neural network.

This is the neuro-architectural equivalent of building redundant support systems, multiple staircases, and alternative pathways into the cathedral.

If one pathway is blocked by damage, the brain can reroute cognitive traffic through another.

This idea is formalized in the Scaffolding Theory of Aging and Cognition (STAC).¹⁸

This theory proposes that as the brain ages and some neural circuits become less efficient, the brain compensates by recruiting additional neural circuitry—building “scaffolding”—to support cognitive function.

Sustained, engaging cognitive effort, like that involved in reading, is precisely the kind of activity that enhances the construction of this compensatory scaffolding, thereby protecting and preserving cognitive function into old age.¹⁸

The epidemiological evidence is compelling.

Numerous studies have shown that individuals who engage in mentally stimulating activities like reading throughout their lives have a significantly slower rate of cognitive decline and a lower risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias.¹⁶

One study found that frequent participation in such activities later in life reduced the rate of mental decline by 32%.²⁰

Reading is not a magic cure, but it is a powerful, evidence-based strategy for building a cognitive fortress that can better withstand the ravages of time.

Designing for Humanity: The Social and Emotional Scaffolding

A cathedral is more than just stone and glass; it is a space designed to elevate the human spirit.

Similarly, the neuro-architecture of reading builds more than just a powerful cognitive engine; it constructs a more empathetic and emotionally resilient mind.

Reading, particularly literary fiction, is a powerful empathy engine.

It is a unique technology for exploring the inner lives of others.

This is the domain of “Theory of Mind” (ToM)—the crucial human ability to recognize and understand that other people have beliefs, desires, feelings, and perspectives that are different from our own.²⁰

Multiple studies have found a strong connection between reading fiction and enhanced ToM, with avid readers of literary fiction consistently performing better on tests of empathy and social acumen.¹²

The mechanism for this goes back to the fMRI findings of “embodied semantics”.¹³

When you read about a character’s heartbreak or joy, your brain doesn’t just process the words; it activates the same neural regions associated with feeling those emotions yourself.

You are, in a very real sense, running a high-fidelity simulation of another person’s consciousness.

This is an unparalleled form of social-emotional practice, building our capacity for compassion and understanding in a way that watching a film or scrolling a feed simply cannot replicate.²²

Finally, the mental cathedral built by reading contains a quiet chapel—an inner sanctuary for refuge and restoration.

In our age of chronic stress, reading provides a profound and immediate antidote.

The research is striking: a 2009 study from the University of Sussex found that just six minutes of reading can reduce stress levels by up to 68%.²²

It does this by lowering heart rate and easing muscle tension, proving more effective at inducing relaxation than listening to music, drinking a cup of tea, or going for a walk.²⁰

By losing yourself in a thoroughly engrossing book, you can escape the worries of the day and allow your mind and body to enter a state of deep calm.¹⁹

Part IV: From Theory to Practice: An Actionable Guide to Reclaiming Your Mind

My journey from cognitive fog to mental clarity was not just an intellectual exercise; it required a deliberate change in my daily habits.

The blueprint for a resilient mind is useless if you don’t pick up the tools and start building.

This is the practical guide I developed for myself, grounded in the science of how to construct a reading life in a world of endless distraction.

Constructing a Reading Habit in a World of Distraction

The first step is to clear the ground.

You cannot build a cathedral in the middle of a noisy, chaotic marketplace.

This means being intentional about your information diet and creating the mental space necessary for deep reading.

• Curate Your Content: Actively choose what you consume. Unfollow accounts and unsubscribe from feeds that provide shallow, negative, or overly stimulating content. Be intentional, approaching online content with a purpose rather than falling into the trap of mindless scrolling.³
• Set Digital Boundaries: Use the features on your devices to set firm screen time limits, especially for social media and news apps. Create device-free times (e.g., the first hour of the day, after 9 PM) and device-free zones (e.g., the bedroom, the dinner table). The simple act of removing a smartphone from your immediate presence can reduce distraction and improve focus.²³

The Medium is the Message: Print vs. Digital Reading

While any reading is better than no reading, the choice of medium matters.

A growing body of research suggests that reading on paper offers distinct cognitive advantages over reading on screens.

• Enhanced Retention and Comprehension: Studies indicate that readers of print books often retain more of the information and have a deeper comprehension of the material than those who read the same content digitally.¹⁹
• The Power of Touch: The tactile experience of a physical book—the feel of the paper, the weight of the book in your hands, the physical act of turning a page—provides the brain with additional sensory and spatial context. This physical map of the text appears to aid in memory formation and recall, helping you to “place” information within the book’s geography.
• Slowing Down: We tend to read more slowly and deliberately on paper compared to the skimming and scrolling behavior encouraged by digital formats.¹² This slower pace allows for deeper processing and a more thorough construction of understanding.

A Lifelong Project: Reading for Every Age

Neuro-architecture is not a project you complete once; it is a lifelong practice of maintenance, renovation, and expansion.

The benefits of reading are profound at every stage of life.

• For Children (Laying the Blueprint): The impact of reading to young children cannot be overstated. Research shows a direct causal link between the frequency of being read to at age 4-5 and later success in school.²⁴ Reading to a child 6-7 days a week has the same positive effect on their reading skills as being almost a full year older. It builds their vocabulary, develops their imagination, enhances their language and numeracy skills, and, crucially, forges a powerful emotional bond with their caregivers.²⁴ You are not just reading a story; you are handing them the foundational blueprints for their own mental cathedral.
• For Adults (Building and Expanding): For adults navigating the cognitive demands of modern life, reading is the primary tool for maintenance and repair. It rebuilds the focus shattered by digital distraction, deepens empathy, reduces stress, and continuously builds cognitive reserve.
• For Seniors (Protecting the Structure): In later life, reading becomes a vital practice for protecting the mind. Continued engagement in mentally stimulating activities like reading is a cornerstone of healthy brain aging, helping to maintain mental acuity, slow cognitive decline, and provide a powerful defense against the onset of dementia.¹²

Conclusion: Living in the Cathedral

Today, the fog has lifted.

I can stand at a lectern with confidence.

I can lose myself for hours in the dense prose of a scientific journal or the intricate world of a novel.

The change was not instantaneous.

It was the result of a slow, deliberate, and deeply rewarding process of reconstruction.

I traded the flimsy, prefabricated sheds of digital distraction for the enduring stone and soaring arches of the written word.

The central lesson of my journey is this: reading is not an outdated hobby or a quaint form of entertainment.

It is a foundational technology for building a better mind.

In an age that prizes speed, convenience, and constant stimulation, the slow, effortful, and deeply focused act of reading has become more essential than ever.

It is our most powerful tool to counteract the cognitive erosion of the digital deluge.

The work of neuro-architecture is available to everyone.

It does not require expensive software or a monthly subscription.

It requires only a library card or a bookshelf, and the willingness to invest time in the quiet, profound act of building.

By choosing to read, we choose to be architects of our own minds.

We choose to construct an inner world of strength, beauty, complexity, and resilience—a mental cathedral in which we can live a more thoughtful, empathetic, and meaningful life.

The tools are in your hands.

The work awaits.

Works cited

1. Brain Health Risks From Multitasking And Digital Overload, accessed August 12, 2025, https://lonestarneurology.net/others/the-neurological-effects-of-chronic-multitasking-and-digital-overload/
2. Demystifying the New Dilemma of Brain Rot in the Digital Era: A …, accessed August 12, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11939997/
3. Brain Rot Explained: How Digital Overload Affects Your Mind | Inspira Health, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.inspirahealthnetwork.org/news/healthy-living/brain-rot-explained-how-digital-overload-affects-your-mind
4. Brain Training Games: Do They Really Work? Unveiling the Truth …, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.vitarx.co/resources/brain-memory-focus/brain-training-games-do-they-really-work
5. Do Brain Training Games Really Work? : r/cogsci – Reddit, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/cogsci/comments/fvv5mv/do_brain_training_games_really_work/
6. Why Brain Overload Happens | Lesley University, accessed August 12, 2025, https://lesley.edu/article/why-brain-overload-happens
7. Cognitive overload: Info paralysis – Mayo Clinic Health System, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.mayoclinichealthsystem.org/hometown-health/speaking-of-health/cognitive-overload
8. Do Brain-Training Apps Really Work? | Discover Magazine, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.discovermagazine.com/do-brain-training-apps-really-work-45068
9. What the health: Do brain training apps work? – UQ School of Psychology, accessed August 12, 2025, https://psychology.uq.edu.au/article/2019/04/what-health-do-brain-training-apps-work
10. (PDF) A Survey of Engagement with Mindfulness and Brain Training Apps – ResearchGate, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391494227_A_Survey_of_Engagement_with_Mindfulness_and_Brain_Training_Apps
11. Reading and the Brain: What to Know – Landmark Outreach, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.landmarkoutreach.org/strategies/reading-brain/
12. Benefits of Reading Books: For Your Physical and Mental Health, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.healthline.com/health/benefits-of-reading-books
13. Short- and Long-Term Effects of a Novel on Connectivity in the Brain …, accessed August 12, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3868356/
14. Reading intervention and neuroplasticity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of brain changes associated with reading intervention – PubMed Central, accessed August 12, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10327490/
15. The Functional Neuroanatomy of Reading Intervention – Frontiers, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2022.921931/full
16. Cognitive reserve, cortical plasticity and resistance to Alzheimer’s …, accessed August 12, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3334540/
17. Cognitive resilience/reserve: Myth or reality? A review of definitions and measurement methods – PubMed Central, accessed August 12, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11095447/
18. The aging mind: neuroplasticity in response to cognitive training – PMC, accessed August 12, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3622463/
19. 10 Benefits of Reading Print Books, According to Science – Real Simple, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.realsimple.com/health/preventative-health/benefits-of-reading-real-books
20. Why reading can be good for mental health – MHFA England, accessed August 12, 2025, https://mhfaengland.org/mhfa-centre/blog/reading-good-mental-health/
21. Reading Improves Memory, Concentration, and Stress | National University, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.nu.edu/blog/reading-improves-memory-concentration-and-stress/
22. Why Reading is Good for Mental Health – NAMI California, accessed August 12, 2025, https://namica.org/blog/why-reading-is-good-for-mental-health/
23. Attention, Media Use, and Children – Children and Screens, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.childrenandscreens.org/learn-explore/research/attention-media-use-and-children/
24. Reading to Young Children: A Head-Start in Life – Education | vic.gov.au, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.education.vic.gov.au/documents/about/research/readtoyoungchild.pdf
25. The Benefits of Reading to Children of All Ages | OhioKAN Kinship & Adoption Navigator, accessed August 12, 2025, https://ohiokan.ohio.gov/the-benefits-of-reading-to-children-of-all-ages/
26. Benefits of Starting Reading at a Young Age – Nationwide Children’s Hospital, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.nationwidechildrens.org/family-resources-education/700childrens/2022/11/benefits-of-starting-reading