Table of Contents
Introduction: The $700,000 Resignation Letter
The hire was perfect.
On paper, she was everything we could have asked for: stellar resume, glowing references, and a series of interviews where she demonstrated not just competence, but a deep understanding of our industry.
As the head of our People function, this was my win.
We had followed the traditional Human Resources playbook to the letter—a rigorous, multi-stage screening process, competitive compensation benchmarking, and a structured offer.
The team celebrated.
We had landed a star.
Six months later, she resigned.
The departure was a quiet shockwave that rippled through the entire division.
The exit interview was polite but revealing.
It wasn’t about the money or the title.
It was about a thousand tiny papercuts: a disconnect with her manager’s style, a feeling of being siloed from other teams, and a sense that the company’s stated values didn’t quite match the day-to-day reality of the work.
We had recruited a person, but we had failed to integrate her into a living, breathing organization.
We had treated the role like a vacant slot in a machine, found a perfectly machined gear, and were then shocked when the gear didn’t mesh with the complex, unpredictable, and deeply human system around it.
That single resignation was a heartbreaking personal failure, but it was also a brutally expensive business lesson.
It forced me to confront the profound inadequacy of the traditional HR model—a model focused on compliance, administration, and reactive problem-solving.1
This old model, often called personnel management, is fundamentally transactional.
It places job ads when requested, answers benefit questions, and processes terminations.3
It sees people as “human resources,” interchangeable assets to be managed and deployed.
This approach, while perhaps sufficient for smaller, less complex organizations, is dangerously out of step with the modern business landscape.1
It is a framework designed to manage risk and maintain order, not to cultivate talent or drive strategic growth.
The true cost of this outdated philosophy is staggering, and it extends far beyond the administrative budget of the HR department.
The real price is paid in the relentless churn of employee turnover.
While the average turnover rate for employers eased to 18% in 2024, down from a record high of 26% in 2022 and 2023, it remains a significant drain on corporate resources.4
This isn’t just about losing an employee; it’s a cascade of direct and indirect costs that bleed the organization dry.
First, there are the direct costs of replacement.
These are the visible, line-item expenses: advertising for the new position, fees for recruitment agencies, the cost of background checks, and the significant staff time invested in screening and interviewing candidates.5
On average, replacing an hourly employee can cost $1,500, but for a salaried professional, the cost can easily reach tens of thousands of dollars.5
Then come the indirect costs, which are far larger and more insidious.
There is the immediate loss of productivity from the vacant role, forcing the remaining team members to shoulder extra work, often leading to overtime payments and burnout.5
There is the loss of invaluable institutional knowledge—the undocumented processes, customer relationships, and internal networks that walk out the door with the departing employee.7
There is the significant ramp-up time for the new hire; research suggests it takes an average of 28 weeks for a new employee to reach the productivity level of the person they replaced.9
And finally, there is the corrosive effect on the morale of the remaining team and the potential for damage to customer loyalty and the company’s reputation.7
When you add it all up, the numbers become terrifying.
One business example calculated that for a company with just 50 employees and a 20% annual turnover rate, the total cost could exceed $700,000 per year.7
My “perfect” hire who left after six months wasn’t just a single failed placement; she was a symptom of a systemic failure that was costing the company hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of dollars.
The heartbreaking truth is that most of this turnover is preventable.
Studies show that over 77% of voluntary turnover could be avoided, as it stems not from unavoidable “pull” factors like a better opportunity, but from “push” factors within the company’s control: lack of career growth, poor management, and a weak or misaligned culture.9
This realization forced me to ask a fundamental question.
The traditional model of HR, built on the metaphor of a company as a machine, was clearly broken.
It was reactive, transactional, and viewed people as replaceable parts.11
What if the metaphor itself was wrong? What if a company isn’t a machine to be engineered, but something else entirely?
The Epiphany: From Cold Machine to Living Ecosystem
In the wake of that costly resignation, I stepped away from the standard business literature.
The books on process optimization and human capital management felt hollow; they were all variations on the same theme of control and efficiency that had led to my failure.
In my search for a new perspective, I stumbled into a completely different field: ecological resilience.
It was a world of complex adaptive systems, biodiversity, and symbiotic relationships.12
This was the epiphany.
The most resilient systems on Earth—rainforests, coral reefs, prairies—are not managed through rigid, top-down control.
They thrive because they are diverse, interconnected, and adaptive.
A forester doesn’t “manage” a forest by dictating where each tree should grow.
Instead, they cultivate the conditions for life—healthy soil, adequate water, and protection from invasive threats—and allow the complex system to organize itself and flourish.
This sparked a radical reframing of my entire professional worldview.
I began to see the stark contrast between the two dominant metaphors for an organization:
- The Old Model (The Company as a Machine): This is the bedrock of traditional management theory and HR. The organization is seen as a complex piece of machinery designed for a specific output. Employees are the cogs, gears, and levers. When a part breaks (an employee leaves), HR’s job is to act as the mechanic, finding a replacement part as quickly and cheaply as possible to minimize downtime.1 The focus is on standardization, predictability, and control. This model values efficiency above all else.
- The New Model (The Company as an Ecosystem): This model views the organization as a living, dynamic, and complex adaptive system.12 The goal is not to control every variable but to act as a steward, cultivating a healthy environment where talented people (the “organisms”) can thrive, adapt, collaborate, and create emergent value. This philosophy aligns perfectly with the modern shift from “Human Resources” to “People Operations,” a function that is proactive, employee-centric, and deeply strategic.11
This is far more than a simple rebranding or a change in job titles from “HR Manager” to “People Partner.” It represents a fundamental paradigm shift in how we understand and lead organizations.
It is the difference between being a mechanic, focused on fixing what’s broken, and being a gardener, focused on cultivating the potential for life.
The mechanic is reactive; the gardener is proactive.
The mechanic sees interchangeable parts; the gardener sees unique organisms that require specific conditions to flourish.
This “Organizational Ecosystem” model provides a powerful new framework for diagnosing the failures of the past and building the resilient, thriving companies of the future.
It moves the conversation beyond administrative efficiency and places the focus where it belongs: on the four foundational pillars that determine whether an organization is truly alive or is simply a machine waiting to break down.
Part I: The Foundations of a Resilient Ecosystem
Chapter 1: Cultivating Rich “Organizational Soil” – The Tangible ROI of Culture
In any terrestrial ecosystem, everything begins with the soil.
It is the foundation, the substrate from which all life springs.
The health of the soil—its composition, its structure, its nutrient content—determines the health and resilience of the entire system.
A forest cannot grow on barren rock.
In an organizational ecosystem, the soil is the company’s culture.
It is the invisible, yet all-encompassing, medium in which work happens.
It dictates what is possible, what is rewarded, and what is rejected.
For decades, leaders have dismissed culture as “fluff”—a soft, immeasurable concept secondary to hard metrics like sales and profit margins.
This is a dangerous misconception.
Healthy soil is not a simple, inert substance; it is a complex, dynamic mixture of physical, chemical, and biological components.17
Likewise, a healthy organizational culture is composed of concrete, measurable elements that directly impact performance.
- The Physical Structure (The “How”): In soil science, this refers to the arrangement of sand, silt, and clay particles, which creates the pores for air and water.20 In an organization, this is the structure of daily work: the processes, norms, and behaviors. Is communication open and transparent, or is it guarded and political? Is collaboration seamless, or are teams siloed and competitive? These are the channels through which information, ideas, and trust flow—or fail to flow.10
- The Chemical Properties (The “What”): Soil chemistry involves the balance of nutrients and pH levels that make growth possible.18 In a company, this is the composition of its core values, its stated mission, and its ultimate purpose. Do employees believe in the “why” behind their work? A significant 31% of departing employees cite a misalignment between their personal values and the company’s mission as a primary reason for leaving.22 This “chemical imbalance” creates a toxic environment where talent cannot thrive.
- The Biological Component (The “Who”): Healthy soil is teeming with life—a vast, invisible community of bacteria, fungi, and other organisms that decompose matter and cycle nutrients.17 This is the living, breathing heart of the organizational culture: the people and the quality of their relationships. Is there a foundation of trust, respect, and fairness? Do people feel a sense of camaraderie and psychological safety? These are the “microbes” that break down barriers, foster collaboration, and make the entire system fertile and productive.23
The idea that this foundational “soil” is merely a “nice-to-have” is obliterated by a mountain of data demonstrating its direct, quantifiable impact on the bottom line.
Investing in culture is not an expense; it is one of the highest-return investments a company can make.
Consider the evidence:
- Companies with a strong corporate culture experience revenue growth four times higher than companies with a weak culture.24
- A positive culture is the primary driver of employee engagement. Organizations with highly engaged employees see 59% less turnover and are 21% more profitable.26
- The quality of a manager, which is a direct output of the prevailing culture, accounts for a staggering 70% of the variance in team engagement.24
- The link to retention is undeniable. In companies with poor cultures, 64% of employees are actively looking for a new job. In companies with good cultures, that number plummets to just 22%.22
This data transforms the conversation.
Culture is no longer a matter of opinion; it is a matter of financial performance.
The challenge for leaders, then, is to move the measurement and management of culture from the realm of “fluff” to the center of their business strategy.
This requires a new approach, one that treats culture as a tangible asset with a provable return on investment (ROI).
A critical flaw in many organizations is the traditional wall between the People function and the Finance department.
HR talks about engagement and retention; Finance talks about EBITDA and operating margins.
To prove the ROI of culture, these two functions must become deeply integrated partners.
The modern People leader cannot simply run programs; they must be able to build a financial model that quantifies the cost of attrition caused by cultural weaknesses and presents a clear business case for investment.27
This means using the language of finance to demonstrate how a $100,000 investment in leadership training (to improve the “biological component” of the soil) can prevent $500,000 in turnover costs, yielding a clear and compelling R.I.
This partnership enables a more sophisticated approach to measurement.
Annual engagement surveys, while useful, are often too slow and generic to provide actionable insights.28
A modern approach uses a combination of tools: frequent pulse surveys to get a real-time read on morale, anonymous feedback channels to build trust, and benchmarking against industry standards to provide context.23
This data creates a dashboard for the health of the organizational soil.
Finally, the ROI of culture extends beyond internal metrics and directly impacts the customer.
A positive culture fosters engaged employees, who in turn provide better service, drive more innovation, and create superior customer experiences.
This creates a virtuous cycle: engaged employees deliver 10% higher customer ratings and 20% more sales, which in turn fuels business growth and allows for further investment in the culture that started it all.26
The health of the internal ecosystem is directly reflected in the value it creates for the external world.
Table 1: The Financial Case for a Strong Organizational Culture
| Cultural Metric | Impact of Strong Culture | Source(s) |
| Revenue Growth | 4x Increase in Revenue Growth | 24 |
| Profitability | 21% Higher Profitability | 26 |
| Employee Turnover | 59% Less Turnover | 26 |
| Innovation | 30% Higher Levels of Innovation | 26 |
| Customer Ratings | 10% Higher Customer Ratings | 26 |
| Productivity | 17% Higher Productivity | 26 |
Chapter 2: Fostering “Biodiversity” – The Strategic Power of Employee Experience (EX)
Once the soil is fertile, the resilience of an ecosystem depends on its biodiversity.
A monoculture crop, like a vast field of a single strain of corn, is incredibly efficient under stable conditions but dangerously fragile.
A single new pest or a slight change in climate can cause a total collapse.
In contrast, a natural prairie, with its hundreds of species of grasses, flowers, and insects, is remarkably resilient.
A drought might weaken some species, but others will thrive, ensuring the overall system survives and adapts.30
Biodiversity creates stability through variety and redundancy.13
In the organizational ecosystem, the equivalent of biodiversity is the Employee Experience (EX).
EX is not simply another buzzword for employee happiness or a synonym for engagement.
It is the sum total of every interaction an employee has with the organization, from the moment they see a job posting to their very last day.33
It is the entire journey, the rich and varied tapestry of touchpoints that defines their relationship with the company.35
A company that offers a monolithic, one-size-fits-all experience is a monoculture.
It may be efficient, but it is brittle.
A company that cultivates a rich, multifaceted, and positive Employee Experience is fostering “experiential diversity.” It is building an organization that can attract, engage, and retain a wide variety of talent, making it more adaptive, innovative, and resilient to the inevitable shocks and changes of the market.
To truly manage EX, we must move beyond the narrow confines of traditional HR processes.
The scope of EX is vast and cross-functional, shaped by three core components: the company’s culture (the values in action), the technology employees use to do their jobs, and the physical or digital workplace itself.34
This reality fundamentally transforms the role of the People function.
It can no longer operate in a silo, managing its discrete portfolio of tasks like payroll and benefits administration.
To steward the Employee Experience, the People leader must become a master of influence and a cross-functional integrator, working with IT on technology, with facilities on the workplace, and with business leaders on management practices to ensure a cohesive and positive journey for every employee.
This journey can be understood through five critical lifecycle stages.
Cultivating a positive experience at each stage is essential for building a resilient, high-retention organization.34
1.
Recruitment: The employee experience begins long before the first day.
The recruitment stage is a candidate’s first real interaction with the company as an employer.
Is the application process simple and respectful, or is it a convoluted black hole? Are interviewers trained to represent the company’s culture and values? A negative candidate experience, driven by poor communication or a disorganized process, can poison the well, turning away top talent and damaging the employer brand before a relationship even has a chance to form.34
With 80% of turnover being attributed to bad hiring decisions, getting this first step right is critical.9
2.
Onboarding: For many companies, onboarding is a perfunctory checklist of paperwork and compliance training.
This is a massive missed opportunity.
A strategic onboarding process is an immersive cultural experience.
It connects the new hire to the company’s mission, introduces them to their team and key stakeholders, and clarifies their role in the larger ecosystem.34
It answers the big questions about payroll, benefits, and tools upfront so the employee can focus on learning and contributing.
With only 12% of employees believing their organization does a great job of onboarding, excellence in this stage represents a powerful competitive advantage.9
3.
Development: Once an employee is established, their experience is defined by their opportunities for growth.
The number one reason talented people quit their jobs is a perceived lack of career development and skill-building opportunities.9
In our ecosystem analogy, this is the equivalent of an organism having no path to mature or occupy a more significant niche.
A strong EX provides clear, flexible career paths, invests in training, and fosters a culture of continuous learning.
It helps employees grow the skills that not only advance their own careers but also have the biggest impact on the company’s success.34
4.
Retention: Retention is not a separate activity; it is the outcome of a positive experience across the preceding stages.
It is the day-to-day reality of working in an environment built on trust, respect, fairness, and camaraderie.23
It’s about feeling valued, having the right tools to do your job effectively, and working for a manager who supports your well-being.
This is where the concepts of Employee Experience and Employee Engagement intersect.
The EX is the environment the employer creates; engagement is the emotional and psychological commitment an employee feels as a result.34
A great experience is the cause; high engagement is the effect.
5.
Exit: Even an employee’s departure is a critical touchpoint in their experience.
A poorly handled exit can burn bridges and create a disgruntled detractor.
A respectful and supportive offboarding process, however, can turn a former employee into a lifelong brand advocate, a future customer, or even a “boomerang” hire who returns later with new skills and experience.35
The experience doesn’t end when the resignation is submitted; it ends with the final interaction, and that final impression matters.
By meticulously designing and managing each of these five stages, a company moves beyond the transactional nature of traditional HR and begins to cultivate a truly biodiverse and resilient organizational ecosystem.
Part II: The Dynamics of a Thriving Ecosystem
Chapter 3: Identifying and Nurturing “Keystone Species” – The Asymmetric Impact of Leadership
In ecology, not all species are created equal in their influence.
A keystone species is an organism whose presence has a disproportionately large and stabilizing effect on its entire ecosystem, far beyond what its numbers would suggest.
The classic example is the sea otter in the kelp forests of the Pacific coast.
Otters prey on sea urchins, which in turn graze on kelp.
When otters are removed, the urchin population explodes, devours the kelp forest, and causes the entire ecosystem—and the myriad of species that depend on it—to collapse.
The otter is the keystone that holds the arch of the ecosystem together.36
In the organizational ecosystem, the keystone species are the managers and leaders.
While they may not be the most numerous employees, their impact on the health of their local environment—their team—is immense and decisive.
A great manager can create a micro-ecosystem of high trust, psychological safety, and exceptional performance.
A poor manager, like the removal of the sea otter, can trigger a cascading collapse of morale, engagement, and productivity, ultimately leading to the loss of valuable talent.
The data supporting this assertion is overwhelming and should be a top strategic concern for any CEO. The impact of a direct manager is not a minor variable; it is the single most dominant factor in the employee experience.
- A Gallup study found that managers account for a staggering 70% of the variance in employee engagement across business units.24 The quality of a team’s culture is almost entirely a reflection of its leader.
- The link to retention is direct and powerful. Employees who work with poorly rated managers are four times more likely to be looking for a new job than those with highly rated managers.9
- Conversely, strong management characterized by transparency and clear communication can improve employee retention rates by 30%.9
Given that the cost of turnover is a massive financial drain on most companies, it becomes clear that bad management is not just a cultural problem; it is a significant, quantifiable financial liability.
The single most high-leverage investment a company can make to improve its bottom line is not in a new marketing campaign or a product feature, but in the selection and development of its frontline managers.
Yet, so many organizations get this backward, promoting their best individual contributors into management roles with little to no training, effectively setting them—and their teams—up for failure.
To nurture these keystone species, organizations must fundamentally shift their understanding of what leadership Is. The old model of the “boss” who commands and controls is obsolete.
The new model is that of the steward, who cultivates and enables.
This stewardship has three primary functions:
1.
Cultivating the “Soil”: Keystone leaders are the primary gardeners of their team’s micro-culture.
They are responsible for tilling the soil of trust, ensuring psychological safety where team members feel they can speak up, take risks, and admit mistakes without fear of retribution.
They set the “chemical” balance by consistently reinforcing the company’s values in their decisions and actions.
2.
Enabling the “Organisms”: Great stewards don’t micromanage; they empower.
They provide their team members with crystal-clear expectations, and then they focus on removing roadblocks and providing the resources needed to succeed.
They understand the unique strengths of each person on their team and work to put them in positions where those strengths can flourish, much like a gardener placing a sun-loving plant in a sunny spot.
3.
Connecting to the “Ecosystem”: Finally, keystone leaders provide context and purpose.
They are responsible for connecting the day-to-day work of their team to the broader mission and strategy of the organization.16
They help each person see how their individual contribution fits into the larger picture, fostering a sense of meaning that is a powerful driver of engagement.
Operationalizing this insight requires a deliberate, strategic approach to building a keystone leadership program.
It cannot be an afterthought.
- Selection: The process for identifying future leaders must change. Instead of promoting the best salesperson or the most brilliant engineer into management, companies must select for leadership competencies: empathy, communication, coaching ability, and a genuine desire to see others succeed.
- Training: Investment in leadership development must be a top priority. The data is clear: companies with the best-in-class cultures are 72% more likely to invest in training for their leaders than other companies.24 This training should be less about financial reporting and more about the human skills of building trust, giving effective feedback, and coaching for development.
- Support and Accountability: Leaders cannot be left on an island. The modern People Operations model introduces the concept of “People Partners,” who are not administrative HR reps but strategic consultants assigned to business units.16 These partners act as coaches and advisors to leaders, helping them diagnose team health issues and develop strategies for improvement. Furthermore, leaders must be held accountable for the health of their teams. Their performance should be measured not just on financial results, but on key people metrics like employee engagement and retention. What gets measured gets managed, and it is time to manage the quality of leadership as the critical business driver it is.
Chapter 4: Managing “Ecological Succession” – A Framework for Growth and Development
Ecosystems are not static.
They change over time through a predictable process known as ecological succession.
This is the gradual process by which the mix of species and the structure of a habitat evolve, often following a disturbance.38
Understanding succession provides ecologists with a powerful lens for predicting how a landscape will change and for managing its long-term health.
This same lens can provide business leaders with an invaluable framework for navigating the often-chaotic stages of organizational growth.
Ecological succession comes in two main forms, which map directly onto the lifecycle of a company:
1.
Primary Succession (The Startup): This process begins on newly formed, barren land, like a cooled lava flow or a landscape scoured clean by a retreating glacier.38
There is no soil, no life.
The first organisms to arrive are
pioneer species—hardy lichens, mosses, and grasses that can survive in harsh, resource-scarce conditions.
They are generalists, adaptable and resilient.
Over time, as these pioneers live and die, they begin to break down the rock and create the very first layer of soil, making the environment slightly more hospitable for other species to arrive.38
This is the perfect analogy for a startup.
It begins on “bare rock,” with an idea but no infrastructure, processes, or culture.
The first employees are pioneers.
They are adaptable generalists who can wear multiple hats and thrive in the ambiguity and resource scarcity of the early days.
They are not just doing their jobs; they are creating the initial “organizational soil”—the first sales processes, the first lines of code, the unwritten rules of the early culture.
2.
Secondary Succession (The Growth Stage): This process occurs after a disturbance disrupts an existing community, but leaves the soil and some life intact.
A forest fire, for example, clears out the undergrowth and many trees, but the nutrient-rich soil remains.40
This newly opened, resource-rich environment is quickly colonized by a new set of species.
These are often fast-growing, more specialized plants that may outcompete the original pioneers for light and nutrients.
Over time, these are replaced by even more specialized, shade-tolerant species, until the community matures.41
This mirrors the growth phase of a company, often triggered by a “disturbance” like a large round of funding or finding product-market fit.
The environment is suddenly richer.
The company needs to scale, and this requires a new wave of employees.
These are often specialists—a dedicated Head of Marketing, a team of specialized engineers, a professional finance leader.
These “later successional species” are highly efficient in their specific niches.
The very skills that made the early pioneers successful (scrappy improvisation, generalist knowledge) may now be less valuable than the deep expertise of the new specialists.
3.
The Climax Community (The Mature Company): Eventually, succession leads to a relatively stable “climax community,” like a mature old-growth forest.
This ecosystem is characterized by high biomass, complex structures, and efficient nutrient cycling.41
It is highly resilient to small disturbances but can be vulnerable to large-scale, novel changes.
This is the large, mature corporation with deep-rooted culture, highly specialized roles, and established processes.
This ecological framework has profound strategic implications for talent management.
The common and often painful phenomenon where founding employees struggle or leave as a company scales—sometimes called “founder’s syndrome”—is not a series of isolated personal failures.
It is a predictable ecological process.
The pioneer species are being outcompeted in a changing environment.
By framing this challenge through the lens of succession, leaders can move from reacting in crisis to managing the transition proactively.
It allows the People function to destigmatize the process and design programs to help pioneers adapt—by finding new, more specialized niches or developing new skills—or to transition out of the organization gracefully, preserving their knowledge and legacy.
This model allows leaders to anticipate the talent they will need at each stage.
Hiring a “climax community” specialist (e.g., a VP from a Fortune 500 company with a team of 50) for a “primary succession” startup is a classic recipe for disaster.
They will be frustrated by the lack of resources and structure.
Conversely, a “pioneer” generalist may struggle to adapt to the processes and specialization required in a mature organization.
Finally, this framework informs how we design organizations for long-term resilience.
The role of early employees should be explicitly recognized and rewarded for “facilitation”—the act of creating the soil and structure that allows later generations of employees to thrive.41
And even in mature, “climax” organizations, leaders must act as stewards who introduce small-scale, controlled disturbances—like new cross-functional projects, internal incubators, or strategic reorganizations.
These actions, like a controlled burn in a forest, clear out the undergrowth, create openings for new talent to emerge, and prevent the entire ecosystem from becoming stagnant, rigid, and ultimately, fragile.
Conclusion: The People Leader as Ecosystem Steward
The journey from that single, painful resignation to this new understanding has been a complete transformation of thought.
The traditional, mechanistic view of Human Resources is no longer fit for purpose.
It is a relic of a simpler, more predictable industrial age.
In today’s dynamic and complex world, organizations that continue to operate like machines—with their rigid structures, standardized processes, and view of people as interchangeable parts—are destined to break down.
They will be out-innovated and outmaneuvered by competitors who have embraced a more vital, adaptive, and resilient model.
The future belongs to the living organization.
The future belongs to companies that are managed not as machines, but as ecosystems.
This paradigm shift demands a new kind of leader.
The administrative HR manager of the past must give way to the Ecosystem Steward of the future.
This is not a change in title; it is a profound change in function, mindset, and impact.
The work of this new leader is not centered on policies and procedures, but on the active and strategic cultivation of a thriving environment.
This stewardship is defined by four continuous, interconnected activities:
- Cultivating the Soil (Culture): The steward’s primary responsibility is the health of the organizational soil. This means moving beyond platitudes and actively building, measuring, and nurturing a culture founded on trust, psychological safety, and a clear, shared purpose. It requires partnering with finance to prove the tangible ROI of this work, transforming culture from a “soft” topic into a hard-nosed business imperative.
- Fostering Biodiversity (EX): The steward understands that resilience comes from diversity. They meticulously design and manage a rich and multifaceted Employee Experience across the entire lifecycle, from the first recruitment contact to the final exit interview. They work cross-functionally to ensure that every touchpoint—technological, physical, and cultural—contributes to a cohesive and positive journey.
- Nurturing Keystones (Leadership): The steward knows where to focus their leverage. They recognize that managers are the keystone species of the organization and invest disproportionately in their selection, development, and support. They champion a model of leadership based on coaching and empowerment, and they hold leaders accountable for the health of their teams.
- Managing Succession (Growth): The steward uses an ecological lens to guide the organization through its natural lifecycle. They anticipate the talent and structural needs of each stage of growth, from scrappy startup to mature enterprise. They manage the inevitable “disturbances” of growth proactively, helping people and the organization adapt and evolve without the chaos and trauma that so often accompanies scale.
To stop being an HR administrator and start being an ecosystem steward is the fundamental challenge facing every People leader today.
It requires a shift from control to cultivation, from process to people, from reactive fixing to proactive gardening.
This is the work that builds organizations that are not just profitable in the next quarter, but are resilient, innovative, and truly alive for decades to come.
Works cited
- HRMS Software vs. Traditional HR Practices: Why Businesses Are Making the Switch, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://engagedly.com/blog/hrms-software-vs-traditional-hr-practices/
- Traditional vs. Contemporary Human Resources Management – Empower HR, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://empowerhr.com/traditional-vs-contemporary-hr/
- Strategic vs. Traditional HR Management – What is the Difference | Purdue Business, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://business.purdue.edu/news/features/?story=5674
- Companies’ employee turnover rate eased to 18% in 2024 – CFO.com, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.cfo.com/news/companies-employee-turner-rate-eased-to-18-in-2024/743093/
- Does Employee Turnover Have Financial Implications? – Your Money Line, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.yourmoneyline.com/blog/does-employee-turnover-have-financial-implications
- The Cost of Employee Turnover Vs a Car Benefit | CBS, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://carbenefitsolutions.co.uk/insights-centre/cost-of-employee-turnover-vs-car-benefit/
- The Economics of High Turnover – Gordian Staffing, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.gordianstaffing.com/the-economics-of-high-turnover
- integritystaffing.com, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://integritystaffing.com/integrity-insights/turnover/#:~:text=On%20average%2C%20replacing%20an%20hourly,money%2C%20efficiency%2C%20and%20stability.
- Employee Turnover Statistics: Causes and Solutions in 2024 – TeamStage, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://teamstage.io/employee-turnover-statistics/
- Five Benefits Of A Strong Organizational Culture – Fortune Management, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.fortunemgmt.com/post/five-benefits-of-a-strong-organizational-culture
- From HR to People Operations: Why The Language We Use Is Changing | Eden Blog, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.edenworkplace.com/blog/from-hr-to-people-operations-why-the-language-we-use-is-changing
- The Seven Principles for Resilience Thinking – Grower Group Alliance, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.gga.org.au/activity/the-seven-principles-for-resilience-thinking/
- Environmental resilience: biodiversity and ecosystems – Enel Group, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.enel.com/company/stories/articles/2023/03/ecological-resilience
- Ecological resilience – Wikipedia, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecological_resilience
- How to transition from traditional HR to people operations effectively | peopleHum, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.peoplehum.com/blog/how-to-transition-from-traditional-hr-to-people-operations
- Why And How To Evolve From Human Resources To People And Culture – Forbes, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbeshumanresourcescouncil/2023/02/08/why-and-how-to-evolve-from-human-resources-to-people-and-culture/
- Key Components of Healthy Soils and Their Role in Crop Production – New Prairie Press, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://newprairiepress.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1385&context=kaesrr
- The Three Components of Soil Health – – Custom Biologicals, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://custombiologicals.biz/microbial-products-blog/the-three-components-of-soil-health/
- Principles of soil health | MOSH, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://mosh.umn.edu/principles
- newprairiepress.org, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://newprairiepress.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1385&context=kaesrr#:~:text=Some%20soil%20properties%20include%20soil,are%20determinants%20of%20soil%20health.
- What Makes Up a Healthy Soil? – SDSU Extension, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://extension.sdstate.edu/what-makes-healthy-soil
- 95 Company Culture Statistics: Leadership, Employee Engagement, and Work-Life Balance, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://flair.hr/en/blog/company-culture-statistics/
- What Is Employee Experience? Definition & Strategies | Great Place To Work®, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.greatplacetowork.com/resources/blog/what-is-employee-experience
- The ultimate list of corporate culture statistics – Arbinger Institute, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://arbinger.com/blog/the-ultimate-list-of-corporate-culture-statistics/
- Company Culture Stats Driving Business Success in 2025 – UJJI, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.ujji.io/posts/company-culture-statistics
- Culture by the Numbers: The ROI of Workplace Culture Investments – Enculture, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.enculture.ai/blog/culture-by-the-numbers-the-roi-of-workplace-culture-investments
- How to Measure the ROI of Positive Company Culture – myHRfuture, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.myhrfuture.com/blog/2024/3/13/how-to-measure-the-roi-of-positive-company-culture
- Employee Engagement Surveys: Pros, Cons & Pricing Guide for 2025 – FaceUp, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.faceup.com/en/blog/pros-and-cons-of-employee-engagement-surveys
- The ROI of Organizational Culture » Community | GovLoop, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.govloop.com/community/blog/the-roi-of-organizational-culture/
- Biodiversity Critical to Maintaining Healthy Ecosystems | U.S. Geological Survey – USGS.gov, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.usgs.gov/index.php/news/biodiversity-critical-maintaining-healthy-ecosystems
- Diversity is key to ecosystem stability | ScienceDaily, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/05/250522125158.htm
- Why is biodiversity important? – Royal Society, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://royalsociety.org/news-resources/projects/biodiversity/why-is-biodiversity-important/
- www.paycom.com, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.paycom.com/resources/blog/employee-experience/#:~:text=EX%20covers%20everything%20workers%20experience,and%20calculating%20time%2Doff%20balances.
- What Is Employee Experience (EX)? – Paylocity, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.paylocity.com/resources/library/articles/employee-experience/
- Employee Experience 101: Everything You Need to Know About EX – Medallia, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.medallia.com/experience-101/employee-experience/
- www.ebsco.com, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/environmental-sciences/keystone-species#:~:text=Keystone%20species%20are%20essential%20organisms,often%20resulting%20in%20decreased%20biodiversity.
- What are Keystone Species | Prairie Nursery, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://www.prairienursery.com/resources-guides/what-are-keystone-species/
- Ecological succession, explained – University of Chicago News, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://news.uchicago.edu/explainer/what-is-ecological-succession
- news.uchicago.edu, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://news.uchicago.edu/explainer/what-is-ecological-succession#:~:text=Ecological%20succession%20is%20the%20process,a%20fundamental%20concept%20in%20ecology.
- 4.3.4: Ecological Succession – Biology LibreTexts, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://bio.libretexts.org/Courses/Thompson_Rivers_University/Principles_of_Biology_II_OL_ed/04%3A_Ecology/4.03%3A_Community_Ecology/4.3.04%3A_Ecological_Succession
- Intro to Ecology Unit 8 – Ecological Succession – Fiveable, accessed on July 23, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/fundamentals-ecology/unit-8
