Table of Contents
Section 1: The Brutal Portent of Chapter One: A Foundational Introduction
In any critical examination of F.
Scott Fitzgerald’s seminal novel, The Great Gatsby, the character of Tom Buchanan looms large, a figure of immense physical presence and oppressive ideological force.
A query regarding the point of his arrival in the narrative is, on the surface, a simple matter of textual navigation.
However, to fully appreciate Fitzgerald’s artistry and the character’s profound significance, one must look beyond the mere chapter number and delve into the intricate and deliberate construction of his first appearance.
This initial encounter is not merely an introduction; it is a masterfully crafted microcosm of Tom’s entire being, a brutal portent that establishes the physical, psychological, and moral architecture of the novel’s primary antagonist.
1.1. Direct Answer and Initial Encounter
Tom Buchanan is introduced to the reader in Chapter 1 of The Great Gatsby.1
The narrative context for his appearance is established as the narrator, Nick Carraway, travels from his modest home in the “less fashionable” West Egg to the aristocratic enclave of East Egg for dinner.1
This journey across the bay is a symbolic passage from the world of the “new rich” to the rarefied domain of the established, “old money” elite.2
Nick is visiting his second cousin, Daisy, and her husband, Tom, a man he vaguely knew from their shared time at Yale University.1
This immediate positioning of Tom within the dual institutions of old money and an Ivy League education serves to place him at the apex of the American social hierarchy of the 1920s, a man whose status is not achieved but inherited and assumed.
Nick’s arrival at the Buchanan estate sets the stage.
He is greeted by Tom, who is standing “in riding clothes…
with his legs apart on the front porch”.7
This posture is the first of many physical cues that signify Tom’s sense of ownership and casual dominance.
The house itself is described as an “overwhelmingly decorated” Georgian Colonial mansion, a physical manifestation of the Buchanans’ immense and established wealth.1
The very setting, therefore, works in concert with Tom’s physical presence to project an aura of unassailable power and entitlement before he has even spoken a significant line of dialogue.
1.2. The Physical Embodiment of Power and Cruelty
Fitzgerald’s introduction of Tom Buchanan is a masterclass in using physical description to foreshadow character and ideology.
Nick’s first detailed observation of Tom is not just a portrait but a diagnosis.
He sees “a sturdy, straw haired man of thirty with a rather hard mouth and a supercilious manner”.9
This initial sketch immediately conveys an air of condescension and physical robustness.
The description deepens, moving from general form to specific, telling details.
Tom’s face is dominated by “two shining, arrogant eyes” that give him “the appearance of always leaning aggressively forward”.7
This perpetual forward lean is a physical manifestation of his confrontational nature, his tendency to invade space and impose his will upon his surroundings and the people within them.
He is a man who does not wait for the world to come to him; he moves upon it with inherent aggression.
The most critical element of this initial description, however, is the assessment of his physique.
Nick observes “a great pack of muscle shifting when his shoulder moved under his thin coat,” leading to the chilling conclusion: “It was a body capable of enormous leverage—a cruel body”.6
This phrase is the linchpin of Tom’s characterization.
Fitzgerald explicitly and immediately forges an unbreakable link between Tom’s immense physical power and a capacity for cruelty.
His strength is not presented as a neutral attribute or a source of athletic grace; it is defined from the outset as a weapon.
This foreshadows his later acts of violence, such as when he carelessly hurts Daisy’s finger in this same chapter, prompting her to call him a “brute of a man, a great, big, hulking physical specimen”.6
Daisy’s comment, though delivered with a degree of teasing fondness, is deeply revealing.
The choice of the word “specimen” suggests something less than fully human, an object of study notable for its physical characteristics rather than its soul or intellect.6
It captures his brute, almost savage nature, which stands in stark, ironic contrast to the white supremacist beliefs he will soon espouse.
He sees himself as a pillar of a superior civilization, yet his own wife identifies him by his primitive, physical force.
This initial portrait, rendered through Nick’s observant and Daisy’s complexly complicit eyes, establishes Tom not as a man who possesses strength, but as a man who is defined and driven by it, a force of nature whose primary mode of interaction with the world is through physical imposition and the latent threat of violence.
1.3. The Ideology of a “Has-Been”: Racism, Restlessness, and Reactionary Fear
Beyond his imposing physicality, Tom’s introductory scene reveals a mind plagued by restlessness, intellectual insecurity, and a profound, reactionary fear of social change.
Nick provides crucial backstory that contextualizes Tom’s psychological state.
He recalls that at Yale, Tom “had been one of the most powerful ends that ever played football at New Haven—a national figure in a way, one of those men who reach such an acute limited excellence at twenty-one that everything afterward savors of anti-climax”.6
This single sentence is a devastating psychological profile.
Tom is a “has-been” at the age of thirty.6
Having peaked so early, his life since has been a downward slope of diminishing excitement, a perpetual search to recapture the thrill and adulation of his youth.6
This explains his fundamental restlessness, a quality Nick observes in his eyes that “flashed about restlessly” and his tendency to “hover restlessly about the room”.6
He is a man adrift in a sea of immense wealth and privilege, but without purpose or direction, a state characteristic of many in his “Lost Generation” who survived the war.6
This internal dissatisfaction fuels his intellectual and ideological posturing.
During the dinner party, Tom aggressively steers the conversation toward a book he has been reading, titled The Rise of the Colored Empires.1
This is a thinly veiled reference to real-world white supremacist tracts of the 1920s, such as Lothrop Stoddard’s
The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy.
Tom’s defense of the book’s ideas is both passionate and clumsy.
“It’s all scientific stuff; it’s been proved,” he insists, revealing a pseudo-intellectual reliance on received ideas rather than genuine critical thought.10
He has “nibbled at the edge of stale ideas” to justify his prejudices.10
Daisy’s gentle mockery—”Tom’s getting very profound…
He reads deep books with long words in them”—serves to underscore his intellectual shallowness and insecurity.14
His racism is not just a character flaw; it is a symptom of his fear.
He is terrified that the “dominant race” will be “utterly submerged,” a fear that reflects his own personal sense of being past his prime and his anxiety about the social order that guarantees his superiority being dismantled by rising forces he cannot control.12
The final element that completes this initial portrait of moral decay is the interruption of the dinner party by a phone call.
The tension is immediate.
Daisy is visibly upset, and Jordan Baker leans in to inform Nick, “Tom’s got some woman in New York”.1
The placement of this revelation in the very first chapter is a deliberate authorial choice.
It instantly establishes the foundational hypocrisy and moral emptiness of Tom’s world.
His marriage, the supposed bedrock of the “family institutions” he will later claim to defend, is a sham from the moment we see it.
The awkward, tense atmosphere that descends upon the dinner party is a harbinger of the emotional violence and “quiet desperation” that characterize the lives of the East Egg elite.1
Tom’s brazen infidelity, conducted with such little discretion that his mistress calls him at home during dinner, defines him as a man governed by selfish impulse and utterly devoid of empathy or moral consideration.
Fitzgerald’s construction of Tom Buchanan’s introduction is thus a comprehensive diagnostic chart of the moral and ideological sickness afflicting the “old money” establishment.
Every detail—from his aggressive posture and “cruel body” to his nostalgic restlessness, his parroted racism, and his casual adultery—is a carefully chosen symptom.
The physical power of his body is not just a trait but the very source of his dominance and the instrument of his will, a fact that will be brutally confirmed by his later actions.
The nostalgia for his football glory is not mere backstory but the psychological engine of his present discontent, making him a figure inherently resistant to the future and its changes.
His racism is not a random prejudice but a direct, fearful response to the rise of “new money” figures like Gatsby and other social shifts that threaten the established order he personifies.
And the affair, revealed almost immediately, establishes the profound hypocrisy that lies at the core of his character, making his later pronouncements on family and tradition ring hollow.
Chapter 1 is not, therefore, a simple introduction.
It is a complete, condensed, and damning portrait.
Fitzgerald provides the reader with all the necessary tools—physical, psychological, ideological, and moral—to understand and anticipate every subsequent action Tom Buchanan will take in the novel.
Section 2: Deconstructing the “Hulking Physical Specimen”: A Synthesis of Character
While Chapter 1 provides a powerful and comprehensive blueprint for Tom Buchanan’s character, the full measure of his personality is revealed through his actions and interactions across the entire narrative.
Expanding from this initial foundation, a complete profile emerges of a man defined by an oppressive combination of inherited arrogance, toxic masculinity, and profound hypocrisy.
At his core, Tom is a static character, a figure whose physical hardness is mirrored by a mental and moral inflexibility that makes him incapable of growth and renders him a destructive force within the novel’s world.
2.1. The Arrogance of Inherited Power
Tom Buchanan’s character is fundamentally a product of his “old money” status.6
Having been born into a world of immense, generational wealth, he possesses an unshakeable sense of entitlement that shapes his every interaction.17
This is not merely the pride of a rich man; it is an ingrained ideology of superiority.
He views the world and its inhabitants as extensions of his own will, a collection of possessions to be managed and controlled.
This proprietary attitude is evident in his relationship with Daisy, whom he treats as a beautiful prize he has won, and is even more starkly illustrated in his affair with Myrtle Wilson, a woman he effectively “purchases” with gifts and the allure of his status.19
His condescension is a constant.
He treats Nick with a “paternal contempt,” a patronizing air that Nick notes was present even during their college years at Yale, where many “hated his guts”.7
This indicates that Tom’s arrogance is not a recent development but a long-standing, core component of his personality.
He looks down on Gatsby with undisguised scorn, not simply as a romantic rival, but as a representative of the “nouveau riche,” a social contaminant whose wealth lacks the pedigree and therefore the legitimacy of his own.7
Tom’s power is not just in his money, but in the social certainty that money has given him—a certainty that he is inherently better than those who have had to acquire their fortunes.
2.2. The Brutality of Toxic Masculinity
Fitzgerald positions Tom as the novel’s primary embodiment of what contemporary criticism would label “hyper and toxic masculinity”.6
He defines his manhood almost exclusively through physical strength, aggression, and the domination of others.6
This is not a subtle undercurrent but a defining characteristic that repeatedly manifests in overt acts of violence.
The initial hint of this in Chapter 1, when he bruises Daisy’s finger, is a prelude to a more shocking display in Chapter 2.
At the party in the Manhattan apartment he keeps for his affair, Myrtle Wilson, emboldened by alcohol and her fantasy of a life with Tom, taunts him by repeatedly chanting Daisy’s name.
Tom’s response is swift and brutal: “Making a short deft movement, Tom Buchanan broke her nose with his open hand”.24
This act of violence is a raw and chilling display of patriarchal power.
It is not an act of passion but one of control, a physical punishment designed to put Myrtle “in her place” for daring to transgress the unwritten rules of their affair—namely, that the reality of his wife and his primary life in East Egg must not be mentioned.26
His violence is a tool to enforce the boundaries of his world and assert his dominance.
This aggression also permeates his language.
He rarely engages in genuine dialogue; instead, he interrupts, dismisses, and intimidates.
In moments of conflict, particularly the confrontation with Gatsby, his speech “snapped” and “exploded,” demonstrating a reliance on verbal force and humiliation rather than reason.14
2.3. The Hypocrisy of a Patriarch
The most damning aspect of Tom’s character is his profound and un-self-aware hypocrisy.
He consistently presents himself as a staunch defender of traditional values, social order, and the sanctity of the family.
During the climactic confrontation at the Plaza Hotel, he positions himself as the wronged husband, a moral guardian fighting to protect his home from a dangerous interloper.14
He speaks of “family life and family institutions,” attempting to occupy the moral high ground.
This self-portrayal is rendered utterly fraudulent by his own behavior.
From the novel’s outset, he is engaged in a sordid and relatively public affair with Myrtle Wilson.16
He is so brazen in his infidelity that he takes Nick along to meet her, forces him to attend a party at their love nest, and allows Myrtle to call him at his home.1
His outrage at Daisy’s relationship with Gatsby is therefore not born of wounded love or moral indignation, but of a proprietary rage.
It is an offense to his status and his sense of ownership.
He is less concerned that Daisy might love another man than he is that she might leave him for a “common swindler” from “nowhere”.23
The perceived slight is one of class and status.
His hypocrisy is absolute: he demands a fidelity from his wife that he has no intention of offering himself, revealing a worldview in which patriarchal privilege grants him a completely different set of rules.
It becomes clear that Tom’s defining characteristic is not merely arrogance or brutality, but a profound mental inflexibility that is a direct parallel to his physical hardness.
This connection is a cornerstone of Fitzgerald’s critique.
Just as his “cruel body” is an unyielding mass of muscle, his mind is an unyielding mass of prejudice and entitlement.
This mental rigidity makes him completely impervious to reason, empathy, or change.
One can observe this process unfold in his patterns of thought and action.
He uncritically absorbs and repeats the racist dogma from his book because it reinforces his pre-existing sense of superiority.
He stubbornly insists, against all evidence, that he and Daisy share an unbreakable bond of love, because to admit otherwise would be to concede a loss of control.
He cannot be persuaded through logic or emotional appeal; his only responses to challenges are intimidation, threats, and, ultimately, violence.
This inflexibility is the very source of his power within the narrative.
While Jay Gatsby’s dream is imaginative, fluid, and ultimately fragile, Tom’s reality is concrete, rigid, and shatterproof.
In their final confrontation, Gatsby’s romantic, imaginative demand—”Tell him you never loved him”—is an appeal to a different version of the past.
It disintegrates against the hard, immovable wall of Tom’s reality, which is based on the brute facts of their shared social class, their marriage, and his refusal to lose.
Tom’s “cruel body” is thus a perfect metaphor for his cruel and inflexible mind.
He cannot be changed or swayed; he can only be opposed, endured, or, in the case of Myrtle and Gatsby, broken by his force.
He is a static embodiment of the oppressive status quo, and his power lies not in his intellect or his character, but in his absolute, unthinking, and brutal refusal to bend.
Section 3: The Antagonist as Ideology: Old Money vs. The American Dream
In the narrative architecture of The Great Gatsby, Tom Buchanan serves a function that transcends that of a simple personal rival.
He is the novel’s primary antagonist, the central obstacle to the protagonist’s quest, but more profoundly, he is the personification of an entire social and ideological order.24
The central conflict of the book is not merely a love triangle; it is a symbolic war between two competing visions of America.
Tom represents the entrenched power of the “old money” establishment, a force of hereditary privilege and social rigidity, while Jay Gatsby embodies the striving, aspirational energy of the self-made man and a corrupted version of the American Dream.
Their rivalry is the dramatic engine through which Fitzgerald stages this epic cultural clash.
3.1. The Great Gatsby’s Central Conflict
The core of Gatsby’s dream is to recapture a moment from his past with Daisy, but to do so, he believes he must first conquer the social world she inhabits—a world of which Tom Buchanan is the king.
Tom, therefore, represents the biggest barrier standing between Gatsby and Daisy’s reunion.29
The conflict is starkly geographical and sociological.
Tom’s East Egg is the domain of conservative, aristocratic families whose wealth is generational and whose social codes are unwritten but absolute.2
Gatsby’s West Egg is the territory of the “nouveau riche,” individuals who have acquired their fortunes recently and often through questionable means, and who lack the social refinement and connections of the East Egg set.2
Tom’s contempt for Gatsby is rooted in this distinction.
He is threatened not just by Gatsby’s love for his wife, but by what Gatsby represents: the encroachment of the lower classes upon his privileged world.29
The battle for Daisy’s love is simultaneously a battle for the soul of the American elite.
3.2. The Plaza Hotel: A Climactic Confrontation
This ideological and personal conflict culminates in the sweltering heat of a parlor at the Plaza Hotel in Chapter 7, the novel’s searing climax.9
Here, the subtext of their rivalry erupts into open warfare.
Tom, though initially shaken by the realization of Daisy’s love for Gatsby, quickly seizes control of the confrontation by shifting the terms of the debate from love to class.
He does not argue that he is a better man or a more loving husband; instead, he launches a brutal attack on Gatsby’s social standing and the origins of his wealth.
With calculated cruelty, Tom exposes Gatsby as a fraud and a criminal, a “bootlegger” who runs underground drugstores.9
He sneers, “I’ll be damned if I see how you got within a mile of her unless you brought the groceries to the back door,” a line designed to humiliate Gatsby by reminding him of his service-class origins.24
He then solidifies his victory by appealing to the power of their shared class and history, something the outsider Gatsby can never penetrate.
He reminds Daisy of their shared memories, their common world, asserting that they have a history that Gatsby could never understand.4
This argument proves decisive.
Daisy, unable to renounce her past and the security of her social position, falters.
Tom’s ultimate display of power is his contemptuous dismissal of the defeated pair.
He insists that Gatsby drive Daisy home, a gesture of supreme confidence and dominance.9
It is a nonverbal declaration that he has nothing to fear from Gatsby, that the threat has been neutralized, and that he knows Daisy will ultimately remain with him.
He has successfully used the unassailable power of the established social order to crush the aspirational dream of the self-made man.
3.3. The Careless Destroyer
Tom’s role as antagonist extends beyond this pivotal confrontation.
His final, and most destructive, act is to deflect blame for Myrtle’s death and channel George Wilson’s vengeful grief directly toward Gatsby.
When Wilson, mad with sorrow, concludes that the driver of the “death car” must have been Myrtle’s lover, Tom sees an opportunity.
He not only allows Wilson to believe that Gatsby was the driver, but he also implicitly confirms that Gatsby was her lover, thereby sealing Gatsby’s fate.16
This is a calculated act of self-preservation and malice, eliminating his rival and his mistress’s inconvenient husband in one stroke.
This act cements Nick’s final, damning judgment of both Tom and Daisy.
They are “careless people” who “smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness…
and let other people clean up the mess they had made”.8
Tom’s carelessness is not accidental; it is a destructive privilege afforded to him by his wealth and social standing.
He moves through the world with the assurance that he will never have to face the consequences of his actions, a belief that the novel’s conclusion tragically affirms.
The fundamental opposition between Tom Buchanan and Jay Gatsby is so central to the novel’s thematic structure that a direct comparison illuminates the core ideological conflict Fitzgerald is exploring.
The following table distills their contrasting attributes, revealing how they function as archetypes of two conflicting American ideals.
This side-by-side analysis makes the abstract concepts of class struggle, the nature of wealth, and the critique of the American Dream concrete and accessible, providing a clear framework for understanding the novel’s central tragedy.
| Attribute | Tom Buchanan | Jay Gatsby |
| Social Class | “Old Money” Elite (East Egg) 2 | “New Money” (West Egg) 2 |
| Source of Wealth | Inherited, generational 6 | Illicit (bootlegging, bond fraud) 9 |
| Personality | Arrogant, aggressive, cynical, physically dominant 11 | Hopeful, reserved, obsessive, romantic 16 |
| Core Motivation | Maintenance of status quo, control, self-indulgence 18 | Recapturing the past, winning Daisy’s love 4 |
| Relationship to Past | Nostalgic for personal glory (college football) 6 | Obsessed with recreating a specific past moment 4 |
| View of Others | As possessions or instruments for his will 19 | As audience or means to an end (reuniting with Daisy) 38 |
| Narrative Role | Antagonist; represents oppressive social reality 24 | Protagonist; represents the corrupted American Dream 16 |
Section 4: Critical Interrogations: Tom Buchanan Through Marxist and Feminist Lenses
To fully excavate the significance of Tom Buchanan is to move beyond a purely narrative analysis and apply the interrogative tools of critical theory.
When viewed through the lenses of Marxism and feminism, Tom ceases to be merely an individual character and becomes a powerful symbol of the oppressive structures of class and gender.
These critical perspectives reveal the deeper socio-political critique embedded in Fitzgerald’s work, exposing Tom as the embodiment of a corrupt bourgeois patriarchy, whose personal flaws are inextricable from the ideologies he represents.
4.1. A Marxist Critique: The Bourgeoisie Incarnate
From a Marxist perspective, the social landscape of The Great Gatsby is a clear depiction of class struggle, and Tom Buchanan is the quintessential representative of the ruling class, the bourgeoisie.39
His immense power is derived not from labor or merit, but from inherited capital, and his life exemplifies how wealth functions to corrupt human relationships and insulate the powerful from consequence.5
Tom’s entire worldview is shaped by the logic of capitalism, specifically the concept of commodification, where all things and people are assigned a value based on their utility or exchange potential.19
This commodification of relationships is starkly evident in his marriage and his affair.
His union with Daisy was a transaction: her youth, beauty, and impeccable social standing were exchanged for his wealth and the power and stability it conferred.
The $350,000 pearl necklace he gave her as a wedding gift was not merely a present but the symbolic price of this “purchase”.19
Similarly, his affair with Myrtle Wilson is a clear case of the bourgeoisie exploiting the proletariat.
He uses his money and status to “purchase” Myrtle, a working-class woman desperate to escape the “valley of ashes”.19
He treats her as a commodity—an object for his pleasure that he can control with gifts, flaunt when it suits him, and physically abuse when she oversteps her role.41
His consistent choice of lower-class women for his affairs is a strategic “marketing” of his socioeconomic status where it will have the greatest impact, among women most awed by what he has to sell.19
The dynamic between Tom and George Wilson further illustrates this class exploitation.
Tom dangles the possibility of selling Wilson his car, a transaction that would represent a significant opportunity for the struggling mechanic, but he does so with a patronizing air, enjoying the power he holds over Wilson’s economic hopes.19
He simultaneously exploits Wilson by carrying on an affair with his wife, a violation made possible by the class differential that renders Wilson powerless.
The novel’s tragic conclusion is the ultimate Marxist parable: Tom, the bourgeois capitalist, directs the enraged proletarian (Wilson) to eliminate a rival (Gatsby), who represents a threat to the established order from the “new money” class.
Having used the lower class to do his dirty work, Tom and Daisy retreat into the invulnerable fortress of their “vast carelessness,” leaving the working class to deal with the death and destruction.34
4.2. A Feminist Critique: The Face of Patriarchy
Through a feminist lens, Tom Buchanan emerges as a textbook emblem of an oppressive and toxic patriarchy.
He systematically objectifies, controls, and silences the women in his life, using his physical, economic, and social power to enforce a rigid gender hierarchy.27
His physical violence is the most overt tool of this patriarchal control.
His abuse of Myrtle is a direct punishment for her attempt to assert her own voice and challenge his authority by speaking his wife’s name.27
The earlier incident where he injures Daisy’s finger serves as a constant, low-level reminder of his physical dominance and the potential for violence that undergirds their relationship.6
Tom’s hypocrisy regarding fidelity is a classic example of the patriarchal double standard.
He is publicly outraged by Daisy’s affair, framing himself as a victim whose home is being violated: “I suppose the latest thing is to sit back and let Mr. Nobody from Nowhere make love to your wife.
Well, if that’s the idea you can count me out”.42
This righteous indignation is completely detached from the reality of his own flagrant and long-standing infidelity.
In his worldview, his status as a man, and specifically as a wealthy, powerful man, grants him sexual freedoms that are denied to his wife.
Her affair is a threat to his ownership and status; his is a perquisite of his station.
Furthermore, Tom’s reactionary politics can be interpreted as stemming from a deep-seated anxiety about shifting gender roles.
His lament that “civilization’s going to pieces” is not just about race and class, but also about the erosion of traditional patriarchal control.1
The 1920s witnessed the emergence of the “New Woman” and the flapper—figures who challenged conventional notions of femininity with their social and sexual freedom.32
The novel’s most modern woman, Jordan Baker, with her athletic career, independence, and ambiguous morality, represents this shift.
Tom’s desire for a return to a more ordered past is a desire for a world with clearly defined and enforced gender roles.
One critical analysis points to the revealing sequence in Chapter 1: Nick’s comment to Daisy, “You make me feel uncivilized,” immediately precedes Tom’s racist tirade.45
This juxtaposition suggests that Tom’s fear of civilization’s decline is triggered by the perception of female power and agency.
He views femininity itself as a potential source of cultural decay, a threat to the white, masculine authority he embodies.45
A more nuanced understanding emerges when these critical perspectives are synthesized.
Tom’s racism and his misogyny are not presented as separate, isolated character flaws.
Instead, they appear as two interconnected facets of a single, unified ideology rooted in a profound fear of displacement.
His core anxiety is the terror of losing his privileged status as a dominant, white, “old money” male in a world undergoing rapid and destabilizing change.
The 1920s, as depicted in the novel, was an era of unprecedented social flux.
Prohibition inadvertently created a pathway for a “new money” class, personified by Gatsby, to challenge the hegemony of the old elite.
Simultaneously, the “New Woman” was challenging the foundations of traditional gender roles.
From Tom’s perspective, these are not separate phenomena but a multi-pronged assault on the hierarchy that defines his existence.
His outburst about “The Rise of the Colored Empires” is not just about race; it is a defense of the entire social structure he sits atop.
Any challenge to any part of that structure—whether from a bootlegger from West Egg, a woman with an independent mind, or another race—is perceived as an existential threat to his world and his identity.
His racism and his misogyny are the ideological weapons he wields in a desperate, multi-front war against modernity itself.
Section 5: Conclusion: The Enduring Legacy of Careless Power
In the final accounting of The Great Gatsby, Tom Buchanan stands as a figure of chilling permanence.
He is not redeemed, not tragic, and not vanquished.
He is, instead, a testament to a brutal and enduring form of power, a character whose significance resonates far beyond the confines of the Jazz Age.
By synthesizing his narrative function, his psychological composition, and the socio-political ideologies he embodies, a conclusive portrait emerges: Tom Buchanan is Fitzgerald’s most potent critique of the American establishment, a representation of the amoral, careless force of inherited privilege that not only survives the chaos it creates but thrives in its wake.
5.1. The Final Judgment: “Careless People”
The novel’s ultimate moral verdict is delivered through Nick Carraway’s final, scathing assessment of Tom and his wife: “They were careless people, Tom and Daisy—they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness, or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made”.8
This is the novel’s most famous and resonant passage, and it is the key to understanding Tom’s legacy.
His “carelessness” is not simple negligence or thoughtlessness; it is a profound moral failing born of absolute privilege.34
It is the destructive freedom that comes from knowing that wealth and social status form an impenetrable shield against consequence.48
While Daisy is complicit in this carelessness, Tom is its most active and brutal agent.
He smashes Myrtle’s nose, Gatsby’s dream, and ultimately Gatsby’s life, all without suffering any meaningful repercussions.
He ends the novel as he began it: wealthy, powerful, and secure in his insulated world.
5.2. Tom Buchanan and the Corruption of the American Dream
F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novel is a sustained critique of the American Dream, and the characters of Gatsby and Tom represent two distinct facets of this critique. If Gatsby embodies the tragic corruption of the dream—the transformation of a noble ideal into a hollow, materialistic quest—then Tom represents the immovable barrier to the dream.31 He is living proof that, in the society Fitzgerald depicts, the promise of class mobility is a cruel illusion. The established hierarchy, with its deep roots in inherited wealth and unwritten social codes, is simply too powerful and too ruthless to be overcome by the ambition and hope of an outsider.23 Tom’s victory over Gatsby is not a personal triumph; it is the triumph of an entire social system, demonstrating that the gates to the highest echelons of American society are closed to those not born within them.
5.3. An Unchanging, Untragic Force
Unlike Jay Gatsby, who is imbued with a “romantic readiness” and a capacity for wonder that renders him tragic, Tom Buchanan is an utterly untragic figure.
He undergoes no transformation, learns no lessons, and experiences no catharsis.
His brief moment of sorrow after Myrtle’s death is quickly subsumed by self-preservation and the reassertion of his own dominance.
He is a static force, a “hulking” embodiment of the status quo.6
His victory is not just the defeat of one man but the defeat of the very idea of change.
Ultimately, Tom Buchanan is Fitzgerald’s most chilling creation and his most damning indictment of the Jazz Age and the class system it perpetuated.
He is the novel’s true, unpunished villain, a character whose arrogance, brutality, and hypocrisy allow him to destroy lives with impunity.24
His enduring legacy in American literature is that of a quiet, brutal reminder that power, particularly the unearned power of inherited wealth, can be a profoundly destructive and amoral force.
In the world of
The Great Gatsby, the green light of romantic hope may flicker on the horizon, but it is inevitably extinguished by the unyielding, careless, and hulking presence of Tom Buchanan.
Works cited
- Best Summary and Analysis: The Great Gatsby, Chapter 1 – Blog PrepScholar, accessed July 28, 2025, https://blog.prepscholar.com/the-great-gatsby-chapter-1-summary
- The Great Gatsby Chapter 1 Summary & Analysis – SparkNotes, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/gatsby/section1/
- The Great Gatsby Chapter 1 Summary – Shmoop, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.shmoop.com/study-guides/great-gatsby/chapter-1-summary.html
- The Great Gatsby: Full Book Summary – SparkNotes, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/gatsby/summary/
- Exploring Wealth and the Wealthy Elite in “The Great Gatsby” and “Vile Bodies” – Medium, accessed July 28, 2025, https://medium.com/@mattmeisterb/exploring-wealth-and-the-wealthy-elite-in-the-great-gatsby-and-vile-bodies-8ef8659b8bf5
- pmt.physicsandmathstutor.com, accessed July 28, 2025, https://pmt.physicsandmathstutor.com/download/English-Literature/A-level/Notes/AQA/The-Great-Gatsby/Character-Profiles/Tom%20Buchanan.pdf
- Tom Buchanan – English Lit: AQA A Level The Great Gatsby – Specification A – Seneca, accessed July 28, 2025, https://senecalearning.com/en-GB/revision-notes/a-level/english-literature/aqa/the-great-gatsby-specification-a/4-4-1-tom-buchanan
- The Insecurities of Tom Buchanan and Curley: Examining Toxic Masculinity in The Great Gatsby and Of Mice and Men – Steven J. Smith, accessed July 28, 2025, https://stevensmith3-67563.medium.com/the-insecurities-of-tom-buchanan-and-curley-examining-toxic-masculinity-in-the-great-gatsby-and-62c0f999594e
- Best Character Analysis: Tom Buchanan – The Great Gatsby – Blog PrepScholar, accessed July 28, 2025, https://blog.prepscholar.com/tom-buchanan-great-gatsby-character-analysis-quotes
- Tom Buchanan Character Analysis in The Great Gatsby – Analytical essay writing service, accessed July 28, 2025, https://kaitlynessays.com/tom-buchanan-in-the-great-gatsby/
- Tom Buchanan in The Great Gatsby Character Analysis – Shmoop, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.shmoop.com/study-guides/great-gatsby/tom-buchanan.html
- The Great Gatsby Tom Buchanan Character Analysis – SparkNotes, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/gatsby/character/tom-buchanan/
- A Synopsis of Tom Buchanan’s Theories of Race Theory and Women – Teen Ink, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.teenink.com/opinion/all/article/1208137/A-Synopsis-Of-Tom-Buchanans-Theories-Of-Race-Theory-And-Women
- Tom Buchanan Character Analysis – 1239 Words – Bartleby.com, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Tom-Buchanan-Character-Analysis-FCGJYPAWL5V
- The Great Gatsby at 100: the Jazz Age novel that helps explain Trump’s America – Yahoo, accessed July 28, 2025, https://au.news.yahoo.com/great-gatsby-100-jazz-age-185553754.html
- The Great Gatsby: Analysis of Major Characters | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/literature-and-writing/great-gatsby-analysis-major-characters
- Blog post #6: Tom Buchanan – Inside The Great Gatsby – Create OU Sites, accessed July 28, 2025, https://sites.create.ou.edu/mmarquez/2025/05/01/blog-post-6-tom-buchanan/
- Tom Buchanan: Deciphering the Complex Antagonist in ‘The Great Gatsby’ – TYCHR, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.tychr.com/tom-buchanan-deciphering-the-complex-antagonist-in-the-great-gatsby/
- critical theory today, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.cusd80.com/cms/lib/AZ01001175/Centricity/Domain/8219/Marxist%20Crit%20-%20Gatsby.pdf
- Gatsby Marxist Criticism – WordPress.com, accessed July 28, 2025, https://yourfingersspeak.files.wordpress.com/2019/08/gatsby-marxist-criticism-.pdf
- Tom Buchanan Character Analysis – 271 Words – Bartleby.com, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Tom-Buchanan-Character-Analysis-DA4D6FE6D1BCAD31
- The Lopsided American Dream: A Comparison of Jay Gatsby and Tom Buchanan in F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby Iram Quresh, accessed July 28, 2025, http://tlhjournal.com/uploads/products/28.iram-qureshi-article.pdf
- Social Class And Wealth In The Great Gatsby – 701 Words – Bartleby.com, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Social-Class-And-Wealth-In-The-Great-FY2JEGM6WQ6
- Tom Buchanan as a Villain in F. Scott Fitzgerald’s ‘The Great Gatsby’ – Free Essay Example, accessed July 28, 2025, https://hub.edubirdie.com/examples/tom-buchanan-as-a-villain-in-f-scott-fitzgeralds-the-great-gatsby/
- Relationship Between Tom Buchanan And Myrtle Wilson – 493 Words – Bartleby.com, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Relationship-Between-Tom-Buchanan-And-Myrtle-Wilson-A11236A640635397
- The Great Gatsby Myrtle Wilson Character Analysis – SparkNotes, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/gatsby/character/myrtle-wilson/
- www.ukessays.com, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.ukessays.com/essays/english-literature/feminist-criticism-of-the-great-gatsby-english-literature-essay.php#:~:text=Tom%20objectifies%20both%20Daisy%20and,what%20the%20social%20norm%20is.
- The Great Gatsby | Summary, Characters, Reception, & Analysis | Britannica, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/topic/The-Great-Gatsby
- The Great Gatsby: Antagonist | SparkNotes, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/gatsby/antagonist/
- Tom Debrief – gatsby_debrief – Create OU Sites, accessed July 28, 2025, https://sites.create.ou.edu/carolinejones/2023/10/03/tom-debrief/
- Tom and Gatsby in The Great Gatsby – (English 9) – Vocab, Definition, Explanations, accessed July 28, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/key-terms/english-9/tom-and-gatsby-in-the-great-gatsby
- 8 Ways ‘The Great Gatsby’ Captured the Roaring Twenties—and Its Dark Side | HISTORY, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.history.com/articles/great-gatsby-roaring-twenties-fitzgerald-dark-side
- The Great Gatsby: Historical Context Essay: The Great Gatsby and the Jazz Age | SparkNotes, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/gatsby/context/historical/gatsby-and-the-jazz-age/
- The Great Gatsby Flashcards – Quizlet, accessed July 28, 2025, https://quizlet.com/au/697377263/the-great-gatsby-flash-cards/
- Quote by F. Scott Fitzgerald: “They were careless people, Tom and Daisy – Goodreads, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/327461-they-were-careless-people-tom-and-daisy–they-smashed-up
- www.bartleby.com, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Compare-and-Contrast-Gatsby-and-Tom-FKJ2NWJVC#:~:text=Gatsby%20and%20Tom%20are%20similar,that%20they%20both%20want%20Daisy.
- The Great Gatsby – Chapter 1 Summary and Analysis – YouTube, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a13o8ZoudKE
- How Does Tom Differ In The Great Gatsby – 517 Words | Bartleby, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.bartleby.com/essay/How-Does-Tom-Differ-In-The-Great-FJ6AMNTYZDV
- Examples Of Marxism In The Great Gatsby – 949 Words – Bartleby.com, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Examples-Of-Marxism-In-The-Great-Gatsby-F517C9B339739E87
- www.ipl.org, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.ipl.org/essay/Marxist-Analysis-Of-Tom-In-The-Great-FC38725E2A3F4934#:~:text=In%20The%20Great%20Gatsby%20Tom’s,while%20committing%20non%2Dmoral%20behavior.
- What is a Marxist perspective/interpretation of F. Scott Fitzgeralds’ ‘The Great Gatsby’? : r/DebateCommunism – Reddit, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateCommunism/comments/b84j2q/what_is_a_marxist_perspectiveinterpretation_of_f/
- Feminist Criticism In Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby – 1006 Words | Cram, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.cram.com/essay/Feminist-Criticism-In-Fitzgeralds-The-Great-Gatsby/FCJCDWRKJ5U
- Redefining gender in the Jazz Age: the women of “The Great Gatsby”, accessed July 28, 2025, https://thesis.unipd.it/retrieve/7d283ca6-1e5a-4659-a815-730e74677801/Marcazzan_Mery.pdf
- The Great Gatsby and the Unwelcome Entrance of the New Woman | Linguistics and Culture Review, accessed July 28, 2025, https://lingcure.org/index.php/journal/article/download/2230/1029/1075
- The Great Gatsby, Gender, and Masculine Anxiety – Merrimack ScholarWorks, accessed July 28, 2025, https://scholarworks.merrimack.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=honors_capstones
- oll.libertyfund.org, accessed July 28, 2025, https://oll.libertyfund.org/publications/reading-room/2025-01-08-careless-people-in-the-great-american-novel#:~:text=Tom%20and%20Daisy%20are%20careless,bang%20but%20with%20a%20whimper.
- Examples Of Carelessness In The Great Gatsby – 892 Words – Bartleby.com, accessed July 28, 2025, https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Examples-Of-Carelessness-In-The-Great-Gatsby-672CA9DF3CE4817B
- The Great Gatsby’s Lessons On Wealth And Money | Altoo AG, accessed July 28, 2025, https://altoo.io/the-great-gatsbys-lessons-on-wealth-and-money/
