The Empathy Trap: How I Stopped ‘Feeling’ and Started Connecting with Mycelial Wisdom

Introduction: The Day My Empathy Broke Everything

For years, I built my career on a simple, deeply held belief: empathy was the ultimate leadership virtue.

As a team leader in a fast-paced tech environment, I saw it as my superpower.

It was the golden rule, the secret sauce, the one thing that could cut through corporate jargon and build a team that was not just productive, but truly connected.

I prided myself on being the manager people could come to, the one who got it.

I was wrong.

And the day I learned just how wrong I was is seared into my memory.

It started with Alex.

A brilliant developer and the linchpin of our most critical project, Alex was in the midst of a quiet, gut-wrenching personal crisis.

The details aren’t important; the effect was.

Alex’s focus was shattered, their code was late, and the stress was radiating from them in palpable waves.

My empathy alarm bells didn’t just ring; they screamed.

Following what I thought was best practice, I dove headfirst into Alex’s pain.

I listened for hours, absorbing the anxiety, the fear, the exhaustion.

I felt it all, a vicarious suffering that I believed was the very definition of being a supportive leader.¹

This intense emotional mirroring—what psychologists call affective empathy—compelled me to act.²

Driven by a desperate need to alleviate Alex’s immediate distress, I made a series of decisions that felt kind, compassionate, and utterly right in the moment.

I unilaterally reassigned Alex’s most complex modules to Maria, our stoic, ever-reliable senior engineer, figuring she could handle the load.

I pushed back deadlines, assuring the team that “people come before projects.” I was, in my own mind, the model of an empathetic leader.

The fallout was catastrophic.

My “empathetic” intervention didn’t feel like support to Alex; it felt like a spotlight on their struggle, a public declaration that they were failing.

They felt patronized, not protected.

Maria, who had her own invisible pressures, was now silently drowning under the extra workload, her resentment a quiet poison seeping into the team’s dynamic.

The rest of the team, thrown into chaos by the shifting timelines, grew anxious and lost confidence in my leadership.

My attempt to solve one person’s emotional crisis had created a systemic one.

I had fallen into what psychologist Paul Bloom calls the empathy trap: my intense focus on one person’s visible suffering made me blind to the long-term consequences and the needs of everyone else.⁴

In the aftermath, sitting amidst the wreckage of a compromised project and fractured team morale, I was haunted by a single, burning question.

I had tried to be empathetic.

I had followed the advice I’d read in countless leadership books.

How did it all go so spectacularly wrong? And if this raw, heartfelt empathy wasn’t the answer, what was? That failure became my crucible, the painful moment of adversity that forced me to question everything I thought I knew and set me on a journey to find a better Way.⁷

It was a journey that would lead me from the familiar terrain of management theory to the strange and beautiful world of underground fungal networks, and ultimately, to a new and far more powerful understanding of what it truly means to connect.

Part 1: The Allure of the Mushroom: Why Our Empathy Instincts Deceive Us

The modern world worships at the altar of empathy.

We are told it is an “absolute good,” a moral panacea for the world’s ills.⁸

From presidential speeches urging us to see through the eyes of others to corporate mission statements touting its importance, the message is clear: more empathy is always better.⁶

This was the gospel I had so fervently believed.

My failure with Alex, however, forced me to commit a kind of heresy: to question the virtue itself.

What I discovered was that the popular conception of empathy is dangerously simplistic.

We have conflated the entire, complex phenomenon with just one of its parts: affective empathy, the visceral, often involuntary act of feeling another person’s emotions.²

This is the empathy of tears welling up when a friend cries, of wincing when we see someone fall.

It is potent, immediate, and deeply human.

It is also, I realized, like a mushroom.

It’s the most visible part of a much larger system, the part we notice and react to.

But like a mushroom, it is also isolated, ephemeral, and a terribly poor guide for navigating the complex forest of human interaction.

My leadership failure was a direct result of being captivated by the mushroom—the raw, unguided emotional signal—while remaining completely ignorant of the vast, intelligent network that lay beneath.

Deconstructing Affective Empathy: The Spotlight and The Bias

My journey into the “empathy trap” led me to the work of Yale psychologist Paul Bloom, whose book Against Empathy felt like a lifeline.

Bloom argues that if our goal is to be good and do good, affective empathy is a poor moral guide.⁴

It’s not that feeling for others is inherently bad; it’s that our feelings are inherently flawed instruments for making just and effective decisions.

Bloom’s critique rests on several devastating points that perfectly illuminated my own failure.

First, empathy acts like a spotlight.

It focuses our attention with laser-like intensity on a single, vivid subject, while plunging everything else into darkness.⁴

When I saw Alex’s pain, my emotional spotlight fixed on them so completely that Maria and the rest of the team ceased to exist as individuals with their own needs and pressures.

They became mere instruments in my mission to solve Alex’s suffering.

This “identifiable victim effect” is a well-documented psychological bias where the plight of a single, named individual moves us far more than the suffering of a faceless, statistical Mass.¹¹

As Mother Teresa famously said, “If I look at the mass I will never act.

If I look at the one, I will”.⁶

This spotlight effect means that affective empathy is fundamentally at odds with principles of fairness and justice, which demand we consider the whole system, not just the most emotionally compelling part.¹¹

Second, and flowing from the first point, empathy is innumerate and biased.

It doesn’t do Math. Our emotional response to one suffering child can be more powerful than our response to the news that thousands are suffering from a preventable disease.⁴

Furthermore, our empathy is not distributed equally.

We are hardwired to feel more for those who are attractive, who look like us, who share our background, or whose situation is simply easier for us to imagine.⁶

This is the parochial, in-group bias of empathy, a leftover from an evolutionary past where favoring our own kin and tribe was a survival strategy.¹²

In a modern, diverse workplace, this bias is disastrous.

My empathy for Alex was easily triggered, but my empathy for the stoic, uncomplaining Maria was not.

My decision-making was therefore prejudiced from the start, guided not by a rational assessment of the team’s needs but by the arbitrary pull of my own emotional wiring.

The Inevitable Burnout: The High Cost of ‘Feeling’

Beyond leading to poor decisions, the over-reliance on affective empathy carries a profound personal cost.

In my quest to understand my failure, I stumbled upon the concepts of “empathy fatigue” and “compassion fatigue,” terms used to describe the deep emotional, physical, and spiritual exhaustion that can result from prolonged exposure to the suffering of others.¹³

While often used interchangeably, there’s a key distinction.

Burnout is a general syndrome of emotional exhaustion from prolonged stress that can occur in any profession.

Compassion fatigue, however, is a form of secondary or vicarious trauma that specifically affects those in helping roles who are in direct contact with the suffering they are trying to alleviate.¹³

The symptoms are insidious and debilitating: a reduced sense of personal accomplishment, emotional numbness, detachment, increased irritability, and a feeling of being overwhelmed.¹³

In trying to “become the wounded person,” as Walt Whitman poetically but dangerously advised, we don’t just compromise our own well-being; we become less effective at helping.¹⁶

A leader or caregiver drowning in another’s emotions is in no position to throw a life raft.

This is precisely what happened to me.

The emotional toll of absorbing Alex’s anxiety left me exhausted and clouded my judgment.

This phenomenon is particularly acute in leadership and caring professions like healthcare.

Studies on leadership show that managers who try to share in the negative emotions of their team members are at a higher risk of burnout and personal distress.⁵

In medicine, where empathy is crucial for patient outcomes, the constant exposure to pain and trauma without proper emotional boundaries is a primary driver of physician burnout.¹³

The lesson is clear and stark: a model of connection built solely on the foundation of feeling another’s pain is unsustainable.

It is a recipe for burnout, poor judgment, and ultimately, failure.

I had been trying to be a fountain of empathy, but I was pouring from an empty cup.

It was time to find a new source.

Part 2: The Mycelial Epiphany: A New Framework for Value and Connection

My search for a better model of connection felt, for a time, like wandering in a fog.

The old map was useless, but I had no new compass.

The turning point—my epiphany—came from a place I never expected: a documentary about the hidden life of forests.

I learned about mycelium, the vast, subterranean network of fungal threads that connects trees and plants in a complex, communicative Web.²⁰

What we see as individual mushrooms are merely the fruiting bodies, the temporary, visible expressions of this massive, intelligent, and largely invisible organism.

The true life of the forest, its resilience and strength, lies in this underground network.

It is the “wood-wide web,” a system that exchanges nutrients, shares information about threats, and allocates resources to where they are most needed, strengthening the entire ecosystem.²¹

It struck me with the force of a revelation: this was a perfect metaphor for empathy.

I had been chasing mushrooms.

I had been fixated on the visible, emotional flare-ups—the anger, the sadness, the panic—believing they were the connection.

But they weren’t.

They were just signals.

The real connection, the true, resilient, and intelligent empathy, was the network beneath the surface.

This insight gave me a new language and a new framework, one I call “Mycelial Empathy.”

The New Paradigm: Mycelial Empathy

Mycelial Empathy reframes the components of empathy not as a confusing jumble, but as a coherent, functional system.

It allows us to see how the different parts work together to create a connection that is both profound and practical.

• Affective Empathy (The Mushroom): This is the visceral, emotional reaction—what most people simply call “empathy.” In the mycelial model, it is the mushroom. It’s a vital signal. When you feel a pang of another’s sadness or a flash of their anger, it’s a mushroom popping up, indicating that there is a point of connection, something worthy of your attention.² But its job is simply to alert the network. It is not the main event. It provides little data and, if mistaken for the whole system, can be misleading or even toxic.
• Cognitive Empathy (The Mycelial Network): This is the vast, intelligent, and invisible network that does the real work. Cognitive empathy is the ability to understand another person’s perspective, to build a mental model of their world, their thoughts, their feelings, and their motivations, without necessarily feeling those emotions yourself.² It is a skill of data-gathering, perspective-taking, and intellectual inquiry. It is the “act of correctly acknowledging the emotional state of another without experiencing that state oneself”.²⁴ This is the true foundation of connection, the system that gives context and meaning to the emotional signals. Just as the mycelium underpins the entire forest, cognitive empathy underpins all effective human interaction.²⁰
• Compassionate Empathy (The Symbiotic Exchange): This is the action that results from the network’s wisdom. It is the targeted, rational, and effective transfer of resources—support, help, a listening ear, a practical solution—to where they are most needed.³ This is not the blind, reflexive “helping” driven by emotional distress. It is a deliberate, skillful act guided by the rich information gathered by the cognitive network. Paul Bloom calls the engine for this “rational compassion”.²⁷ It combines the genuine
  care for another’s well-being with a clear-headed analysis of what will truly be beneficial. This is the forest’s symbiotic exchange in action: resources flowing through the network to strengthen the whole.

The Currency of Connection: Re-evaluating Empathy’s Worth

This new paradigm forced me to confront the central question of my quest: Is empathy a value? The mycelial model, when combined with a little classical philosophy, revealed that the question itself is flawed.

The problem lies in how we define “value.” Moral philosophers distinguish between two fundamental types of value: intrinsic value and instrumental value.²⁸

Something has intrinsic value if it is good or desirable in and of itself, as an end.

Happiness and pleasure are often cited as intrinsic values; it makes little sense to ask why someone wants to be happy.²⁹

Something has

instrumental value if it is good or desirable because it is a means to achieving some other end.

A hammer or money has instrumental value; they are useful tools for building a house or buying goods.²⁹

Herein lies the core of the empathy trap.

Our culture has mistakenly taught us to treat affective empathy—the mushroom—as having intrinsic value.

We believe that the act of “feeling for” someone is, in itself, a moral good.

My own failure proved this was false.

My intense feeling for Alex was not, in itself, good; in fact, it led to unjust and destructive actions.

Mycelial Empathy corrects this valuation.

It reveals that empathy’s true worth is almost entirely instrumental.

It is a powerful tool for achieving intrinsically valuable ends, such as justice, well-being, and strong relationships.³¹

• Cognitive Empathy (The Network) is an invaluable instrument for gathering the information needed to act wisely.
• Compassionate Empathy (The Exchange) is the instrument for delivering help effectively.
• Affective Empathy (The Mushroom) has only one, limited instrumental value: to act as a trigger, a notification that prompts the rest of the network into action.

To treat the trigger as the goal is a profound category error.

It’s like valuing the smoke alarm more than the fire department.

The alarm is useful, even essential, but its value is purely instrumental.

The real work is done by the system it activates.

To clarify these crucial distinctions, it is helpful to lay them out side-by-side.

The following framework compares the different forms of fellow-feeling, moving from the most detached to the most integrated, and maps them onto the mycelial model.

Concept	Core Mechanism	Focus	Potential Pitfall	Mycelial Analogy
Pity	Feeling of discomfort at another’s distress, often from a superior position.26	“I feel sorry for you.”	Condescending; maintains distance and hierarchy. Reinforces the other’s powerlessness.14	Observing a struggling plant from afar, feeling bad for it, but doing nothing.
Sympathy	Feeling of care and concern for another, often with a wish to see them better off.26	“I care about your suffering.”	Does not require shared perspective; can remain at a distance. Can be a passive acknowledgment rather than an active engagement.26	Seeing a struggling plant and wishing it had more water.
Affective Empathy	Viscerally sharing or “catching” another’s emotional state; emotional contagion.2	“I feel your suffering.”	Prone to bias, shortsightedness, and emotional burnout. Can lead to poor, reactive decisions.4	The visible Mushroom: A potent but fleeting signal of distress.
Cognitive Empathy	Intellectually understanding another’s perspective, thoughts, and feelings without necessarily sharing them.2	“I understand your suffering.”	Can be used for manipulation if detached from care. Can feel cold or analytical if not communicated with warmth.23	The vast, intelligent Mycelial Network: Gathers and processes information about the entire ecosystem.
Compassionate Empathy	Understanding and feeling for another, coupled with a motivation to act and help alleviate their suffering.3	“I see your suffering and I want to help.”	Requires rational assessment to ensure the “help” is genuinely effective and not just what feels good to the helper.4	The Symbiotic Exchange: The network actively and intelligently moves resources to where they are most needed.

This framework became my new map.

It showed me that the path to true connection wasn’t about feeling more, but about understanding better and acting wiser.

It was a skill I could learn, a network I could consciously cultivate.

Part 3: Cultivating Your Network: A Practical Guide to Mycelial Empathy

The epiphany was one thing; putting it into practice was another.

Realizing I had been chasing mushrooms was a relief, but it also meant I had to learn an entirely new way of being.

I had to become a cultivator of my own mycelial network.

This wasn’t about suppressing emotion but about integrating it into a more intelligent and resilient system.

I discovered that effective empathy is not an innate gift but a set of learnable skills, a discipline that can be developed with conscious effort.³⁴

The process can be broken down into three essential practices: mapping the terrain, facilitating the symbiotic exchange, and protecting the ecosystem.

Step 1: Mapping the Terrain (Developing Cognitive Empathy)

This is the foundational work of building your network.

It is the active, curious process of gathering information to create a rich, accurate mental model of another person’s world.

This is the core of cognitive empathy, and it begins with listening.

• Practice Radical Listening: Most of us don’t truly listen. We engage in what communication experts call “cosmetic listening” (pretending to listen) or “factual listening” (listening only to form a rebuttal).³⁵ Building your network requires
  empathic listening. This means giving the other person your undivided attention—no phones, no distractions—and focusing not just on the facts they are presenting, but on the human story behind them.³⁵ It involves silencing your own internal monologue, deferring judgment, and using non-verbal cues like eye contact and open posture to create a space of psychological safety.³⁶
• Ask Powerful, Open-Ended Questions: The network grows by asking the right questions. The goal is to move from assumptions to understanding. Instead of closed questions that elicit a simple “yes” or “no,” practice asking open-ended questions that invite stories and deeper insights.³⁸ The “What? How? Why?” framework used in design thinking is incredibly powerful here.⁴⁰ Instead of asking a distressed colleague, “Are you okay?” (a closed question that pressures them to say “yes”), try asking, “How are you experiencing this situation?” or “What’s this been like for you?”.³⁹ This signals a genuine desire to understand their unique perspective, not just to categorize their feeling.
• Engage in Active Perspective-Taking: Empathy is a muscle that strengthens with exercise.³⁷ Make a conscious habit of trying to see situations from other viewpoints. Read fiction and non-fiction that exposes you to lives and cultures different from your own. When you disagree with someone, pause and try to construct the most charitable, intelligent version of their argument from their point of view. Engage with “extreme users” in your work or life—people whose experiences are vastly different from the norm—as they can often highlight needs and challenges that mainstream individuals can’t articulate.⁴⁰ This practice expands your capacity to model other minds, which is the very essence of the cognitive network.

Step 2: The Symbiotic Exchange (Practicing Compassionate Empathy)

Once the network is gathering information, the next step is to use that information to act effectively.

This is the symbiotic exchange—the practice of compassionate empathy.

It’s about moving from passive understanding to skillful, helpful action.

• Embrace Rational Compassion: This is the powerful alternative to knee-jerk emotional reactions that Paul Bloom advocates for.²⁷ It involves combining the genuine
  care for another’s well-being with a rational analysis of what will actually help them in the long run. If I could go back to the situation with Alex, I wouldn’t ignore their pain. I would use my cognitive network to understand the needs of everyone involved—Alex’s need for support and reduced pressure, Maria’s need for a manageable workload, and the project’s need to stay on track. Then, collaboratively, we would devise a solution that was both supportive and fair, such as temporarily re-scoping Alex’s tasks or bringing in short-term help, rather than making an impulsive, unilateral decision.
• Validate, Don’t Just Solve: Often, the most powerful and compassionate action is not to “fix” the problem, but to simply communicate your understanding. People need to feel heard and seen even more than they need a solution. Use reflective listening to show you’ve understood.⁴³ Phrases like, “It sounds like you’re feeling incredibly frustrated because you feel your work isn’t being valued,” or “I can see why that would be so disappointing, especially after all the effort you put in,” are incredibly powerful.³⁶ This act of validation is a low-cost, high-impact resource exchange. It tells the other person, “You’re not alone, and you’re not crazy for feeling this way.”

Step 3: Protecting the Ecosystem (Managing Empathy Fatigue)

A mycelial network cannot thrive if it is constantly overwhelmed and depleted.

A healthy empathetic system requires strong boundaries and active self-care to avoid burnout and maintain its ability to function.

• Distinguish Self from Other: This is the crucial boundary that prevents cognitive empathy from collapsing into exhausting affective empathy. The goal is to understand another’s experience, not to merge with it and adopt it as your own.¹⁴ As one researcher puts it, you want to be “full of them” in your understanding, but not have them “full of you”.⁴⁵ This requires maintaining a degree of professional or emotional distance, a sense of separateness that allows you to be a calm, stable resource rather than another victim of the emotional storm.¹⁶
• Practice Self-Compassion: You cannot sustainably offer compassion to others if you do not offer it to yourself. Programs like Mindful Self-Compassion (MSC), developed by researchers Kristin Neff and Christopher Germer, teach practical skills for treating yourself with the same kindness you would offer a friend.⁴⁶ This involves recognizing your own suffering, understanding that imperfection is part of the shared human experience, and actively soothing and comforting yourself. This isn’t selfish; it’s essential resource management for the entire ecosystem.
• Set Clear Boundaries: Learn to recognize your limits. As a leader or caregiver, you are not responsible for taking on every problem or feeling every emotion of those you support.⁵ It is not a failure of empathy to say, “I can see how much you’re struggling, and I want to support you. Let’s schedule a time to talk tomorrow when I can give you my full attention,” instead of dropping everything in a moment of crisis. Protecting your time and energy is vital for long-term effectiveness.

To make these principles immediately applicable, I developed a toolkit that translates the mycelial model into concrete workplace behaviors.

Mycelial Principle	Core Skill	“Try This” (Workplace Example)	“Avoid This” (Common Mistake)
Mapping the Terrain	Radical Listening & Powerful Questions	An employee seems disengaged. Instead of assuming they’re lazy, schedule a one-on-one and ask, “I’ve noticed a shift in your energy lately. How are things going for you in this role?” Listen without interrupting.43	Seeing the disengagement and immediately saying, “You need to step up your game or you’ll be on a performance plan.” This is a judgment without any data gathering.
The Symbiotic Exchange	Rational Compassion & Validation	A team member is overwhelmed by a personal issue. “I understand this is a really difficult time for you. Your well-being is important. Let’s look at your current projects and identify one or two things we can delegate to the team for the next week to give you some breathing room”.47	“I feel so bad for you! Just take all the time you need, don’t worry about work.” This is an impulsive, affective response that ignores the impact on the team and project, causing more stress later.
Protecting the Ecosystem	Boundaries & Self-Regulation	An employee is venting emotionally. Listen to understand their frustration, then say, “I hear how frustrating this is. I have another commitment in 10 minutes, but let’s use this time to brainstorm one concrete next step you can take to address the issue”.18	Getting caught up in the employee’s emotional state, spending an hour commiserating, and leaving the conversation feeling drained and without a constructive path forward.

This toolkit became my guide.

It transformed empathy from a vague, intimidating feeling into a clear, actionable, and sustainable practice.

Part 4: The Network in Action: Case Studies in Mycelial Empathy

My personal journey convinced me of the power of the mycelial model, but I needed to know if it was more than just a personal theory.

I began to look for it in the world, and I found it everywhere.

The principles of Mycelial Empathy—of a deep cognitive understanding fueling wise, compassionate action—are not a new invention.

They are a new description for what is already working in the most effective, human-centered systems across disparate professional fields.

This framework provides a unifying language for best practices that have emerged independently in leadership, healthcare, and design.

Domain 1: The Empathetic Leader’s Dilemma

The modern workplace is facing an empathy crisis.

Leaders are told relentlessly that empathy is the most important leadership skill.⁴⁹

And yet, the data shows a massive disconnect.

Businessolver’s 2024 State of Workplace Empathy report revealed a shocking 23-point “empathy gap” between how CEOs and employees perceive empathy in their organizations.⁵⁰

While 89% of CEOs believe a company’s financial performance is tied to empathy, a staggering 63% of them admit they find it hard to demonstrate it consistently.⁵²

The mycelial model explains this paradox perfectly.

The gap exists because leaders and employees are often talking about different things.

Many leaders, like I once did, equate empathy with “being nice” or feeling others’ emotions (affective empathy).⁵²

This leads directly to the pitfalls of bias in decision-making, emotional burnout, and a fear of being seen as a “pushover”.⁵

Employees, on the other hand, don’t necessarily want a leader who feels their pain; they want a leader who

understands their challenges and takes meaningful, supportive action.⁵⁴

They are asking for cognitive and compassionate empathy.

The most successful leaders intuitively practice the mycelial model.

Consider Satya Nadella’s transformation of Microsoft.

He explicitly centered his leadership philosophy on empathy, but not the soft, affective kind.

His focus was on understanding the “unmet, unarticulated needs of customers” and employees.⁵⁵

This is pure cognitive empathy—building the network.

This deep understanding then fueled compassionate action, like promoting a growth mindset and fostering open communication, which revitalized the company’s culture and market value.⁵⁶

In my own career, after my initial failure with Alex, I faced a similar situation involving a conflict between two team members over project direction.

Instead of siding with the more emotionally distraught team member, I applied the mycelial model.

I spent time with each person separately, using radical listening and open-ended questions to map the terrain of their perspectives, technical concerns, and personal stakes.

With this network of understanding in place, I brought them together not to declare a winner, but to facilitate a symbiotic exchange, helping them find a third path that incorporated the strengths of both their ideas.

The result was a stronger solution and a repaired relationship.

Domain 2: The Healer’s Touch in Healthcare

Nowhere is the distinction between the different forms of empathy more critical than in healthcare.

A large body of research demonstrates that physician empathy is directly correlated with better patient outcomes.

Patients of more empathetic doctors show higher satisfaction, are more likely to adhere to treatment plans, and experience better clinical results.⁵⁷

But what kind of empathy is at play?

If doctors relied on affective empathy—literally feeling the pain and fear of every patient—the system would collapse under the weight of universal burnout.

The high rates of compassion fatigue in medicine are a testament to the danger of this approach.¹³

Effective clinical empathy is a masterful application of the mycelial model.

The best clinicians are experts at building a cognitive network.

They go beyond symptoms to understand the patient’s life context, their fears, their beliefs, and their family situation.²⁴

They use tools and techniques, like the E.M.P.A.T.H.Y.

model (Eye contact, Muscles of facial expression, Posture, Affect, Tone of voice, Hearing the whole patient, Your response), to systematically gather data from the patient’s entire being, not just their words.⁶¹

This deep cognitive understanding then allows for compassionate action: co-creating a treatment plan that the patient not only understands but is also willing and able to follow.

The goal is not for the doctor to

feel the patient’s chronic pain, but to understand it so profoundly that they can act in the most helpful way possible.

Domain 3: The Blueprint of Design Thinking

Perhaps the clearest illustration of Mycelial Empathy in action can be found in the world of design.

The entire methodology of Design Thinking, responsible for some of the most innovative and user-friendly products and services, begins with a phase explicitly named “Empathize”.⁴¹

A closer look at this phase reveals that it is a rigorous, structured process for building a cognitive mycelial network about a target user.

Designers are trained to set aside their own assumptions and immerse themselves in the user’s world.⁴⁰

They don’t sit in a room and try to

feel what a user might feel.

Instead, they employ a battery of cognitive techniques:

• User Interviews: Asking open-ended questions to uncover motivations and pain points.³⁸
• Observation: Watching users interact with a problem in their natural environment to identify “unarticulated needs”—the things people do that they can’t even explain themselves.⁴⁰
• Empathy Maps: A collaborative tool where teams literally map out what a user is seeing, hearing, thinking, and feeling, creating a shared cognitive model of that person’s experience.⁶⁴

The goal of this entire process is to build a deep, data-rich network of understanding.

This network then fuels the subsequent phases of the design process: defining the core problem, ideating solutions, and prototyping.

It ensures that the final product is not based on what the designer thinks the user wants, but on a profound, evidence-based understanding of what the user actually needs.

It is the perfect embodiment of using a cognitive network to drive compassionate, effective action.

Across these diverse fields, the pattern is the same.

The systems and individuals who succeed in creating genuine, effective human connection are not the ones who simply feel the most.

They are the ones who build the most robust networks of understanding and use that wisdom to act with targeted, rational compassion.

Conclusion: From Mushroom to Mycelium—Becoming a Steward of the Human Network

My journey began with a painful failure, a moment when my deeply held belief in empathy as an absolute good shattered against the hard reality of human complexity.

I had been a mushroom hunter, chasing fleeting emotional signals, believing they were the essence of connection.

I was trapped, exhausted, and ineffective.

The discovery of the mycelial model was more than just an intellectual exercise; it was a profound shift in my entire way of being.

I am no longer afraid of empathy.

Instead, I have become a conscious steward of my own empathetic network.

I have learned to honor the mushroom of affective feeling as a vital signal, but to trust the deep, quiet work of the cognitive network to guide my actions.

So, is empathy a value? The question, I now realize, is flawed.

It treats a complex, multifaceted process as a simple monolith.

A better question, the one that has reshaped my life and leadership, is this: How can empathy be made valuable?

Raw, unguided emotional resonance is a trap.

It is biased, shortsighted, and exhausting.

It is an unreliable guide for moral action and a poor foundation for sustainable relationships.

But empathy as a disciplined practice—a conscious cultivation of a vast, intelligent network of understanding that fuels wise, compassionate action—is more than just a value.

It is the very architecture of connection.

It is the skill that allows us to navigate our complex world not as isolated individuals buffeted by random feelings, but as part of a thriving, resilient, and interconnected whole.

The challenge for each of us is to stop merely feeling for others and to start the patient, disciplined work of building our own mycelial network of understanding.

It is a journey from the reactive, isolating experience of the mushroom to the proactive, connected wisdom of the network.

It is in this deep, subterranean space that true connection lies.

As the great psychoanalyst Alfred Adler said, “Empathy is seeing with the eyes of another, listening with the ears of another, and feeling with the heart of another”.⁴⁵

It is a complete act of perception, not just of passion, and it is a skill we can all learn, a network we can all grow.

Works cited

1. The Importance of Empathy in the Workplace – Center for Creative Leadership, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.ccl.org/articles/leading-effectively-articles/empathy-in-the-workplace-a-tool-for-effective-leadership/
2. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed August 2, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8989800/#:~:text=Empathy%20is%20commonly%20conceptualised%20as,Singer%20%26%20Lamm%2C%202009).
3. Cognitive Empathy vs. Emotional Empathy – Verywell Mind, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.verywellmind.com/cognitive-and-emotional-empathy-4582389
4. The Case Against Empathy – P4H Global, accessed August 2, 2025, https://p4hglobal.org/p4h-blog/2019/6/24/the-case-against-empathy
5. Empathy In Leadership: The Good and the Bad – BambooHR Blog, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.bamboohr.com/blog/empathy-in-leadership-the-good-and-the-bad
6. Against Empathy – Boston Review, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.bostonreview.net/forum/paul-bloom-against-empathy/
7. Why Leaders Must Share Crucible Stories | The Quiet Workplace, accessed August 2, 2025, https://thequietworkplace.com/blog/crucible-stories/
8. Empathy: What is it, What is it Good For? – Carroll Collected, accessed August 2, 2025, https://collected.jcu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1119&context=honorspapers
9. Against Empathy by Paul Bloom (Book Review) – – Lapsed Economist, accessed August 2, 2025, https://bioeconometrician.github.io/bookreview_againstempathy/
10. The Psychology of Emotional and Cognitive Empathy | Lesley University, accessed August 2, 2025, https://lesley.edu/article/the-psychology-of-emotional-and-cognitive-empathy
11. Empathy, justice, and moral behavior – PMC, accessed August 2, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4748844/
12. Friends or foes: Is empathy necessary for moral behavior? – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed August 2, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4241340/
13. Compassion fatigue: Signs, symptoms, and how to cope – Canadian Medical Association, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.cma.ca/physician-wellness-hub/content/compassion-fatigue-signs-symptoms-and-how-cope
14. Moving from compassion fatigue to compassion resilience Part 4 …, accessed August 2, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7560777/
15. Am I Just Burned Out or is it Compassion Fatigue? – Atracare – Premiere, Modern Healthcare, accessed August 2, 2025, https://atracare.com/news/compassion-fatigue/
16. The Risks and Downsides of Empathy as a Leader – Effective Retail Leader, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.effectiveretailleader.com/effective-retail-leader/downsides-of-empathy
17. 63 Best Empathy Quotes from Empaths & World Changers, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.goodgoodgood.co/articles/empathy-quotes
18. To be an empathetic leader, don’t do this! – University of Toronto, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www-2.rotman.utoronto.ca/insightshub/leadership-career-development/empathetic-leadership-donts
19. The Double-Edged Sword of Empathetic Leadership – Begenius Thoughts, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.ivankabandize.com/randomthoughts/the-double-edged-sword-of-empathetic-leadership/
20. Teams and Organizations as living networks: the mycelium …, accessed August 2, 2025, https://transitionstudio.global/en/teams-and-organizations-as-living-networks-the-mycelium-metaphor/
21. Inter-plant communication through mycorrhizal networks mediates …, accessed August 2, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4497361/
22. The Human Mycelium: Connecting Our Sense of Self and Solving Global Problems, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.theoctopusmovement.org/post/the-human-mycelium-connecting-our-sense-of-self-and-solving-global-problems
23. Cognitive vs Affective Empathy Leadership – Christian Espinosa, accessed August 2, 2025, https://christianespinosa.com/blog/cognitive-vs-affective-empathy-leadership/
24. What is Clinical Empathy? – PMC, accessed August 2, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1494899/
25. Cognitive Vs Emotional/Affective Vs Compassionate Empathy : r/aspd – Reddit, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/aspd/comments/10vgbnp/cognitive_vs_emotionalaffective_vs_compassionate/
26. The Difference Between Empathy and Sympathy | Psychology Today, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/hide-and-seek/201505/the-difference-between-empathy-and-sympathy
27. Why I’m against empathy | Paul Bloom – YouTube, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VUpo28aAks&pp=0gcJCfwAo7VqN5tD
28. www.reddit.com, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/philosophy/comments/4vz03m/ethics_the_difference_between_intrinsic_value_and/#:~:text=In%20this%20Wireless%20Philosophy%20video,or%20achieve%20some%20other%20thing.
29. Instrumental and intrinsic value – Wikipedia, accessed August 2, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instrumental_and_intrinsic_value
30. Difference Between Intrinsic and Instrumental Value – ThoughtCo, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.thoughtco.com/intrinsic-and-instrumental-value-2670651
31. Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Value – Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed August 2, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/value-intrinsic-extrinsic/
32. What Is the Value of Empathy and How Does it Relate to Morality? – Latest Thinking, accessed August 2, 2025, https://lt.org/publication/what-value-empathy-and-how-does-it-relate-morality
33. The balance between feeling and knowing: affective and cognitive empathy are reflected in the brain’s intrinsic functional dynamics, accessed August 2, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3427869/
34. How to be more empathetic: Skills to strengthen connection – Marlee, accessed August 2, 2025, https://getmarlee.com/blog/how-to-be-more-empathetic
35. A Five-step Guide to Building Empathy That Can Boost Your … – InfoQ, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.infoq.com/articles/guide-empathy-boost-career/
36. Build Stronger Connections: 5 Tips To Become More Empathetic – Mindmaven, accessed August 2, 2025, https://mindmaven.com/blog/5-tips-to-become-more-empathetic/
37. Empathy: How to Feel and Respond to the Emotions of Others – HelpGuide.org, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.helpguide.org/relationships/communication/empathy
38. 7 Types of Questions to Build Empathy for Design Thinking – Mural, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.mural.co/blog/design-thinking-empathize
39. How to Build Empathy: Lessons I Learned Through Self-Reflection – Medium, accessed August 2, 2025, https://medium.com/@summerrbornn/how-to-build-empathy-lessons-i-learned-through-self-reflection-c9e1b8786c28
40. What Empathy in Design Thinking is and Why it’s Important – CareerFoundry, accessed August 2, 2025, https://careerfoundry.com/en/blog/ux-design/what-is-empathy-in-design-thinking/
41. Stage 1 in the Design Thinking Process: Empathise with Your Users …, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/stage-1-in-the-design-thinking-process-empathise-with-your-users
42. The Trouble With Empathy: A Response To The People Against Empathy – Forbes, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbooksauthors/2023/11/13/the-trouble-with-empathy-a-response-to-the-people-against-empathy/
43. Practical Examples of Empathy in the Workplace – Southern New Hampshire University, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.snhu.edu/about-us/newsroom/career/empathy-in-the-workplace
44. Dealing With People Who Lack Empathy and Don’t Know It | Article – SkillPath, accessed August 2, 2025, https://skillpath.com/blog/dealing-with-people-who-lack-empathy-and-do-not-know-it
45. 100+ Empathy Quotes to Foster Understanding and Compassion – Mindfulness Exercises, accessed August 2, 2025, https://mindfulnessexercises.com/empathy-quotes/
46. The Mindful Self-Compassion (MSC) Program, accessed August 2, 2025, https://self-compassion.org/the-program/
47. Examples of Empathy In the Workplace – ThriveSparrow, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.thrivesparrow.com/blog/examples-of-empathy-in-the-workplace
48. 9 Examples of Empathy in the Workplace | Pollack Peacebuilding Systems, accessed August 2, 2025, https://pollackpeacebuilding.com/blog/workplace-empathy-examples/
49. Empathy In Leadership: Importance, Benefits, & Examples – Management Consulted, accessed August 2, 2025, https://managementconsulted.com/empathy-in-leadership/
50. Empathy As A Workplace Superpower – Forbes, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbesbusinesscouncil/2024/12/09/empathy-as-a-workplace-superpower/
51. Businessolver 2024 Empathy Study: 55% of CEOs Say They’ve Experienced a Mental Health Issue, Up 24 Points, accessed August 2, 2025, https://businessolver.com/news/businessolver-2024-empathy-study-55-of-ceos-say-theyve-experienced-a-mental-health-issue-up-24-points/
52. Businessolver 2024 State of Workplace Empathy Report – Katharine Manning, accessed August 2, 2025, https://katharinemanning.com/businessolver-2024-state-of-workplace-empathy-report/
53. State of Workplace Empathy – Businessolver, accessed August 2, 2025, https://businessolver.com/workplace-empathy/
54. Practical Empathy | 2024 Global Culture Report | O.C. Tanner, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.octanner.com/global-culture-report/2024-practical-empathy
55. 3 CEOs Using Empathy to Unlock Innovation – Twenty One Toys, accessed August 2, 2025, https://twentyonetoys.com/blogs/future-of-work/3-ceos-using-empathy-to-unlock-innovation
56. Case Studies: Successful Leaders Who Prioritize Empathy | by DILIP PATIL – Medium, accessed August 2, 2025, https://patildilip23.medium.com/case-studies-successful-leaders-who-prioritize-empathy-3bf1814fcbd1
57. Building Empathy into the Structure of Health Care | Harvard …, accessed August 2, 2025, https://learn.hms.harvard.edu/insights/all-insights/building-empathy-structure-health-care
58. Elevating Patient Care through Empathy | Harvard Medical School Professional, Corporate, and Continuing Education, accessed August 2, 2025, https://learn.hms.harvard.edu/insights/all-insights/elevating-patient-care-through-empathy
59. A systematic review of research on empathy in health care – PMC, accessed August 2, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10012244/
60. Effectiveness of empathy in general practice: a systematic review – PMC, accessed August 2, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3529296/
61. The Role of Empathy in Strengthening Patient-Provider Relationships – ChenMed, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.chenmed.com/blog/role-empathy-strengthening-patient-provider-relationships
62. What is Empathize? | IxDF – The Interaction Design Foundation, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/empathize
63. What Is Empathy and Why Is It So Important in Design Thinking? | IxDF, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/design-thinking-getting-started-with-empathy
64. The role of empathy mapping in the process of design thinking – QED42, accessed August 2, 2025, https://www.qed42.com/insights/how-empathy-works-in-design-thinking