The Leader as Ecosystem: A New Blueprint for Women’s Leadership Beyond the ‘Fix the Woman’ Canon

Part I: The Paradox of the Modern Woman Leader: Progress, Plateaus, and Persistent Biases

The narrative of women in leadership in the 21st century is one of profound contradiction.

It is a story of undeniable breakthroughs set against a backdrop of persistent, systemic barriers; a tale of record representation in some areas shadowed by alarming stagnation and even regression in others.

To comprehend the landscape that today’s female leader must navigate, and to understand why traditional models of leadership development are proving insufficient, one must first grasp this complex, fractured reality.

The data paints a picture not of a steady march toward parity, but of a challenging climb on a treacherous path, where progress is hard-won and easily stalled.

This section establishes the data-driven context for a new leadership paradigm, moving from the quantitative evidence of progress and plateaus to the qualitative experience of navigating a system rife with hidden biases and structural impediments.

The Statistical Reality in 2025: A Fractured Picture of Advancement

A surface-level glance at leadership statistics reveals a narrative of progress.

Since 2015, the proportion of women in C-suite roles has climbed from 17% to 29% in 2024, a significant gain.¹

The number of women leading S&P 500 companies, while still small, has risen from just nine in the year 2000 to 48 in 2025, representing nearly 10% of all CEOs.²

This upward trend appeared to be gaining momentum, with women accounting for 17% of all new S&P 500 CEO hires in 2024.³

Globally, businesses have projected that gender parity in senior management roles could be reached by 2051.⁴

However, a deeper analysis of the most recent data reveals a troubling deceleration, a “Great Stall” that challenges any narrative of inevitable progress.

According to global data from LinkedIn covering 74 countries, the steady gains in women’s leadership representation seen between 2015 and 2022 have slowed dramatically.

In the last two years, the share of women in leadership positions has increased by a mere 0.2 percentage points, a significant drop from the previous average annual gain of 0.4 percentage points.

In 2024, a staggering 65% of countries saw no improvement or a decline in the share of women in leadership compared to the previous year.⁵

This trend is mirrored in the political sphere, where 2025 marked the first-ever recorded global decline in the number of women serving as Cabinet ministers.⁶

This stagnation is not a sign of a saturated pipeline; rather, it points to critical leaks and blockages at specific, pivotal moments in a woman’s career.

The first and most significant leak occurs at the very beginning of the management track.

This is the “broken rung” on the corporate ladder: for every 100 men promoted to their first manager role, only 81 women receive the same advancement.⁷

This early disparity has a compounding effect, ensuring that fewer women are in the pool for subsequent promotions to senior leadership.

Even for the women who navigate past this broken rung, a second, more pernicious barrier emerges at the apex of the corporate pyramid: the “final drop.” An analysis of the 100 largest public companies reveals that while women hold a respectable 24% of the key “launch positions”—roles with significant profit-and-loss (P&L) and operational responsibility that are prerequisites for the CEO job—their representation plummets from there.

For every ten women who are fully qualified, prepared, and ready in these launch roles, only three ascend to the CEO position.³

This 70% drop-off at the final hurdle demonstrates that the issue is not a simple lack of qualified women, but a systemic failure to select them.

This leads to a crucial paradox.

The few women who do break through this final, heavily fortified barrier are often demonstrably more qualified than their male peers.

They clear a higher bar.

A 2025 analysis of S&P 500 CEOs reveals that women are 32% more likely to have taken the additional step of serving as company President before being appointed CEO. They are also more than one and a half times as likely to have served as Chief Financial Officer, a role that underscores demonstrable financial fluency, which boards appear to prize more highly in female candidates.²

This “qualification premium” suggests that for a woman to be seen as a viable CEO candidate, she must often possess a more extensive and rigorously vetted resume than her male counterparts.

This phenomenon is not limited to the corporate world; women who run for executive office also face a higher bar and more scrutiny.

While they are underrepresented, those who succeed often do so against greater odds.

The combination of a stalled progress rate and a higher qualification standard for those who succeed points to a concerning dynamic.

It suggests that organizations, perhaps reacting to economic uncertainty or experiencing a subtle retreat from diversity commitments, are becoming more risk-averse in their top leadership selections.

This risk aversion often translates to a preference for more traditional, male-coded leadership profiles, forcing female candidates to be “super-qualified” to overcome the heightened implicit bias.

Compounding this challenging environment is a new trend of decreasing transparency.

From 2024 to 2025, the share of S&P 500 companies disclosing data on the number of women in management positions fell by 16%.

The share of firms disclosing the use of DEI metrics in executive compensation plans plummeted from 68% to just 35%.⁸

This decline in disclosure may signal a broader “DEI fatigue” or a strategic decision to reduce public accountability, creating conditions that could allow gender inequity to persist or worsen away from the public eye.

The data, in its totality, reveals that the path to leadership for women is not simply a matter of time or pipeline development; it is an obstacle course where the hurdles are becoming higher and the rules less transparent.

Navigating the Labyrinth: The Double-Bind, the Motherhood Penalty, and the Sponsorship Gap

The statistics outline the “what” of women’s leadership challenges; the qualitative research from institutions like Catalyst, McKinsey, and Harvard Business Review explains the “why.” These studies illuminate the lived experience behind the numbers, revealing a set of deeply ingrained systemic barriers that function as a persistent “competence discount,” forcing women to over-perform simply to be perceived as equally capable.

The most pervasive of these barriers is the “double-bind.” Rooted in gender stereotypes that expect men to “take charge” and women to “take care,” this dynamic puts female leaders in an unwinnable situation.⁹

If a woman is assertive, decisive, and direct—qualities celebrated in male leaders—she risks being perceived as “too hard,” “abrasive,” or “overly ambitious”.⁹

If she is collaborative, empathetic, and inclusive, she risks being seen as “too soft” and not having the requisite toughness for leadership.

She is judged as either competent or liked, but rarely both.⁹

This creates a “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” trap where women must constantly modulate their behavior, walking a tightrope that men do not have to navigate.¹⁰

The practical effect is that women must work twice as hard to prove their leadership effectiveness while also managing the social perceptions of their style.⁹

This double-bind directly fuels the “prove it again” phenomenon.

Whereas men are often promoted based on their perceived potential, women are more frequently promoted based on their past performance and accomplishments.¹²

They must repeatedly demonstrate their capabilities to be considered for advancement.

This is intricately linked to what researchers Herminia Ibarra and Otilia Obodaru have termed the “vision thing”.¹³

Their research found that in 360-degree leadership assessments, women outshone men on most leadership dimensions but were consistently rated lower on their ability to be “visionary”.¹³

This is not necessarily because women lack vision.

Instead, they often develop and communicate it differently, preferring a more collaborative process grounded in concrete facts and details rather than bold, top-down pronouncements.

This approach, while often leading to more robust and executable strategies, is not always recognized or valued by traditional models that equate visionary leadership with charismatic, assertive storytelling.¹³

Another critical systemic barrier is the sponsorship gap.

While many organizations have established mentorship programs, the research is clear: women are often “over-mentored and under-sponsored”.¹⁵

Mentors provide advice and guidance, but sponsors—typically senior leaders—use their political and social capital to advocate for their protégés.¹¹

They ensure their sponsees get visibility, are considered for high-stakes “hot jobs” and international assignments, and receive air cover when they take risks.⁹

Studies show that while women are more likely than men to be assigned a mentor in a leadership development program, men are more likely to receive the game-changing P&L roles, significant budget responsibilities, and international experiences that are the true currency of career advancement.¹⁵

The absence of powerful sponsors leaves many talented women on the sidelines, watching as their male peers are pulled into the inner circle where careers are made.¹⁶

Finally, the burden of these systemic challenges is compounded by the risk of burnout.

Women in senior leadership report higher levels of burnout than their male counterparts, a gap that has nearly doubled since the COVID-19 pandemic.¹⁷

This stems from the well-documented “second shift” of disproportionate household and childcare responsibilities.

It is now exacerbated by a new “third shift” at the office: the expectation that women will take on the bulk of the emotional labor and DEI-related work, such as mentoring junior employees, serving on diversity committees, and promoting an inclusive culture.

This work is vital for organizational health but is often informal, uncompensated, and not factored into performance evaluations, making it a significant and invisible drain on women’s time and energy.¹⁷

Taken together, these barriers do not merely make the path to leadership more difficult; they systematically discount the perceived competence of women.

A man’s confidence is often read as competence; a woman’s is often read as arrogance.

A man’s presence in a key network is seen as a sign of his potential; a woman’s absence from that network makes her seem less impactful.

A woman’s grounded, collaborative approach to strategy can be misread as a lack of vision.

This cumulative “competence discount” explains the “qualification premium” observed in the data.

Women need more formal credentials and a longer track record of success to overcome the informal, biased discount that is applied to them throughout their careers.

The problem is not just that the system is unfair; it is that the system is designed in a way that consistently misreads, misinterprets, and undervalues female talent and leadership potential.

Table 1: The State of Women in Leadership, 2025: Key Global Benchmarks

Metric	2025 Statistic	Change from 2022/24	Source(s)	Strategic Implication
Global Share of Women in Leadership (All Levels)	30.6%	+0.2 percentage points since 2022	5	Progress has nearly flatlined, indicating that previous strategies are no longer effective and a new approach is required.
Share of Women in C-Suite (S&P 500)	29%	+6 percentage points from 23% in 2015	1	While there is long-term growth, the C-suite remains far from parity, with progress concentrated in specific roles.
Share of Women CEOs (S&P 500)	9.6% (48 CEOs)	Up from 9 in 2000	2	Representation at the very top remains critically low, highlighting a severe bottleneck at the final stage of the pipeline.
Share of Women on Boards (Russell 3000)	30.3%	+0.6 percentage points from Q1 2024	19	Board diversity initiatives have had a noticeable impact, but progress is slow and the number of all-male boards has stagnated.
Promotion Rate to First Manager Role (Women vs. Men)	81 women for every 100 men	N/A	7	The leadership pipeline is leaking at its source. All downstream D&I efforts are undermined by this “broken rung.”
The “Final Drop” (S&P 100)	Women hold 24% of launch roles but only 3 of 10 become CEO	N/A	3	The problem is not a lack of qualified women but a failure of selection at the most critical juncture, pointing to deep-seated bias.
Disclosure of DEI Metrics in Exec Comp (S&P 500)	35%	-33 percentage points from 68% in 2024	8	A sharp decline in transparency and accountability, suggesting a potential retreat from DEI commitments and a major risk to future progress.
Global Share of Women in Cabinet/Ministerial Roles	22.9%	-0.4 percentage points from 23.3% in 2024	6	For the first time, political representation is regressing, indicating that progress is not guaranteed and can be reversed.

Part II: The “Lean In” Doctrine: An Analysis of the ‘Fix the Woman’ Canon

In response to the persistent challenges women face, a significant and influential genre of leadership literature has emerged over the past two decades.

This canon, characterized by best-selling titles like The Confidence Code, Dare to Lead, and the seminal Lean In, focuses primarily on the internal world of the female leader.

It diagnoses the problem as a deficit of certain psychological traits—confidence, courage, ambition—and prescribes a set of individual actions and mindset shifts to overcome these internal barriers.

This section provides a critical analysis of this “fix the woman” doctrine.

It deconstructs the core arguments of its most prominent texts, acknowledging their empowering potential while simultaneously exposing their profound limitations when confronted with the systemic realities detailed in Part I.

The central argument is that this advice, while often valuable on an individual level, is fundamentally mismatched with the biased operating systems of most organizations, leading to unintended consequences and placing an unsustainable burden on women themselves.

The Gospel of Confidence and Courage: Deconstructing The Confidence Code and Dare to Lead

At the heart of the “fix the woman” canon are two powerful concepts: confidence and courage, championed respectively by The Confidence Code and Dare to Lead.

These books have provided a valuable language for millions of women to understand and articulate their internal experiences in the workplace.

The Confidence Code: The Science and Art of Self-Assurance—What Women Should Know, by journalists Katty Kay and Claire Shipman, posits that a significant “confidence gap” exists between men and women.²⁰

They argue this gap is not about competence—women are often equally or more competent—but about the self-assurance needed to act, take risks, and pursue opportunities.

The authors blend neuroscience, psychology, and interviews with successful women to argue that confidence is a combination of genetic predisposition and, crucially, choice and action.²¹

The core prescription of the book is that confidence is built not through introspection alone, but through doing.

By taking action, courting risk, and persevering through setbacks, women can physically alter their brain’s wiring, building what the authors call a “virtuous circle” of confidence.²¹

The book provides a clear roadmap for overcoming common female tendencies like perfectionism, rumination, and negative self-talk, urging women to reframe failure as an essential learning opportunity on the path to self-assurance.²⁰

It empowers women by making confidence feel less like an innate, magical quality and more like a skill that can be developed through deliberate practice.

Similarly, Brené Brown’s Dare to Lead: Brave Work.

Tough Conversations.

Whole Hearts. has had a profound impact on leadership discourse.

Brown’s central thesis is that true leadership is not about titles or power, but about the courage to be vulnerable.²⁴

She defines vulnerability not as weakness, but as “the emotion that we experience during times of uncertainty, risk, and emotional exposure”.²⁵

In her view, courage is impossible without “rumbling with vulnerability.” The book outlines four teachable skill sets for daring leadership: embracing vulnerability, living into one’s values, braving trust, and learning to rise from failure.²⁶

Brown challenges what she calls “armored leadership”—the self-protective behaviors like perfectionism, cynicism, and emotional stoicism that are often mistaken for strength but actually corrode trust and innovation.²⁷

Instead, she advocates for leadership grounded in empathy, connection, and authenticity.

For many women,

Dare to Lead offered a powerful alternative to traditional, masculine-coded leadership models, validating relational strengths and providing a framework for leading with one’s “whole heart”.²⁴

Together, these two books form the cornerstone of the modern “fix the woman” approach.

They identify internal psychological states—a lack of confidence, a fear of vulnerability—as the primary obstacles holding women back.

Their solutions are powerful, individually focused, and aimed at fostering significant mindset shifts.

They encourage women to move from a state of inaction and fear to one of action and courage, providing tactical tools to manage the internal emotional landscape that often accompanies the pursuit of leadership.

The Lean In Legacy: An Empowerment Narrative or a Systemic Sidestep?

No single book has defined the modern conversation around women and leadership more than Sheryl Sandberg’s 2013 blockbuster, Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead.

Sandberg, then the COO of Facebook, argued that in addition to external societal barriers, women are hindered by internal barriers.

She contended that women often hold themselves back by “leaning back” from opportunities, failing to “sit at the table” in important meetings, and dialing back their ambitions in anticipation of future family responsibilities—a phenomenon she termed “leaving before you leave”.¹¹

The book’s central call to action was for women to “lean in” to their careers with more vigor.

It provided a playbook of actionable strategies: challenge self-doubt and imposter syndrome, communicate with confidence and clarity, seek out mentors and sponsors, negotiate for what you deserve, and, crucially, demand that your partner be a “real partner” in domestic responsibilities.¹¹

For many,

Lean In was a revolutionary and empowering text.

It gave a generation of women explicit permission to be ambitious and to unapologetically pursue power.

It launched a global movement of “Lean In Circles,” providing a structure for women to find peer support and encouragement, a critical resource in navigating often isolating corporate environments.²⁹

The book’s immense popularity started a worldwide conversation about women’s ambition and the unseen barriers to their success.

However, from its publication, Lean In has also faced significant and sustained criticism for what many see as a fundamental flaw: it places the primary burden of fixing gender inequality on the shoulders of individual women, rather than on the biased systems and structures they must navigate.¹²

The book’s introductory chapter, “Internalizing the Revolution,” frames the struggle as a battle to restructure the self, not a demand for corporations to renovate their sexist operations.³¹

Critics like the feminist academic bell hooks labeled it a form of “corporate feminism” that primarily serves to help privileged women succeed within the existing oppressive system by mimicking the behaviors of the powerful men who run it, rather than challenging the system itself.³²

The argument is that

Lean In effectively lets employers and society off the hook.

By focusing on how women should change, it sidesteps the more difficult and costly work of changing organizational policies, practices, and cultures.¹²

It suggests that if women would just be more confident, more assertive, and more ambitious, the problem of gender inequality would be solved—a “bootstraps” ideology that can inadvertently blame women for their own struggles within a biased system.³²

The Unintended Consequences: When ‘Fixing the Woman’ Becomes a Gender Tax

The “fix the woman” canon, from The Confidence Code to Lean In, is not inherently flawed; the advice to be more confident, courageous, and ambitious is, in a vacuum, sound.

The problem arises when this advice is deployed within the biased organizational systems described in Part I.

The mismatch between the advice and the system’s response creates a series of unintended negative consequences that can harm the very women the advice is meant to help.

One of the most significant consequences is the creation of a “gender tax”.¹⁸

Many companies, inspired by these books, have invested heavily in Women’s Leadership Development Programs (WLDPs).

While well-intentioned, these programs communicate a subtle but powerful message: that women are the ones who need fixing.

They require women to spend additional time, energy, and cognitive labor working on their leadership skills, often taking them away from their daily tasks and promotion-enhancing projects.

Meanwhile, their male colleagues continue to get valuable face time with senior leaders and advance their work.¹⁸

This can become a form of “performative allyship,” where an organization can point to its investment in WLDPs as evidence of its commitment to gender equality, while failing to make the deeper, structural changes—like creating robust sponsorship programs—that are actually required for women to advance after they complete the training.¹⁸

Furthermore, the advice to adopt more assertive, “masculine-coded” behaviors runs directly into the wall of the double-bind.

When women “lean in,” speak up forcefully, or negotiate aggressively, they are often penalized for violating gender norms.

They are perceived as less likable, less collaborative, and “not a team player”—negative labels that are rarely applied to men exhibiting the same behaviors.¹¹

The advice, therefore, puts women in a no-win situation: they are criticized for not being assertive enough, and then penalized when they are.

This creates a vicious cycle of confusion and frustration, where women are blamed for their failure to successfully navigate an impossible tightrope.²⁹

Finally, this entire paradigm implicitly devalues traditionally “feminine-coded” leadership styles.

The focus on assertiveness and individual ambition often overlooks the immense value of skills like empathy, collaboration, active listening, and systems thinking.

Research from McKinsey and others shows that not only are these skills increasingly critical for success in the modern, complex business environment, but they are also behaviors that women leaders already tend to exhibit more frequently than men.¹⁰

By telling women they need to change to fit an outdated model of leadership, organizations miss the opportunity to learn from and leverage the powerful leadership styles that many women already bring to the table.¹²

Ultimately, the core failure of the “fix the woman” canon lies in this fundamental advice-system mismatch.

It is analogous to trying to run a sophisticated piece of modern software on an old, incompatible operating system.

The advice—be assertive, take risks, be vulnerable—represents the software’s commands.

The organization’s biased culture and structures represent the faulty operating system.

When a woman executes the command, the system, with its inherent biases, cannot process it correctly and generates an error: she is labeled “difficult” or “not a leader.” The “fix the woman” narrative then diagnoses this as a user error, suggesting she didn’t apply the advice with enough nuance or skill, rather than identifying the true problem: the system itself is incapable of supporting the desired action.

This leads to a cycle of self-blame, frustration, and burnout, leaving the flawed system intact and the individual woman exhausted.

To achieve real progress, the focus of the intervention must shift from the “user” to the “operating system.”

Part III: Shifting the Lens: From Fixing Women to Fixing Systems

Recognizing the limitations of the individual-focused approach is the first step toward a more effective model for advancing women’s leadership.

The next, crucial step involves shifting the analytical lens from the woman to the organization she inhabits.

This “fix the system” paradigm moves beyond personal development to advocate for deep, structural, and cultural changes within the workplace.

It argues that creating an environment where women can thrive is not a matter of fixing their perceived deficits, but of dismantling the systemic barriers that impede their progress.

This section synthesizes the evidence-based recommendations from leading research institutions like Harvard Business Review, McKinsey, and Catalyst.

It introduces the Centered Leadership model as a powerful framework that bridges individual growth with systemic awareness and makes the case that a deliberate, accountable focus on active sponsorship is the single most potent lever for meaningful change.

The Organizational Mandate: Insights from HBR, McKinsey, and Catalyst on Systemic Change

A wealth of research provides a clear blueprint for the systemic changes required to foster gender equity.

These are not piecemeal initiatives but a comprehensive overhaul of the policies, practices, and cultural norms that govern organizational life.

Harvard Business Review scholars, particularly Herminia Ibarra, Robin Ely, and Deborah Kolb, have been at the forefront of this thinking.

They argue that the focus must shift from overt discrimination to what they term “second-generation” gender bias.³³

This refers to the powerful but subtle and often invisible barriers that arise from cultural assumptions and organizational structures that inadvertently favor men.

For example, organizations often advise women to proactively seek leadership roles without simultaneously addressing the policies and practices that communicate a mismatch between how women are perceived and the qualities people associate with leaders.³³

The solution is not just traditional training but creating validating experiences that allow women to construct and internalize a leader identity—a process that is often disrupted by these subtle biases.

This requires moving beyond simple mentoring to provide women with opportunities to experiment with leadership in safe environments where they can receive affirmation and build confidence.³³

McKinsey & Company’s research reinforces the need for a holistic approach.

Their studies of companies that are high-performing on gender equality reveal that success does not come from isolated programs.

Instead, these organizations enact a full suite of integrated practices.

Their framework of ten key practices includes several critical systemic interventions: a visible and unwavering commitment to diversity from senior leadership; the redesign of roles and work to enable flexible work and normalize its uptake across all genders and levels; the establishment of clear diversity aspirations backed by robust accountability mechanisms; and, critically, a willingness to challenge traditional definitions of merit in recruitment, evaluation, and promotion processes.³⁵

This last point is crucial, as it directly targets the unconscious biases that lead to the “prove it again” phenomenon and the undervaluing of female leadership styles.

Catalyst, a global nonprofit focused on advancing women in the workplace, offers a set of equally pragmatic and powerful recommendations for leaders.

Their research emphasizes the need to shift focus from “time spent at the desk” to productivity and results, which helps to normalize flexible work arrangements that benefit all employees.⁹

They advocate for concrete actions to ensure equity, such as conducting regular wage audits, implementing “no negotiations” policies to combat pay gaps, and evaluating all talent systems for gender bias.

Most importantly, Catalyst highlights the critical role of senior leaders in providing women with access to “hot jobs”—high-visibility, mission-critical assignments—and in moving beyond mentorship to active sponsorship.⁹

They call on leaders to build inclusive cultures by being willing to have uncomfortable conversations about bias and confronting inequities head-on, understanding that silence is complicity.⁹

Centered Leadership: A Framework for Integrating Meaning, Framing, and Energy

While systemic change is paramount, individual development still plays a role.

The key is to find a model that equips women with personal resilience while also acknowledging and preparing them for the systemic challenges they will face.

The “Centered Leadership” model, developed by McKinsey consultants Joanna Barsh and Susie Cranston and detailed in their book How Remarkable Women Lead, provides such a framework.

Based on five years of proprietary research and interviews with successful female leaders, it serves as a powerful bridge between the “fix the woman” and “fix the system” paradigms.³⁶

The model is built on five interconnected dimensions that leaders must cultivate to achieve sustained success and personal fulfillment:

1. Meaning: This dimension focuses on finding purpose and passion in one’s work. It involves identifying personal strengths and values and aligning them with one’s professional life. This provides a deep well of motivation and resilience, as seen in the story of conductor Alondra de la Parra, who built a career around her passion in a male-dominated field.³⁶
2. Framing: This is the ability to reframe situations with optimism and to see challenges as opportunities for growth. It’s about consciously choosing one’s response to setbacks, a skill exemplified by former Avon CEO Andrea Jung, who “fired herself” on a Friday after a downturn and re-emerged on Monday with a new, turnaround mindset.³⁸
3. Connecting: This dimension moves beyond the purely internal and directly addresses the need to navigate the organizational system. It emphasizes building strong, mutually beneficial relationships and, crucially, securing sponsors who can provide support and advocacy during difficult times. The experience of Ruth Porat at Morgan Stanley, whose sponsors were her “ballast,” highlights the importance of this external support network.³⁸
4. Engaging: This involves taking deliberate action and managing risk. It is the proactive element of leadership, where one steps outside their comfort zone to seize opportunities and drive change.³⁶
5. Energizing: This dimension recognizes the immense physical and emotional demands of leadership and the risk of burnout. It focuses on practices for managing and renewing one’s energy to sustain high performance over the long term, both at work and in the “second shift” at home.³⁶

The Centered Leadership model is particularly effective because it does not treat the leader in isolation.

It integrates internal, psychological work (Meaning, Framing, Energizing) with external, strategic action (Connecting, Engaging).

By explicitly including the need to build a network of sponsors, it acknowledges the systemic reality that success is not achieved alone.

It provides women with a holistic toolkit that builds their inner fortitude while simultaneously teaching them how to strategically navigate the external organizational landscape.

It is a more complete and realistic model, especially valuable for women in the early to middle stages of their careers as they build the foundations for senior leadership.³⁷

Beyond Mentorship: The Critical and Underutilized Role of Active Sponsorship

Across all the research on systemic change, one intervention emerges as the most powerful and yet most underutilized: active sponsorship.

Understanding the distinction between mentorship and sponsorship is fundamental to grasping why so many corporate diversity initiatives fail to produce meaningful results.

Mentors act as advisors.

They talk to their mentees, offering guidance, sharing experiences, and providing a sounding board.

Mentorship is valuable for skill development and personal growth.

Sponsors, in contrast, act as advocates.

They talk about their sponsees in the rooms where decisions are made.¹¹

Sponsorship is the deliberate use of one’s own power, influence, and social capital to actively advance another person’s career.⁹

A sponsor will recommend their protégé for a promotion, ensure they are considered for a high-visibility stretch assignment, connect them to other influential leaders, and provide political air cover if they stumble while taking a necessary risk.¹⁶

The evidence of a profound sponsorship gap is overwhelming.

Numerous studies show that women are frequently “over-mentored and under-sponsored”.¹⁵

An analysis of the outcomes of leadership development programs found that while women were more likely than men to be assigned a mentor, this did not correlate with advancement.

Men, meanwhile, were more likely to receive the tangible career-advancing outcomes like P&L responsibility, international assignments, and increased budget authority—the very opportunities that are often unlocked by a sponsor’s endorsement.¹⁵

This disparity is a critical failure point.

Organizations invest in developing women’s skills through mentorship and training but then fail to provide the sponsorship necessary to deploy those skills in roles with real power and influence.

To be effective, sponsorship cannot be left to chance or informal networks, which tend to be homophilous and favor men.

It must be a formal, accountable part of an organization’s talent management strategy.

This requires what Harvard Business Review has called “genuine allyship”.¹⁸

It means that when a manager identifies a high-potential woman and nominates her for a leadership program, that manager must also be held accountable for actively sponsoring her for a new, career-enhancing opportunity upon her return.

This involves publicly advocating for her potential, nominating her for stretch assignments, sharing social capital through deliberate networking, and voicing support for her in promotion and compensation decisions.¹⁸

This focus on active, accountable sponsorship represents the most effective “system hack” an organization can implement.

If the systemic barriers outlined in Part I create a “competence discount” for women, then sponsorship is the mechanism that directly overrides that discount.

It operates within the informal power structures where perceptions are formed and decisions are truly made.

A formal performance review is often just a lagging indicator of a consensus that has already been built in hallways and informal conversations.

A powerful sponsor’s voice—”She is ready for this role.

Give her the project.”—can single-handedly change that consensus.

It short-circuits the “prove it again” trap by bestowing an opportunity based on the sponsor’s trust in the woman’s potential, not just her documented past performance.

By shifting focus and resources from generic mentorship programs to formal, accountable sponsorship initiatives, organizations can make the single highest-leverage investment in rewiring their biased operating systems and creating genuine pathways to leadership for women.

Part IV: The Next Frontier: Leadership as a Living Ecosystem

The evolution of leadership development from “fixing the woman” to “fixing the system” marks a significant step forward.

However, it still often operates within a mechanistic worldview, treating the organization as a complicated but ultimately static machine to be re-engineered.

The next frontier of leadership thinking proposes a more dynamic and holistic paradigm: viewing the organization not as a machine, but as a living ecosystem.

This approach reframes the role of the leader from a commander or engineer to that of a gardener or an architect—someone who designs and nurtures a complex, adaptive environment where talent can flourish.

Drawing on principles from ecology, architecture, and systems thinking, this final analytical section outlines a forward-looking model that positions the cultivation of diverse leadership as a core driver of organizational resilience, innovation, and long-term vitality.

Lessons from the Wild: Ecological Principles for Resilient and Adaptive Leadership

Nature, the ultimate complex adaptive system, offers powerful metaphors and principles for modern leadership.

Shifting the guiding metaphor from the organization-as-machine to the organization-as-ecosystem provides a new lens through which to understand leadership challenges and opportunities.

An organization, like a forest or a coral reef, is an intricate web of interdependence where the health of the whole depends on the vitality and harmonious interaction of its parts.⁴¹

Leadership in this context is not about top-down control but about nurturing the conditions for collective success.⁴³

Several key ecological principles provide a roadmap for this new mode of leadership:

• Adaptability and Resilience: In a forest, trees face storms and droughts. The most resilient are not the most rigid; they are the ones that can bend with the wind, drop leaves to conserve energy, and extend their roots deeper to find water.⁴¹ A palm tree survives a hurricane by being flexible, not by standing rigid.⁴⁴ Leaders, too, must embrace change and adapt their strategies to shifting environments without losing their core values or vision. They must build organizations that can absorb shocks and emerge stronger.
• Interconnectedness and Collaboration: Ecosystems thrive on symbiotic relationships. Coral reefs depend on algae for oxygen; forests rely on vast underground fungal networks for communication and nutrient sharing.⁴¹ Leaders must recognize that no team or department works in isolation. The imperative is to break down silos and foster environments where diverse perspectives and capabilities can combine to create a collective intelligence that is far greater than the sum of its parts.⁴¹
• Nurturing Future Growth and Diversity: A healthy ecosystem supports its members and prepares the next generation. In a wolf pack, the strongest wolves often travel at the back to protect the entire group, allowing the older and younger members to set the pace, ensuring no one is left behind. Experienced members mentor the young in essential skills.⁴¹ This is a powerful model for leadership succession and talent development. Great leaders are not threatened by the growth of others; they actively cultivate it, understanding that the long-term health of the ecosystem depends on the strength of its future leaders.
• Structure and Flow: Nature operates with profound underlying structures—circadian rhythms, seasonal cycles, the laws of physics—yet within these frameworks, there is infinite variation, creativity, and flow.⁴¹ No two snowflakes are identical. Leaders must provide a clear sense of purpose, values, and strategic direction (the structure), but also create the psychological safety and autonomy that allow for innovation, experimentation, and adaptation (the flow).

The Leader as Architect: Designing and Nurturing Thriving Organizational Ecosystems

Translating these ecological principles into a leadership model shifts the leader’s primary role from a manager of people to an architect of environments.⁴⁵

This is a fundamental change in perspective.

An architect does not build the building brick by brick; they create the blueprint, ensure the integrity of the structure, and design spaces that enable the inhabitants to thrive.

Similarly, the leader-as-architect is responsible for designing and nurturing the organization’s culture, processes, and talent systems.⁴⁵

This approach is formalized in the emerging “Ecosystem Leadership” model.

This model recognizes that modern organizations do not exist in a vacuum; they are part of a larger, interconnected ecosystem of customers, suppliers, partners, and even competitors.⁴⁶

Success in this environment requires a mindset shift from zero-sum competition to collaborative, shared success.

It demands a new set of leadership competencies, which one framework identifies as the “4-As” ⁴⁷:

1. Awareness: Deep self-awareness, a curiosity for continuous learning, and the ability to identify and mitigate personal and systemic bias.
2. Agility: The resilience and flexibility to know when to pivot in the face of change and when to persevere on a strategic course.
3. Authenticity: The ability to inspire inclusively, grounded in emotional intelligence, a strong sense of purpose, and a willingness to be vulnerable.
4. Accountability: The practice of holding oneself answerable first, thereby creating a culture of ownership that empowers others.

This framework aligns powerfully with the principles of systems thinking, which encourages leaders to view problems not as isolated incidents but as part of a larger, dynamic system.⁴⁸

By identifying the key interconnections and feedback loops, leaders can find high-leverage points where small interventions can produce significant, lasting change.

This is a skill set that research suggests many women leaders naturally possess.

McKinsey’s findings that women tend to score high on relational competencies and systems thinking—the very attributes needed to navigate today’s complexities—indicate that women are not just well-suited to participate in this new leadership paradigm; they are uniquely equipped to be its architects.¹⁰

Case Studies in Ecosystem Leadership: From Microsoft’s Cultural Transformation to Maersk’s Digital Disruption

The ecosystem leadership model is not merely a theoretical construct; it is being actively implemented by some of the world’s most successful and innovative companies.

These organizations are moving beyond traditional industry boundaries to build and orchestrate powerful networks that create new forms of value.

• Microsoft: The transformation of Microsoft under CEO Satya Nadella is a textbook example of an internal ecosystem shift. He inherited a famously competitive and siloed culture where internal divisions fought for resources. Nadella deliberately re-architected this culture around a “growth mindset,” continuous learning, and open collaboration. By shifting the company’s strategic focus to cloud services (Azure) and embracing partnerships with former rivals, he transformed Microsoft from a closed, proprietary entity into a central hub of a vast technological ecosystem.⁴⁹
• Maersk: The 118-year-old Danish shipping conglomerate, a market leader in a traditional industry, is disrupting itself by building digital platform solutions. Instead of simply providing point-to-point shipping, Maersk is creating an ecosystem that connects shippers, ports, customs authorities, and trucking companies, aiming to orchestrate the entire global supply chain. This is a strategic move from being a participant in an industry to becoming the orchestrator of a digital business ecosystem.⁵⁰
• Unilever and Tesla: These companies exemplify how to actively reshape an external ecosystem to achieve strategic goals, particularly around sustainability. When Unilever committed to using only cage-free eggs for its Hellmann’s mayonnaise, the supply did not exist at the required scale. The company had to work with suppliers, farmers, and verifiers to build a new supply chain ecosystem.⁵¹ Similarly, Tesla’s success depends not just on building cars, but on orchestrating an entire ecosystem of charging infrastructure, battery production, and renewable energy solutions.⁴⁹
• Corporate-Entrepreneurial Ecosystems: The model also applies at a regional level. In Munich’s technology hub, large corporations like BMW and Siemens act as crucial resource-enrichers for the broader entrepreneurial ecosystem. They provide funding through corporate venture capital, mentorship through incubators and accelerators, and potential exit opportunities through acquisitions. This is a deliberate strategy of ecosystem cultivation that fosters innovation for both the large corporations and the startups.⁵²

These case studies reveal a profound shift in strategic thinking.

The most forward-thinking companies no longer view their boundaries as fixed.

They understand that their success is inextricably linked to the health and vitality of the networks in which they operate.

They are moving from protecting value within their own walls to co-creating value with a diverse set of partners.

This shift provides the most powerful and strategic business case yet for gender diversity.

The cultivation of an adaptive, resilient business ecosystem is not merely a D&I initiative; it is a core business strategy for navigating a complex and uncertain world.

The leadership competencies required to execute this strategy—collaboration, empathy, network-building, systems thinking—are the very competencies that research shows women leaders disproportionately possess.

Therefore, the deliberate advancement of women into senior leadership is no longer just a matter of fairness or tapping into a wider talent pool.

It is a direct and necessary investment in building an organization’s capacity for innovation, resilience, and long-term survival.

In the ecosystem paradigm, diversity is not a separate goal; it is the essential fuel for the entire system’s vitality.

Conclusion: Cultivating the Future: A New Leadership Bookshelf for a New Era

The journey through the landscape of leadership advice for women reveals a clear evolutionary path.

It begins with a well-intentioned but flawed focus on fixing the individual, progresses to a necessary and more effective mandate to fix the system, and ultimately arrives at a forward-looking, holistic paradigm of cultivating the ecosystem.

Each stage represents a growing level of maturity in understanding the complex interplay between a leader and their environment.

An organization cannot leap to sophisticated ecosystem thinking if its foundational systems remain riddled with bias and its culture still implicitly asks women to solve the problem of their own exclusion.

The ultimate responsibility of leadership, therefore, is not to find and fix flawed individuals, but to design and nurture a resilient, inclusive, and adaptive ecosystem where all talented people can thrive and contribute to their full potential.

This requires a new leadership bookshelf—a strategic toolkit that equips leaders not just to survive the current landscape, but to actively reshape it for the future.

This new bookshelf is not a simple list of titles, but a curated, multi-layered resource for development:

• The Foundation (Know the Terrain): To act effectively, leaders must first understand the data-driven reality and the systemic barriers at play. This foundational layer includes seminal collections like HBR’s 10 Must Reads on Women and Leadership ⁵³ and the critical ongoing research reports on the state of women’s leadership from institutions like McKinsey, Catalyst, the World Economic Forum, and Grant Thornton.⁴
• The Individual Toolkit (Strengthen the Self): While systemic change is paramount, personal resilience is non-negotiable. This layer includes works like Brené Brown’s Dare to Lead ²⁶ and Katty Kay and Claire Shipman’s
  The Confidence Code.²³ It also features the integrated framework of
  Centered Leadership from Joanna Barsh and Susie Cranston’s How Remarkable Women Lead.³⁶ This toolkit should be approached as a means of personal fortification for navigating a challenging system, not as a substitute for changing that system.
• The Organizational Blueprint (Redesign the System): This layer contains the tactical guides for institutional change. It is composed of key articles and frameworks from HBR, McKinsey, and Catalyst that detail how to implement accountable sponsorship programs, redesign roles for flexibility, de-bias recruitment and promotion processes, and build genuinely inclusive cultures.¹⁵
• The Future (Cultivate the Ecosystem): This is the most advanced layer, focused on the next frontier of leadership. The “books” here are often conceptual frameworks rather than single texts, drawing from the principles of systems thinking, organizational ecology, and ecosystem strategy to build adaptive and innovative organizations.⁴⁶

This tiered approach provides a comprehensive development path.

It equips individual women with the tools for resilience, provides organizational leaders with the blueprints for systemic change, and offers all strategists a vision for the future of leadership itself.

By progressing through these layers, organizations can move beyond the frustrating cycle of well-intentioned but ineffective initiatives and begin the real work of building environments where the question is no longer whether women are ready to lead, but whether the organization is ready for their leadership.

Table 2: A Comparative Analysis of Leadership Development Paradigms

Paradigm	Core Problem Diagnosis	Primary Locus of Intervention	Key Actions	Guiding Metaphor	Key Texts / Sources
1. Fix the Woman	Women lack key leadership traits (e.g., confidence, ambition, assertiveness).	The individual woman.	Skill-building workshops, assertiveness training, coaching on self-perception, perfectionism management.	The Student / The Patient	Lean In, The Confidence Code, Dare to Lead
2. Fix the System	Organizational structures, policies, and cultures are biased and create barriers.	The organization.	Implementing sponsorship programs, de-biasing hiring/promotion, pay equity audits, formalizing flexible work.	The Engineer / The Architect	HBR, McKinsey, and Catalyst articles on systemic change; How Remarkable Women Lead
3. Cultivate the Ecosystem	The organization lacks the adaptability, resilience, and collaborative capacity to thrive in a complex world.	The entire network (internal teams, external partners, customers, community).	Fostering collaboration, building strategic partnerships, breaking down silos, promoting systems thinking.	The Gardener / The Steward	Frameworks on Ecosystem Leadership, Organizational Ecology, and Systems Thinking

Works cited

1. www.mckinsey.com, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/women-in-the-workplace#:~:text=Women’s%20representation%20in%20senior%20vice,over%20the%20same%20time%20period.
2. The Higher Bar for Women at the Very Top – Leading Ladies, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.leadingladiesbusiness.com/news/the-higher-bar-for-women-at-the-very-top
3. New Report Shows Women CEOs of S&P 500 Companies Are Equally—If Not More—Qualified Than Male Counterparts | Morningstar, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.morningstar.com/news/pr-newswire/20250520ne91819/new-report-shows-women-ceos-of-sp-500-companies-are-equallyif-not-morequalified-than-male-counterparts
4. Women in Business 2025: Impacting the missed generation | Grant Thornton, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.grantthornton.com/insights/articles/insights/2025/women-in-business-2025-impacting-the-missed-generation
5. The State of Women in Leadership | LinkedIn’s Economic Graph, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://economicgraph.linkedin.com/content/dam/me/economicgraph/en-us/PDF/the-state-of-women-in-leadership.pdf
6. Women’s political leadership declines, with fewer women in executive office in 2025, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.unwomen.org/en/news-stories/press-release/2025/06/womens-political-leadership-declines-with-fewer-women-in-executive-office-in-2025
7. How women can steer toward growing industries and companies – McKinsey, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/how-women-can-steer-toward-growing-industries-and-companies
8. Report: Big US Companies Are Disclosing Less of Their Work in DEI… – The Conference Board, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.conference-board.org/press/corporate-diversity-disclosure-2025
9. Issues Women Face at Work and What Leaders Can Do to Help, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.catalyst.org/insights/2017/10-big-issues-women-face-at-work-and-what-leaders-can-do-to-help
10. Women CEOs: Leading the journey to excellence | McKinsey, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/the-inner-game-of-women-ceos
11. Lean In by Sheryl Sandberg | Summary, Quotes, FAQ, Audio – SoBrief, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://sobrief.com/books/lean-in
12. The Problem With Telling Women to ‘Lean In’ – Women In Retail Leadership Circle, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.womeninretail.com/the-problem-with-telling-women-to-lean-in/
13. Women and the vision thing – Herminia Ibarra, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://herminiaibarra.com/women-and-the-vision-thing/
14. INSEAD Professor Herminia Ibarra on women and the ‘vision thing’ – YouTube, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBYTlKnLSMk
15. Study: women get fewer game-changing leadership roles – Herminia Ibarra, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://herminiaibarra.com/study-women-get-fewer-game-changing-leadership-roles/
16. Challenges Facing Female Leaders of Color in U.S. Higher Education – Western Michigan University, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/context/ijad/article/1016/viewcontent/IJAD_2.2___1_Challenges.pdf
17. Stepping up, but risking burnout: Women leaders in the public and social sectors in 2021, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/social-sector/our-insights/stepping-up-but-risking-burnout-women-leaders-in-the-public-and-social-sectors-in-2021
18. Where Women’s Leadership Development Programs Fall Short …, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://hbsp.harvard.edu/inspiring-minds/where-womens-leadership-development-programs-fall-short
19. Q1 2025 Equilar Gender Diversity Index, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.equilar.com/reports/117-q1-2025-equilar-gender-diversity-index.html
20. Book Review: The Confidence Code by Katty Kay and Claire Shipman – Medium, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://medium.com/@readmaze/book-review-the-confidence-code-by-katty-kay-and-claire-shipman-2b187d9d4827
21. The Confidence Code: The Science and Art of Self-Assurance—What Women Should Know, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-confidence-code-katty-kay/1117906916
22. The Confidence Code Summary – Four Minute Books, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://fourminutebooks.com/the-confidence-code-summary/
23. The Confidence Code by Katty Kay: 8 Minute Summary – YouTube, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=un2SdGwxgmo&pp=0gcJCfwAo7VqN5tD
24. Dare to Lead by Brené Brown – Goodreads, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/40109367-dare-to-lead
25. Dare to Lead: A Summary Part by Part – Runn, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.runn.io/blog/dare-to-lead-summary
26. Dare to Lead Book Summary – You Exec, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://youexec.com/book-summaries/dare-to-lead-by-brene-brown
27. “Dare to Lead” Summary: Key Takeaways & Review | ClickUp, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://clickup.com/blog/dare-to-lead-summary/
28. “Lean In: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead” by Sheryl Sandberg (Summary) – YouTube, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VLP7CoT-l-A
29. IBCK: Lean In : r/IfBooksCouldKill – Reddit, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/IfBooksCouldKill/comments/1beh6bk/ibck_lean_in/
30. The Failures of Lean-In Feminism – Elizabeth Grace Matthew – Law & Liberty, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://lawliberty.org/the-failures-of-lean-in-feminism/
31. Feminism’s Tipping Point: Who Wins from Leaning in? – Dissent Magazine, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/feminisms-tipping-point-who-wins-from-leaning-in/
32. “Leaning in” won’t liberate us | National Organization for Women, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://now.org/blog/leaning-in-wont-save-us/
33. Women Rising: The Unseen Barriers, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://oae.illinois.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Women-Rising-The-Unseen-Barriers-Harvard-Business-Review-0913.pdf
34. Taking Gender into Account: Theory and Design for Women’s Leadership Development Programs – INSEAD, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://flora.insead.edu/fichiersti_wp/inseadwp2011/2011-69.pdf
35. Women in leadership – McKinsey, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/featured%20insights/gender%20equality/women%20in%20leadership%20lessons%20from%20australian%20companies%20leading%20the%20way/women-in-leadership-lessons-from-australian-companies-leading-the-way.pdf
36. How Remarkable Women Lead | People & Organizational Performance – McKinsey, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/how-remarkable-women-lead
37. Book Review – How Remarkable Women Lead by Joanna Barsh, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.miriamgrobman.com/post/2015/12/08/book-review-how-remarkable-women-lead-by-joanna-barsh
38. How Remarkable Women Lead: The Breakthrough Model for Work and Life, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/how-remarkable-women-lead-joanna-barsh/1100995638
39. How Remarkable Women Lead – Audible, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.audible.com/pd/How-Remarkable-Women-Lead-Audiobook/B008FQHFK4
40. How Remarkable Women Lead – Joanna Barsh, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://joannabarsh.net/books/how-remarkable-women-lead/
41. 10 Leadership Lessons We Can Learn From Nature, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.learnbiomimicry.com/blog/leadership-lessons-from-nature
42. Embrace the Wild Side: Essential Lessons from Nature to Become a Better Leader, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://windowstill.com/embrace-the-wild-side-essential-lessons-from-nature-to-become-a-better-leader/posts/
43. Leadership Ecosystem: A Unique Interconnected Paradigm | by Canakapalli Bhaktavatsala Rao | Medium, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://medium.com/@cbrao2005/leadership-ecosystem-a-unique-interconnected-paradigm-7589c5818415
44. 7 Leadership Lessons from Nature – MGSCC – Knowledge Bank, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://knowledgebank.mgscc.net/7-leadership-lessons-from-nature/
45. www.aia.org, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.aia.org/resource-center/leadership-practice
46. Ecosystem Leadership – Global Institute of Leadership and Technology (GILT), accessed on August 7, 2025, https://gilt.global/ecosystem-leadership/
47. Ecosystem Leadership: A New Mindset for Global Leaders – Skillsoft, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.skillsoft.com/blog/ecosystem-leadership-a-new-mindset-for-global-leaders
48. Applying Systems Thinking for Holistic Solutions – Women in Tech Network, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.womentech.net/en-bg/how-to/applying-systems-thinking-holistic-solutions
49. Examples of Businesses navigating complexity by fostering Ecosystems. – Paul4innovating, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://paul4innovating.com/2024/02/08/examples-of-businesses-navigating-complexity-by-fostering-ecosystems/
50. How to Become a Successful Business Ecosystem Player | BCG – Boston Consulting Group, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.bcg.com/publications/2022/major-shifts-to-become-successful-ecosystem-strategy-player
51. How Companies Shape Ecosystems to Achieve Sustainability and Advantage, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://bcghendersoninstitute.com/how-companies-shape-ecosystems-to-achieve-sustainability-and-advantage/
52. The role of large corporations in entrepreneurial ecosystems – a case study of Munich, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09654313.2023.2301295
53. HBR’s 10 Must Reads on Women and Leadership (with bonus article “Sheryl Sandberg: The HBR Interview”) – Barnes & Noble, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/hbrs-10-must-reads-on-women-and-leadership-harvard-business-review/1129811041
54. HBR’s 10 Must Reads on Women and Leadership (with bonus article “Sheryl Sandberg: The HBR Interview”), accessed on August 7, 2025, https://store.hbr.org/product/hbr-s-10-must-reads-on-women-and-leadership-with-bonus-article-sheryl-sandberg-the-hbr-interview/10231
55. Labour markets, political leadership and supporting frameworks – Global Gender Gap Report 2025 | World Economic Forum, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-gender-gap-report-2025/in-full/labour-markets-political-leadership-and-supporting-frameworks/
56. Dare to Lead – Book Summary : r/20minutebooks – Reddit, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/20minutebooks/comments/1ihjkov/dare_to_lead_book_summary/
57. medium.com, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://medium.com/@readmaze/book-review-the-confidence-code-by-katty-kay-and-claire-shipman-2b187d9d4827#:~:text=Katty%20Kay%20and%20Claire%20Shipman%2C%20in%20The%20Confidence%20Code%2C%20explore,harness%20your%20confidence%20more%20effectively.
58. The new ecology of leadership: Revisiting the foundations of management, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://iveybusinessjournal.com/publication/the-new-ecology-of-leadership-revisiting-the-foundations-of-management/