The Sidewalk Ballet: A New Blueprint for Leadership in the Age of Disruption

Introduction: The $400 Billion Paradox

The global leadership development industry represents a staggering paradox.

Organizations collectively invest an estimated $400 billion annually in training their managers and executives, a clear acknowledgment that leadership is a critical driver of success.¹

Yet, the returns on this massive investment are alarmingly poor.

A staggering 75% of organizations rate their own leadership development programs as “not very effective”.¹

Similarly, 75% of managers surveyed across numerous organizations expressed dissatisfaction with their company’s Learning & Development (L&D) function, and a mere 12% of employees report applying new skills from in-company training to their actual jobs.²

This is not a marginal failure; it is a systemic breakdown on an industrial scale.

This report argues that the root cause of this failure is not insufficient spending but a profoundly flawed philosophy.

The prevailing model of leadership development is built on an outdated, mechanistic paradigm that treats leaders as components to be programmed and skills as software to be installed.

This approach mirrors the failed top-down urban renewal projects of the mid-20th century, which Jane Jacobs famously critiqued as the “anti-city”.³

These projects, with their rigid zoning, sterile green spaces, and destruction of organic human networks, looked orderly on paper but created lifeless, dysfunctional environments.

In the same way, traditional leadership development—with its isolated off-site retreats, siloed competency-based courses, and top-down curriculum design—creates an artificial and ineffective “anti-organization” for learning.

The solution requires a radical shift in perspective.

It requires moving away from the futile attempt to engineer leaders in a vacuum and toward cultivating a dynamic, self-organizing leadership ecosystem.

This report proposes a new blueprint for leadership development, one inspired by Jacobs’ powerful metaphor for a healthy, vibrant city: the “sidewalk ballet”.⁴

In this model, the organization itself becomes the primary site of development, a living stage where leadership is a continuous, improvised, and collective performance.

By understanding the anatomy of the current model’s failure and embracing the principles of this new, organic approach, organizations can finally begin to close the gap between their investment in leadership and the results they so desperately need.

Part I: Anatomy of a Failure: Why Legacy Leadership Models Are a Dead End

The widespread dissatisfaction with leadership development is not the result of a few poorly executed programs but of a set of deeply ingrained, interconnected flaws in the dominant paradigm.

These flaws—a disregard for context, a disconnect from real work, an underestimation of mindset, and a failure to measure what matters—create a self-perpetuating cycle of ineffectiveness.

Understanding this anatomy of failure is the first step toward building a better model.

The Flaw of Context: The “One-Size-Fits-All” Fallacy

A primary reason for the failure of leadership development is the pervasive “one-size-fits-all” approach.⁶

Too many initiatives rest on the assumption that a universal set of leadership skills or a single style is appropriate regardless of an organization’s specific strategy, culture, or competitive landscape.

This fundamental oversight, identified as a key mistake in a classic McKinsey analysis, ignores the reality that effective leadership is profoundly contextual.⁷

A sales-team leader who needs to master coaching and motivation requires a distinctly different skill set than an operations director who must excel at cross-functional problem-solving and process optimization.⁶

Providing them with an identical, standardized curriculum is not just inefficient; it is strategically negligent.

This flaw manifests as a focus on generic leadership skills that neglects the specialized knowledge and behaviors necessary to navigate the organization’s unique challenges and drive its specific objectives.⁸

The result is a portfolio of training that is disconnected from tangible business outcomes.¹

Instead of identifying the two or three critical competencies that would make a significant difference to performance in their specific environment—such as improving decision quality or fostering peer-to-peer influence—organizations offer a broad, complex web of dozens of competencies and vague corporate values statements.⁹

This approach leads to a “check-the-box” mentality, where L&D functions can claim to have “trained” leaders on a variety of topics, but without producing any measurable improvement in their ability to meet critical business objectives.¹⁰

The Flaw of Application: The Gulf Between the Classroom and Real Work

Even when content is theoretically relevant, it often fails to bridge the vast gulf between the classroom and the complex realities of the workplace.

The legacy model of leadership development, with its emphasis on off-site workshops and classroom-style lectures, is fundamentally at odds with how adults learn and retain information.

Research shows that the typical learner retains only 10% of what they hear in a lecture-based setting, compared to nearly two-thirds when they learn by doing.⁷

This “forgetting curve” is exacerbated by program designs that are too short to create lasting impact and provide no structured opportunities for participants to apply new skills in their daily work and receive feedback.²

This disconnect is a critical failure point.

Leadership skills, like any complex capability, require practice, experimentation, and refinement in real-world scenarios.⁸

Without the chance to apply learnings to the real issues and opportunities they face, participants struggle to integrate new knowledge and translate abstract concepts into concrete behavioral changes.⁶

The problem is compounded by a lack of ongoing support and reinforcement from senior management.

When senior leaders are not actively involved, it signals that the development program is not a true organizational priority, which undermines participant commitment and the transfer of learning back to the job.⁸

This failure to connect learning to real work and reinforce it within the organizational system ensures that even the most insightful off-site experience fades into a distant memory, leaving frontline behaviors unchanged.⁷

The Flaw of Mindset: Underestimating the Psychology of Change

Perhaps the most profound failure of traditional leadership development is its superficial approach to human psychology.

Lasting behavioral change is rarely a matter of simply acquiring new knowledge or skills; it requires a fundamental shift in underlying mindsets, beliefs, and even identity.

This is a difficult, often uncomfortable process that most programs are designed to avoid.⁷

A review of programs at dozens of business schools reveals a guiding concern for participants’ comfort, with success often measured by positive reactions and “smile sheets”.¹²

However, research shows no significant relationship between liking an educational experience and actually learning from it.¹²

By prioritizing comfort, these programs sidestep the necessary “crucible experiences of trial and tribulation” that forge real growth.¹²

A significant degree of discomfort is often a precondition for genuine behavioral change.⁹

For example, teaching delegation skills to a manager is futile if their underlying mindset is one of “ownership is power” and they fundamentally distrust their subordinates.⁷

The program fails because it addresses the surface-level behavior without touching the root cause.

This leads to what can be described as “leadership theater,” where leaders may learn to perform the right actions in a training setting but revert to old habits under pressure because their core identity remains unchanged.¹³

True development requires addressing these deeper levels, helping leaders find security in their identity rather than in their performance metrics, which allows them to handle conflict without defensiveness, delegate without anxiety, and lead with authenticity.¹³

By shying away from this deeper, more challenging work, legacy programs condemn themselves to superficiality.

The Flaw of Measurement: The Tyranny of Vanity Metrics

The final flaw that locks the system into a cycle of failure is a profound inability to measure what matters.

Despite paying lip service to the importance of leadership, many companies have no credible evidence to quantify the value of their development investments.⁷

Instead of tracking long-term behavioral change or tangible business impact, the majority of programs settle for weak, short-term proxies for success, such as positive participant reactions or evidence of knowledge gained in the classroom.¹²

This reliance on vanity metrics is dangerous, as it incentivizes program designers to please participants rather than challenge them.⁷

The evaluation of most programs focuses on short-term, individual-level outcomes, while reports on long-term organizational or cultural impact are rare.¹⁴

Without clear, measurable learning objectives that are explicitly aligned with organizational goals, it is impossible to assess a program’s true impact.⁶

This failure to measure results ensures that leadership development is never held to the same standard of accountability as other business functions.

It remains a line item of faith, an expense to be managed rather than an investment to be optimized.

This lack of proven ROI makes L&D budgets particularly vulnerable during tough economic times, further undermining the potential for long-term, sustained development efforts.⁹

These four flaws are not discrete problems but are deeply interconnected, forming a cascade of failure.

A program that lacks context is inherently irrelevant, making it impossible for participants to apply it to their real work.

This lack of application means the learning never becomes ingrained, preventing any meaningful shift in mindset.

And because the program is decontextualized and unapplied, it produces no tangible business results that can be measured, forcing a reliance on feel-good metrics that mask the underlying failure.

This vicious cycle explains the $400 billion paradox and makes a compelling case for abandoning the entire paradigm in favor of a new, systemic approach.

Table 1: Anatomy of Failure: Common Pitfalls in Legacy Leadership Development Programs

The Flaw	Core Symptom	Supporting Evidence	Negative Business Impact
Lack of Context	“One-size-fits-all” curriculum; generic skills training.	Assumes the same skills are appropriate regardless of strategy or culture.6 Fails to equip leaders with the 2-3 specific competencies that would drive performance.9	Wasted resources on irrelevant training; persistent skills gaps in critical areas; failure to meet business objectives.1
Lack of Application	Theoretical, classroom-based learning with no real-world practice.	Adults retain only 10% of lecture content vs. 66% from learning-by-doing.7 Programs are too short and lack opportunities for practice and feedback.11	Low transfer of skills to the job (only 12% apply them 2); investment yields no behavioral change; employee cynicism about L&D initiatives.9
Lack of Mindset Shift	Prioritizing participant comfort over challenging growth experiences.	Programs avoid the discomfort necessary for behavioral change.7 Focuses on “leadership theater” (performance) instead of “Identity-First Leadership” (being).13	Leaders revert to old behaviors under pressure; root causes of ineffective leadership are never addressed; lack of resilience and adaptability.13
Lack of Measurement	Reliance on vanity metrics like participant satisfaction (“smile sheets”).	Fails to quantify the value of the investment or track behavioral change over time.7 Evaluation focuses on short-term individual outcomes, not long-term organizational impact.12	Inability to prove ROI; L&D is seen as a cost center, not a strategic partner; perpetuation of ineffective programs.9

Part II: The Emerging Leadership Archetype: Core Competencies for an Era of Complexity

To build a better development model, we must first define the target.

The leader of the future is not a slightly improved version of the past; they are a new archetype forged in response to the unique pressures of a world defined by technological acceleration, constant disruption, and an increasingly human-centric workplace.

The essential competencies for this new era can be understood not as a checklist of isolated skills, but as three deeply interconnected clusters: a Human-Centric Core, the capabilities of a Strategic Navigator, and the mindset of an Adaptive Catalyst.

The Human-Centric Core: Leading with Emotional Intelligence, Empathy, and Trust

As artificial intelligence and automation absorb more analytical and routine tasks, the primary differentiator and value of human leadership shifts decisively to the domain of interpersonal connection.

The foundation of this new leadership is a human-centric core.

Emotional Intelligence (EQ) has emerged as one of the most critical traits for effective leaders.¹⁵

It is the bedrock capability that enables leaders to manage their own emotions, understand the perspectives of others, and navigate complex interpersonal dynamics with clarity and empathy.¹⁵

High EQ encompasses self-awareness (knowing one’s strengths and weaknesses), self-regulation (managing one’s own emotions), motivation, and empathy.¹⁷

Leaders who cultivate these skills are better equipped to foster a positive work culture, resolve conflict, enhance decision-making, and drive employee engagement.¹⁵

Building on EQ, Empathy and Inclusive Leadership are now paramount.

In a world where employees want more than just a job, leaders must create a supportive environment where every individual feels recognized, valued, and psychologically safe.¹⁸

This requires moving beyond passive non-discrimination to the active practice of inclusion.

Development in this area focuses on building cultural competence, recognizing and addressing unconscious bias, and embedding inclusive practices into decision-making and talent management.¹⁵

An inclusive leader empowers their teams to share unique perspectives, which is a direct driver of innovation and business success.¹⁵

These capabilities culminate in the ability to build Relationships and Trust.

The notion of the aloof, transactional manager is obsolete.

Forging genuine, trust-based working relationships is a strategic imperative.¹⁹

These relationships form the bedrock upon which psychological safety, open communication, and team cohesion are built.

According to Gallup, business units with highly engaged employees—a direct outcome of leaders who invest in relationships—see 21% higher productivity and 41% fewer quality defects.¹⁹

In an era of decentralized and remote work, the leader’s ability to build trust and maintain strong connections becomes the essential glue that holds a high-performing team together.¹⁸

Research confirms that trust-based environments outperform command-and-control models across every major metric, from productivity to retention.¹³

The Strategic Navigator: Mastering Vision, Critical Thinking, and Decisive Action

While the human-centric core provides the “how” of modern leadership, the strategic navigator capabilities provide the “what” and “where.” In a volatile and uncertain environment, leaders must be able to see through the noise, make sense of complexity, and chart a clear course forward.

Strategic Thinking and Visionary Leadership are essential for steering the organization through disruption.

This competency involves more than just planning; it is the ability to develop a long-term vision, anticipate industry trends and disruptions, and convert emerging challenges into competitive advantages.¹⁵

A strategic leader can analyze complex data to make informed decisions and, crucially, align the efforts of their team with the overarching strategy of the organization, ensuring that daily work contributes to long-term goals.¹⁵

This vision must be grounded in rigorous Critical Thinking and Proactive Problem-Solving.

The modern leader’s role is not to have all the answers but to ask the right questions.

They must encourage analytical thinking, challenge existing hypotheses, and seek diverse perspectives to avoid ineffective solutions.¹⁸

This involves using structured approaches like design thinking or post-mortem reviews to identify the true root causes of problems.¹⁸

Furthermore, it demands a proactive mindset—the ability to identify and address potential issues before they escalate into significant challenges, ensuring smoother operations and keeping key projects on track.¹⁶

Finally, strategic navigation in the 21st century requires Data-Driven and Tech-Savvy Decision-Making.

Intuition and experience remain valuable, but they must be augmented by the ability to leverage AI, data analytics, and other digital tools.¹⁵

A 2024 Korn Ferry survey found that 73% of business leaders believe AI will significantly enhance their value in the coming years.¹⁸

This is not just about using technology but understanding its potential and its ethical limits.

Leaders must be able to guide their organizations through digital transformation, navigate risks like cybersecurity, and foster a culture of innovation through the thoughtful adoption of new technologies.¹⁵

The Adaptive Catalyst: Driving Change, Fostering Agility, and Building Resilience

The final cluster of competencies recognizes that leadership is no longer about maintaining a stable state.

The modern leader must be a catalyst for continuous evolution, building organizations that can thrive amidst constant change.

Change Management and Adaptability are now core survival skills.

With rapid technological and economic shifts rendering old assumptions obsolete, leaders must be “change-ready” and resilient.¹⁸

This involves more than just managing a project plan; it requires leading teams through transitions with transparency, empathy, and clear communication.¹⁵

A key lesson is that all organizational change is ultimately personal; employees will always ask, “How will this impact me?”.²²

An adaptable leader can address these concerns while keeping the team focused and proactive, inspiring a growth mindset that embraces change rather than resisting it.¹⁶

This adaptability is operationalized through Agile Leadership.

This approach, borrowed from software development, involves implementing flexible processes that encourage experimentation, rapid learning, and continuous improvement.¹⁵

An agile leader moves away from a “know it all” culture to a “learn it all” culture.²³

They empower their teams to run iterative projects, respond quickly to new information, and innovate without fear of failure.

This mindset is crucial for navigating unpredictable environments and maintaining a competitive edge.¹⁵

Underpinning this entire cluster is the leader’s role as a Coach and Team Developer.

The command-and-control leader is a relic; the modern leader is a coach who empowers their people.²³

This involves mastering the skills of setting clear goals, providing actionable and supportive feedback, and building a culture of accountability and ownership.¹⁵

Effective coaching is not about telling people what to do but about asking good questions that unlock their own creativity and problem-solving abilities.²³

By developing the capabilities of their team members, leaders create a more resilient, self-sufficient organization capable of tackling future challenges.

These three competency clusters—Human-Centric, Strategic, and Adaptive—are not a menu from which organizations can pick and choose.

They form a tightly integrated, interdependent system.

A leader who is brilliantly strategic but lacks empathy will find that no one is willing to follow them through a difficult change.

An empathetic leader who cannot think critically or make a decisive, data-informed choice will lead their team into chaos.

Effective change management (Adaptive) is impossible without the communication and empathy (Human-Centric) needed to address employee concerns.²²

Fostering innovation (Adaptive) is impossible without building the psychological safety (Human-Centric) where people feel secure enough to experiment and fail.²³

The development of this holistic, integrated leadership archetype is the goal, and it demands an equally holistic and integrated development system.

Part III: A New Vision for Growth: The Organization as a ‘Sidewalk Ballet’

To cultivate the integrated leadership archetype the future demands, organizations must abandon the failed, mechanistic models of the past.

The required transformation is not incremental but philosophical.

It demands a new guiding metaphor, one that replaces the sterile blueprint of the “anti-city” with the vibrant, living ecosystem of a thriving urban neighborhood.

That metaphor is Jane Jacobs’ “sidewalk ballet.”

Introducing the Sidewalk Ballet: Order from Chaos

In her seminal 1961 work, The Death and Life of Great American Cities, Jane Jacobs introduced the concept of the “sidewalk ballet” to describe the complex, seemingly chaotic, yet marvelously effective order of a healthy city street.⁴

She argued that the safety and vitality of public spaces are not primarily maintained by formal authorities like the police, but by an “intricate, almost unconscious, network of voluntary controls and standards among the people”.²⁴

The essence of this order is the “constant succession of eyes on the street”.⁴

A diverse mix of residents, shopkeepers, and passersby, each going about their own business, collectively creates a web of natural surveillance.

This casual, mutual oversight deters crime and fosters a sense of shared responsibility and trust.²⁴

The ballet is not a rigid, synchronized performance; it is “replete with improvisations”.⁵

It is composed of continuous “movement and change,” reflecting the dynamic life of the city.⁴

Jacobs vividly described the daily rhythm of this ballet on her own Hudson Street.

The performance had different “acts” throughout the day: the morning rush of students and residents, the “heart-of-the-day” interactions between local business owners and parents with children, the evening crescendo of shoppers and teenagers, and the late-night flow of night workers and bar patrons.⁴

This continuous, varied use of the sidewalk by a diverse cast of characters was the source of its strength, safety, and vitality.

It created an environment that was not just safe but also peaceful and even leisurely, a place of social cohesion built on countless small, informal interactions.⁴

The “Anti-City” as a Metaphor for Failed L&D

The power of the sidewalk ballet as a concept is best understood by contrasting it with what it replaced: the top-down, master-planned urban renewal projects that Jacobs railed against.

These projects, inspired by visions like Le Corbusier’s “Radiant City,” sought to impose a simplistic, artificial order on the complex life of the city.³

They were the “anti-city,” and they serve as a perfect metaphor for the failures of traditional leadership development.

This analogy can be mapped with startling precision:

• Isolated Corporate Retreats as “Pointless Greensward”: The urban planners of the anti-city demolished dense, messy, but functional neighborhoods and replaced them with vast, empty green lawns that looked pleasant but served no real human purpose.³ Similarly, leadership development programs often pull leaders out of the messy reality of their work and place them in isolated off-site retreats. These events are separated from the real life of the organization and, like the pointless greensward, fail to foster the genuine interactions and applied learning that drive real growth.
• Siloed, One-Size-Fits-All Courses as “Rigid Zoning”: The anti-city was defined by rigid zoning that strictly separated where people lived from where they worked, shopped, or played.³ This destroyed the intricate mix of uses that gave old neighborhoods their vitality. Legacy L&D mirrors this flaw with its rigid “zoning” of competencies. Courses on “finance for non-financial managers” are siloed away from “empathy training,” which is separate from “strategic planning.” This approach fails to recognize that in the real world, a leader must use all these skills together in a single, complex conversation.
• Top-Down Curriculum Design as “Centralized Planning”: The anti-city was the product of centralized planners who believed they could design a perfect city from on high, ignoring the emergent, on-the-ground wisdom of its inhabitants. This is precisely how most L&D programs are designed. A central function creates a standardized curriculum that is imposed on the organization, ignoring the specific, emergent needs of leaders and teams in their unique contexts. This top-down approach stifles organic learning and creates a system that is brittle and unresponsive.

The Organization as a Living Sidewalk: A New Paradigm

Embracing the sidewalk ballet as a new paradigm means fundamentally reimagining the purpose and practice of leadership development.

The goal is no longer to send leaders “away” to be trained in isolated programs.

Instead, the objective is to intentionally design the organization itself to be the primary site of development.

The aim is to choreograph a “leadership sidewalk ballet.”

This new vision is guided by a set of core principles derived from Jacobs’ work:

• The organization’s daily life—its meetings, projects, informal interactions, and communication channels—is the stage for the ballet.
• Leadership skills are not learned in abstract but are practiced, honed, and demonstrated through the intricate, improvised movements of daily work.
• The “eyes on the street” concept is translated into a culture of continuous, multi-directional feedback, peer coaching, and mutual accountability, where everyone shares responsibility for upholding standards and supporting growth.
• The goal is not to train a few “star dancers” in isolation but to foster a “collective engagement” ²⁵ where leadership is an emergent property of the entire system, practiced at all levels.

This shift has profound implications.

It moves leadership development from a discrete, episodic function to a continuous, embedded process.

It transforms the role of the L&D department from a content provider to an “urban planner” of the leadership ecosystem.

Most importantly, it addresses the deepest flaw of the old model: the failure to change mindset and identity.

In the sidewalk ballet, people are not “performing” community; they are living it.

Their roles are integrated into their identity, and their actions are authentic expressions of that identity.

A development system modeled on this principle shifts the focus from “doing leadership tasks” to “being a leader” within the organizational community.

Development becomes about shaping a leader’s identity in context, through real relationships, real responsibilities, and real consequences.

This is the path to authentic, sustainable change.

Part IV: Choreographing the Ballet: A Practical Framework for Systemic Leadership Development

Translating the “sidewalk ballet” metaphor from a powerful idea into a practical reality requires a concrete framework.

This is not about abandoning structure for chaos; it is about replacing the rigid, artificial structures of traditional L&D with a flexible, enabling framework that guides and shapes organic growth.

The role of the organization is to act as a choreographer—to design the stage, establish the rhythm, and foster the conditions under which the ballet can thrive.

Each principle of the sidewalk ballet can be used to generate specific, actionable tactics that solve the failures of the legacy model and build the competencies of the modern leader.

“Eyes on the Street”: Cultivating a Culture of Continuous Feedback and Shared Accountability

The “constant succession of eyes” on Jacobs’ street created a system of informal, voluntary control and mutual support.

In an organization, this translates to a robust culture of continuous feedback.

• Solves: The Flaw of Measurement (by providing real-time, relevant data on behavior) and the Flaw of Application (by reinforcing learning on the job).
• Builds: Self-Awareness, Coaching, Accountability, and Interpersonal Skills.
• Tactics:

• Dismantle the Annual Review: Replace the dreaded, once-a-year performance review with lightweight, continuous 360-degree feedback systems. These tools can provide leaders with an ongoing, accurate picture of their strengths and weaknesses from the perspective of their superiors, peers, and direct reports.¹⁰
• Train for Feedback Literacy: Simply having tools is not enough. Organizations must actively train managers and employees in the skills of giving and receiving actionable, supportive, and constructive feedback. This includes mastering active listening and non-verbal communication to ensure feedback fosters growth rather than defensiveness.¹⁵
• Establish Peer Coaching Circles: Create facilitated peer coaching groups where leaders can meet regularly to discuss their challenges, share what they are learning, and hold each other accountable in a psychologically safe environment.¹ These circles become the organizational equivalent of the stoop, where the “voluntary controls and standards” of the community are discussed and reinforced.²⁴

“Mixed-Use Development”: Integrating Learning with High-Impact, Real-World Projects

A vibrant street mixes residential, commercial, and recreational uses, creating a rich tapestry of activity.

A vibrant learning organization must similarly mix development with the real work of the business.

• Solves: The Flaw of Application (by eliminating the gap between learning and doing).
• Builds: Strategic Thinking, Problem-Solving, Change Management, and Cross-Functional Collaboration.
• Tactics:

• Frame Work as Learning: Mandate that all major business projects and strategic initiatives be explicitly designed as leadership development opportunities.⁶ Every project plan should include specific learning objectives and behavioral goals for the leaders involved.
• Deploy Action Learning: Charter small, cross-functional teams of leaders and task them with solving a real, urgent, and complex business problem. This “action learning” approach ensures that development is directly tied to creating business value.⁷
• Reward Applied Skill: Shift reward and recognition systems to value not just the completion of training modules, but the demonstrated application of leadership skills in achieving tangible business outcomes. This explicitly connects learning to measurable impact, solving the measurement flaw.⁷

“The Rhythm of the Street”: Designing Continuous, Spaced Learning Journeys

The sidewalk ballet is not a single event but a continuous daily rhythm.

Leadership development must follow a similar cadence to be effective.

• Solves: The Flaw of Application (by combating the “forgetting curve” of one-off events).
• Builds: Learning Agility and Adaptability.
• Tactics:

• End the Workshop: Replace multi-day, off-site workshops with blended learning journeys that are spaced out over several months.¹ This respects the research showing that humans learn best with spaced repetition, not by cramming.
• Embrace Micro-Learning: Structure these journeys with a mix of short, focused sessions (e.g., one-hour virtual classes), on-demand digital resources, and immediate application assignments that can be integrated into the leader’s daily workflow.¹ Retention is significantly higher in one-hour sessions than in full-day classes.¹
• Create a Cadence: This approach creates a continuous rhythm of learning, application, and reflection that mirrors the natural flow of work, making development a sustained process rather than an isolated event.

“Embracing the Unplanned Encounter”: Fostering Serendipity and Cross-Functional Collaboration

Much of the vitality of Jacobs’ street came from the unplanned encounters between people from different walks of life.

Organizations must intentionally engineer this kind of serendipity to break down silos and spark innovation.

• Solves: The Flaw of Context (by exposing leaders to diverse perspectives beyond their functional silo).
• Builds: Ecosystem Thinking, Innovation, and Relationship Building.
• Tactics:

• Design for Collision: Intentionally design physical and digital spaces to encourage “serendipitous encounters” between people from different departments. This can be as simple as strategically placing coffee machines or creating shared virtual channels for informal problem-solving.
• Foster Co-Creation: Utilize structures like “decision circles and cross-functional workgroups” to bring diverse minds together to tackle key challenges.¹⁸ This encourages co-creation and shared responsibility, welcoming ideas from all levels of the hierarchy.
• Build Enterprise-Wide Networks: This intentional cross-pollination breaks down the “narrow functional orientation” that can derail a leader’s career ¹⁰ and builds the sophisticated networks that accelerate innovation and amplify organizational impact.²⁰

“Safety and Trust”: Creating the Conditions for Discomfort and Growth

The foundation of the sidewalk ballet is a sense of safety and trust that allows for freedom and improvisation.

The foundation of a powerful learning culture is the psychological safety that allows for the discomfort of genuine growth.

• Solves: The Flaw of Mindset (by creating the conditions where it is safe to address root causes and change behavior).
• Builds: Resilience, Emotional Intelligence, and Trust.
• Tactics:

• Leaders Go First: Senior leaders must model the way by “walking the talk”.⁹ They need to be vulnerable, openly discuss their own development challenges and failures, and actively participate in the development process. This signals that growth is a priority and that it is safe to be imperfect.⁸
• Facilitate with Empathy: Train L&D facilitators and all managers in emotional intelligence so they can create and hold psychologically safe spaces. This means approaching learners with empathy, self-awareness, and strong social skills, recognizing that participating in development can be intimidating.⁶
• Reframe Failure as Learning: Institute a culture where experimentation is encouraged and failure is treated as a valuable source of data and learning, not a reason for punishment. This is the essence of Satya Nadella’s “growth mindset” transformation at Microsoft, which shifted the culture from one of internal competition to one of experimentation and learning.²³ This foundation of safety is what makes the challenging, uncomfortable, and transformative experiences of real development possible.¹²

Table 2: The Sidewalk Ballet Framework for Leadership Development

Sidewalk Ballet Principle	Legacy Flaw Addressed	Core Competency Developed	Actionable Tactic / Implementation	Desired Outcome / Metric
“Eyes on the Street”	Measurement, Application	Self-Awareness, Coaching, Accountability	Establish peer coaching circles; implement continuous 360-degree feedback tools; train all employees in feedback literacy.10	Observable change in leader behavior; improved team engagement and psychological safety scores; reduced interpersonal conflict.22
“Mixed-Use Development”	Application, Context	Strategic Thinking, Problem-Solving, Decisiveness	Embed leadership development goals into all major business projects; use cross-functional “action learning” teams to solve real business challenges.7	Quantifiable business impact from projects (e.g., cost savings, new revenue); increased promotion rates and retention of program participants.7
“The Rhythm of the Street”	Application	Learning Agility, Adaptability	Replace one-off workshops with blended, spaced learning journeys over several months; use a mix of micro-learning, on-demand content, and immediate application.1	Higher retention and application of learned skills; demonstrated ability of leaders to adapt to changing priorities; improved organizational agility.
“Unplanned Encounters”	Context	Ecosystem Thinking, Innovation, Relationship Building	Design physical/digital spaces for serendipity; use cross-functional workgroups for co-creation; create formal mentorship programs that cross silos.18	Increased cross-functional collaboration and innovation; breakdown of departmental silos; stronger informal networks across the organization.14
“Safety and Trust”	Mindset	Resilience, Emotional Intelligence, Trust	Senior leaders model vulnerability and “walk the talk”; train facilitators in EQ to create psychologically safe environments; reframe failure as a learning opportunity.6	Increased willingness of leaders to take risks and experiment; open dialogue about leadership challenges; improved ability to navigate difficult conversations and change.12

Conclusion: From Isolated Training to a Thriving Leadership Ecosystem

The verdict on the traditional leadership development industry is clear: it is a systemically broken model that consumes vast resources while delivering underwhelming results.

The core of the problem lies in its flawed philosophy—a mechanistic, top-down approach that ignores context, divorces learning from work, avoids the psychological depth of real change, and fails to measure what truly matters.

Continuing to invest in this “anti-city” of leadership development is a strategic dead end.

The future requires a new archetype of leader—one who is at once deeply human-centric, strategically astute, and a catalyst for adaptive change.

Cultivating this integrated profile cannot be achieved through the fragmented, siloed programs of the past.

It demands a new vision, a new philosophy, and a new operating model.

This report has proposed that the “sidewalk ballet” of Jane Jacobs provides the perfect blueprint for this transformation.

It calls for a fundamental mindset shift: from viewing leadership development as a series of isolated training events to seeing it as the continuous cultivation of a living, thriving ecosystem.

In this model, the organization itself becomes the stage.

The daily rhythms of work become the practice.

The network of relationships becomes the source of feedback and support.

And leadership becomes an emergent property of the entire system, not a title bestowed upon a few.

The framework presented here is not a call for chaos but for a more sophisticated and effective kind of order.

It is a call for senior leaders and L&D professionals to change their role from that of a program manager to that of an “urban planner” for their leadership culture.

The task is to have the courage to dismantle the sterile, ineffective structures of the past and begin the patient, intentional work of choreographing a living ballet.

It is time to stop building empty parks and start fostering the intricate, improvised, and ultimately more powerful dance of a truly effective leadership ecosystem.

Works cited

1. The Leadership Training Industry Is Broken, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.td.org/content/atd-blog/the-leadership-training-industry-is-broken
2. Why Leadership Development Fails & What to do About it – Gasparotto Group, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://gasparotto.co/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Gasparotto-Whitepaper-Why-Leadership-Development-Fails-What-to-do-About-It.pdf
3. Jane Jacob Says No: The trouble with street ballet – The Developer, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://thedeveloper.live/places/places/jane-jacob-says-no-the-trouble-with-street-ballet
4. The Sidewalk Ballet – Jane’s Walk Ottawa, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.janeswalkottawa.ca/en/le-sidewalk-ballet
5. Sidewalk Ballet by Jane Jacobs – Plough Publishing, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.plough.com/en/topics/culture/literature/sidewalk-ballet
6. Why Leadership Development Programs Fail | CMOE, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://cmoe.com/blog/why-leadership-development-programs-fail/
7. Why leadership-development programs fail | McKinsey, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/leadership/why-leadership-development-programs-fail
8. Why Most Leadership Development Programs Are Not Working – PeopleThriver, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://peoplethriver.com/why-are-most-leadership-development-programs-not-working/
9. Why Leadership Development Programs Fail — and How To Do It the Right Way, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://raybwilliams.medium.com/why-leadership-development-programs-fail-and-how-to-do-it-the-right-way-a5967811ba43
10. The 16 Most-Needed Leadership Competencies | CCL, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.ccl.org/articles/leading-effectively-articles/most-important-leadership-competencies/
11. 5 Problems With Leadership Training – MacklinConnection Blog, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.macklinconnection.com/blog/5-problems-with-leadership-training
12. Leadership Development Is Failing Us. Here’s How to Fix It, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/leadership-development-is-failing-us-heres-how-to-fix-it/
13. Why 90% of Leadership Programs Fail—And the One Shift That Changes Everything, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://influencejournalforleaders.com/2025/07/01/why-90-of-leadership-programs-fail-and-the-one-shift-that-changes-everything/
14. Measuring for Success: Evaluating Leadership Training Programs for Sustainable Impact, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8284530/
15. Top Leadership Development Topics for 2025 | Empowering Leaders to Succeed — PRC, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.powersresourcecenter.com/blog/top-leadership-development-topics-2025
16. 15+ Key development areas for managers to build strong leaders – CultureMonkey, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.culturemonkey.io/employee-engagement/development-areas-for-managers/
17. 18 Key Leadership Competencies for 2025 Success – AIHR, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.aihr.com/blog/leadership-competencies/
18. 7 Key Leadership Trends to Elevate Your Teams in 2025 – Proaction International, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://blog.proactioninternational.com/en/leadership-trends
19. The 8 Key Leadership Skills You Need to Know in 2025 – IMD Business School, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.imd.org/blog/leadership/leadership-skills/
20. The Top Leadership Skills You Need To Succeed In The Future Job Market, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.lollydaskal.com/leadership/the-top-leadership-skills-you-need-to-succeed-in-the-future-job-market/
21. Top 15 Development Goals for Managers for 2025 – Eagle’s Flight, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://eaglesflight.com/blog/2025/01/13/top-15-development-goals-for-managers-for-2025/
22. The Top Priorities for Leadership Development in 2025, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://stewartleadership.com/priorities-for-leadership-development/
23. Five leadership skills for the future | London Business School, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.london.edu/think/five-leadership-skills-for-the-future
24. “The Uses of Sidewalks: Safety”, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.miguelangelmartinez.net/IMG/pdf/1961_Jacobs_TheUsesofSidewalksby_excerpt.pdf
25. The Death and Life of the ‘Sidewalk ballet’ | by anagha – Medium, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://thatcitygirl.medium.com/sidewalks-and-streets-the-death-and-life-of-the-sidewalk-ballet-8e59bd886cb1