From Factory to Forest: Why Our Leadership Programs Are Broken and How to Grow Them Differently

Introduction: The Day a Perfectly Engineered Program Died

Consider the story of a seasoned organizational development (OD) strategist at a high-growth tech firm.

This strategist had spent months designing the company’s flagship leadership program, a marvel of modern corporate education.

It was the epitome of established best practices: a multi-module, blended learning journey featuring expert facilitators, validated psychometric assessments, personalized coaching sessions, and enthusiastic sponsorship from the C-suite.¹

The program was an intricate machine, engineered for excellence, and the strategist was confident in its power to forge the next generation of leaders.

The program launched to great acclaim.

Participation was high, and the initial feedback—the “smile sheets”—was glowing.

Yet, six months after the first cohort graduated, the machine began to show its cracks.

The program’s star participant, a brilliant and high-potential manager earmarked for a director role, resigned.

In her exit interview, she delivered a quiet but devastating critique that dismantled the strategist’s entire framework.

She confessed that the program, for all its polish, felt like a “beautifully designed machine that had no connection to the messy reality of her job.” It armed her with elegant theories on conflict resolution and strategic thinking but offered no practical guidance for navigating the daily chaos of competing deadlines, team anxieties, and political cross-currents.³

The program, designed to empower her, had instead left her feeling more inadequate, highlighting a chasm between what she knew she

should do and what she was actually able to do in the workplace.⁵

This single, heartbreaking failure became a catalyst for a radical re-examination of the foundational assumptions of leadership development.

It posed a critical question that echoes through countless organizations today: Are we truly developing leaders, or are we just running them through a sophisticated assembly line that polishes their exterior but fails to strengthen their core? The story of this strategist’s failed program is not an anomaly; it is a symptom of a deeply flawed, mechanistic paradigm that dominates the industry—a paradigm that must be deconstructed before a healthier, more effective alternative can take root.

Part I: The Assembly Line of Lost Potential: Deconstructing the Myth of the Leadership Factory

The dominant approach to leadership development can be best understood through the metaphor of a factory.

In this model, leaders are seen as products to be manufactured.

Organizations invest in raw materials (high-potential employees) and run them through a standardized assembly line of workshops, modules, and assessments, expecting a uniform, high-quality leader to emerge at the end.⁶

This industrial mindset is the source of the widespread failure and disillusionment with leadership development, a failure rooted in its inability to account for the complexity of human beings and the systems they work in.

The “One-Size-Fits-All” Delusion and The Tyranny of Context

The factory model’s first critical flaw is its reliance on generic, one-size-fits-all content.³

Programs are often designed in a vacuum, applying the same material across vastly different industries, company cultures, and leadership levels.⁴

This approach fundamentally misunderstands that leadership is not a universal skill set but a practice that is highly dependent on context.⁷

A leadership style that succeeds in a stable, hierarchical manufacturing firm may be disastrous in a fast-moving tech startup.

The strategist’s “perfect” program failed precisely for this reason: it was designed for a hypothetical, idealized organization, not the real one with its unique political landscape, communication norms, and strategic pressures.

This context-blindness treats leaders like interchangeable machine parts, ignoring their individual strengths, the specific needs of their teams, and the nuanced demands of their roles.⁷

The result is a learning experience that feels disconnected from real-world application, leading to low engagement and a colossal waste of resources.³

The Illusion of the Event and The “Knowing-Doing” Gap

A second, equally damaging flaw is the treatment of development as a one-off event rather than a continuous process.³

The “leadership workshop” becomes the centerpiece—a short, intense burst of learning that is expected to create lasting change.

This model ignores a fundamental truth of human learning: knowledge fades rapidly without reinforcement and application.⁴

Research shows that people forget a significant portion of new information within 24 hours if it is not reinforced.¹⁰

This leads to what is known as the “knowing-doing gap”—the vast chasm between what leaders learn in a classroom and what they actually do back at their desks.⁵

Shocking data reveals that only 12% of learners report applying skills from training to their jobs, and an estimated 75% of L&D professionals believe that less than half of what they teach is ever applied.¹¹

The factory model inspects for knowledge at the end of the workshop but provides no scaffolding or support for the messy, difficult work of translating that knowledge into new behaviors in a complex and often resistant work environment.

This is why the star manager in the opening story felt abandoned; she left the program armed with new knowledge but was left completely alone to face the challenge of implementation.

The Staggering Price of Failure

The consequences of this broken factory model are not just disappointing; they are catastrophic in scale.

Organizations are caught in a cycle of massive investment for minimal return.

Globally, companies spend an estimated $366 billion on leadership development, with $166 billion in the U.S. alone.¹¹

Yet, a staggering 75% of organizations rate their own leadership development programs as “not very effective”.¹³

This ineffective spending fuels a crisis of leadership.

An estimated 60% of new managers fail within the first 24 months of their role, largely due to a lack of proper training and support.¹⁴

This poor management is a primary driver of employee turnover, with some studies suggesting up to 75% of employees leave their jobs specifically to get away from a bad boss.¹⁵

The cumulative economic damage is almost incomprehensible, with the global cost of poor management estimated to be as high as $7 trillion annually.¹⁴

These figures paint a damning portrait of a system that is failing on every conceivable level.

The problem, however, goes deeper than just poorly designed programs.

The entire system of how leadership development is commissioned, measured, and justified is flawed.

L&D departments are often evaluated on “activity” metrics—such as program completion rates or participant satisfaction scores—rather than on tangible business impact or behavioral change.¹⁶

This creates a perverse incentive to run more programs and generate positive short-term feedback, even if the programs do not solve the underlying leadership deficit.

The result is a self-perpetuating cycle of failure: organizations spend billions on programs that don’t work, leaders continue to fail, employees remain disengaged, and the very problem the system claims to solve only grows worse.

The leadership factory is not just inefficient; it is a core contributor to the global leadership crisis.

Part II: The Gardener’s Epiphany: A New Biology for Leadership

Following the collapse of the tech firm’s program, the OD strategist entered a period of profound disillusionment.

The established “best practices” had failed, and the industrial model of leadership development seemed bankrupt.

The breakthrough came not from another management textbook or industry conference, but from an entirely different field: ecology.

While reading about the concept of trophic cascades, a new and powerful metaphor for organizational change began to emerge.

The Yellowstone Analogy: A Story of Systemic Transformation

The story that sparked the epiphany was the reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone National Park in the 1990s.¹⁷

For decades, the park had suffered from a seemingly intractable problem: an overpopulation of elk.

Without their natural predators, the elk herds grew to unsustainable levels, overgrazing the landscape and devastating young tree populations, particularly willow and aspen.

A “factory” solution to this problem would have been direct and linear: build fences to protect certain areas or conduct a massive cull of the elk herd.

Such interventions would have been costly, difficult to sustain, and would have only addressed the symptom, not the systemic imbalance.

The ecological solution was far more elegant and profound.

Biologists reintroduced a small number of wolves, a “keystone species,” back into the ecosystem.

The results were astonishing and went far beyond simply controlling the elk population.

The presence of wolves changed the behavior of the elk, who began to avoid open valleys and riverbanks.

This allowed the overgrazed vegetation to recover.

As the willows and aspens returned, they stabilized the riverbanks, which in turn altered the course of the rivers themselves, making them meander less and form more pools.

These changes created new habitats for beavers, whose dams created marshland for otters, muskrats, and fish.

The revitalized vegetation brought back songbirds, and the carrion left by wolf kills provided food for eagles, bears, and other scavengers.

The reintroduction of one species triggered a cascading, positive transformation that revitalized the entire ecosystem, from the flow of the rivers to the health of dozens of other species.¹⁷

The New Paradigm: The Leadership Ecosystem

The Yellowstone story provided the central epiphany: leadership development is not an industrial process of building leaders, but a biological process of cultivating leadership.

The correct metaphor is not a factory, but a garden or a forest.¹⁸

This is more than a simple change in terminology; it represents a fundamental shift in worldview, from a mechanistic paradigm to a biological one.²⁰

The mechanistic worldview, which underpins the factory model, sees organizations as predictable, controllable, and linear systems.

It focuses on optimizing individual parts in isolation, assuming that if each component is perfected, the whole machine will run smoothly.

The biological or ecological worldview, by contrast, sees organizations as complex, adaptive systems characterized by interdependence, emergence, and constant change.

In this view, you cannot simply “build” a perfect leader and insert them into the system, because their effectiveness depends entirely on their interactions with every other part of that system.

This paradigm shift reframes the role of those responsible for development.

They are no longer engineers with a fixed blueprint, attempting to construct a standardized product.

Instead, they become gardeners or ecological stewards, whose primary role is to understand the unique conditions of their environment and cultivate the soil, ensuring the entire system has the nutrients and support it needs for healthy, resilient, and diverse life to flourish.¹⁹

The goal is not to control outputs, but to nurture the potential within the system itself.

Dimension	The Factory Model (Mechanistic)	The Ecosystem Model (Biological)
Core Metaphor	Assembly Line	Garden / Forest
Primary Goal	Build Standardized Leaders	Cultivate Adaptive Leadership
Learning Method	Event-Based Training (Workshops)	Continuous & Integrated Process
View of Leader	A Manufactured Product	A Developing Organism
Role of L&D	Engineer / Mechanic	Gardener / Steward
Focus	Optimizing Parts in Isolation	Nurturing the Whole System
Key Metrics	Completion Rates, Satisfaction Scores	Business Impact, Behavioral Change
Typical Outcome	The “Knowing-Doing Gap”	Sustainable, Resilient Growth

Part III: The Four Pillars of a Thriving Leadership Ecosystem

Adopting an ecosystem paradigm requires moving beyond abstract metaphors to concrete action.

This new approach can be structured around four interconnected pillars.

Just as a gardener must consider the soil, the seeds, the watering schedule, and the climate, an organizational steward must cultivate the culture, personalize development pathways, integrate learning into daily work, and foster adaptability.

Pillar 1: Cultivating Rich Soil (The Foundational Culture)

Growth cannot happen on barren ground.

The first and most critical pillar of a leadership ecosystem is the foundational culture of the organization.

A program, no matter how well-designed, will fail if it is planted in toxic soil.

This “soil” is composed of three essential nutrients: trust, psychological safety, and authentic senior leadership modeling.

When employees trust their organization’s leadership, they are four times more likely to be engaged.²²

This trust is the bedrock upon which all development is built.

It creates an environment of psychological safety, where individuals feel secure enough to be vulnerable, take risks, ask for help, and learn from failure without fear of retribution.²³

Without this safety, genuine learning is impossible.

Crucially, this culture must be championed and modeled from the very top.

One of the most common reasons leadership programs fail is a lack of visible, unwavering support from senior executives.⁷

If the C-suite pays lip service to a new leadership model but continues to reward old, contradictory behaviors, the initiative is doomed.

Employees are adept at spotting hypocrisy; if senior leaders do not personally embody the desired changes, they send a powerful signal that the new way is not truly valued, and the ecosystem is poisoned from the start.²⁵

This pillar reframes culture not as a “soft” or secondary concern, but as the essential infrastructure that makes all growth possible.

Pillar 2: Planting for Diversity and Resilience (Personalized Pathways)

A healthy ecosystem thrives on biodiversity, not a monoculture of a single crop.

The factory model’s attempt to produce standardized leaders is inherently fragile and ill-suited to a complex world.

The ecosystem approach, in contrast, recognizes that the organization needs a wide variety of leadership styles and capabilities.

It seeks to plant many different “seeds” (individuals with diverse talents) and nurture each one according to its unique needs.

This requires a decisive shift away from standardized curricula and toward personalized development pathways.

The most powerful and effective tools for this personalization are coaching and mentoring.

While traditional training has its place, the data on coaching is overwhelmingly persuasive.

One study found that while training alone can increase productivity by 22%, combining that training with coaching boosts productivity by a staggering 88%.²⁶

Other research points to a return on investment for coaching as high as 788%, driven by measurable improvements in productivity, team performance, and employee retention.²⁶

Organizations with strong coaching cultures report significantly higher retention rates, and leaders who receive quality coaching are far less likely to feel the need to leave the company to advance their careers.¹⁶

The remarkable effectiveness of coaching stems from its ability to provide the critical “nutrients” that are absent in a typical training workshop.

A workshop can deliver information—the “seeds” of knowledge—but it does little to prepare the environment for those seeds to germinate.

It’s like scattering seeds on concrete.

Coaching, on the other hand, cultivates the soil around the individual.

It provides context, helping the leader apply abstract concepts to their specific, real-world challenges.

It creates accountability, providing a structure for follow-up and reinforcement that ensures new behaviors are practiced and sustained.

And it offers psychological safety, a confidential space where a leader can be vulnerable, experiment with new approaches, and process feedback without judgment.²²

Coaching’s high ROI isn’t just about better information transfer; it’s about creating the enabling conditions that allow any learning to be absorbed, applied, and ultimately, to grow.

Pillar 3: Tending the System (Continuous and Integrated Learning)

A garden is not tended once a year during a special “gardening event.” It requires constant, patient care.

Similarly, leadership development in an ecosystem model is not a standalone program but a continuous process woven into the daily fabric of work.

This means fully embracing the 70-20-10 model for development, which posits that learning comes 70% from on-the-job experiences and challenges, 20% from relationships and feedback (like coaching and mentoring), and only 10% from formal coursework and training.⁹

The focus must shift from the 10% (the workshop) to the 90% (the workplace).

Development activities should be explicitly connected to the real, pressing challenges that leaders face every day.⁹

This requires creating robust, healthy feedback loops throughout the organization.

However, this does not mean simply implementing more formal feedback tools.

Many organizations rely on 360-degree feedback assessments, but these can be deeply flawed.

Research shows a majority of employees suspect colleagues of using them to settle personal grudges, and nearly half believe the feedback is tainted by personal bias, often leading to strained workplace relationships.²⁹

Instead of relying on these potentially toxic instruments, an ecosystem approach fosters a culture of continuous, informal, and psychologically safe feedback.²³

This is about creating an environment where asking for and offering constructive input is a normal part of how teams operate.

It involves leaders who actively listen, who model how to receive feedback gracefully, and who build the trust necessary for candid conversations to occur.

This pillar directly addresses the “event versus process” failure of the factory model, transforming development from an occasional interruption into the very rhythm of work itself.

Pillar 4: Reading the Climate (Adaptive Leadership)

The external environment—the “climate” in which the organizational ecosystem exists—is not static.

It is defined by volatility, uncertainty, complexity, and ambiguity.²⁵

The rigid, hierarchical, command-and-control leadership styles that were effective in a more stable industrial era are now dangerously obsolete.³³

A thriving ecosystem requires leaders who can adapt to this changing climate.

This means cultivating a portfolio of modern, adaptive leadership models.

These are not merely buzzwords but distinct mindsets and behavioral repertoires suited to contemporary challenges:

• Servant Leadership: Puts the needs and growth of the team first, which boosts trust, engagement, and productivity.³⁰
• Authentic Leadership: Built on transparency, self-awareness, and integrity, it cultivates deep trust and loyalty.³⁴
• Agile Leadership: Fosters flexibility, decentralized decision-making, and rapid iteration, crucial for navigating uncertain markets.³⁴
• Transformational Leadership: Inspires teams through a shared vision and purpose, igniting intrinsic motivation and innovation.³⁶

The rise of these “human-centered” leadership models is not an ideological or “soft skills” trend.

It is a pragmatic and necessary adaptation to the hard economic realities of a modern, knowledge-based economy.

In the industrial era, value was created through efficiency and compliance, which could be commanded and controlled.

Today, value is created through innovation, collaboration, and agility—qualities that cannot be forced.

They can only emerge from teams that feel engaged, trusted, and psychologically safe.

These modern leadership styles are, in essence, the operating systems best suited to running a complex, adaptive business ecosystem in the 21st century.

Part IV: The Harvest: Measuring the True Yield of Your Ecosystem

A fundamental critique of the factory model is its failure to measure what truly matters.

The ecosystem approach demands a corresponding revolution in metrics, shifting the focus from superficial activity to the tangible yield of a healthy, thriving organization.

This means looking beyond the “smile sheet” and tracking the indicators that reflect the true impact of leadership on the business.

Metrics That Matter: Moving Beyond the Smile Sheet

To measure the health of a leadership ecosystem, organizations must abandon vanity metrics like course completion rates and participant satisfaction scores.

While easy to track, these numbers say nothing about whether behavior has changed or performance has improved.

Instead, a steward of an ecosystem focuses on metrics that are directly tied to business outcomes and the well-being of the system.¹⁶

A robust measurement framework should include a balanced scorecard of hard and soft indicators, such as:

• Employee Retention and Turnover: This is one of the most direct measures of leadership quality. Organizations should specifically compare voluntary turnover rates on teams led by developed leaders versus those led by untrained ones to isolate the impact of their investment.¹⁶
• Team Productivity and Performance: This can be tracked through Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) like revenue per employee, project completion rates, cycle times for key processes, and other department-specific output metrics.¹⁶
• Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty: Effective leadership creates a customer-centric culture. This can be measured through metrics like Net Promoter Scores (NPS), Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) scores, and customer retention rates.¹⁶
• Innovation and Agility: This can be assessed by tracking the number of new ideas generated, the speed of implementation for new strategies, and the team’s ability to adapt to market changes.
• Safety and Quality: In relevant industries, metrics like accident rates, workplace injury frequency, and quality defect rates are powerful indicators of a leader’s ability to build a culture of excellence and care.¹⁶

By focusing on these metrics, organizations can move from justifying leadership development based on activity to demonstrating its clear and compelling return on investment.

Stories from Thriving Ecosystems

The ecosystem model is not merely a theory; it is a practical strategy being implemented by forward-thinking organizations to achieve remarkable results.

These brief examples illustrate the power of the four pillars in action:

• Randstad (Pillar 2: Personalized Pathways): The global HR consulting firm implemented a comprehensive workplace mentoring program, making it easy for any employee to find a mentor within the organization. The results were dramatic: a study of the program found that employees who participated in mentorship were 49% less likely to leave the company, demonstrating the immense power of personalized support in driving retention.³⁸
• Allstate (Pillar 3: Integrated Learning): The insurance giant uses rotational programs to build well-rounded leaders. Their Technology Leadership Development Program, for example, focuses on cross-functional learning through rotations in technology, finance, and data analysis. This approach embodies the principle of on-the-job learning, providing future leaders with valuable experience and a holistic perspective on the business through challenging assignments and workshops.³⁸
• Deloitte (Pillar 1: Foundational Culture): The firm’s $300 million investment in Deloitte University, a dedicated leadership and learning center, signals a profound commitment to cultivating its cultural soil. By creating a world-class physical space for development, Deloitte makes a powerful statement that learning is a strategic priority, not an afterthought.³⁸
• Rich City Rides (The Yellowstone Effect in Microcosm): In Richmond, California, a grassroots organization called Rich City Rides sought to address the interconnected challenges of poverty, chronic disease, and environmental issues. Instead of tackling each problem in isolation, they used cycling as a “keystone” intervention. By establishing a bike shop that trained and employed local youth to repair bicycles, they simultaneously provided job skills, created sustainable transportation, and fostered community engagement through group rides and park cleanups. This small-scale initiative demonstrates the core principle of ecosystem thinking: a single, strategic intervention can create cascading positive effects across an entire system.³⁹

These stories, from multinational corporations to community organizations, provide tangible proof that when organizations shift their focus from manufacturing leaders to cultivating leadership ecosystems, the harvest is abundant and sustainable.

Conclusion: Your First Steps as a Leadership Gardener

The journey from a frustrated factory engineer to a fulfilled ecosystem steward is a profound one.

It begins with the recognition that our old models are broken and that a new, more vital paradigm is required.

Consider the OD strategist from the introduction.

In a later role, faced with another critical project, the strategist abandoned the blueprint of the past.

Instead of launching a formal program, the focus shifted to cultivating the team’s ecosystem.

The work began with establishing psychological safety, moved to providing targeted coaching for key individuals based on their real-time challenges, and fostered a culture of continuous, open feedback.

The result was not a perfectly polished team, but a resilient, adaptive, and highly engaged one that successfully navigated immense complexity and delivered a breakthrough outcome.

The failure was redeemed, not by building a better machine, but by learning to tend a garden.

This transformation from engineer to gardener is available to any leader willing to embrace a new way of thinking.

Building an ecosystem is not a project with a fixed end date; it is a continuous journey of tending, nurturing, and adapting.

The prospect can feel daunting, so it is best to start small.

Here are three simple, immediate actions you can take to begin your journey:

1. Start with One Conversation. The next time you discuss development with a high-potential employee, put the course catalog aside. Instead, ask them: “What is the single biggest on-the-job challenge you are facing right now, and how can I best support you in navigating it?” This shifts the focus from generic training to specific, contextual support.
2. Plant One Seed of Coaching. The next time a manager is struggling, resist the default impulse to send them to a generic “management skills” workshop. Instead, invest in a small, targeted coaching package for them. Track not only their feedback but the tangible changes in their team’s engagement and performance over the next three to six months. Measure the difference.
3. Read the Soil. Schedule a dedicated, honest conversation with your senior leadership team. Ask a single question: “What is one specific behavior we could all commit to modeling, starting tomorrow, that would make it safer for people in this organization to speak up and take smart risks?” This focuses on the critical work of cultivating the cultural foundation.

The work of a gardener is never truly done, but it is among the most rewarding endeavors.

It requires patience, attentiveness, and a deep respect for the complex forces of life.

By shifting our perspective from building machines to cultivating ecosystems, we can move beyond the failed factories of the past and begin the vital work of growing the resilient, adaptive, and deeply human leaders our world so desperately needs.

Works cited

1. 13 Key Leadership Development Strategies to Inspire Growth – Proaction International, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://blog.proactioninternational.com/en/leadership-development-strategies
2. Core Leadership Development Practices – Wowledge, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://wowledge.com/18-core-leadership-development-practices-to-define-and-structure-leadership-capabilities
3. Why Traditional Leadership Training No Longer Works …, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.leadershipchoice.com/why-traditional-leadership-training-no-longer-works/
4. Why Traditional Leadership Training Fails (And What To Do Instead), accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.excel-communications.com/blog/why-traditional-leadership-training-fails-and-what-to-do-instead
5. Demystifying Why Leadership Development Often Fails, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.performdev.com/blog/demystifying-why-leadership-development-often-fails/
6. McKinsey Classics: Why leadership development programs fail, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/email/classics/2025/2025-01-18d.html
7. The 6 Reasons Leadership Development Programs Fail …, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://peoplethriver.com/why-leadership-development-programs-fail/
8. Why leadership-development programs fail – McKinsey, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/leadership/why-leadership-development-programs-fail
9. Leadership Development Best Practices | CCL, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.ccl.org/articles/leading-effectively-articles/3-keys-making-leadership-development-work/
10. The Failure of Traditional Leadership Development – Midlife Fulfilled Podcast, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://midlifefulfilled.com/the-failure-of-traditional-leadership-development/
11. 29 Eye-Opening Leadership Development Statistics 2025 | Exec Learn, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.exec.com/learn/28-eye-opening-leadership-development-statistics-that-will-transform-your
12. 10 Statistics on Corporate Training – Shift E-Learning, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.shiftelearning.com/blog/statistics-on-corporate-training-and-what-they-mean-for-your-companys-future
13. The Leadership Training Industry Is Broken – Association for Talent Development, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.td.org/content/atd-blog/the-leadership-training-industry-is-broken
14. Managing to Fail? Why New Leaders Need Training – Wharton Executive Education, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://executiveeducation.wharton.upenn.edu/thought-leadership/wharton-at-work/2024/09/new-leaders-need-training/
15. 24 Leadership Training Statistics for 2025: Data, Insights & Predictions | Research.com, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://research.com/careers/leadership-training-statistics
16. ROI of Leadership Development: Quantifying the Benefits of Great Leaders – DDI, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.ddiworld.com/blog/roi-of-leadership-development
17. Transformational Change: An Ecosystem Approach Lessons from Nature for Those Leading Change in Organizations – Center for Creative Leadership – Innovation, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://cclinnovation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/transformationalchange.pdf
18. A Garden Metaphor for Leadership Development | Noddlepod, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.noddlepod.com/blog/a-garden-metaphor-for-leadership-development
19. Analogies between Gardening and … – Regent University, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/sl_proceedings/2008/grahn.pdf
20. THE ECOLOGY OF LEADERSHIP: Adapting to the Challenges of a Changing World – Dr. Kathy Allen, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://kathleenallen.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/The-Ecology-of-Leadership.pdf
21. The Linkage Between Leadership and Ecosystems – weLEAD, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.leadingtoday.org/welead-online-magazine-the-linkage-between-leadership-and-ecosystems/
22. Why Executives Need Leadership Development – Gallup.com, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.gallup.com/learning/474638/effective-leadership-training.aspx
23. Leadership Trends for 2025: Human Connection Is the Catalyst for Future Success – DDI, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.ddiworld.com/blog/leadership-trends-2025
24. Why Leadership Development Programs Fail – HowNow, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.gethownow.com/blog/why-leadership-development-programs-fail
25. Missing the Mark: Why Leadership Programs Fail – Egon Zehnder, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.egonzehnder.com/leadership-development-revisited/missing-the-mark-why-leadership-programs-fail
26. The ROI of Executive Coaching | American University, Washington, DC, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.american.edu/provost/ogps/executive-education/executive-coaching/roi-of-executive-coaching.cfm
27. The ROI of Executive Coaching: Quantifying Benefits for Leaders and Organizations, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.leggup.com/articles/the-roi-of-executive-coaching-quantifying-benefits-for-leaders-and-organizations
28. Impact of Leadership Development Workshops in Facilitating Team-Based Practice Transformation – PMC, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6821575/
29. www.shrm.org, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.shrm.org/topics-tools/news/organizational-employee-development/employees-reject-360-degree-reviews-cite-bias#:~:text=79%25%20of%20employees%20suspect%20colleagues,due%20to%20360%2Ddegree%20feedback.
30. Leadership Development Frameworks: Which one is the right fit for me? – Inspire Group, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.inspiregroup.net/blog/leadership-development-frameworks
31. 7 Steps to Create a Leadership Development Plan [Free Template] – AIHR, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.aihr.com/blog/leadership-development-plan/
32. Are Traditional Leadership Development Programs Still Effective? Exploring New Approaches – Paradigm Shift, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.ps.company/post/are-traditional-leadership-development-programs-still-effective-exploring-new-approaches
33. Why Traditional Models of Leadership Fall Short in the 2020s, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.ihrim.org/2023/08/why-traditional-models-of-leadership-fall-short-in-the-2020s/
34. Top 5 Innovative Leadership Models Reshaping Business – GESTALDT, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.gestaldt.com/insights/top-5-innovative-leadership-models-reshaping-business
35. The Leadership of Innovation | Berkeley Exec Ed, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://executive.berkeley.edu/thought-leadership/blog/leadership-innovation
36. 12 Leadership Models That Can Define Your Style | USAHS – University of St. Augustine, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.usa.edu/blog/leadership-models/
37. 6 Innovative Leadership Styles to Redefine Success – CEO Boardroom, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://ceoboardroom.com/6-innovative-leadership-styles/
38. 6 Examples of Incredible Leadership Development Programs (+ How You Can Develop Your Leaders), accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.togetherplatform.com/blog/examples-of-leadership-development-programs
39. Systems Leadership for Sustainable Development: Strategies for Achieving Systemic Change – Harvard Kennedy School, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.hks.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/centers/mrcbg/files/Systems%20Leadership.pdf