The Mycelial Leader: Why Your Leadership Program Is Failing and How to Grow a Thriving Organizational Network

Part I: The Silent Failure of the Perfect Tree

I still remember the feeling.

It was a mix of pride and exhaustion, the kind you get after pouring your soul into a project.

For six months, I had been the architect of what I believed was the perfect leadership development program.

As an Organizational Development practitioner with over a decade in the field, this was meant to be my masterpiece.

My client, a fast-scaling tech firm, had given me a generous budget and their full support.

We had it all.

We started with rigorous 360-degree assessments to identify each participant’s strengths and weaknesses.¹

We designed a curriculum around a set of universally accepted leadership competencies—strategic thinking, communication, decision-making.²

We flew in a renowned business school professor for a series of electrifying workshops.

We capped it all off with a three-day off-site retreat at a beautiful resort, a space designed for deep reflection and connection.

On paper, it was a “best-in-class” program, a textbook example of corporate investment in human capital.

The initial feedback was glowing; the “happy sheets” were full of praise for the speakers, the content, and the food.⁴

We celebrated a resounding success.

Then, a year later, the truth hit me like a physical blow.

I checked in with the company’s HR Director, expecting to hear stories of transformation.

Instead, she delivered the devastating news.

Nearly half of the 20 “high-potentials” from my cohort had left the company.

Of those who remained, several reported feeling more isolated and cynical than before the program started.

The expensive, meticulously designed intervention hadn’t just failed to create positive change; it seemed to have made things worse.

This failure sent me into a professional crisis.

It wasn’t a failure of execution; it was a failure of the entire premise.

My experience, I soon discovered, was not unique.

Companies spend billions of dollars annually on leadership development, yet a staggering number of these programs fail to produce any lasting business impact or meaningful behavioral change.⁴

We keep investing in these initiatives, convinced that with a better speaker or a more robust assessment, this time it will work.

But it rarely does.

The problem isn’t the quality of the individual components.

The problem is the model itself.

We spend our time and money trying to cultivate perfect individual leaders—like flawless specimen trees in a climate-controlled greenhouse—and then we wonder why they wither and die when we transplant them into the wild, complex, and often toxic ecosystem of the actual organization.

My heartbreaking failure forced me to ask a fundamental question: What if we’ve been focusing on the tree, when we should have been looking at the forest?

Part II: Deconstructing the Greenhouse – The Four Flaws of Isolated Leadership Development

The dominant model for leadership development, the one I had so faithfully executed, is what I now call the “Greenhouse Model.” It’s an approach that isolates individuals, nurtures them in a sterile, controlled environment, and expects them to thrive when returned to their day-to-day reality.

This model is built on a series of flawed assumptions that almost guarantee failure.

It’s a system designed to grow beautiful leaves that will be shredded by the first real storm.

Flaw 1: Overlooking the Soil (Ignoring Context)

My failed program used a competency model that was, in hindsight, a work of fiction.

It described a polished, formal, “corporate” leader, while the company itself had a scrappy, informal, “get-it-done” culture.

The behaviors we were teaching felt alien and inauthentic to the participants when they returned to their desks.⁹

This is the cardinal sin of most leadership programs: overlooking context.⁵

They deploy a one-size-fits-all approach, assuming that the same set of leadership skills is universally applicable, regardless of the organization’s unique strategy, culture, or challenges.⁴

Effective programs are not generic; they are bespoke.

They must begin with a deep and thorough needs assessment that identifies the organization’s specific leadership requirements, aligned with its strategic goals and growth plans.²

The critical question is not “What does a good leader look like?” but rather, “What kind of leadership does

this organization need, in this market, with this culture, to achieve these specific goals?”.¹

The failure to address context points to a deeper philosophical error.

We treat leadership as a set of transportable skills that can be installed in an individual, like software on a laptop.

But the evidence of widespread failure suggests something else entirely.

Leadership is not a static set of traits; it is a dynamic, relational activity that is emergent from a specific organizational system.

The system’s unwritten rules, its power dynamics, its communication patterns, and its cultural norms are the “soil” that determines what kind of leadership can realistically grow.⁸

Therefore, the first step of any development effort shouldn’t be designing a curriculum; it must be a deep diagnosis of the organizational soil to understand what it can actually sustain.

Flaw 2: Decoupling from the Forest (Ignoring Real Work)

The off-site retreat for my cohort was a powerful experience.

We had profound conversations and “aha” moments.

But within a week of returning to the relentless pressure of their jobs—the overflowing inboxes, back-to-back meetings, and quarterly targets—that inspiration evaporated.

The new behaviors felt like a luxury they couldn’t afford.

This is the classic “knowing-doing gap”.¹⁴

We know that adults retain only about 10% of what they hear in a classroom lecture, but they retain nearly two-thirds of what they learn by doing.⁵

The 70-20-10 model—which posits that 70% of development comes from on-the-job experiences, 20% from relationships and feedback, and only 10% from formal training—is widely cited but rarely practiced with conviction.⁶

Most programs, like mine, are heavily weighted toward that ineffective 10%, decoupling the learning from the real work it’s meant to influence.⁴

The problem of “learning transfer” isn’t something to be solved after the program ends with “reinforcement activities.” It’s a fundamental design flaw from the beginning.

By pulling leaders out of their complex, messy, real-world environment and teaching them in a sterile, artificial one, we create the very problem we then struggle to solve.

It is akin to training a pilot exclusively in a flight simulator and then being surprised when they struggle to handle a real plane in turbulent weather.

The solution is not better post-flight coaching; it is to integrate the training into real-world conditions from the start.

The “work” itself must become the classroom, and the organization’s most pressing business challenges must become the curriculum.

Flaw 3: Underestimating the Roots (Ignoring Mindsets)

I can still picture the face of one manager from my failed program.

He was brilliant, dedicated, and a notorious micromanager.

During a workshop, he could articulate the principles of delegation perfectly.

He intellectually understood the benefits of empowering his team.

Yet, back in the office, he couldn’t do it.

His actions were not governed by the new knowledge he had acquired, but by a deep-seated, unexamined belief: “If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself.” My program gave him new leaves but never touched his roots.

This is the failure to underestimate mindsets.⁵

Leadership is not just a set of skills; it is the behavioral expression of our deepest beliefs and assumptions.

Many programs focus on teaching observable behaviors (the “what”) while completely ignoring the underlying mindsets and emotional intelligence (the “why”) that either enable or block those behaviors.³

True, sustainable change requires a journey inward.

It demands that leaders develop profound self-awareness—understanding their strengths, weaknesses, values, and emotional triggers.¹

It requires them to confront their “inner critic” and the hidden narratives that drive their actions.¹⁷

Attempting to change behavior without addressing the underlying mindset is like trying to weed a garden by snipping off the tops of the weeds.

The roots remain, and the old habits will grow back, especially under pressure.

A program that teaches “how to have difficult conversations” will fail if the participant’s core mindset is “conflict is dangerous and must be avoided.” The new skill will feel inauthentic and will be abandoned at the first sign of real tension.

Therefore, an effective development program must do more than teach; it must create a psychologically safe container where leaders feel secure enough to be vulnerable, to excavate their own beliefs, and to consciously choose new ones.⁴

Flaw 4: Measuring the Leaves, Not the Fruit (Ignoring Real Impact)

The most insidious part of my failed program was that, by one metric, it was a huge success.

The participant satisfaction scores—the “happy sheets”—were off the charts.

They loved the hotel, the food, the charismatic speaker.

We had created a delightful experience.

But we never asked the questions that truly mattered: Did their teams become more engaged? Did they solve critical business problems? Did they innovate more? Did they retain their best people?

This is the fatal flaw of failing to measure results and R.I.⁴

When the primary metric for success is participant satisfaction, the entire system becomes optimized to create pleasant, entertaining, and ultimately superficial experiences.

Trainers are incentivized to please, not to challenge.

Discomfort, which is a prerequisite for genuine growth, is designed out of the system.⁵

What an organization chooses to measure is the clearest signal of what it truly values.

Measuring satisfaction signals that leadership development is a perk, a reward for high performance.

Measuring business impact signals that it is a core strategic investment.

To break the cycle of ineffective programs, the definition of success must be shifted from the start.

Success must be defined in tangible business and behavioral terms: a reduction in employee turnover, an increase in team productivity, an acceleration of project timelines, or a measurable improvement in specific leadership behaviors as assessed by 360-degree feedback over time.¹

This reorientation forces the entire design of the program to be relentlessly focused on creating tangible, demonstrable value.

We must stop measuring the beauty of the leaves and start measuring the quantity and quality of the fruit.

Part III: The Epiphany from the Forest Floor – The Wood-Wide Web

My professional crisis sent me searching for answers far outside the familiar terrain of business books and HR journals.

I started reading about systems thinking, complexity science, and ecology.

And that’s when I stumbled into the mysterious and magical world of mycology—the study of fungi.

It was here, in the damp soil of the forest floor, that I found the key to understanding why my program had failed and the blueprint for a new way forward.

I learned about the work of scientists like Suzanne Simard, who discovered that the forest is not a collection of solitary, competing trees, but a deeply interconnected, cooperative system.²⁰

The agent of this connection is an underground network of fungal threads called mycelium.

These threads fuse with tree roots in a symbiotic relationship called a mycorrhiza, creating a shared network that links virtually every tree in the forest.

This network has been dubbed the “Wood-Wide Web,” an organic internet that allows the forest to behave like a single, intelligent organism.²¹

This natural network performs functions that are shockingly analogous to the needs of a thriving organization:

• It Shares Nutrients and Resources: The mycelial network is a dynamic marketplace. It transports vital resources like carbon, nitrogen, and water from trees that have a surplus (those in full sun) to those in need (saplings struggling in the shade).²⁵ This resource sharing makes the entire forest more resilient, ensuring that even the most vulnerable members have a chance to survive and thrive. It is the forest’s social safety net and its resource allocation system, all in one.
• It Transmits Warning Signals: When a tree is attacked by a pest or disease, it releases chemical distress signals into the network. These signals travel through the mycelial threads to neighboring trees, warning them of the impending threat. The receiving trees can then mount their own defensive responses—such as producing insect-repelling tannins—before they are even attacked.²³ It is a biological early-warning system that enhances the collective immunity of the forest.
• It Nurtures the Next Generation: The largest, most established trees, which Simard calls “Mother Trees,” act as hubs in the network. They are connected to hundreds of other trees. Critically, these Mother Trees have been shown to recognize their own kin and preferentially send more nutrients and carbon to their offspring, dramatically increasing their chances of survival.²⁰ This is nature’s succession plan, a mechanism for investing in the future leadership of the forest.

Reading this, the scales fell from my eyes.

The epiphany was as simple as it was profound: Great organizations don’t just grow great leaders (trees); they intentionally cultivate the invisible, supportive network that connects them (the mycelium).

My entire career, I had been a greenhouse manager, obsessing over the health of individual specimen trees.

I had failed because I was blind to the soil, the roots, and the vast, life-giving network that truly determined their fate.

The goal wasn’t to create a perfect tree in isolation.

The goal was to become a forest-keeper, to cultivate a rich, resilient, and intelligent ecosystem where leadership could thrive.

This realization demanded a complete paradigm shift, a move away from the isolated Greenhouse Model to a connected, systems-based approach.

Feature	The Greenhouse Model (Old Paradigm)	The Mycelial Model (New Paradigm)
Unit of Focus	The individual leader (“The Specimen Tree”)	The network & relationships between leaders
Core Activity	Episodic training events, knowledge transfer	Continuous process of connection & practice
Learning Method	Theoretical, classroom-based	Experiential, on-the-job, peer-to-peer
Context	Generic, one-size-fits-all competencies	Tailored to specific organizational challenges
Goal	Develop individual skills	Build collective capability & resilience
Measure of Success	Participant satisfaction, knowledge retention	Business impact, behavioral change, network health

Part IV: The Mycelial Leadership Framework – A Blueprint for Interconnected Growth

Inspired by the wisdom of the forest, I began to develop a new approach to leadership development, one designed not to “train” individuals but to “weave” a network.

The Mycelial Leadership Framework is not a program in the traditional sense; it is a continuous process for building a connected, adaptive, and resilient organization.

It is based on three core pillars that mirror the functions of a healthy natural ecosystem.

Pillar 1: Preparing the Soil – Cultivating a Psychologically Safe Ecosystem

Before a single mycelial thread can grow, the soil must be fertile.

It needs the right balance of nutrients, moisture, and structure.

In an organization, the soil is the culture.

A toxic, fear-based culture will kill any attempt at growth.

The essential nutrient for a thriving organizational network is psychological safety.

This is the shared belief that the team is safe for interpersonal risk-taking—safe to speak up, to disagree, to ask for help, and to fail without fear of humiliation or punishment.¹¹

Psychological safety is not a “soft” HR concept; it is the absolute prerequisite for the high-speed, honest information exchange that a mycelial network requires.

Fear blocks the flow.

Fear of looking incompetent, fear of retribution, fear of failure—these emotions cause people to withhold crucial information, delay sharing bad news, and avoid challenging the status quo.

Cultivating safety is the foundational work of the organizational mycologist.

Actionable Steps:

• Secure Executive Sponsorship and Role-Modeling: The network cannot grow if senior leaders are poisoning the soil. Their authentic, visible buy-in is non-negotiable.¹⁵ They must not only provide resources but also model the desired behaviors themselves. Critically, senior leaders must participate in the development process, demonstrating that learning and vulnerability are expected at all levels, not just pushed down to middle management.⁸ When leaders act as if they are exempt from the new rules, they send a powerful signal that the old ways still reign supreme.¹³
• Define Leadership for Your Context: As discussed, the process must begin with a deep diagnosis of the organization’s strategic needs.² Work with the senior team to identify the two or three most critical leadership capabilities that will directly enable the business strategy.⁵ This moves the initiative from a generic “leadership training” to a targeted “strategic capability build,” making its value clear and aligning all efforts toward a tangible goal.¹
• Build a Robust Feedback Culture: Self-awareness is the bedrock of growth, and feedback is the tool that builds it.¹⁷ Implement systems for candid, constructive, and continuous feedback. This includes formal tools like 360-degree assessments, which provide structured, multi-rater input, but also informal practices that encourage open dialogue. The goal is to normalize the process of giving and receiving feedback, transforming it from a dreaded annual event into a daily practice of learning and adjustment.¹

Pillar 2: Weaving the Network – Forging Symbiotic Connections

Once the soil is prepared, the real work of weaving the network begins.

This is about moving from abstract principles to concrete, structured practices that force connection, collaboration, and mutual support.

The Mycelial Framework uses three powerful, field-tested methodologies that work together as an integrated system, mirroring the structure of a forest’s underground network.

1. Cross-Functional “Challenge” Projects (The Main Roots):

The thick, structural roots of the mycelial network are the cross-functional projects.

These are not theoretical case studies; they are real, high-stakes business challenges that the organization needs to solve.

High-potential leaders are assigned to lead small, diverse teams tasked with tackling one of these challenges, such as launching a new product, optimizing a supply chain, or entering a new market.

This is the ultimate expression of the 70-20-10 rule, embedding development directly into value-creating work.⁵

It forces leaders from different functional silos—engineering, marketing, finance, sales—to leave their departmental tribes and work together toward a common goal.³¹

In doing so, they build the most critical leadership skills for today’s complex world: strategic thinking, adaptability, problem-solving, and, most importantly, influencing without formal authority.³¹

They learn to navigate different priorities, speak different functional languages, and build the trust and relationships necessary to get things done across organizational boundaries.³⁴

2. Peer-to-Peer Coaching Pods (The Hyphae):

If cross-functional projects are the main roots, peer coaching pods are the fine, thread-like hyphae that create the dense, resilient fabric of the network.

These are small, confidential groups of 4-6 leaders who meet regularly (e.g., bi-weekly) to coach each other on their live, real-time leadership challenges.³⁶

This is not a casual chat.

It is a structured, reciprocal process where members take turns being the “coachee” and the “coach”.³⁷

Unlike traditional mentoring, it is non-hierarchical; the power dynamic is flat, which fosters a unique level of honesty and vulnerability.³⁸

These pods become a safe space where leaders can admit they don’t have the answers, share their struggles without fear of judgment, and get diverse perspectives from peers who understand their context.³⁹

This process builds deep, trust-based relationships, provides crucial emotional support, and creates a powerful accountability mechanism for behavioral change.³⁸

Furthermore, it teaches participants the meta-skill of coaching itself: the art of asking powerful, open-ended questions that unlock insight in others, rather than simply giving advice.³⁷

3. Action Learning Sets (The Nutrient Hubs):

Action Learning Sets (ALS) are the nodes of the network—the points where resources and intelligence are concentrated and processed for the benefit of the whole system.

An ALS is a structured problem-solving process where a group convenes to help one member tackle a complex, urgent challenge.⁴¹

The process is deceptively simple but powerful.

The presenter outlines their problem.

The role of the group, however, is not to offer solutions or advice.

Instead, their sole task is to ask clarifying, probing, and insightful questions.

“What have you already tried?” “What assumptions are you making?” “What would happen if you did nothing?” Through this disciplined process of inquiry, the presenter is guided to see their problem from new angles, challenge their own thinking, and ultimately arrive at their own solution and action plan.⁴¹

ALS builds the collective capacity for critical thinking, complex problem-framing, and systems analysis.

It reinforces a culture of inquiry over advocacy, teaching leaders that the most valuable contribution is often a powerful question, not a premature answer.

These three practices are not a menu of options to be chosen from.

They are an integrated, mutually reinforcing system.

The cross-functional projects provide the real-world “what”—the substantive challenges that ground the development process.

The peer coaching pods provide the relational “who”—the trust and support needed to navigate those challenges.

The Action Learning Sets provide the cognitive “how”—the disciplined thinking required to solve them.

Together, they weave a multi-layered, resilient, and highly effective leadership ecosystem.

Pillar 3: Enabling the Flow – The Exchange of Knowledge and Resources

A network is only as valuable as the information that flows through it.

A forest with a vast mycelial network that doesn’t transport water or nutrients is a dead forest.

This final pillar focuses on creating the channels and culture necessary for knowledge, insights, and support to move freely and efficiently throughout the organization.

Actionable Steps:

• Establish a Digital Substrate: The mycelial network in a modern organization has a digital component. This is the “digital soil” that supports asynchronous communication and knowledge retention. Champion the use of collaborative platforms like Microsoft Teams, Slack, Confluence, or Notion as the organization’s central nervous system.⁴² These tools should be the primary place where project progress is documented, questions are asked, and learnings are shared. This creates a searchable, persistent organizational memory, ensuring that valuable insights are not lost in individual inboxes or fleeting conversations.⁴²
• Promote a Culture of Continuous Learning: Leadership development is not a one-time event; it is a continuous journey.¹ The initial weaving of the network must be followed by continuous nourishment. This means providing ongoing resources to the network—curated articles, expert webinars, access to online courses, and follow-up coaching—that reinforce and deepen the learning.³ This creates a culture where learning is not something that happens “off-site,” but is an integral part of the daily work.
• Measure the Flow and Health of the Network: Shift your measurement strategy away from individual satisfaction and toward network effectiveness. Track metrics that indicate the health of your organizational ecosystem. Are the cross-functional projects meeting their business goals? Are participants in peer coaching pods reporting high levels of trust and value? Is knowledge being actively shared and accessed on the digital platforms? Are you seeing a measurable improvement in the specific leadership behaviors you targeted in Pillar 1? This focus on network health ensures that the development effort remains tied to real, strategic outcomes.

The ultimate goal is to build a true “learning organization.” This is not an abstract ideal but a practical reality.

A learning organization is one that can sense and adapt to change with speed and agility.

This requires information to flow from the edges of the organization—where change is first detected—to the strategic core with minimal friction.

The Mycelial Leadership Framework, with its interconnected projects, peer pods, and digital platforms, is a practical blueprint for building exactly that.

The “development program” is no longer a cost center; it becomes the engine for building a permanent organizational capability for sensing, responding, and thriving in a complex world.

Part V: The Fruiting Bodies – A Case Study in Applied Mycelial Leadership

After my initial, painful failure, the Mycelial Framework became my guiding philosophy.

The opportunity to put it to a true test came a couple of years later with a mid-sized industrial manufacturing firm.

They were facing a classic set of problems: deep functional silos, a stagnant culture, and a leadership pipeline that was failing to produce leaders capable of navigating increasing complexity.

Their previous attempts at leadership training had been expensive and ineffective.

They were skeptical, but desperate enough to try something new.

This was my chance to move from being a greenhouse manager to a forest-keeper.

The Application:

• Preparing the Soil: We began not with a curriculum, but with a series of candid workshops with the CEO and his senior team. We didn’t talk about generic competencies; we talked about their five-year strategic plan. From that, we identified three leadership behaviors that were absolutely critical to their future success: 1) Fostering cross-functional collaboration to break down silos, 2) Driving customer-centric innovation, and 3) Demonstrating deep commercial acumen. The CEO committed not only to funding the initiative but to personally modeling these behaviors and holding his team accountable for doing the same.
• Weaving the Network: We identified three mission-critical “challenge projects” that directly mapped to their strategic goals: one focused on optimizing their global supply chain, a second on developing a new “smart” product line with embedded IoT technology, and a third on reducing factory floor waste by 15%. We hand-picked 18 of their most promising mid-level leaders to lead and participate in these project teams, ensuring a mix of functions (engineering, operations, sales, finance) on each. These 18 leaders were then organized into three peer-to-peer coaching pods of six, which met every two weeks.
• Enabling the Flow: The company was already a Microsoft shop, so we established Microsoft Teams as the non-negotiable central hub for all project communication, documentation, and knowledge sharing. Each project had its own dedicated channel, and we created a separate “Leadership Network” channel for the 18 participants to share insights and ask for help across projects.

The process was not always smooth.

There were conflicts over resources and priorities.

There were uncomfortable moments in the peer coaching pods as individuals confronted their blind spots.

But because we had prepared the soil and built the network on a foundation of real, meaningful work, they persevered.

The Results (The Fruiting Bodies):

After 18 months, the results were no longer underground.

They were visible, tangible “fruiting bodies” that the entire organization could see.

• The supply chain project team successfully redesigned their logistics network, reducing average lead times by 18% and saving the company over $3 million in the first year.
• The product development team, which brought together engineers who had never spoken to salespeople, launched the new smart product line two months ahead of schedule. It became their most successful new product in a decade.
• 360-degree feedback, conducted before the initiative and 18 months later, showed a 40% average improvement in scores related to cross-departmental collaboration and communication for the 18 participants.
• And the metric that was most personal to me: of the 18 leaders who participated, 17 were still with the company, and 12 had been promoted. Retention was 94%.

This success, which mirrors the outcomes seen in innovative programs at companies like General Electric and Randstad that emphasize experiential learning and mentorship ⁴⁵, was not a result of better training modules.

It was the result of a healthier ecosystem.

We didn’t just grow 18 stronger trees; we grew a more resilient forest.

Part VI: How to Become a Forest-Keeper

The greatest challenge in leadership development is not a lack of knowledge or resources.

It is a failure of imagination.

We continue to invest in the flawed Greenhouse Model because it is familiar, linear, and easy to measure with the wrong metrics.

It feels controllable.

The Mycelial Model asks for a fundamental shift in perspective.

It asks us to let go of the illusion of control and embrace the messy, complex, and emergent reality of organizational life.

It asks us to stop being greenhouse managers, obsessing over the perfection of individual leaders, and to become patient, observant forest-keepers, focused on the health and connectivity of the entire ecosystem.

This shift can feel daunting, but the journey does not have to begin with a massive, company-wide transformation.

Like a mycelial network, it can start small and spread.

If you are a leader looking to cultivate a more resilient and adaptive organization, here is a simple way to begin:

1. Start with One Real Problem: Don’t try to boil the ocean. Identify one single, critical, and complex business challenge that your organization is facing right now.
2. Form One Cross-Functional Team: Assemble a small, diverse team of 5-7 individuals from different parts of the business to tackle that one problem. Choose people known for their expertise and collaborative spirit.
3. Launch One Peer Coaching Pod: Mandate that this team meets for one hour every two weeks, using the peer coaching format to support each other through the challenges of the project. Give them the guidelines: no advice, only open-ended questions.
4. Listen to the Network: Your role is not to direct them, but to listen. Pay close attention to what they learn, where they struggle, and what they need. Observe the flow of information and the quality of their collaboration.
5. Nurture and Expand: Protect this small experiment. Celebrate its successes—both the business outcomes and the collaborative breakthroughs. Use the story of this first team to build momentum and secure buy-in to expand the network, one project and one pod at a time.

The most powerful leadership development program is not a program at all.

It is a new way of seeing and being in our organizations.

It is the conscious and continuous effort to cultivate the rich, interconnected, and life-giving network where leadership, innovation, and resilience can emerge and thrive naturally, like mushrooms after a rain.

Works cited

1. Essential Components of a Leadership Development Plan: A Comprehensive Guide to the Top 5 Elements – PeopleThriver, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://peoplethriver.com/what-are-the-five-components-of-a-leadership-development-plan/
2. Components of a Successful Leadership Development Program – TrainingFolks, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.trainingfolks.com/blog/components-of-a-successful-leadership-development-program
3. Guide to Leadership Development Programs & Management – BMC Training, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.bmc.net/blog/management-and-leadership-articles/leadership-development-programs
4. Why Leadership Development Programs Fail | CMOE, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://cmoe.com/blog/why-leadership-development-programs-fail/
5. Why leadership-development programs fail | McKinsey, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/leadership/why-leadership-development-programs-fail
6. Leadership Development Programs: A Complete Guide – Qualtrics, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.qualtrics.com/experience-management/employee/leadership-development/
7. Why Most Leadership Development Programs Are Not Working …, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://peoplethriver.com/why-are-most-leadership-development-programs-not-working/
8. The 6 Reasons Leadership Development Programs Fail – PeopleThriver, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://peoplethriver.com/why-leadership-development-programs-fail/
9. 6 Common Mistakes in Leadership Development – The L&D Academy, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.thelndacademy.com/post/6-common-mistakes-in-leadership-development
10. McKinsey Classics: Why leadership development programs fail, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/email/classics/2025/2025-01-18d.html
11. 4 Key Components of an Effective Leadership Development Program, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://letts-consult.com/4-key-components-effective-leadership-development-program/
12. Importance of leadership development programs | University Canada West (UCW), accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.ucanwest.ca/blog/education-careers-tips/importance-of-leadership-development-programs
13. Missing the Mark: Why Leadership Programs Fail – Egon Zehnder, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.egonzehnder.com/leadership-development-revisited/missing-the-mark-why-leadership-programs-fail
14. Demystifying Why Leadership Development Often Fails, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.performdev.com/blog/demystifying-why-leadership-development-often-fails/
15. www.ccl.org, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.ccl.org/articles/leading-effectively-articles/3-keys-making-leadership-development-work/
16. Address Key Components of Executive Leadership Development – FranklinCovey Academy, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.franklincoveyacademy.com/executive-leadership-training/
17. Leadership Development Program – Co-Active Training Institute, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://coactive.com/blog/leadership-development-program/
18. 10 Objectives of Leadership Training – Highrise Coaching, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.tryhighrise.com/blog-posts/objectives-of-leadership-training
19. GUIDE TO LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS – Center for …, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.ccl.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/open-enrollment-leadership-programs-guide-center-for-creative-leadership.pdf
20. Exploring How and Why Trees ‘Talk’ to Each Other – Yale E360, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://e360.yale.edu/features/exploring_how_and_why_trees_talk_to_each_other
21. What Can Mushrooms Teach Us About Leadership? A Lot, Actually. – Recruiter.com, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.recruiter.com/recruiting/5-ways-leaders-can-mirror-nature-to-reward-cooperation/
22. Teams and Organizations as living networks: the mycelium metaphor – TransitionStudio, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://transitionstudio.global/en/teams-and-organizations-as-living-networks-the-mycelium-metaphor/
23. Do Trees Talk to Each Other? – Smithsonian Magazine, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/the-whispering-trees-180968084/
24. Understanding the Wood Wide Web – EcoMatcher, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.ecomatcher.com/understanding-the-wood-wide-web/
25. Common Mycorrhizae Network: A Review of the Theories … – Frontiers, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/fungal-biology/articles/10.3389/ffunb.2021.735299/full
26. Underground Networking: The Amazing Connections Beneath Your Feet – National Forest Foundation, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.nationalforests.org/blog/underground-mycorrhizal-network
27. Full article: Common mycorrhizal networks and their effect on the bargaining power of the fungal partner in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis – Taylor & Francis Online, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19420889.2015.1107684
28. The Common Mycelial Network (CMN) of Forests – College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://clas.ucdenver.edu/ges/common-mycelial-network-cmn-forests
29. Inter-plant communication through mycorrhizal networks mediates …, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4497361/
30. Mycelium: The Forest’s Secret Communication System – Great South Bay Audubon Society, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.greatsouthbayaudubon.org/the-sandpiper/mycelium-the-forests-secret-communication-system/
31. 7 Essential Skills For Cross-Functional Team Leaders | Vervoe Blog, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://vervoe.com/7-essential-skills-for-cross-functional-team-leaders/
32. How Cross-Functional Collaboration Drives Success – College of …, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://ccaps.umn.edu/story/how-cross-functional-collaboration-drives-success
33. 10 Essential Skills for Effective Cross-Functional Leadership | Thomas.co, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.thomas.co/resources/type/hr-blog/10-essential-skills-effective-cross-functional-leadership
34. 11 Strategies for Effective Cross-Functional Team Leadership …, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.tryhighrise.com/blog-posts/cross-functional-team-leadership
35. 9 Proven Steps to Build a High-Impact Cross-Functional Team, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.edstellar.com/blog/how-to-build-cross-functional-team
36. Peer Coaching | McNulty Leadership Program, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://leadership.wharton.upenn.edu/peer-coaching/
37. Peer Coaching as a Leader Development Tool in Professional …, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Journal-of-Military-Learning/Journal-of-Military-Learning-Archives/JML-October-2023/Peer-Coaching/
38. 10 Benefits of Peer Coaching in the Workplace | UWA Online, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://online.uwa.edu/news/peer-coaching-workplace/
39. Why Leaders and Managers Need Peer-to-Peer Coaching to Thrive …, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://drnataliepickering.com/why-leaders-and-managers-need-peer-to-peer-coaching-to-thrive-in-todays-complex-work-environment/
40. Peer Coaching for Managers and Teams: Your Go-To Guide, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.betterup.com/blog/peer-coaching
41. Action learning sets – NHS England, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.england.nhs.uk/improvement-hub/wp-content/uploads/sites/44/2015/08/learning-handbook-action-learning-sets.pdf
42. 18 Best Knowledge Sharing Platforms in 2025 – Whatfix, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://whatfix.com/blog/knowledge-sharing-platforms/
43. 7 Best Knowledge-Sharing Tools in 2025 – Document360, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://document360.com/blog/knowledge-sharing-tools/
44. Trainual: Training, Knowledge, & Learning Management Software, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://trainual.com/
45. 6 Examples of Incredible Leadership Development Programs (+ …, accessed on August 7, 2025, https://www.togetherplatform.com/blog/examples-of-leadership-development-programs