The Architect and the Garden: Why Most Leadership Advice Fails and How to Cultivate a Thriving Team

Introduction: The Day My Blueprint Cracked

I still remember the feeling—a cold knot of dread in my stomach as I stared at the project status board, a sea of red indicators glaring back at me.

I was in my late twenties, a newly minted manager, and this project was meant to be my showpiece.

I had been given a critical initiative, a talented team, and what I believed was the perfect blueprint for leadership.

That blueprint, meticulously assembled from business school case studies and the prevailing wisdom of the time, was my shield and my sword.

And it was failing, spectacularly.

My approach was, I thought, the very definition of strong leadership.

I took complete control, embodying an autocratic style because I believed a leader’s job was to make the tough decisions and move forward with speed.¹

I spent weeks defining every role, every responsibility, every process.

My project plan was a work of art, a testament to structure and control.

This was a top-down operation, focused on hitting immediate objectives and adhering to standardized procedures.¹

I was the builder, and my team were the laborers tasked with executing my flawless design.

This model was rooted in a deep, unexamined belief that leadership was a set of inherent qualities—confidence, intelligence, determination—that certain people possessed.

The “Great Man” theory, as the academics call it, suggests leaders are born, not made, possessing intrinsic traits that enable them to assume authority when needed.³

I acted as if I had been born for this, that my blueprint was an extension of these innate traits.

The implosion was not sudden; it was a slow, grinding collapse.

The team, initially compliant, grew disengaged.

Creativity vanished, replaced by a sullen, box-ticking mentality.

Communication frayed into a series of terse emails and avoided eye contact.

They felt disempowered, their own expertise and ideas ignored in favor of my rigid plan.¹

I was so focused on the mechanics of the project—the what and the when—that I had completely ignored the human beings who were meant to bring it to life.

The project missed its key deadlines, the final product was a shadow of its potential, and the failure was both public and painful.

It was my crucible.

Staring at that sea of red, I was forced to confront a devastating truth: my blueprint wasn’t just flawed, it was fundamentally wrong.

The problem wasn’t my plan; it was my entire philosophy of leadership.

The Epiphany: Leadership Isn’t Construction, It’s Cultivation

In the humbling aftermath of that failure, I stepped back.

I read everything I could, not just about business, but about systems, psychology, and biology.

The real turning point, however, came from an unexpected place: a documentary on landscape architecture.

I watched as a world-renowned architect described her process for designing a public garden.

She didn’t start with a rigid, preconceived blueprint to impose on the land.

Her first step was to walk the grounds for days, studying the native soil, the patterns of sunlight and shade, the flow of water, the existing plants.

Her goal wasn’t to force a design onto the environment, but to create the optimal conditions for a resilient, beautiful, and self-sustaining ecosystem to emerge and thrive.

That was it.

That was the lightning bolt.

I had been trying to lead my team like a construction foreman building a skyscraper—all steel, concrete, and rigid lines, demanding that every piece fit perfectly into my predetermined structure.

I should have been leading like a landscape architect cultivating a garden.

A team isn’t a machine to be built; it’s a living ecosystem to be nurtured.

This single shift in metaphor didn’t just give me a new set of tactics; it gave me an entirely new worldview.

It was the birth of a new paradigm, one I came to call the Ecosystem Architect.

The role of a leader, I realized, is not to be a master builder who commands and controls, but a patient architect who understands, cultivates, and nurtures the complex, interconnected system of their team.

This new model reframed everything.

It honored the complexity of people and the dynamic nature of work, providing a more holistic and adaptive way to lead.

Feature	The Blueprint Leader (The Builder)	The Ecosystem Leader (The Architect)
Core Metaphor	Building a structure	Cultivating a garden
Primary Focus	Control, process, and structure	Conditions, relationships, and culture
Source of Power	Positional authority and commands	Influence and service
Goal	Predictability and short-term results	Resilience and long-term health
View of Team	Laborers executing a plan	Unique organisms in an ecosystem
Response to Problems	Enforce the plan more rigidly	Diagnose the system and adjust conditions
Leader’s Role	Hero who has all the answers	Steward who prepares the environment

Part I: Preparing the Soil: The Foundational Principles of a Thriving Ecosystem

Any gardener knows that a project is doomed before it begins if the soil is dead.

You can have the best seeds and the perfect amount of sunlight, but without rich, fertile soil, nothing of value will grow.

My first, failed attempt at leadership was a soil-less enterprise; I tried to plant a garden on concrete.

I learned the hard way that the “soil” of any team is the underlying culture, a medium rich with two essential, non-negotiable nutrients: trust and purpose.

Without this foundation, no leadership style, no matter how clever or well-intentioned, can ever take root.

The Nutrient of Trust – The Role of Authentic Leadership

Trust is the primary nutrient in the soil of a team.

It’s the humus, the organic matter that allows for connection, risk-taking, and growth.

This trust doesn’t come from a leader’s title or their ability to articulate a plan; it comes from their authenticity.

Authentic Leadership is a modern approach built on the principle that leaders prove their legitimacy by nurturing sincere relationships and being true to themselves.⁵

It is the polar opposite of the role-playing I did in my early career.

The research identifies four key components that make a leader authentic and, therefore, trustworthy ⁶:

1. Self-Awareness: This is the starting point. An authentic leader has done the hard work of introspection. They reflect on their actions and decisions, examining their own strengths, weaknesses, and biases without illusion.⁵ They understand their own values and moral compass, which allows them to act with consistency and integrity.⁷ This self-awareness is what prevents them from trying to imitate other leaders or fit into a preconceived mold; they lead from a place of genuine self-knowledge.⁷
2. Integrity and an Internalized Moral Perspective: Authentic leaders don’t just know their values; they live them. Their behavior is consistent with their beliefs, and they keep their word.⁵ This creates predictability and safety. When a leader’s actions align with their stated principles, people stop questioning their motives and start trusting their character.⁸
3. Transparency: Authentic leaders are not afraid to be who they are. They don’t hide their mistakes or weaknesses, and the image they project in public is not drastically different from who they are in private.⁵ This relational transparency, this willingness to be vulnerable and direct, demolishes the walls that positional power often creates, fostering open communication and genuine connection.⁶
4. Balanced Processing: This means being a good listener, even when—especially when—someone contradicts your views.⁵ An authentic leader actively seeks out diverse perspectives and is willing to change their mind when an argument makes sense. They are not threatened by dissent; they welcome it as a path to a better decision.

When a leader embodies these qualities, they create an environment of profound psychological safety.

Team members feel they can take risks, offer radical ideas, and admit mistakes without fear of punishment.

This is the fertile ground where innovation and high performance can finally sprout.

The Water of Purpose – The Principles of Servant Leadership

If trust is the soil’s nutrient, purpose is the water that gives it life.

It’s what quenches the team’s thirst for meaning and allows them to grow toward something greater than themselves.

This sense of purpose flows directly from the leader’s fundamental motivation.

Is the leader there to serve their own ego, their career, or a rigid project plan? Or are they there to serve the team and its shared mission? This is the central question of Servant Leadership.

Proposed by Robert K.

Greenleaf, Servant Leadership begins with the natural feeling that one wants to serve first.⁹

It inverts the traditional power pyramid, placing the leader at the bottom, responsible for supporting and uplifting their team.

This isn’t about being subservient; it’s about understanding that a leader’s primary role is to enable the success and growth of others.

The key principles of this philosophy provide the “water” for the ecosystem:

• Listening and Empathy: A servant leader makes a deep commitment to listening intently to others, seeking to identify and clarify the will of the group.⁹ This isn’t passive hearing; it’s an active, empathetic process of striving to understand and accept people for their unique spirits, even when you have to reject a specific behavior or performance.¹⁰ They assume good intentions, which fosters a climate of mutual respect.
• Commitment to the Growth of People: This is perhaps the most critical element. Servant leaders believe that people have an intrinsic value beyond their tangible contributions as workers.⁹ They are deeply committed to nurturing the personal, professional, and even spiritual growth of every individual in their organization.⁹ This means empowering others, creating a safe environment for them to grow, and actively uncovering the shared goals that inspire ownership and internal motivation.¹²
• Stewardship: A servant leader sees their role as a form of stewardship. They hold their institution, their team, and its purpose “in trust for the greater good of society”.⁹ This means they privilege people before tasks and choose ethics before profit.¹² Their focus is on building a better future, not just on hitting a quarterly target.
• Building Community: In a world where large institutions can feel alienating, the servant leader actively seeks to build a sense of community within the team.⁹ They create an environment of connection and belonging where people feel like they are part of something meaningful.

My initial failure was a direct result of ignoring these foundational elements.

I was not authentic; I was playing the role of a “boss.” I was not a servant; I was a master demanding compliance with my blueprint.

The ground was barren.

It was only by understanding that Authentic and Servant Leadership are not just optional “styles,” but are the preconditions for a healthy ecosystem, that I was able to start leading effectively.

They are the soil and water, the non-negotiable foundation upon which everything else is built.

Part II: Mastering the Climate: Applying Adaptive Leadership Styles

Once the soil is rich with trust and purpose, the Ecosystem Architect’s work shifts.

They must now become a master of the climate.

A garden is not a static environment; it is subject to changing seasons and weather patterns.

Some plants thrive in direct, intense sun; others require gentle, filtered light.

Some need a daily soaking; others prefer dry conditions.

A skilled architect doesn’t use a single approach for the entire garden.

They read the environment and adapt their actions to meet the specific needs of the situation and the organisms within it.

This was the second great lesson I learned.

My original “blueprint” approach was like trying to impose a perpetual, harsh midday sun on every corner of the garden, scorching some plants while leaving others in desperate need of shade.

I had to learn to stop using one rigid style and instead develop a toolkit to manage the climate.

Reading the Seasons – The Wisdom of Situational & Contingency Theory

The first step in mastering the climate is diagnosis.

Before acting, the architect must assess the conditions.

This is the core insight of Situational and Contingency theories of leadership, which emerged in the 1960s as a direct response to the idea that there was one “best” way to lead.¹³

These theories assert that effective leadership is contingent upon the context.⁴

There is no single style that works in all situations; a leader must be able to diagnose the environment and then choose the approach that best fits.¹⁵

Two of the most influential models provide a powerful diagnostic framework:

• Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Theory focuses on the “readiness” or maturity of the followers.¹³ This readiness is a combination of their competence (ability) and their commitment (willingness). The theory proposes four leadership styles—telling, selling, participating, and delegating—that a leader should adapt based on where their team members fall on this readiness spectrum.⁶ A new, insecure employee needs a different approach than a seasoned, self-sufficient expert.
• Fiedler’s Contingency Model argues that a leader’s effectiveness depends on the fit between their style (which he saw as relatively fixed) and the situation’s favorableness.¹³ This favorableness is determined by three factors: leader-member relations (the level of trust), task structure (how clear and defined the work is), and the leader’s position power (their formal authority).

The crucial takeaway from these theories is not the specific quadrants or charts, but the fundamental shift in mindset they represent.

They force a leader to stop looking inward at their own preferred style and start looking outward at the needs of the team and the demands of the situation.

It is the move from a monologue to a dialogue.

My blueprint failed because it was a monologue; I never stopped to read the climate.

From Harsh Sun to Gentle Rain – A Spectrum of Leadership Behaviors

After diagnosing the climate, the architect selects the right tool.

This is where the various leadership “styles” identified by researchers become not rigid identities, but a flexible toolkit of behaviors.

The historical evolution of leadership thought itself provides a map for this development.

Early theories focused on who you are (Traits), which is a static concept.

They were followed by Behavioral theories, which shifted the focus to what you do (Actions), suggesting leadership could be learned.¹³

Situational theories represent the highest level of this evolution: adapting

what you do based on the context.

My own journey mirrored this path: I started with a flawed, trait-based identity, and my failure forced me to mature into a more adaptive practitioner.

Drawing from models like Daniel Goleman’s six styles and Kurt Lewin’s foundational work, we can build a practical “climate control” toolkit ¹⁵:

• The Commanding/Autocratic Style (A Sudden Storm): This is a “do what I say” approach. It’s often seen as negative, and if overused, it certainly is. It can stifle motivation and disempower a team.¹ However, in a true crisis—a “code blue” in the ICU, a critical system failure—it is not only effective but necessary. There is no time for debate; fast, decisive action is required to save the patient or the project.¹⁵
• The Visionary Style (Bright, Clear Sunlight): This style is about mobilizing the team toward a shared dream. The leader articulates a clear and compelling vision for the future and invites people to join them on the journey.¹⁵ It is most effective when an organization is adrift or needs a new direction. It doesn’t focus on the day-to-day tasks but illuminates the destination, giving everyone’s work a sense of higher purpose.
• The Democratic Style (A Council Circle): This is the opposite of the autocratic style. The leader actively solicits input, fosters debate, and builds consensus before making a decision.¹ This approach is incredibly valuable for getting buy-in, ensuring diverse perspectives are heard, and improving innovation. Its primary drawback is speed; it can be a slow way to move forward and can lead to stalemates if not managed well.¹ It’s best used in the early stages of a project to set the vision and direction collaboratively.
• The Coaching & Affiliative Styles (Steady, Nurturing Rain): These two styles are focused on people and relationships. The Coaching leader takes a developmental approach, helping team members identify their strengths and weaknesses and improve their skills over the long term.¹⁵ The
  Affiliative leader prioritizes creating emotional bonds and a positive, harmonious work environment. They are masters of empathy and building team morale. Both styles are about nurturing the individuals within the ecosystem, ensuring they feel supported and valued.
• The Pacesetting Style (Leading the Pack): The pacesetting leader leads by example, setting extremely high standards of performance and expecting the team to match their pace.¹⁵ This can be effective with a team that is already highly skilled and motivated. However, it can quickly backfire, overwhelming team members and making them feel like they can never measure up.

By understanding these styles not as fixed identities but as tools in a kit, a leader can become a true Ecosystem Architect, applying the right approach at the right time to cultivate a thriving and adaptive environment.

A Leader’s Climate Control Toolkit
Style / Behavior	Climate Analogy	Best Used When…	Potential Risks
Commanding	A Sudden Storm	In a crisis, to kickstart a turnaround, or with problem employees.	Erodes morale and stifles creativity if overused.
Visionary	Bright, Clear Sunlight	A clear new direction is needed; change requires a new shared vision.	Can fail if the vision is not grounded in reality or a clear plan.
Democratic	A Council Circle	To build buy-in or consensus and to get valuable input from the team.	Can be very slow, leading to endless meetings and indecision.
Affiliative	A Harmonious Atmosphere	To heal rifts in a team, motivate during stressful times, or strengthen connections.	Can lead to avoidance of conflict and a lack of critical feedback.
Coaching	Nurturing Rain	To help an employee improve performance or develop long-term strengths.	Is time-consuming and can feel like micromanaging if not done well.
Pacesetting	Leading the Pack	To get high-quality results from a motivated and competent team.	Can overwhelm team members and crush morale if standards are too high.

Part III: The Role of the Architect: Transactional Management vs. Transformational Cultivation

We have prepared the soil with trust and purpose, and we have learned to master the daily climate with adaptive styles.

Now we arrive at the highest level of the architect’s work: the ultimate vision and purpose of the garden itself.

Is the goal simply to have a neat, orderly plot of land that follows all the rules? Or is it to cultivate a breathtaking, innovative, and flourishing ecosystem that reaches its absolute fullest potential? This question brings us to the central dichotomy in modern leadership thought: the distinction between Transactional and Transformational leadership.

Through the lens of our analogy, this is not a choice between two competing styles.

It is the difference between the ongoing work of a gardener and the visionary work of the architect.

And a truly great ecosystem needs both.

The Gardener’s Maintenance – The Necessary Role of Transactional Leadership

Every garden, no matter how visionary its design, requires constant maintenance.

Weeds must be pulled, plants must be pruned, and regular watering schedules must be kept.

This is the essential, practical work of the gardener.

In leadership, this is the role of Transactional Leadership.

Transactional leadership is a style focused on exchanges.

It operates on a system of contingent rewards and punishments.¹⁷

The leader clarifies work roles and task requirements, and followers are motivated by the promise of rewards (like a bonus, promotion, or recognition) for meeting specific goals, or the threat of consequences for failing to do so.³

This approach is characterized by a clear chain of command and a focus on monitoring performance and managing by exception—that is, intervening only when things go wrong.²⁰

This style is practical, structured, and highly effective for maintaining stability and achieving clear, short-term objectives.¹⁸

It ensures that the day-to-day operations run smoothly.

In my initial failure, I was

only a transactional leader.

I was so focused on the weeding and pruning—the tasks, the metrics, the deadlines—that I completely missed the bigger picture.

Transactional leadership is the necessary but insufficient work of the gardener.

It keeps the garden from falling into chaos, but on its own, it will never make it great.

It maintains the status quo but does not inspire change or innovation.¹⁹

The Architect’s Vision – The Power of Transformational Leadership

While the gardener maintains what exists, the architect dreams of what could be.

They possess a vision for a garden that is more beautiful, more vibrant, and more alive than its current state.

They don’t just manage the system; they seek to elevate it.

This is the essence of Transformational Leadership.

Transformational leadership is a process of inspiring and motivating followers to move beyond their immediate self-interest and commit to a shared vision, achieving extraordinary outcomes in the process.³

Research shows that followers of transformational leaders tend to be more productive, more satisfied, and more innovative.¹⁷

This is not achieved through simple exchanges, but through four key behaviors, often called the “Four I’s” ¹⁷:

1. Idealized Influence (Vision): These leaders are admired, respected, and trusted role models. They embody the values and vision they espouse and consider the needs of their followers over their own.²¹ They don’t just talk about the vision; they
   are the vision.
2. Inspirational Motivation (Purpose): They articulate a compelling and inspiring vision of the future, giving followers a sense of meaning and purpose in their work.¹⁸ They make it clear how each individual’s effort contributes to the larger, shared aspiration.
3. Intellectual Stimulation (Innovation): Transformational leaders challenge the status quo. They encourage their followers to be innovative and creative by questioning assumptions, reframing problems, and approaching old situations in new ways.¹⁷ They create an environment where there is no ridicule for mistakes, only learning. This is the cross-pollination that allows a garden to evolve and create new, beautiful hybrids.
4. Individualized Consideration (Growth): They act as coaches and mentors, paying special attention to each follower’s needs for achievement and growth.¹⁷ They provide personalized support and encouragement, nurturing the unique potential of each person in the ecosystem, much like a gardener tending to the specific needs of each variety of plant.¹⁹

The debate between Transactional and Transformational leadership is, in the end, a false dichotomy.

The true insight is that they are two sides of the same coin, two essential functions that must coexist.

A transformational vision without transactional execution is just a fantasy.

An inspired team still needs clear goals, structure, and feedback to bring a vision to life.

Conversely, purely transactional management without a transformational vision leads to the very stagnation and disengagement that caused my first project to fail.

The Ecosystem Architect must be both.

They must possess the grand vision of the architect and the practical diligence of the gardener.

The Gardener vs. The Architect
Function	The Gardener (Transactional Leadership)	The Architect (Transformational Leadership)
Core Focus	Maintenance and Management	Inspiration and Motivation
Primary Goal	Stability, order, and predictability	Change, innovation, and growth
Time Horizon	Short-term tasks and goals	Long-term vision and potential
Source of Motivation	Extrinsic (rewards, punishments)	Intrinsic (purpose, belief, autonomy)
Follower Response	Compliance and expected effort	Commitment and extraordinary effort
Key Question	“Are we doing things right?”	“Are we doing the right things?”
Analogy’s Role	Keeps the garden neat and orderly.	Elevates the entire ecosystem to a new level.

Conclusion: Your Architectural Legacy

A few years after my initial failure, I was given another chance.

I was asked to lead a team that was struggling, plagued by low morale and missed targets.

The old me would have charged in with a new, even more detailed blueprint.

But this time, I was armed with a different mindset.

I was an Ecosystem Architect.

I didn’t start with a project plan.

I started by walking the grounds.

For the first two weeks, my primary job was to listen (Servant Leadership) and to be open and genuine about my own past failures (Authentic Leadership).

I spent hours with each team member, not to talk about tasks, but to understand their frustrations, their aspirations, and their view of the problems.

I was testing the soil, and I found it depleted of trust and purpose.

So, my first action was to begin enriching it.

Next, I started managing the climate (Situational Leadership).

I saw that some team members were insecure and needed clear direction (a “telling” style), while others were experienced but frustrated, needing to be brought into the decision-making process (a “participating” style).

I adapted my approach for each person, providing the specific conditions they needed to thrive.

Finally, I embraced my dual role as Architect and Gardener.

Together with the team, we co-created an inspiring vision for what our project could become—not just a deliverable, but something we could all be proud of (Transformational).

But I also made sure we had clear, achievable short-term goals, regular check-ins, and a system for recognizing and rewarding progress (Transactional).

The result was, quite literally, transformative.

The team came alive.

Engagement soared, creativity flourished, and not only did we meet our targets, but we exceeded them in ways no one had thought possible.

The success wasn’t because I had become a “Great Man” or found a magical blueprint.

It was because I had learned to stop trying to build a machine and started cultivating an ecosystem.

The path to extraordinary leadership does not lie in finding the one “right” style or a perfect, rigid plan.

It lies in abandoning the blueprint mentality altogether.

It lies in embracing your role as an Ecosystem Architect.

Become a humble student of your own garden.

Take the time to understand its unique soil, to manage its ever-changing climate, and to hold a vision for its most beautiful future.

This is how you move beyond simply managing and start cultivating a true legacy of growth, resilience, and shared purpose.

Works cited

1. 10 Management Styles Of Effective Leaders – Forbes Advisor, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/advisor/business/management-styles/
2. The 10 Major Leadership Theories for Effective Management – Simplilearn.com, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.simplilearn.com/top-leadership-theories-every-manager-should-know-article
3. Types of Leadership Theories – EZRA coaching, accessed August 7, 2025, https://helloezra.com/resources/insights/seven-leadership-theories-you-might-not-know-of
4. Evolution of leadership theory – BMJ Leader, accessed August 7, 2025, https://bmjleader.bmj.com/content/leader/5/1/3.full.pdf
5. yscouts.com, accessed August 7, 2025, https://yscouts.com/10-authentic-leadership-characteristics/
6. Classical and Contemporary Leadership Theories | Educational Leadership Class Notes, accessed August 7, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/educational-leadership/unit-2/classical-contemporary-leadership-theories/study-guide/amEfeujV1t5JasQX
7. Contemporary Leadership for Today’s Ever-Changing World, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.vantagecircle.com/en/blog/contemporary-leadership/
8. The 8 essential qualities of a successful leader – Advisory Board, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.advisory.com/daily-briefing/2024/01/09/leader-qualities
9. Character and Servant Leadership: Ten Characteristics of Effective, Caring Leaders, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.regent.edu/journal/journal-of-virtues-leadership/character-and-servant-leadership-ten-characteristics-of-effective-caring-leaders/
10. Ten Principles of Servant Leadership | Butler University, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.butler.edu/student-life/volunteer/resources/servant-leadership-principles/
11. 10 Principles of Servant Leadership (and Why It’s How We Lead) – TeamGantt, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.teamgantt.com/blog/servant-leadership
12. www.pointloma.edu, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.pointloma.edu/resources/business-leadership/7-values-servant-leadership
13. Leadership Theories: History and description of their model – Wevalgo, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.wevalgo.com/know-how/manager-excellence/leadership/leadership-theory
14. Evolution of leadership theory | BMJ Leader, accessed August 7, 2025, https://bmjleader.bmj.com/content/5/1/3
15. Leadership Style: One Size Does Not Fit All – Forbes, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbooksauthors/2024/04/09/leadership-style-one-size-does-not-fit-all/
16. Exploring Contemporary Leadership Theories, Models, and Principles: A Comprehensive Analysis | by Prestini_Dawid | Medium, accessed August 7, 2025, https://medium.com/@prestinidawid1/exploring-contemporary-leadership-theories-models-and-principles-a-comprehensive-analysis-c094205b0161
17. Transformational and Transactional Leadership | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/social-sciences-and-humanities/transformational-and-transactional-leadership
18. Transformational and Transactional Leadership: Association With Attitudes Toward Evidence-Based Practice – PMC, accessed August 7, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1876730/
19. Transactional vs.Transformative Leadership: Which is Better? | Meridian University, accessed August 7, 2025, https://meridianuniversity.edu/content/transactional-vs-transformative-leadership-which-is-better
20. The Difference Between Transactional and Transformational Leadership – Florida Tech, accessed August 7, 2025, https://online.fit.edu/degrees/undergraduate/applied-psychology/organizational-psych/the-difference-between-transactional-and-transformational-leadership/
21. Transactional or transformational: What is your leadership style? – Forbes Australia, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.forbes.com.au/news/leadership/transactional-or-transformational-what-is-your-leadership-style/
22. www.ebsco.com, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/social-sciences-and-humanities/transformational-and-transactional-leadership#:~:text=Transformational%20leaders%20are%20concerned%20with,embrace%20concern%20for%20the%20organization.