The Prestige of a Poem: A Journey from Code-Breaking to Catharsis

Introduction: The Pledge – The Unsolvable Riddle

The journey for many readers into the world of poetry begins not with a sense of wonder, but with a quiet dread.

It often starts in a classroom, under the fluorescent hum of institutional lighting, where a poem is laid out on a desk like a patient on an operating table.

The air thickens with the expectation of dissection.

For the narrator of this journey, a high school student at the time, the poem was an object of fear, a puzzle box with a secret combination known only to the teacher.¹

The task was presented as a form of intellectual archaeology: to excavate a single, correct meaning buried beneath layers of arcane language and obscure symbolism.

This approach, common in many educational settings, reduces the poem to roadkill, a specimen to be picked apart for its component features—a metaphor here, an allusion there—in a joyless exercise of feature spotting.³

This initial encounter establishes the core problem, a profound and frustrating disconnect.

The language of the poems presented, often drawn from a distant literary past, felt “lofty” and “archaic,” a dialect intentionally designed to exclude the uninitiated.⁴

The syntax was convoluted, the vocabulary unfamiliar, creating a formidable wall between the text and the reader.⁴

This linguistic barrier was compounded by an intense psychological pressure: the assumption that one

should understand the poem on the first reading, and that any failure to do so pointed to a personal deficiency or a flaw in the poem itself.⁷

The classroom became a theater of intellectual anxiety, where students, afraid to offer a “wrong” interpretation, waited for the teacher to produce the key to the riddle, a process that often left them feeling stupid and alienated.²

The inevitable result of this experience was a deep-seated conviction that “poetry is not for me”.⁸

The narrator, like so many others, felt bored, confused, and a little dumb in the face of these texts.⁷

The experience was stultifying, confirming the suspicion that poetry was an esoteric art form reserved for a select few with the training to appreciate it.²

This initial phase of the relationship with poetry can be understood as the first act of a magic trick: “The Pledge”.⁹

The magician—the teacher, the anthology, the culture—presents an ordinary object: a collection of words on a page.

Yet, it is presented in such a way that its true nature is concealed, making it feel like an unsolvable riddle.

The struggle, however, was rooted in a fundamental misdiagnosis of the problem.

The difficulty was not merely a matter of unfamiliar vocabulary or a lack of historical context.

The deeper issue was a category error in the reader’s approach.

Conditioned by a world of prose and literal communication, the narrator was treating the poem as a vehicle for information transfer.¹¹

The goal was to extract a clear, paraphrasable message, to “crack the code” and state the poem’s meaning in other words.⁷

But poetry, at its core, is not a system for delivering data; it is a technology for transmitting

experience.

It is an art form that uses words to say what is not words, to make the world “strange again” so that we might feel it more acutely.¹³

The frustration did not arise from a failure of intellect, but from applying the cognitive tools of prose to the unique architecture of the poem.

The narrator was trying to unlock a door with the key to a different house.

The journey forward would not be about acquiring more keys, but about discovering that the door was never locked in the first place.

Part I: The Turn – The Deconstruction of a Wall

The second act of a magic trick is “The Turn,” the moment the ordinary object does something extraordinary.¹⁵

For the narrator, this turn was not a single, dramatic event but a series of quiet revelations that began to dismantle the wall of frustration brick by brick.

It was a gradual process of unlearning, of shedding the assumptions that had made poetry feel so impenetrable.

This transformation began not with the eyes, but with the ears.

Chapter 1: Finding the Music

Having largely abandoned the intellectual project of “understanding” poetry, the narrator’s perspective began to shift during a university lecture where a professor, without preamble, simply read a poem aloud.

It was not a dramatic performance, but the act of hearing the words spoken changed their texture.

The poem, previously a flat artifact on a page, became a three-dimensional event in the air.

This experience was the first clue that poetry is fundamentally an oral art form, and that its sound is an integral part of its meaning.¹⁶

This led to a new practice: reading poems aloud, alone.

The simple act of vocalization had a profound effect on the reading process.

First, it imposed a slower, more deliberate pace.

Unlike prose, which can be skimmed for information, poetry cannot be rushed.¹⁷

Speaking the words forced a meditative attention to each line, each phrase.

Second, it unveiled the “internal music” of the verse.¹⁸

The subtle interplay of rhythm, meter, alliteration, and assonance—elements that are often invisible on the page—became palpable through the voice.¹⁹

The narrator began to feel the poem as a physical, sensory experience before attempting to analyze it.

The old, stilted “poetry voice” learned in school was abandoned in favor of following the natural cadence dictated by punctuation, which revealed the meter not as a rigid, artificial constraint, but as a “pleasing background beat”.⁸

The most crucial revelation was that this sonic layer was not mere decoration; it was a carrier of meaning.

The way a poem sounds is inseparable from what it says.⁷

The physical act of shaping the words with breath and tongue became a form of embodied cognition.

Meaning was being processed physically and emotionally

before it was being deconstructed intellectually.

This bypassed the purely analytical part of the brain that had been the source of so much frustration.

Instead of a top-down approach—imposing an intellectual framework onto the text—it became a bottom-up process, where the physical experience of the poem’s sound opened up new channels for emotional and intellectual connection.

It was the first crack in the fortress of literalism, a discovery that a poem could be entered through the body as well as the mind.

Chapter 2: The Gospel of the Concrete

Armed with this new, sound-based approach, the narrator stumbled upon a poem that would become the cornerstone of a new understanding.

It was William Carlos Williams’s “The Red Wheelbarrow,” a piece that, on first glance, seemed to embody everything that was frustrating about modern poetry: its minimalism, its apparent lack of subject, its seemingly unearned claim to significance.²¹

so much depends

upon

a red wheel

barrow

glazed with rain

water

beside the white

chickens.

The initial reaction was one of familiar skepticism.

What, exactly, “depends” upon this simple, domestic scene? The poem felt like a trick, a private joke.

But by applying the new method—reading it slowly, aloud, focusing on the sound and the image—something began to shift.

The unusual line breaks, which once seemed arbitrary, now revealed their function.

They act as brakes, forcing the reader to slow down and consider each component of the image in isolation.²²

The mind is forced to “hang off the word ‘depends’,” creating a sense of gravity and importance before the object is even revealed.²²

The separation of “wheel” and “barrow,” “rain” and “water,” compels a deconstruction of the familiar, making the reader see these everyday objects as if for the first time.

This experience led to the narrator’s first true epiphany, an understanding of Williams’s famous maxim: “No ideas but in things”.²¹

The power of “The Red Wheelbarrow” does not lie in a hidden symbolic meaning—it is not an allegory for the agrarian lifestyle or a commentary on industrialization.²¹

Its power resides in the act of perception it generates.

The poem does not

tell the reader that ordinary objects are important; it makes the reader experience the importance of an ordinary object through a moment of heightened, focused attention.

The grand, abstract claim of the first two lines (“so much depends / upon”) is grounded in the most humble, concrete reality imaginable.

The poem is not a statement about the wheelbarrow; it is a carefully calibrated machine for producing a specific perceptual event in the mind of the reader.

Later, the narrator might learn the apocryphal story of the poem’s origin—that Williams, a physician, wrote it on a prescription pad while at the bedside of a gravely ill child, the simple image outside the window a point of stability in a moment of crisis.²³

This context adds a poignant layer of emotional resonance, but the crucial realization is that it is not

necessary for the poem’s primary effect.

The poem works on its own terms.

It demonstrates that a successful poetic image is not a description of a thing, but a re-creation of the experience of that thing.

The “so much” that depends upon the red wheelbarrow is, in fact, the fragile and profound act of seeing the world clearly.

Chapter 3: The Freedom to Be Wrong

With the confidence gained from this breakthrough, the narrator began to approach poetry with a newfound sense of adventure rather than obligation.

The journey transformed from a forced march through a canonical curriculum into a personal exploration.

This phase was defined by the liberating realization that there is no single “correct” way to engage with poetry and no single set of poems that one must appreciate.

The first and most important freedom was the permission to dislike a poem.

The narrator learned that it is perfectly acceptable to read a poem and feel nothing, to find it uninteresting or unmoving, and to simply move on without a sense of personal failure.²⁴

Just as with any other art form, not all poetry is created equal, and personal taste is not only valid but essential.¹⁹

This realization dismantled the pressure to perform appreciation for works that did not resonate, replacing it with a genuine search for those that did.

Flowing from this was the second freedom: the embrace of ambiguity.

The narrator let go of the damaging assumption that every poem is a code with a single, correct solution that must be “cracked”.⁷

Instead, they began to see a poem as a collaborative space, a meeting ground for the consciousness of the writer and the consciousness of the reader.²⁷

The goal shifted from excavating

the meaning to participating in the creation of a meaning—one that was personal, resonant, and potentially different with every reading.²⁴

A poem, it turned out, could have multiple correct interpretations, just as a painting or a piece of music can evoke different feelings in different viewers.²⁴

This led to the third and most exciting phase of the journey: the hunt for “your poets”.²⁶

No longer bound by a rigid syllabus, the narrator began to actively curate a personal canon.

This involved diving into anthologies, listening to poetry podcasts like

Poetry Unbound, subscribing to daily poem emails from organizations like the Poetry Foundation, and exploring the shelves of local bookstores.¹⁶

The process became a kind of literary detective work, following threads of influence from one poet to another or exploring poems grouped by a theme that sparked personal interest, like “poems about the sea” or “poems about cities”.⁵

This active, self-directed exploration solidified a new, healthier relationship with the art form—one based on curiosity and personal connection rather than fear and intellectual duty.

To aid other readers on this path of self-permission, the following table offers a targeted approach to overcoming common beginner frustrations, pairing specific barriers with poems that are uniquely equipped to dismantle them.

It is a practical toolkit for turning points of confusion into moments of clarity.

Common Barrier	Suggested Poem & Author	Focus for a New Reading (The “Turn”)	Relevant Snippets
“It’s too abstract and has no story.”	“The Raven” by Edgar Allan Poe	Focus on the clear narrative arc: a character, a setting, a conflict, and a descent into madness. Treat it like a short story in verse.	29
“The language is old and stuffy.”	“Still I Rise” by Maya Angelou	Listen to the powerful, modern, and defiant voice. Feel the rhythm and repetition as a source of strength and musicality, not just words.	31
“It feels like a trick; what’s the point?”	“The Red Wheelbarrow” by William Carlos Williams	Don’t search for a hidden meaning. Focus only on the object itself. See how the poem forces you to slow down and simply look.	21
“It’s just depressing and I don’t get it.”	“The Peace of Wild Things” by Wendell Berry	Follow the clear emotional journey from despair (“When despair for the world grows in me”) to a state of peace. Notice how nature provides the solution.	33
“The rhymes feel childish and forced.”	“Ozymandias” by Percy Bysshe Shelley	Notice how the rhyme scheme (a complex sonnet) feels natural and powerful, serving the poem’s grand theme of decay and hubris, rather than being mere decoration.	34

Part II: The Prestige – The Reappearance of Meaning

The third and final act of a magic trick is “The Prestige.” This is the moment the vanished object is brought back, but it returns transformed, imbued with a new significance.³⁶

For the narrator, the object that reappeared was “meaning” itself.

It was no longer the simple, literal, paraphrasable message they had first sought, but something far richer, more complex, and deeply intertwined with the very structure of the poem.

This was the culmination of the journey, where the appreciation of poetry evolved from a series of disconnected insights into a unified, holistic understanding.

Chapter 4: The Architecture of Feeling

The ultimate epiphany arrived with the study of a poem that was both emotionally devastating and formally brilliant: Elizabeth Bishop’s “One Art.” At first glance, the poem’s formal complexity seemed to represent the very kind of academic “feature spotting” the narrator had once reviled.³

The poem is a “villanelle,” a highly structured form with nineteen lines, two repeating rhymes, and two refrains that weave throughout the verse.³⁸

This rigid structure seemed antithetical to the expression of genuine, messy emotion.

The art of losing isn’t hard to master;

so many things seem filled with the intent

to be lost that their loss is no disaster.

Lose something every day.

Accept the fluster

of lost door keys, the hour badly spent.

The art of losing isn’t hard to master.

Then practice losing farther, losing faster:

places, and names, and where it was you meant

to travel.

None of these will bring disaster.

As the narrator traced the poem’s progression, a profound connection between its form and its content began to emerge.

The poem moves methodically from small, everyday losses—keys, an hour—to losses of increasing magnitude: places, names, a mother’s watch, beloved houses, cities, even a continent.³⁸

With each escalating loss, the refrain, “The art of losing isn’t hard to master,” begins to sound less like a confident statement of fact and more like a desperate, self-reassuring mantra.

The speaker is trying to convince herself that she can control the uncontrollable, that she can “master” the chaos of grief by treating it as a manageable “Art.”

The genius of Bishop’s choice of the villanelle form becomes clear in this context.

The strict, repetitive structure is not a decorative cage for the poem’s emotion; it is a technology for generating the emotional state of contained grief.

The form’s relentless repetition of the refrains mimics the obsessive, circular nature of grieving, the way the mind returns again and again to the central fact of a loss.³⁹

The rigid rhyme scheme and meter represent a desperate attempt to impose order on an overwhelming feeling.

The tension in the poem is the tension between the wildness of the grief and the strictness of the container trying to hold it.

This tension finally breaks in the last stanza, which deviates from the established pattern by adding a fourth line.³⁸

Here, the speaker confesses the true subject of the poem: the loss of a specific “you.” The admission that even this loss is not a “disaster” is immediately undercut by the parenthetical, choked command: “(Write it!).” It is the sound of the poet forcing herself to articulate a truth that the poem’s rigid structure has been holding at bay.

In that moment, the container cracks.³⁸

The narrator finally understood: the poem’s emotional power is not just

expressed by the form; it is created by it.

The form is the feeling.

This was the moment of true, integrated understanding, moving beyond seeing poetic devices as mere features to recognizing them as the very gears and levers of an emotional machine.

Chapter 5: The Outer Limits of Language

To test the limits of this new, holistic understanding, the narrator deliberately sought out a piece that would challenge every remaining preconception about what a poem could be.

This led to Aram Saroyan’s infamous one-word poem, “lighght.”

lighght

The initial reaction was one of predictable annoyance and dismissal.

This seemed to be the epitome of pretentious modern art, a smudge on the page masquerading as profundity.⁴⁰

It felt less like a poem and more like a typo that had been granted an undeserved sense of importance, a sentiment echoed by the political controversy that erupted when the poem received government funding.⁴²

However, by applying the lessons learned on the journey, the narrator was able to approach it differently.

The key was to shift from trying to read the poem to trying to see it.⁴⁰

As Saroyan himself suggested, his “electric poems” were meant to be “instant and continuous,” bypassing the linear process of reading in favor of an immediate, holistic impression.⁴⁴

The poem is not a word to be decoded but an image to be experienced.

From this visual perspective, a new interpretation bloomed.

The poem is a form of visual onomatopoeia.

The word itself looks like the event it describes: the stuttering, flickering ignition of an old fluorescent tube light.⁴⁰

The initial “ligh” is the first flash of light, and the extra, slightly delayed “ght” is the subsequent flicker as the bulb comes to full power.

The carefully inserted extra “gh” transforms the word into a “refracted image of itself,” capturing the ephemeral nature of light in the physical shape of the letters.⁴⁵

Appreciating “lighght” was the final act of liberation.

It solidified the understanding that poetry has no fixed rules.²⁸

It can be a sprawling epic or an instantaneous visual event.

Its only constraint is the imagination of the artist and the willingness of the reader to engage.

This encounter demonstrated that the most experimental poetry is not just

using language; it is making language itself the subject.

It treats language as a physical medium, like paint or clay, to be sculpted and examined.⁴⁵

It is a metalinguistic art, one that comments on the very mechanics of communication.

A mature reader of poetry can appreciate this entire spectrum, from the narrative verse that functions like a story to the concrete poem that functions like a sculpture, understanding that each is simply using the raw material of language in a different way to achieve a unique effect.

Chapter 6: From Reader to Maker

The journey, which began with the passive reception of poetry, came full circle with the active impulse to create it.

Having learned to read, the narrator now felt the desire to write.

This final step, the attempt to become a maker, provided the most profound and humbling insights of all.

The process of writing was immediately illuminating.

The narrator discovered that inspiration is a “fickle and unreliable thing”.⁴⁶

The blank page was a formidable opponent.

The romantic notion of the poet as a vessel for divine inspiration was quickly replaced by the reality of poetry as a craft requiring constant, patient maintenance.⁴⁶

Most of what was written, especially in the beginning, felt clumsy and inadequate.

As the poet Wisława Szymborska, a Nobel laureate, demonstrated by publishing only around 300 poems and discarding the rest, the creation of good poetry often requires the production of a great deal of “shit”.⁴⁷

This struggle, however, was not a failure.

It was the ultimate act of learning.

By engaging in the “hunt for the right word,” the narrator gained a visceral appreciation for the immense skill required to make a poem feel effortless and inevitable.⁸

Trying to build a simple stanza provided more insight into the architecture of a sonnet than any textbook ever could.

It was the difference between admiring a cathedral from the ground and trying to lay a single, perfect course of stone.

The act of making fostered a deep and abiding empathy for the maker.

This final stage completed the circle of communication.

The journey from reader to writer was not about the ambition to be published, but about understanding the art form from the inside O.T. It was the last and most important step in learning how to read, for it is only by attempting to speak the language oneself that one can truly appreciate the eloquence of its masters.

Conclusion: Living Inside the Poem

The journey from the sterile classroom to the workshop of the imagination can be understood through the three acts of a great magic trick.

The “Pledge” was the initial presentation of the poem as an opaque and intimidating object, a riddle to be solved.

The “Turn” was the series of paradigm shifts—the discovery of sound, the embrace of the concrete image, the freedom to have a personal response—that made the ordinary object of the poem do something extraordinary: it began to live and breathe.

The final act, the “Prestige,” is the reappearance of the transformed object.

In this journey, what reappeared was meaning itself.

The true prestige of a poem is not the moment you “solve” it and put it away, its mystery exhausted.

The prestige is the moment you bring the poem back into your life, where it now exists not as an object to be analyzed, but as a space to be inhabited, an experience to be revisited time and again.³⁷

The poem becomes a “stored magic,” a communiqué that crosses frontiers of time and space, allowing a collaboration between the solitude of the writer and the solitude of the reader.²⁷

Ultimately, learning to read poetry is a journey of unlearning.

It requires the dismantling of the ingrained demand for literalism, the shedding of the fear of being wrong, and the dissolution of the rigid categories we impose on Art. It is the slow cultivation of a new quality of attention—one that is patient, sensory, embodied, and deeply open to ambiguity and wonder.

The reward for this journey is not merely the ability to “understand poetry.” It is the acquisition of a unique and powerful lens through which to understand the world, the self, and the vast, intricate landscape of the human heart.

The magic trick is revealed to be no trick at all, but an invitation.

The door to this world is open to anyone willing to set out on the pilgrimage, to leave the familiar behind and listen for what the poem knows.²⁷

Works cited

1. How to Teach Poetry (Even if You Hate it) – Notes from the Portable -, accessed August 8, 2025, https://jessicazannini.com/2016/06/18/how-to-teach-poetry-even-if-you-hate-it/
2. Teaching Students to Dislike Poetry: “What is the most boring subject/possible?”, accessed August 8, 2025, https://plthomasedd.medium.com/teaching-students-to-dislike-poetry-what-is-the-most-boring-subject-possible-a2300ddb7dc3
3. The trouble with poetry – how we get teaching it wrong | Poor Rude Lines, accessed August 8, 2025, https://johnfield.org/2012/08/12/the-trouble-with-poetry-how-we-get-teaching-it-wrong/
4. www.researchgate.net, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kananelo-Sylvester-Moea/publication/380356763_Challenges_and_perceptions_in_learning_poetry_in_two_Leribe_high_schools_in_Lesotho/links/6637e4837091b94e93f404a1/Challenges-and-perceptions-in-learning-poetry-in-two-Leribe-high-schools-in-Lesotho.pdf
5. [HELP] So I’m trying to get into reading poetry. Where do I begin? – Reddit, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Poetry/comments/8fmhvo/help_so_im_trying_to_get_into_reading_poetry/
6. Reading the Difficult | The Poetry Foundation, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poetrymagazine/articles/70059/reading-the-difficult
7. [OPINION] Why is so hard to understand poetry? : r/Poetry – Reddit, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Poetry/comments/d1yoir/opinion_why_is_so_hard_to_understand_poetry/
8. Anyone else just can’t enjoy poetry ? : r/books – Reddit, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/books/comments/cjmm24/anyone_else_just_cant_enjoy_poetry/
9. Every great magic trick consists of three acts… : r/ChristopherNolan – Reddit, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ChristopherNolan/comments/1b28qy5/every_great_magic_trick_consists_of_three_acts/
10. The Prestige Ending (& All Twists) Explained, accessed August 8, 2025, https://screenrant.com/prestige-movie-ending-twists-explained-2/
11. Why Is Poetry So Difficult to Understand?, accessed August 8, 2025, https://slate.com/human-interest/2015/02/why-is-poetry-difficult-to-understand.html
12. Why Is Poetry Difficult To Understand? – ScienceABC, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.scienceabc.com/social-science/poetry-difficult-understand.html
13. Why Poetry Is Difficult – Ploughshares, accessed August 8, 2025, https://pshares.org/blog/why-poetry-is-difficult/
14. I don’t understand poetry, what do I do and where do I start ? : r/literature – Reddit, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/literature/comments/v0yzpk/i_dont_understand_poetry_what_do_i_do_and_where/
15. The Prestige Theory of Plot Twists – Newbie to Novelist, accessed August 8, 2025, https://newbietonovelist.com/2020/06/25/the-prestige-theory-of-plot-twists/
16. Poetry 101: A Beginner’s Guide to Reading (and Enjoying) Poetry, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.mrsblackwell.com/journal/poetry-101
17. Why *is* it so difficult to read poetry?? | Kaggsy’s Bookish Ramblings, accessed August 8, 2025, https://kaggsysbookishramblings.wordpress.com/2014/12/05/why-is-it-so-difficult-to-read-poetry/
18. The Beginner’s Guide To Reading Poetry – The Good Trade, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.thegoodtrade.com/features/how-to-read-poetry/
19. Do some people naturally understand and click with poetry and others don’t? : r/literature, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/literature/comments/1hhz5pt/do_some_people_naturally_understand_and_click/
20. writing.wisc.edu, accessed August 8, 2025, https://writing.wisc.edu/handbook/readingpoetry/
21. William Carlos Williams: “The Red Wheelbarrow” | The Poetry Foundation, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.poetryfoundation.org/articles/68731/william-carlos-williams-the-red-wheelbarrow
22. “The Red Wheelbarrow”: Dissecting the Minimal Masterpiece – Inquiries Journal, accessed August 8, 2025, http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/536/the-red-wheelbarrow-dissecting-the-minimal-masterpiece
23. The Red Wheelbarrow – Wikipedia, accessed August 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Red_Wheelbarrow
24. [HELP] I’m getting so frustrated with understanding poetry – Reddit, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Poetry/comments/max2l1/help_im_getting_so_frustrated_with_understanding/
25. Poetry: thinking outside of the genre! | Reading Rockets, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.readingrockets.org/poetry-thinking-outside-genre
26. Poetry: I don’t get it and wish I could : r/books – Reddit, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/books/comments/2comuf/poetry_i_dont_get_it_and_wish_i_could/
27. How to Read a Poem – Poetry Foundation, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.poetryfoundation.org/articles/69955/how-to-read-a-poem
28. Learning to Write Poetry is Difficult. Don’t Listen to the Tutorials. | by arete – Medium, accessed August 8, 2025, https://medium.com/the-pub/learning-to-write-poetry-is-difficult-dont-listen-to-the-tutorials-a96b750573f6
29. 20 Famous Poems Everyone Needs to Read at Least Once – Reader’s Digest, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.rd.com/list/famous-poems/
30. What Is a Narrative Poem? 3 Different Types of Narrative Poems With Poetry Examples, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.masterclass.com/articles/what-is-a-narrative-poem-3-different-types-of-narrative-poems-with-poetry-examples
31. 31 of the Best and Most Famous Short Classic Poems Of All Time | by Em – Medium, accessed August 8, 2025, https://medium.com/@EmEmbarty/31-of-the-best-and-most-famous-short-classic-poems-of-all-time-e445986e6df
32. Poems of Hope and Resilience – Poetry Foundation, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.poetryfoundation.org/collections/142028/poems-of-hope-and-resilience
33. Poems for Soft Hearts in Hard Times – Grateful.org, accessed August 8, 2025, https://grateful.org/resource/poems-for-soft-hearts-in-hard-times/
34. 12 Poems Every Child and Adult Should Memorize and Know By Heart, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.humilityanddoxology.com/poems-child-adult-memorize/
35. [HELP] What are some simple poems that a beginner could appreciate? : r/Poetry – Reddit, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Poetry/comments/q0v7eg/help_what_are_some_simple_poems_that_a_beginner/
36. screenrant.com, accessed August 8, 2025, https://screenrant.com/prestige-movie-ending-twists-explained-2/#:~:text=The%20Prestige’s%20Final%20Scene%20Explained,-Angier%20Duplicates%20Himself&text=The%20first%20act%20of%20a,case%2C%20person%20%E2%80%94%20that%20disappears.
37. The Prestige (film) – Wikipedia, accessed August 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Prestige_(film)
38. Bishop’s “One Art” explores loss in all its forms – The Johns Hopkins News-Letter, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2017/02/bishops-one-art-explores-loss-in-all-its-forms
39. Understanding “One Art” by Elizabeth Bishop – YouTube, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HkmEiS_npoI
40. Nesbit Likes: ‘Lighght’ by Aram Saroyan, accessed August 8, 2025, https://nesbitandgibley.wordpress.com/2016/11/14/nesbit-likes-lighght-by-aram-saroyan/
41. [POEM] This was the Poetry Foundation’s poem of the day: “lighght,” by Aram Saroyan, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Poetry/comments/1gluhu1/poem_this_was_the_poetry_foundations_poem_of_the/
42. Lighght – Now I Know, accessed August 8, 2025, https://nowiknow.com/lighght/
43. In Brief – The Forward, accessed August 8, 2025, https://forward.com/culture/13511/in-brief-01957/
44. Aram Saroyan and the Art of the One-Word Poem | The MIT Press Reader, accessed August 8, 2025, https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/art-of-one-word-poem/
45. “eyeye”, “lighght” – Aram Saroyan – Google Arts & Culture, accessed August 8, 2025, https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/eyeye-lighght-aram-saroyan/dQHcIzvP8VfOgA?hl=en
46. How the hell do you write poems : r/poetry_critics – Reddit, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/poetry_critics/comments/drhxuy/how_the_hell_do_you_write_poems/
47. [Help] How do I write poetry I don’t hate? – Reddit, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Poetry/comments/180x1e3/help_how_do_i_write_poetry_i_dont_hate/