The Living Network: Why Most “Communities” Are Dead and How to Build Ones That Truly Thrive

For the first five years of my career, I was a digital mortician.

My job title was “Community Architect,” but my real work was building beautiful, elaborate mausoleums for conversation.

I spent a decade and a half in the field, evolving from a novice who followed checklists to an expert who finally understood the difference between a container and a living thing.

But that understanding was born from a string of painful, expensive failures.

My core struggle was a frustrating paradox: I followed all the “standard advice” for building online communities, yet I consistently failed to create spaces with any real life in them.

I built platforms, launched forums, seeded discussion topics, and curated vast libraries of content.

The result was almost always the same: an initial flurry of polite, obligatory activity followed by a slow, creeping silence.

I was building digital ghost towns—perfectly functional structures devoid of inhabitants.

The metrics would show logins and downloads, but the feeling was one of emptiness.

There was no spark, no momentum, no sense of genuine connection.¹

This culminated in the most significant failure of my early career.

I was hired by a major corporation to build a “Community of Practice” (CoP) for their engineering division.

The term itself, as defined by thinkers like Lave and Wenger, implies a group of people who share a concern or passion and learn to do it better through regular interaction.²

Management, however, saw it differently.

Their vision was a top-down knowledge repository, a tool for capturing intellectual property and tracking engagement metrics.

The project was defined by a narrow mission, much like the failed “Data Teams” programs that focus on test scores to the detriment of actual learning.³

The “community” was given no say in its purpose or structure; it was a mandate, not a shared enterprise.⁴

The platform we built was state-of-the-Art. But it was also sterile.

Engineers, forced to participate, saw it as another administrative burden.

There was no psychological safety to ask “dumb” questions, no trust to share half-formed ideas, and no genuine peer-to-peer interaction.¹

It was a perfect container with nothing living inside.

The project withered and was quietly defunded within 18 months.

It was a heartbreaking professional failure that forced me to question everything I thought I knew.

I had made a fundamental category error: I was trying to

build a community as if it were a product, when in fact, a community is not a product.

It’s an ecosystem.

In a Nutshell: The Mycelial Model of Community

My journey from failure to success was driven by a single, powerful paradigm shift.

I stopped thinking about communities as containers and started seeing them as living networks.

This report will unpack that shift, using an analogy from an unlikely field—mycology—to provide a new framework for understanding, building, and nurturing groups that learn and thrive together.

• The Old Model (The Container): Views a community as a platform or repository. The goal is content delivery, and members are passive consumers. Success is measured by activity metrics like posts and logins. This model almost always leads to disengagement and failure.
• The New Paradigm (The Mycelial Network): Views a community as a living ecosystem. The visible parts (platforms, events) are like mushrooms, but the real organism is the invisible, underground network of relationships, trust, and shared experience—the mycelium. The goal is to cultivate the health of this network.
• The Three Pillars of a Living Network:

1. The Domain as Fertile Soil: A thriving network needs a foundation of shared purpose and psychological safety.
2. The Network as a Living System: The focus must be on fostering connections and the dynamic exchange of knowledge and support.
3. The Practice as Visible Fruit: A healthy network naturally produces tangible outcomes, a shared repertoire of wisdom, and real results.

• The Goal: This report will guide you from being a “Community Manager” who builds empty containers to an “Ecosystem Architect” who cultivates thriving, resilient, and deeply valuable learning networks.

Part I: The Ghost Town and the Forest Floor: A Personal Reckoning

The core of my failure with the corporate “Community of Practice” wasn’t technological; it was biological.

We had built a beautiful, high-tech birdhouse, but we had fundamentally misunderstood the nature of birds.

We focused on the structure—the platform, the features, the content libraries—while ignoring the life it was meant to support.

We treated the community as a static asset to be managed, a library for knowledge extraction.

In doing so, we created an environment that was antithetical to the very definition of a community of practice, which requires mutual engagement, a negotiated joint enterprise, and a shared repertoire developed over time by its members.⁴

The standard approach to building these groups often mirrors the most common failures in employee training programs.

There’s a lack of clear objectives that resonate with the members themselves, insufficient engagement, a one-size-fits-all design, and a failure to align the initiative with the authentic, day-to-day needs of the participants.⁵

The HP-Compaq merger famously failed in part because the two corporate cultures were forced together without allowing an organic integration of relationships and trust to form.⁸

My project was a microcosm of that disaster.

It was an arranged marriage between employees who were given no chance to build rapport, establish trust, or find common ground.

I was trapped in a flawed paradigm.

I saw community as a noun—a thing you build.

I would list my deliverables: a forum, a wiki, a monthly newsletter.

I was focused on the artifacts of community, not the dynamics of it.

This is a common pitfall.

We see a group of people and think the task is to give them a space.

But a space is not a community.

A library is not a book club.

A kitchen is not a family dinner.

The failure of my project, and so many like it, demonstrated that a learning community is not a collection of individuals who happen to share a server.

It is a social process, a state of connection, a feeling of belonging that is intrinsically linked to success.⁶

I had been trying to build the mushroom while poisoning the soil.

To find a better way, I had to look underground.

Part II: The Mycelial Epiphany: A New Paradigm for Learning

Disillusioned, I took a step back.

I started reading and watching documentaries far outside my professional field, and that’s when I encountered the work of mycologist Paul Stamets and the concept of the mycelial network.⁹

It was the epiphany that changed my entire career.

I realized that for years, I had been staring at the mushroom, completely oblivious to the real organism.

The mushroom, as it turns out, is merely the “fruit” of the fungus.

The vast majority of the organism lives underground as mycelium—a sprawling, intricate network of tiny, thread-like filaments called hyphae.¹¹

This network is the true life of the forest floor.

It is a living, sensing, collaborative organism that connects the roots of individual trees into a shared system, a “wood-wide web” that allows them to transfer water, nutrients like carbon and nitrogen, and even send chemical warning signals about pests or disease.¹¹

This was it.

This was the paradigm shift.

The visible parts of a community—the website, the discussion forum, the weekly newsletter, the scheduled events—are just the mushrooms.

They are the fruit, the tangible outputs, but they are not the community itself.

The true community is the mycelium: the vast, often invisible, underground network of relationships, trust, shared history, inside jokes, and quiet favors that connects every single member.¹⁵

This is the living system that nourishes the members, gives the group its resilience, and ultimately produces the “fruit” of learning and innovation.

My job, I realized, was not to be a mushroom farmer, anxiously trying to force fruit from dead soil.

My job was to be an ecosystem architect—a gardener of the mycelium.

My focus had to shift from the visible artifacts of community to the invisible health of the network that connected its members.

This reframing didn’t just give me a new metaphor; it gave me a completely new operating model.

The Two Models of Community: A Comparative Analysis

To make this shift concrete, it’s useful to compare the old, failed model with the new, living-systems approach.

The “Container Model” is what most organizations default to, and it’s why most of their communities fail.

The “Mycelial Model” is a fundamentally different way of seeing and acting.

Feature	The Container Model (The Old Way)	The Mycelial Model (The New Paradigm)
Core Metaphor	A building, a library, a container	A living ecosystem, a forest floor network
Primary Goal	Content delivery, knowledge storage	Connection, mutual support, emergent learning
Member Role	Consumer, user, passive recipient	Co-creator, participant, node in a network
Leader Role	Manager, moderator, content provider	Gardener, facilitator, ecosystem architect
Measure of Success	Activity metrics (posts, logins, downloads)	Health of relationships, quality of exchange, tangible outcomes
Common Outcome	Digital ghost town, low engagement, burnout	Thriving ecosystem, high trust, resilience, innovation

This shift from structure to function is critical.

Many academic definitions of learning communities focus on their structure: a cohort of students taking “linked” courses or living together in the same residence hall.¹⁷

These are structural arrangements.

The mycelial network, by contrast, is defined by its functions: nutrient transfer, communication, decomposition, and symbiosis.¹²

The catastrophic failures in community building happen when a group has the

structure of a community but lacks its essential functions.

My failed corporate CoP had the structure—meetings, a platform, designated members—but it had no functional network of trust, reciprocity, or shared vulnerability.

The mycelial model provides a new diagnostic lens.

We must stop evaluating communities by their org chart and start evaluating them by the vitality of their functions.

Part III: The Architecture of a Living Network: The Three Pillars of a Mycelial Community

Armed with this new paradigm, I began to deconstruct what it actually takes to cultivate a healthy mycelial network.

It’s not about letting things grow wild; it’s about intentional gardening.

It requires building a supportive architecture based on the principles of living systems.

I found that all thriving learning communities, whether they know it or not, are built on three foundational pillars that mirror the functions of a real mycelial ecosystem.

Pillar 1: The Domain as Fertile Soil (Shared Purpose & Psychological Safety)

A mycelial network cannot grow in barren, sterile, or toxic soil.

It needs a substrate rich in nutrients and a balanced pH to thrive.

For a learning community, this fertile soil is composed of two key elements: a compelling shared purpose and a deep sense of psychological safety.

Shared Purpose (The Domain): This is the fundamental nutrient source.

It aligns directly with the first defining characteristic of a Community of Practice: the “Domain”.⁷

A community must be organized around a shared concern, a common passion, or a collective problem that its members genuinely want to solve.²

This purpose cannot be a top-down mandate focused on abstract corporate goals.

It must be grounded in the real-world needs and interests of the participants.

The most successful professional learning communities (PLCs) make a profound shift from a focus on

teaching to a focus on learning.²¹

They rally around a pledge to ensure every member succeeds, asking not “What will we teach?” but “What will we do to ensure everyone learns?” This shared purpose provides the “why” that fuels all interaction.

Psychological Safety (The Soil pH): Even with a compelling purpose, a network cannot grow if the environment is hostile.

Psychological safety is the collective belief that the group is a safe space for interpersonal risk-taking.

It’s the feeling that you can be vulnerable, ask a “stupid” question, share a half-baked idea, or admit a mistake without fear of humiliation or punishment.

This is built on a foundation of mutual respect, trust, and a shared commitment to uphold the dignity of every person.¹

Without it, you get what I built in my failed CoP: a culture of silence and performance, where no real learning can occur.

Practical Application (Tilling the Soil): Cultivating this fertile soil is an active process.

It involves:

• Co-creating Guidelines: Instead of imposing rules, the community should collaboratively develop its own “group agreement” or norms of behavior. This builds ownership and ensures the guidelines reflect the group’s shared values.¹
• Intentional Onboarding: The first few interactions are a “high opportunity zone” for building connection.²⁵ A warm, effective onboarding process—using introduction videos, personal profiles, and welcome rituals—makes new members feel seen and valued from day one.²⁶
• Modeling Vulnerability: The leader must go first. By sharing their own personality, challenges, and learning journey, they signal that it’s safe for others to do the same. This humanizes the experience and builds trust.²⁵

Pillar 2: The Network as a Living System (Connection & Nutrient Exchange)

Once the soil is fertile, the focus shifts to growing the network itself—the intricate web of hyphae that allows for the flow of knowledge, support, and resources.

This is the “how” of the community, the dynamic, multi-directional system of exchange.

It embodies the “Community” and “Practice” elements of a CoP, where members engage in joint activities and build a shared practice together.⁷

A Culture of Collaboration (The Symbiotic Exchange): This is the heart of the learning process.

True collaboration is not just being friendly; it’s a “systematic process in which teachers work together to analyze and improve their classroom practice”.²¹

In the mycelial model, this means creating a culture of symbiosis where members understand that they are stronger together than apart.

It involves actively promoting peer-to-peer learning, where students who have mastered a concept help those who are struggling.²⁹

It requires blending formal knowledge with the sharing of personal experiences, recognizing that every participant brings their own expertise to the group.¹

Facilitating Connection (Growing the Hyphae): As the ecosystem architect, your primary job is to create the structures and opportunities that encourage these connections to form and strengthen.

This is especially critical in online environments, where interaction must be more deliberate.

Key strategies include:

• Structuring for Interaction: Design activities that break down isolation. Use small group learning, breakout rooms for collaborative problem-solving, and team-based projects to foster deeper bonds and a sense of shared purpose.⁶ The goal is to maximize the quality and quantity of interactions.⁶
• The Facilitator’s Role as Gardener: The leader’s role is not to be the “sage on the stage” but the “guide on the side.” This means facilitating discussions without dominating them, asking thought-provoking, open-ended questions, and skillfully drawing attention to peer interactions.²⁵ The goal is to make the instructor’s presence felt as a supportive guide, not an overbearing authority who stifles peer-to-peer dialogue.²⁵
• Leveraging Online Tools for Connection: Modern platforms offer a rich toolkit for fostering interaction. Use real-time chat, quick polls, and emoji reactions to make synchronous sessions more dynamic and inclusive.²⁶ Create informal “water cooler” or “café” discussion boards where members can connect on non-course-related topics, building social bonds.²⁸ Employ engaging tactics like “Ask Me Anything” (AMA) sessions with experts, “Member Spotlight” posts to celebrate contributions, and “#TipTuesday” threads to share practical advice.³²

After my epiphany, I applied this pillar to an online professional development course for teachers.

Instead of front-loading it with content, I focused entirely on connection for the first week.

I created small “pods” of four teachers each.

Their first task was not to read an article, but to schedule a 20-minute video call to introduce themselves.

I paired new members with “buddies” from a previous cohort to act as mentors.³⁴

The main discussion board was gamified to reward not just posting, but replying to and supporting others’ posts.²⁷

The result was transformative.

The course came alive.

Learning felt effortless because it was embedded in a vibrant network of relationships.

The “content” was no longer something to be consumed; it was the raw material for conversations that were already happening.

Pillar 3: The Practice as Visible Fruit (Tangible Results & Shared Repertoire)

A healthy, thriving mycelial network, nourished by fertile soil and interconnected by a living system, inevitably produces fruit.

In a forest, it’s mushrooms.

In a learning community, it’s the tangible, valuable outcomes that benefit both the individual members and the organization as a whole.

A Focus on Results (The Harvest): This pillar aligns with the third core principle of PLCs: judging effectiveness on the basis of results.²¹

However, the mycelial model provides a crucial reframe.

The results are a

consequence of network health, not the sole, obsessive focus.

This subtle distinction is the key to avoiding the trap of the failed “Data Teams,” which fixated on metrics and, in doing so, destroyed the very collaboration needed to improve them.³

In a healthy community, the focus on results is about asking, “What can we achieve together?” and then working collectively to make it happen.

Goals shift from activities (“We will create three new labs”) to outcomes (“We will reduce the failure rate in our course by 50%”).²¹

Shared Repertoire (The Spores): The most valuable “fruit” a community produces is its “shared repertoire”—the collection of experiences, stories, tools, and methods for addressing recurring problems that the group develops over time.⁷

This is the collective wisdom of the community.

It’s the set of best practices shared by engineers at the World Bank ³⁵, the innovative teaching techniques developed by faculty at Orange Coast College ³⁶, or the peer-to-peer support that helps students navigate the stresses of medical school.²⁹

This shared repertoire acts like the spores of a mushroom, spreading the community’s learning and allowing new knowledge to grow elsewhere.

The many benefits cited in research are all different kinds of “fruit” harvested from a healthy network.

When students form lifelong friendships ³⁷, achieve higher GPAs ¹⁹, and feel a greater sense of belonging ¹, it’s because the underlying network is providing the social and academic support they need.

When teachers report higher job satisfaction ³⁸ and develop new leadership skills ³⁹, it’s because the collaborative network is fostering their professional growth.

These benefits are not line items to be engineered directly; they are the natural harvest of a well-tended ecosystem.

This framework resolves a fundamental tension in community design: the conflict between engineered structures and emergent learning.

Formal academic learning communities ¹⁷ and corporate PLCs ²¹ are often highly engineered from the top down.

In contrast, some of the most dynamic communities, like the #etmooc that grew from a massive open online course, are highly emergent, with members co-creating the entire experience.⁴¹

The failure cases reveal the danger of over-engineering.

The HP-Compaq merger failed because the cultures were not allowed to integrate organically.⁸

The “Data Teams” failed because the structure was too rigid and prescriptive.³

The Mycelial Model provides a synthesis.

The three pillars represent the intentional design—the gardening.

You must consciously prepare the soil (Pillar 1), provide structures that encourage connection (Pillar 2), and maintain a focus on tangible outcomes (Pillar 3).

But within that intentional framework, the actual learning, connection, and innovation are

emergent.

The gardener doesn’t command the roots to grow in a specific direction; they create the conditions that allow for healthy, adaptive, and resilient growth.

Part IV: An Ecology of Failure: A Post-Mortem on Dead Communities

Armed with the mycelial lens, it becomes possible to look back at the graveyards of failed communities and perform a proper post-mortem.

A typical post-mortem seeks to identify a root cause to prevent recurrence.⁴²

However, as critics note, these inquiries are often flawed because they lack a sound analytical framework and succumb to political pressure.⁴³

The Mycelial Model provides that missing framework, allowing us to diagnose not just isolated errors, but systemic diseases that lead to ecological collapse.

Diagnosing Community Diseases

Community failure is rarely a single-point event.

It’s a cascade.

A weakness in one pillar creates a feedback loop that weakens the others, eventually killing the entire system.

1. Toxic Soil (Purpose & Trust Failure):

This disease attacks the foundation.

It occurs when a community is built on a foundation of misaligned goals, such as executive pet projects that lack strategic grounding or employee buy-in.44 It festers when there is no psychological safety.

The 2018 rebrand of ConvertKit to “Seva” is a perfect example.

The company failed to understand the deep cultural and religious significance of the word, creating a purpose that was misaligned with the values of a significant audience.

The resulting backlash was a clear sign of toxic soil; the community revolted because its foundational trust was violated.45 Similarly, the failure of the Unum/Provident merger can be seen as an attempt to grow a single network across two fundamentally different soil types, leading to rejection and collapse.8

2. Severed Connections (Collaboration & Engagement Failure):

This is the most common pathology, where the network itself fails to form or is actively destroyed.

It’s characterized by low participation and a lack of meaningful interaction.

The causes are numerous: a one-size-fits-all training approach that ignores diverse learning styles 5; a reliance on monotonous, non-interactive lectures 5; or a lack of follow-up and reinforcement that causes knowledge to decay.5 The failure of Tarsus Distribution’s automation initiative was a communication failure that severed connections; employees resisted because they perceived the change as a threat, killing any chance of collaborative adoption.45 This is the disease of the digital ghost town, where the structure exists but the life-giving flow of interaction has ceased.

3. Nutrient Deserts (Resource & Equity Failure):

A network can also starve to death.

This happens when there is unequal participation, where a few voices dominate and others are unheard, creating knowledge bottlenecks.1 It can be caused by “groupthink,” where the fear of conflict starves the community of new ideas and diverse perspectives.1 It also occurs when a community fails to distribute resources equitably.

The mycelial network in a forest actively redistributes nutrients from older, established trees to struggling saplings, maintaining the health of the whole ecosystem.16 A human community that fails to do the same—by not supporting new members or amplifying marginalized voices—creates nutrient deserts where parts of the network wither and die.

4. Invasive Species (Unmanaged Conflict & Negativity):

A healthy ecosystem has defense mechanisms.

A community without them can be quickly overrun by toxicity.

The spectacular failure of anonymous Q&A forums like Formspring and Yik Yak, which became hotbeds of cyberbullying and legal challenges, is a clear example of this disease.46 Without clear norms, active moderation, and processes for resolving conflict constructively, negativity can spread like an invasive weed, poisoning the soil, severing connections, and making the entire environment uninhabitable for healthy growth.

Looking at failure through this ecological lens reveals the interconnectedness of these diseases.

The failed IT training program ⁵ shows a cascade: a lack of follow-up (a nutrient issue) led to knowledge decay, which severed the connection between the training and its practical application.

The HP-Compaq merger ⁸ shows another cascade: a failure to integrate cultures (toxic soil) led to mistrust, which severed connections between employees, starving the new entity of the collaborative energy needed to succeed.

A post-mortem, therefore, shouldn’t be a simple checklist of errors.

It must be an ecological analysis of the system’s health, identifying the initial point of decay and tracing how that disease spread through the network.

Part V: Conclusion: From Community Manager to Ecosystem Architect

My journey over the past 15 years has been a complete transformation of identity.

I began as a builder, an engineer of platforms and a manager of content.

I measured my success by the quality of the containers I built.

Today, I see myself as a gardener, a cultivator of ecosystems.

I measure my success by the health of the connections I help foster.

The mycelial paradigm is more than just a clever analogy; it is a fundamental shift in our understanding of how people learn and grow together.

It calls on us to stop building empty, sterile containers and start cultivating the living networks that thrive within them.

It demands that we shift our focus from the visible “mushrooms” of activity metrics and content repositories to the invisible, life-giving “mycelium” of relationships, trust, and shared purpose.

This approach is not easier.

It requires patience, empathy, and a willingness to cede control.

It requires us to act as facilitators, not directors; as guides, not gurus.

But it is infinitely more effective and sustainable.

It aligns with our deepest human instincts for connection and belonging, recognizing that learning is not an individual act of consumption but a social act of creation.⁶

The future of learning—in our schools, our companies, and our civic lives—depends on our ability to build these thriving ecosystems.

By embracing our role as ecosystem architects, we can create learning communities that are not only successful in achieving their goals but are also resilient, adaptive, and deeply nourishing for all their members.

We can cultivate human forests that are as vibrant and interconnected as the ancient ecosystems that lie hidden, teeming with life, just beneath our feet.

Works cited

1. 2. Tip Sheet- LC basic principles_with Practice Tips _Final.docx, accessed August 8, 2025, https://mainecenteronaging.umaine.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/201/2024/07/2.-Tip-Sheet-LC-basic-principles_with-Practice-Tips-_July2024.pdf
2. en.wikipedia.org, accessed August 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_of_practice
3. Examination of a Failed Professional Learning Community – ERIC, accessed August 8, 2025, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1054892.pdf
4. Thinking together: What makes Communities of Practice work? – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed August 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5305036/
5. Examining Common Failures in Employee Training Programs, accessed August 8, 2025, https://thetrainingassociates.com/failures-in-employee-training/
6. Learning Community & Belonging | UCL Changemakers – UCL …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.ucl.ac.uk/changemakers/changemakers-projects/learning-community-belonging
7. Communities of Practice Toolkit – UC Davis Health, accessed August 8, 2025, https://health.ucdavis.edu/workforce-diversity/What_We_Do/Communities-of-Practice/COPToolkit.html
8. 13 Notorious Examples of Strategic Planning Failure – AchieveIt, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.achieveit.com/resources/blog/13-notorious-examples-of-strategic-planning-failure/
9. Mycelial Connections – Dark Mountain, accessed August 8, 2025, https://dark-mountain.net/dark-kitchen-mycelial-connections/
10. The Mycelium Network Connects Us All – Fungi Perfecti, accessed August 8, 2025, https://fungi.com/blogs/mycelium-articles/the-mycelium-network-connects-us-all
11. Underground Networking: The Amazing Connections Beneath Your Feet – National Forest Foundation, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.nationalforests.org/blog/underground-mycorrhizal-network
12. The Secret Language of Plants: The Mycelium Network – Londolozi Blog, accessed August 8, 2025, https://blog.londolozi.com/2024/09/30/the-secret-language-of-plants-the-mycelium-network/
13. www.nationalforests.org, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.nationalforests.org/blog/underground-mycorrhizal-network#:~:text=Taken%20together%2C%20myecelium%20composes%20what’s,mycelium%20that%20trees%20%E2%80%9Ccommunicate.%E2%80%9D
14. Unlocking Nature’s Hidden Network: Meet Mycelium, the Fungi that Connects Trees | One Tree Planted – YouTube, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KVdlcTEYLA&pp=0gcJCfwAo7VqN5tD
15. Teams and Organizations as living networks: the mycelium metaphor – TransitionStudio, accessed August 8, 2025, https://transitionstudio.global/en/teams-and-organizations-as-living-networks-the-mycelium-metaphor/
16. The Mycelium Model for capacity builders, professional associations, funders, and other support organizations – Nonprofit AF, accessed August 8, 2025, https://nonprofitaf.com/2019/05/the-mycelium-model-for-capacity-builders-professional-associations-funders-and-other-support-organizations/
17. What Is a Learning Community? | Long Island University, accessed August 8, 2025, https://liu.edu/brooklyn/academics/Centers/Learning-Communities/What-Is-a-Learning-Community
18. What are Learning Communities? – Purdue University, accessed August 8, 2025, https://service.purdue.edu/TDClient/32/Purdue/KB/ArticleDet?ID=180
19. Learning community – Wikipedia, accessed August 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learning_community
20. What Are Learning Communities? (Types, Components, and Examples) – weDevs, accessed August 8, 2025, https://wedevs.com/blog/496480/what-are-learning-communities/
21. MSEd Course Insight: Three Core Principles of Professional …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.waldenu.edu/online-masters-programs/ms-in-education/resource/msed-course-insight-three-core-principles-of-professional-learning-communities
22. Creating a Community of Learning – EL Education, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.eleducation.org/core-practices/culture-and-character/creating-a-community-of-learning/
23. Principles of Community – Virginia Tech, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.vt.edu/principles-of-community.html
24. 8 Tips To Build An Online Learning Community – eLearning Industry, accessed August 8, 2025, https://elearningindustry.com/tips-build-online-learning-community
25. Creating Community Online (Overview) – Teaching Resources – NC State University, accessed August 8, 2025, https://teaching-resources.delta.ncsu.edu/online-learning-communities/
26. Making Virtual Vibes Real: How to Build a Strong Classroom Community Online, accessed August 8, 2025, https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/olc-insights/2024/10/making-virtual-vibes-real-how-to-build-a-strong-classroom-community-online/
27. Mastering Online Community Engagement: Strategies & Tools – Bettermode, accessed August 8, 2025, https://bettermode.com/blog/online-community-engagement
28. Five Ways to Build Community in Online Classrooms – Faculty Focus, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/online-education/online-student-engagement/five-ways-to-build-community-in-online-classrooms/
29. Thinking of Learning Communities? Here Are Some of the Ways They May Benefit Your Medical Students, accessed August 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10775716/
30. Building a Community Online – Teaching Assistants’ Training Program – University of Toronto, accessed August 8, 2025, https://tatp.utoronto.ca/resources/building-a-community-online/
31. Teaching to Connect: Community-Building Strategies for the Virtual Classroom – ERIC, accessed August 8, 2025, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1210946.pdf
32. 10 Online Community Engagement Tactics You Can Steal – Higher Logic, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.higherlogic.com/blog/online-community-engagement-tactics/
33. khoros.com, accessed August 8, 2025, https://khoros.com/blog/online-community-engagement
34. 6 Ways to Keep Members Engaged in Online Communities – Forj, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.forj.ai/resources/6-ways-to-keep-members-engaged-in-online-communities
35. Communities of Practice Success Stories: How World-Class Companies Run Their CoPs, accessed August 8, 2025, https://adaptmethodology.com/blog/communities-of-practice-success-stories/
36. 11 Inspiring Examples of Communities of Practice in Higher Education, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.everylearnereverywhere.org/blog/11-inspiring-examples-of-communities-of-practice-in-higher-education/
37. Advantages of Joining a Learning Community – Minnesota State University, Mankato, accessed August 8, 2025, https://mankato.mnsu.edu/academics/academic-support/scholarly-communities/learning-communities/what-is-a-learning-community/advantages-of-joining-a-learning-community/
38. Unveiling the Benefits of Professional Learning Communities – Positive Action, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.positiveaction.net/blog/professional-learning-communities
39. How Learning Communities Transform Members and Society – QuadC, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.quadc.io/blog/how-learning-communities-transform-members-and-society
40. Learning Communities – CCBC, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.ccbcmd.edu/Student-Life/Student-Communities/pages/Learning-Communities.html
41. Examples / Case Studies – ShapingEDU – Arizona State University, accessed August 8, 2025, https://shapingedu.asu.edu/communities-of-practice/examples
42. Postmortems: Enhance Incident Management Processes | Atlassian, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.atlassian.com/incident-management/handbook/postmortems
43. Why postmortems fail – PNAS, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2116638118
44. The 8 Most Common Mistakes Corporate Social Impact Leaders Make… – MovingWorlds Blog, accessed August 8, 2025, https://blog.movingworlds.org/8-common-mistakes-corporate-social-impact-leaders/
45. 8 Change Management Failures to Learn From (2025) – Whatfix, accessed August 8, 2025, https://whatfix.com/blog/5-change-management-strategy-failures-to-learn-from/
46. 11 Failed Community Startups & the Reasons Behind – Failory, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.failory.com/startups/community-failures
47. On Nature’s Community: Lessons from Mycelium Networks – Golden Poppy, accessed August 8, 2025, https://goldenpoppyherbs.com/on-natures-community-lessons-from-mycelium-networks/