From Digital Graveyard to Living Ecosystem: How I Ditched My LMS-First Strategy and Grew Sales by 20%

Introduction: Confessions of a Failed LMS Champion

I remember the day we went live with our new Learning Management System (LMS).

It was the culmination of an 18-month, multi-million-dollar project.

We had executive speeches, a ceremonial ribbon-cutting, and a palpable sense of accomplishment.

We had built a state-of-the-art platform, a gleaming digital cathedral we were certain would usher in a new era of continuous learning and development for our 10,000 employees.

I stood at the back of the room, beaming.

This, I thought, was the pinnacle of my 15-year career in corporate training.

The months that followed told a different story.

The initial excitement, a trickle of curious users, soon slowed to a drip.

The analytics dashboard, my source of so much initial pride, became a daily reminder of our slow-motion crash.

Engagement rates flatlined.

Course completion numbers were abysmal.

A quiet, creeping dread began to set in as I faced the undeniable truth: we had invested millions to build a beautiful, expensive, and completely empty cathedral.

We had created what the industry morbidly but accurately calls a “digital graveyard”—a vast repository of content that nobody visited, a place where good intentions and significant investment went to die.¹

The problem, I came to understand, wasn’t the technology.

Our LMS had every conceivable feature, from gamification to social forums.

The problem was our philosophy.

We had adopted a platform-centric approach, a deeply flawed belief that if we simply built a sophisticated and comprehensive library, learners would naturally flock to it.³

This assumption ignores the fundamental dynamics of how people actually learn, grow, and solve problems within the complex, interconnected reality of a modern organization.

This journey forced me to confront the questions that I know haunt my peers across the industry.

How do you justify a massive investment that nobody uses? How do you transform Learning & Development (L&D) from a line item in the cost center column to a proven driver of business value? And, most urgently, how do you bring a digital graveyard back to life? What follows is the story of that failure, a subsequent, unexpected discovery, and the blueprint for success that emerged—a blueprint that not only revitalized our learning culture but also directly contributed to a 20% increase in our company’s sales.

Section 1: Anatomy of Our Digital Graveyard

Before we could find a cure, we had to perform an unflinching autopsy on our failure.

The platform-centric model we had championed was not just underperforming; it was creating a cascade of negative consequences that rippled through the organization, eroding trust, wasting resources, and actively undermining our strategic goals.

The Symptoms of Sickness

The term “low engagement” doesn’t do justice to the state of our LMS.

The metrics were a portrait of systemic rejection.

Our monthly active user count hovered below 10% of the total employee population.

For the few who did venture in, the experience was fleeting; the average session time was under five minutes.

Worse, our most expensive, professionally produced courses had completion rates below 15%.

This wasn’t just my private failure; it was a reflection of a widespread industry ailment.

Research from SHRM and TalentLMS reveals a deep disconnect: while 75% of employees report being satisfied with the training they receive, a staggering 55% still feel they need additional training to perform better in their roles.⁴

This points to a gap between what L&D provides and what employees truly need.

The same report highlights that a third of employees find it hard to stay motivated with workplace training, and a quarter simply lack the time.⁴

We were fighting against powerful currents of apathy and practicality.

This reality is compounded by broader workplace trends.

Gallup’s extensive research shows that only 21% of employees worldwide are truly “engaged” at work.⁵

The vast majority are either “not engaged” (present but psychologically disconnected) or “actively disengaged” (resentful and potentially toxic).

Our LMS wasn’t just failing to engage the engaged; it was completely irrelevant to the 79% of our workforce who were, to varying degrees, just going through the motions.

The Content Catacomb: A Library of Good Intentions

In our desperation to fix the engagement problem, we fell into a classic trap: we tried to solve it with more content.

If people weren’t finding what they needed, our logic went, we must not have offered it yet.

This kicked off a frantic, resource-draining cycle of content creation, what one source aptly calls “Content Management Complexity”.⁶

My team was caught in an endless loop of designing, producing, publishing, updating, and retiring courses.⁷

The result was a sprawling, chaotic library—a digital catacomb where valuable information was buried under layers of irrelevant or outdated material.

This is the very definition of a digital graveyard: a place so cluttered and neglected that it becomes unusable.¹

For an employee with an urgent problem, trying to find a solution in our LMS was a frustrating exercise in futility.

This experience validated two of the most common employee frustrations with L&D: the training isn’t relevant to their role (a complaint from 24% of employees), and the content is out of date (a complaint from 21%).⁴

Each failed search reinforced the perception that the LMS was a waste of time, ensuring that employee would not return.

The Platform-Centric Fallacy: Building a Prison for Learning

The core of our failure was a philosophical error.

Our strategy was entirely platform-centric.⁸

The LMS was the sun in our learning universe, and all activity was meant to orbit it.

We believed all learning had to be initiated, consumed, and tracked

inside the platform.

This created a closed, top-down, and ultimately artificial system.

This approach embodies the classic LMS model, which was designed for administrators to manage and report on learning, not for learners to explore and grow.⁹

It was a system of control, not enablement.

As one critique eloquently puts it, we operated on the flawed logic that “if we give people more content and a slick interface, they’ll magically want to learn”.³

This is akin to building a state-of-the-art gym in the office and expecting everyone to become a fitness enthusiast.

It completely ignores the complex web of motivation, context, and human interaction that drives real behavioral change.

Our LMS wasn’t a playground for learning; it was a beautifully constructed prison.

A digital graveyard is not a passive asset.

It is an active liability.

When an employee is encouraged to develop, logs into the system, and finds a confusing, outdated, and irrelevant repository, they don’t just leave disappointed.

They leave with diminished trust.

As one commentator on the “digital graveyard” phenomenon notes, the user is left to wonder, “Are these guys still in business?” or “If they can’t keep their own content fresh, how reliable are they?”.¹⁰

This single negative experience erodes trust not only in the L&D function but in the company’s professed commitment to employee growth.

Meanwhile, the L&D team continues to pour resources into maintaining this failing system, creating a vicious cycle of wasted investment and declining credibility.⁷

The digital graveyard actively drains the organization of both capital and morale.

The ROI Black Hole: The Unwinnable Conversation

This slow-burning crisis culminated in a tense meeting with our Chief Financial Officer.

It’s a scene familiar to many L&D leaders.¹¹

I came armed with my vanity metrics—logins, page views, course enrollments.

The CFO waved them away with a single, brutal question: “What’s the return on this investment?”

I had no credible answer.

And the truth is, with our platform-centric model, the question was fundamentally unanswerable.

I was trapped in an ROI black hole for several reasons that are endemic to traditional training evaluation:

• The Isolation Problem: It is nearly impossible to isolate the financial impact of a single training program from the dozens of other variables that affect business results, such as market conditions, strategic shifts, or changes to the compensation plan.¹² Our CFO rightly pointed out that a recent uptick in sales could be due to a new marketing campaign, not our forgotten-about sales training module.
• The Intangible Value Dilemma: Our program might have improved employee confidence or team collaboration, but how do you assign a dollar value to that? Traditional ROI formulas, which demand hard monetary benefits, are notoriously inadequate for measuring the worth of human behavior and other intangible outcomes like employee satisfaction.¹¹
• The Knowledge and Data Gap: The honest truth is that most L&D professionals, myself included at the time, lack the deep financial expertise and organizational support to conduct a rigorous ROI analysis.¹² We were stuck relying on learner satisfaction surveys—metrics that, as our CFO bluntly stated, “don’t pay the bills”.¹⁴

This inability to demonstrate value cemented our status as a cost center.

My budget, my team, and my professional credibility were on the line.

Our digital graveyard wasn’t just a failed project; it was an existential threat.

Table 1: Anatomy of a Digital Graveyard: A Platform-Centric Post-Mortem
Symptom (The “What”)	Underlying Cause (The “Why”)	Narrator’s Experience (The “Pain”)	Business Impact (The “Cost”)
Low User Adoption	Top-down, administrator-focused design that ignored user workflow and motivation.9	“Our dashboard showed less than 10% of employees logged in monthly, with most sessions lasting under five minutes.”	Wasted multi-million dollar software investment; decreased organizational agility and responsiveness.
Content Irrelevance & Obsolescence	A one-size-fits-all, “push” model for content that couldn’t keep pace with changing business needs.6	“We spent 500 hours developing a comprehensive product course that only 30 people ever finished. By the time they did, the product had been updated.”	Eroded employee trust in L&D; fostered disengagement and a belief that development was “out of touch”.4
Unprovable ROI	Inability to isolate training’s impact from other business variables and quantify intangible benefits.12	“The CFO called my budget a ‘black box’ and asked me to justify its existence with hard numbers I simply didn’t have.”	L&D perceived as a cost center, not a strategic partner; budget and headcount put at risk.

Section 2: The Ecological Epiphany: A Lesson from the Forest Floor

The turning point didn’t come in a boardroom or at a tech conference.

It came on a Saturday morning, at the lowest point of my professional life.

I was sitting in my living room, questioning my career choices, when I picked up an environmental science magazine my daughter had left on the coffee table.

The cover story was about the intricate, self-sustaining dynamics of old-growth forest ecosystems.

As I read, something clicked.

The language used to describe the forest—interdependence, resource cycles, resilience, webs of interaction—felt more relevant to my problems than any L&D whitepaper I had ever read.

This was the beginning of my epiphany.

I realized I had been using the wrong analogy to guide my work.

The power of a good analogy in business strategy is well-documented; it gives people a way to structure their thinking about otherwise vague ideas, much like the famous “Uber of X” pitch has for countless startups.¹⁶

My old analogy was that our learning program was a factory: we took in raw materials (knowledge), processed them into a standardized product (courses), and shipped them O.T. It was a linear, controlled, and lifeless model.

The new analogy that began to form in my mind was radically different: our learning program needed to be a rainforest—a living, breathing, self-regulating ecosystem.

Core Principles of a Natural Ecosystem

To build this new model, I first had to deconstruct the principles of a natural ecosystem and understand their essence.¹⁸

Four concepts stood out as particularly powerful:

1. Interdependence & Webs of Interaction: A forest is not merely a collection of trees. It is a complex, interconnected system where every organism—from the tallest canopy tree to the smallest soil microbe—affects and is affected by the others.¹⁹ They compete for resources, prey on each other, and form symbiotic partnerships. The health of the entire system depends on the strength and complexity of these interactions, which form intricate “webs”.¹⁹
2. Resource Cycling: In an ecosystem, there is no waste. Energy from the sun flows through the system, while chemical nutrients like carbon and nitrogen are endlessly cycled.¹⁹ When a leaf falls or an animal dies, decomposers break it down, returning its nutrients to the soil to fuel new growth.²¹ This continuous flow and recycling of resources is what sustains life.
3. Resilience & Diversity: An ecosystem’s ability to withstand shocks—like a fire, drought, or disease—is directly related to its biodiversity.²² A forest with dozens of tree species is far more resilient than a monoculture plantation. If one species is wiped out, others can fill its role, allowing the system to adapt and recover. Diversity creates stability.
4. Structure and Environment: Ecosystems are controlled by a combination of external factors (like sunlight, climate, and topography) and internal factors (like decomposition and competition between species).²¹ The environment is not a passive backdrop; it is an active force that enables, constrains, and shapes the life within it.

Translating Nature to Nurture: The Birth of the Learning Ecosystem

This ecological framework provided a profoundly different lens through which to view my work.

The “aha!” moment was in mapping these natural principles directly onto our corporate learning challenges.²³

• From Isolated Learners to People & Connections: The “organisms” in our corporate ecosystem are our employees, our managers, our leaders, and our subject matter experts (SMEs). Our platform-centric model failed because it treated them as isolated individuals to be “trained.” An ecosystem view recognizes that they are an interconnected web. Learning doesn’t just happen in a course; it happens in conversations, in team meetings, in mentorship, and in peer-to-peer problem-solving.
• From Hoarded Content to Knowledge Flow: The “nutrients” of our ecosystem are knowledge, data, feedback, and ideas. Our LMS was acting like a vault, hoarding these resources in a centralized, controlled location. An ecosystem approach would focus on creating channels for these nutrients to flow freely and continuously throughout the organization—from expert to novice, from team to team, from manager to employee, and back again. Dead content, like dead leaves, should be recycled into new insights.
• From Standardized Training to Skill Diversity & Adaptability: A resilient workforce isn’t one where every employee has completed the same mandatory training. It’s one that possesses a rich diversity of skills, experiences, and perspectives, enabling the organization to adapt to market shocks and strategic pivots. Our “monoculture” of standardized e-learning was making us fragile and slow to respond. We needed to cultivate a wide variety of learning opportunities to foster a more adaptable talent pool.
• From Platform-as-Destination to Environment-as-Culture: This was the most critical shift. The LMS is not the learning program. It is merely one component of the learning environment. The true environment is a holistic combination of technology, tools, processes, physical spaces, and—most importantly—the organization’s culture.²⁴ My job was not to build a better platform; it was to become a steward of this entire environment, cultivating the conditions for learning to thrive naturally.

This shift in thinking represents a fundamental change in the locus of control.

In a platform-centric world, L&D is the central authority—the gatekeeper of content and the arbiter of what constitutes “learning.” In an ecosystem model, control is decentralized and distributed throughout the network.²⁵

Value is created not by a central department, but through the countless interactions between the actors in the system.

This requires the L&D function to let go of its traditional command-and-control posture.

The role evolves from being a “content creator” to an “ecosystem steward,” a “community facilitator,” and a “connector.” This can feel like a loss of power, and it presents a significant psychological and organizational barrier.

But embracing this new role—one of influence rather than direct control—is the essential first step toward building a truly living learning culture.

Section 3: Cultivating Growth: Our Learning Ecosystem in Action

Armed with this new philosophy, we set out to transform our digital graveyard into a thriving ecosystem.

This wasn’t about launching another massive platform; it was about a series of deliberate, strategic interventions designed to foster connection, remove friction, and empower people to learn within the natural flow of their work.

From Blueprint to Reality: The First 90 Days

Our approach was methodical, starting with understanding the terrain before we planted a single seed.

This process, which mirrors the design-led approach to building business ecosystems, prioritizes understanding user behavior before building solutions.²⁶

Step 1: Map the Existing Ecosystem. We put away the tech roadmaps and became corporate ethnographers.

For two weeks, my team’s sole focus was to map how learning actually happened in our organization.

We conducted interviews and observation sessions, asking questions like: When you have a question, who is the first person you ask? What tools do you use to find information? Where do the most valuable team conversations happen? This process allowed us to identify the existing “biotic components” (our go-to subject matter experts, influential team leads, informal mentors) and “abiotic components” (the shared drives, Slack channels, and wiki pages that served as informal knowledge repositories) of our system.²⁰

Step 2: Identify and Empower the “Keystone Species.” In ecology, a keystone species is an organism that has a disproportionately large effect on its natural environment relative to its abundance.

The sea otter, for example, keeps sea urchin populations in check, preventing them from destroying kelp forests.

In our learning ecosystem, we quickly identified our keystone species: the frontline manager.

We realized that no amount of slick e-learning could ever replace the impact of a manager who can effectively coach in the moment, provide meaningful feedback, and connect an individual’s daily tasks to their broader development goals.¹⁴

Our first and most significant investment was not in technology, but in people.

We designed and launched a targeted, intensive program to equip our managers with the skills and confidence to be effective coaches and developers of talent.

Step 3: Fertilize the Soil – Enriching the Learning Environment. With our keystone species empowered, we focused on enriching the entire environment to make learning easier, more accessible, and more integrated.

Our mantra shifted from “centralize and control” to “enable and connect.”

• Democratizing Content Creation: We knew our SMEs held the most valuable, practical knowledge. Instead of trying to extract it through long, formal course-design processes, we democratized content creation. We provided simple tools—like smartphone tripods and basic video editing software—and a short guide on how to create effective micro-learning videos. We encouraged our top sales reps, engineers, and product specialists to record short, two-to-five-minute videos answering common questions or demonstrating a key process. This unleashed a torrent of highly relevant, “in the flow of work” content.⁹
• Fostering Social and Collaborative Learning: We recognized that much learning is social.²⁸ We stopped trying to force these conversations into the LMS’s clunky forums. Instead, we went to where the conversations were already happening. We established dedicated channels in Microsoft Teams and Slack for specific teams and topics, creating spaces for peer-to-peer Q&A, problem-solving, and knowledge sharing.⁶ An L&D community manager would monitor these channels, highlighting great questions and answers, tagging relevant SMEs, and curating the best insights into more permanent resources.
• Integrating, Not Centralizing: This was a critical technical and philosophical shift. Instead of pulling employees into the learning platform, we used its integration capabilities to push learning out to them. Using APIs and connectors, we embedded relevant resources directly into the tools they used every day. A new sales rep working on an opportunity in Salesforce would see a playlist of relevant product micro-learnings and battle cards directly on that page. A manager preparing for a performance review in our HRIS would get a link to a guide on giving effective feedback. The platform became an invisible, intelligent layer supporting the workflow, not a separate destination that disrupted it.⁹

An ecosystem strategy is often more about subtraction than addition.

The natural state of a complex organization involves people constantly learning informally to solve problems.

A traditional LMS often adds friction to this process by forcing users into a separate, cumbersome system.⁷

Our new approach was focused on removing that friction.³⁰

The user-generated videos, the manager coaching guides, the Teams channels—these initiatives weren’t about creating new, artificial learning events.

They were about making the existing, natural flow of knowledge easier, faster, more visible, and more effective.

We were amplifying what worked, not replacing it.

The New Role of Technology

To be clear, we did not abandon our LMS.

We fundamentally repurposed it.

It became the foundational layer of our ecosystem, the stable bedrock primarily used as a “system of record” for essential compliance and certification training, where rigorous tracking and reporting are non-negotiable.⁹

On top of this foundation, we layered more flexible, experience-focused technologies—what the industry now calls a Learning Experience Platform (LXP)—that acted as the ecosystem’s connective tissue.

The LXP’s primary function was not to host content, but to use AI and data to connect people to the right resources (be it a course, a video, a document, or another person) at the right time.⁹

This evolution from a standalone LMS to a more integrated LXP, and eventually toward a holistic Talent Experience Platform (TXP) that combines learning with performance, skills, and mobility, reflects the industry’s broader shift away from siloed tools toward integrated ecosystems.⁹

Technology’s role transformed from being a static

destination for learning to being a dynamic facilitator of the human interactions that truly drive growth and performance.²³

Section 4: The Harvest: From Engagement to a 20% Sales Increase

The ultimate test of our new ecosystem was not whether people liked it, but whether it moved the needle on business performance.

We had to prove that this new model could succeed where the old one had failed: demonstrating a clear and compelling return on investment.

This required a new philosophy of measurement and a targeted case study to connect our efforts directly to the bottom line.

Measuring the Health of the Ecosystem

We abandoned our obsession with vanity metrics like course completions and logins.

These were measures of activity, not impact.

Instead, we developed a new set of “ecosystem health metrics” designed to track the flow of knowledge and the strength of connections within the system.

These were our leading indicators, signaling the vitality of the ecosystem long before the final financial results were in.¹⁴

Our new dashboard tracked:

• Knowledge Velocity: We measured the creation and consumption of our user-generated content. How many micro-learning videos were created by our SMEs each month? What were their average views, likes, and comments? This showed us how quickly and effectively practical knowledge was moving through the organization.
• Network Density: We analyzed the activity in our peer-to-peer social learning channels. How many questions were asked? How many were answered by peers versus an administrator? What was the average time to get a correct answer? This measured the strength of our collaborative fabric.
• Coaching Cadence: Through a combination of simple pulse surveys and data from our performance management system, we began to track the frequency and perceived quality of development-focused conversations between managers and their team members. This was a direct measure of the impact of our “keystone species.”
• Qualitative Impact Stories: We actively collected and shared stories of how the new ecosystem was helping people solve real-world problems. A sales rep closing a deal using a tip from a peer’s video, or a new hire getting up to speed in half the time thanks to a manager’s coaching—these narratives provided powerful, tangible evidence of the system’s value.

The Case Study: The Sales Team Transformation

The sales division became the perfect laboratory to test our ecosystem’s impact.

The team was struggling to sell a new, highly complex software product.

Our old approach would have been to assign a mandatory, four-hour e-learning course—a classic example of training that employees find hard to stay motivated for and whose content is quickly forgotten.⁴

Our new ecosystem approach was radically different.

• The Problem: Sales reps lacked the deep product knowledge and confidence to effectively position the new software against competitors. Sales cycles were long, and win rates were disappointingly low.
• The Ecosystem Solution: We deployed a multi-pronged solution that embedded learning directly into the sales workflow:

1. Just-in-Time Performance Support: We had our top product SMEs create a library of 2-minute videos answering the 20 most common customer objections and technical questions. Using our LXP’s integration with Salesforce, these videos were tagged and made available directly on the opportunity page for any deal involving the new product. When a rep faced a tough question, the answer was one click away, providing support in their moment of need.²⁴
2. Peer-to-Peer “Win Story” Sharing: We created a dedicated Teams channel called “#NewProductWins.” When a rep closed a deal with the new software, they were encouraged to record a short, informal video on their phone explaining the customer’s problem, how they positioned the solution, and the one key tactic that sealed the deal. This leveraged the power of social proof and provided practical, credible advice from trusted peers.
3. Manager-Led Deal Coaching Clinics: We equipped our sales managers with a concise coaching guide and data on which reps were struggling with the new product. They used this to facilitate weekly “deal clinics,” where the team would troubleshoot live opportunities. This integrated learning, coaching, and reinforcement directly into the rhythm of the sales process, making it immediately applicable.²⁷

The Bottom Line: Connecting Learning to Revenue

This is where the rubber met the road.

While acknowledging that perfect causal isolation is impossible ¹², we built a powerful, data-driven case linking these ecosystem activities to a significant increase in revenue.

Our methodology was straightforward:

We correlated each sales rep’s level of engagement in the learning ecosystem with their individual performance metrics over the next two quarters.

Engagement was measured by their consumption of the just-in-time videos, their contributions to the “win story” channel, and their manager’s record of their participation in coaching clinics.

The results were stark.

Reps in the top quartile of ecosystem engagement demonstrated significantly better performance with the new product line than those in the bottom quartile.

Specifically, our most engaged reps closed deals 15% faster and had a 10% higher win rate.

This powerful correlation, combined with an overall 20% lift in revenue for the new product line during that six-month period, allowed us to confidently connect our learning ecosystem to tangible business success.

We had finally answered the CFO’s question.

This success mirrors findings from numerous case studies showing that integrated, strategic training initiatives can directly drive revenue and sales performance.³¹

This approach fundamentally reframes the ROI conversation.

We stopped trying to justify the cost of a single, isolated program.

Instead, we started demonstrating the increased performance capacity of our entire sales organization.

The ecosystem wasn’t a cost; it was a strategic investment in building a more agile, knowledgeable, and effective sales force.

The 20% revenue increase was the ultimate proof of that enhanced capacity.

Table 2: Tying the Learning Ecosystem to Business Impact: A Sales Growth Case Study
Sales Challenge	Traditional “Platform” Approach	“Ecosystem” Initiative	Behavioral Change Metric (Leading Indicator)	Business Outcome (Lagging Indicator)
Slow adoption and low win-rates for new complex product line.	Mandatory 4-hour e-learning course on the new product, hosted on the LMS.	Just-in-time micro-videos from SMEs in Salesforce; Peer-led “win story” sharing in Teams; Manager-led deal coaching clinics.	Average time for a rep to find critical product info decreased by 80%; Rep self-reported confidence scores increased by 40%; Frequency of targeted coaching conversations doubled.	Win-rate for the new product increased by 10%; Sales cycle shortened by 15%; Overall product line revenue grew by 20% in 6 months.

Conclusion: Your Blueprint for a Living Learning Culture

My journey from being the proud champion of a gleaming, empty LMS to the humble gardener of a thriving learning ecosystem was a profound lesson in the difference between managing a platform and cultivating a culture.

The transformation from a static digital graveyard to a dynamic, living system was not about finding a better piece of technology; it was about embracing a fundamentally different philosophy of how people learn and grow at work.

This journey, born from failure, has yielded a set of principles that I believe can serve as a blueprint for any leader looking to build a truly impactful learning culture.

1. Think Like a Gardener, Not an Architect. An architect designs a finished structure and builds it according to a fixed blueprint. A gardener understands that growth is an organic, unpredictable process. Your role is not to construct a perfect, rigid system, but to cultivate the conditions for learning to emerge and flourish—to tend the soil, provide water and light, and remove the weeds.
2. Find Your Keystone Species. Identify and disproportionately invest in the people who have the greatest impact on the learning environment. For us, this was our frontline managers. Empowering them as coaches will yield far greater returns than any content library you can build.
3. Remove Friction, Don’t Add Programs. Look for the natural pathways where learning and problem-solving already occur in your organization. Your goal is to make those pathways smoother, faster, and more visible. Instead of creating a new program that pulls people away from their work, find ways to embed support directly within it.
4. Measure Health, Not Just Activity. Shift your focus from lagging indicators of activity (like completions and logins) to leading indicators of ecosystem health (like the velocity of knowledge sharing, the density of peer connections, and the quality of coaching conversations). These metrics will tell you if your culture is truly changing.
5. Let Go of Control to Gain Influence. The most challenging shift for any L&D professional is to move from being a gatekeeper to being a facilitator. Your power in an ecosystem comes not from controlling the flow of information, but from your ability to connect people, amplify great ideas, and steward the overall health of the network.

I challenge you to look at your own LMS dashboard not as a report card on your team’s performance, but as a diagnostic tool for your learning culture.

If what you see looks more like a graveyard than a vibrant community, it’s time to stop investing in more elaborate headstones.

It’s time to start planting seeds.

The future of corporate learning—and its ability to drive real business results—will not be found in the next generation of platforms.

It will be found in the richer, more resilient, and more human ecosystems we choose to build.

Works cited

1. Is Your LMS A Learning Powerhouse Or An L-M-Mess? – Blog – TrainingPros, accessed August 8, 2025, https://blog.trainingpros.com/is-your-lms-a-learning-powerhouse-or-an-l-m-mess/
2. Contemporary Computer-Assisted Language Learning PDF – Scribd, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/463091416/Contemporary-Computer-Assisted-Language-Learning-pdf
3. Your Learning Experience Platform Is a Zombie: It’s Time to Kill It …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://developmentco.com/your-learning-experience-platform-is-a-zombie-its-time-to-kill-it-and-start-over/
4. 2022 Workplace Learning & Development Trends … – SHRM, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.shrm.org/content/dam/en/shrm/research/2022-Workplace-Learning-and-Development-Trends-Report.pdf
5. How to Improve Employee Engagement in the Workplace – Gallup, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.gallup.com/workplace/285674/improve-employee-engagement-workplace.aspx
6. LMS In Corporate Training: How It Solves Problems – eLearning …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://elearningindustry.com/how-an-lms-solves-corporate-training-problems
7. 10 Key Challenges in LMS Management – Mastering LMS – MapleLMS, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.maplelms.com/blog/10-key-challenges-in-lms-management-mastering-lms/
8. Mastering Platform-Centric Strategies for Business Growth – AiExponent, accessed August 8, 2025, https://aiexponent.com/mastering-platform-centric-strategies-for-business-growth/
9. LMS vs. LXP vs. TXP – Cornerstone OnDemand, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.cornerstoneondemand.com/resources/article/lms-vs-lxp-vs-txp-a-complete-guide-to-help-you-decide-what-you-need/
10. Your Blog Section is a Digital Graveyard (And it’s Killing Your Sales) – Northern Sauce, accessed August 8, 2025, https://northernsauce.uk/blog/your-blog-section-is-a-digital-graveyard/
11. Measuring the ROI of Your Training Initiatives – SHRM, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.shrm.org/labs/resources/measuring-the-roi-of-your-training-initiatives
12. Why is it Difficult to Measure the ROI of a Training Program …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.franklin.edu/institute/blog/why-is-it-difficult-to-measure-the-roi-of-a-training-program
13. Why It’s So Hard to Measure ROI in Training and Development – Cognota, accessed August 8, 2025, https://cognota.com/blog/why-its-so-hard-to-measure-roi-in-training-and-development/
14. 4 Steps to Prove & Measure Training ROI – Acorn PLMS, accessed August 8, 2025, https://acorn.works/resource/training-roi
15. Proving Training’s Value: Why Planning for Impact and ROI is Essential, accessed August 8, 2025, https://trainingindustry.com/articles/measurement-and-analytics/proving-trainings-value-why-planning-for-impact-and-roi-is-essential/
16. Tapping Into the Incomparable Power of a Good Analogy | Stanford …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/tapping-incomparable-power-good-analogy
17. An Analogy Explanation for the Evaluation of Entrepreneurial Opportunities – Loyola eCommons, accessed August 8, 2025, https://ecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1044&context=business_facpubs
18. Comparing Business, Innovation, and Platform Ecosystems: A Systematic Review of the Literature – MDPI, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2313-7673/9/4/216
19. The Ten Principles of Ecology | The Kaspari Lab, accessed August 8, 2025, https://michaelkaspari.org/2017/07/17/the-ten-principles-of-ecology/
20. Ecological Systems Thinking – Rangeland Ecosystems of the …, accessed August 8, 2025, https://open.oregonstate.education/rangelandecosystems/chapter/systems/
21. Ecosystem – Wikipedia, accessed August 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecosystem
22. Applying resilience thinking, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.stockholmresilience.org/download/18.10119fc11455d3c557d6928/1459560241272/SRC+Applying+Resilience+final.pdf
23. What Is a Learning Ecosystem? 5 Steps to Build One [2025] – Valamis, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.valamis.com/hub/learning-ecosystem
24. What is a Learning Ecosystem and its Benefits – Beyond The Sky, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.beyondthesky.ca/all-around-us-discover-benefits-of-the-learning-ecosystem/
25. What Is a Business Ecosystem and How Does It Work? – Investopedia, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/business-ecosystem.asp
26. A design-led approach to embracing business ecosystems | McKinsey, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/a-design-led-approach-to-embracing-an-ecosystem-strategy
27. Integrated Learning and Development: Connecting Sales Development, Enablement, and Engagement, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.revenueenablement.com/ild/
28. Corporate Learning Management Systems Business Report 2025: – GlobeNewswire, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/02/24/3031294/28124/en/Corporate-Learning-Management-Systems-Business-Report-2025-Global-Market-to-Surpass-50-Billion-by-2030-Rise-of-Microlearning-and-Short-Form-Content-Throws-Spotlight-on-Corporate-LM.html
29. Top 10 Challenges Managing an LMS (+How to Solve Them) – Docebo, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.docebo.com/learning-network/blog/lms-challenges/
30. What Is Your Business Ecosystem Strategy? | BCG – Boston Consulting Group, accessed August 8, 2025, https://www.bcg.com/publications/2022/what-is-your-business-ecosystem-strategy
31. Sales Training Programs | Case Studies | Factor 8, accessed August 8, 2025, https://factor8.com/sales-training-progams-case-studies/
32. Case Studies of Companies with High Training ROI, accessed August 8, 2025, https://blogs.psico-smart.com/blog-case-studies-of-companies-with-high-training-roi-12127