Table of Contents
Part I: The Promise and the Pain of a Final Letter
Introduction: The Day the Words Failed
In the early years of my practice, I was called to consult with a family shattered by the death of their son by suicide.
They sat around a dining room table, a single sheet of paper lying in the center like a sacred text and a landmine.
It was his final note.
They looked to me, the professional, the one with the textbooks and the training, to translate it for them.
They were desperate for an answer to the one question that eclipsed all others: “Why?” I did my best, drawing on my knowledge of common themes and psychological markers.
I pointed to the expressions of guilt, the declarations of love, the practical instructions.
But with every “expert” observation I offered, the chasm of their grief seemed to widen.
My words, rooted in clinical detachment, failed to bridge the gap between the ink on the page and the unbearable pain in that room.
The note, which they hoped would be a key, had become another locked door.
I left that home with a profound sense of failure.
Not just a failure to comfort, but a failure of my entire framework.
The standard analysis felt hollow, an academic exercise that offered no solace and, worse, no real understanding.
That day, I realized that to truly help those left behind, we needed more than a checklist of themes; we needed a new way to read the language of despair.
This report is the result of that journey—a journey to understand not just what a suicide note says, but what it means, and how we can interpret its tragic message with the compassion and clarity that survivors so desperately need.1
The Anatomy of a Farewell: Deconstructing the Final Message
A suicide note is one of the most fraught documents a person can encounter.
It is a final communication from a mind in a state of profound crisis.
While every note is unique to the individual, decades of research have revealed a consistent, almost universal, pattern of themes that surface in these final messages.
Understanding this pattern is the first step toward deciphering their deeper meaning.
Across numerous studies in different cultures and time periods, a core set of emotional and practical content emerges with startling regularity.
The most dominant theme is an expression of apology, shame, or guilt, appearing in as many as 74% to 90% of notes.4
This is often followed by declarations of
love for those left behind, found in approximately 55% to 60% of cases.4
A significant portion of notes, between 23% and 36%, also contain
instructions regarding practical affairs, such as settling debts, distributing possessions, or providing passwords.5
Other common themes include the sense that
life is too much to bear, feelings of hopelessness, and the perception of being a burden to others.1
These notes are addressed to various people—family, spouses, mothers—but a surprisingly high number, over half in one study, are addressed to no one in particular, perhaps reflecting the profound sense of isolation felt by the writer.4
The language can range from elaborate accounts of perceived injustices to simple, straightforward, and heartbreakingly brief messages, especially in notes left by younger individuals.4
However, the most critical feature of these documents is not any single theme, but the frequent and jarring juxtaposition of contradictory ideas.
A note might contain a detailed, pragmatic list of financial matters right next to a raw, emotional plea for forgiveness.6
It can express overwhelming love for family members in one sentence and, by its very existence, represent the ultimate act of leaving them.4
Research has shown that the emotional tone of notes often shifts dramatically, with the ending sentences carrying a much higher emotional weight—deeper fear and sadness, but also, paradoxically, stronger joy and trust—than the main body of the text.9
This is not simply disorganized writing; it is a hallmark of a mind that has lost its ability to maintain a coherent emotional state.
The individual is simultaneously attempting to manage the practical aftermath of their death while being consumed by the very pain driving them toward it.
Therefore, to read a suicide note as a simple, logical explanation of a choice is a fundamental error.
It must be understood as a transcript of a mind in a state of profound internal conflict and psychological fragmentation.
| Table 1: Common Thematic Content of Suicide Notes | |
| Theme | Prevalence Range (from studies) |
| Apology/Shame/Guilt | 74% – 90% 4 |
| Love for Those Left Behind | 55% – 60% 4 |
| Practical Instructions | 23% – 36% 5 |
| Life as Unbearable / Hopelessness | 14% – 48% 5 |
| Burden to Others | 3% – 40% (higher in elderly) 5 |
The Unanswered “Why”: When a Note Creates More Questions
For the family and friends left behind—the survivors of suicide loss—the note often represents a flicker of hope in an abyss of confusion.
There is a deeply ingrained cultural belief that this final message will contain the key, the one piece of information that will make sense of an incomprehensible act.6
The tragic reality is that the note rarely delivers on this promise.
Instead of providing closure, it frequently becomes a source of compounded trauma and unending questions.
It is crucial to recognize that note-leaving is not a universal phenomenon.
Estimates suggest that only 15% to 30% of individuals who die by suicide leave a note.7
This fact alone challenges the idea that they are a definitive window into the suicidal mind.
For the majority of survivors, there is no final letter, leaving them to grapple with a complete void of explanation.
For those who do receive a note, the experience is often one of profound disappointment and confusion.
The central, agonizing question of “why” is one that a note, written from a state of psychological crisis, is fundamentally ill-equipped to answer.3
The writer may have intended to ease the pain of those left behind by offering an explanation or an apology.11
However, the fragmented, contradictory, and emotionally raw nature of the message often generates a hundred more unanswerable questions for every one it purports to solve.6
This leads to one of the most painful and destructive aspects of suicide bereavement: guilt.
Survivors are tormented by feelings of guilt and responsibility, replaying events and searching for clues they might have missed.1
The note can become a focal point for this rumination.
A phrase like “I’m sorry for being a burden” can be internalized by a survivor as proof that they failed to show enough love or support.
A declaration of love can feel like a cruel paradox, leading to the question, “If you loved me, how could you do this?”
The cultural narrative that treats a suicide note as a mystery to be solved places an impossible burden on survivors.
They are conditioned to expect a logical reason for an act that is, by its nature, the endpoint of a deeply distorted psychological process.
When the note fails to provide this clarity, it is often perceived not as a limitation of the note itself, but as a personal failure on the part of the survivor to understand.
This fuels a cycle of guilt, self-blame, and confusion, unintentionally causing more harm in the grieving process.
To break this cycle, we must dismantle the false expectation of closure and reframe the purpose of the note entirely.
Part II: The Epiphany – A New Lens for Understanding
The Faulty Cockpit: A Paradigm Shift
My journey away from that family’s dining room table led me deep into the foundational works of suicidology.
I immersed myself in the writings of pioneers like Edwin Shneidman, who gave us the concept of “psychache,” and contemporary theorists like Thomas Joiner, who developed the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide.13
I realized they were describing the same tragic event from different, complementary angles.
Shneidman was describing the internal weather of the storm, while Joiner was mapping the external forces that created it.
The epiphany came not as a single fact, but as a unifying metaphor that suddenly made all the contradictory pieces fit.
It is this: The mind of a person in a suicidal crisis is like the cockpit of an airplane in a terminal dive.
The pilot is not irrational; they are acting with perfect logic based on information from catastrophically malfunctioning instruments.
A suicide note, then, is the “black box” recording from that cockpit.
It is a tragic, minute-by-minute transcript of a pilot trying to solve an unsolvable problem with broken tools.
This paradigm shifts our understanding entirely.
The person is no longer someone “choosing” death over life.
They are a pilot, trapped in a cockpit, seeing only terrifying readings on their console, and pulling the only lever they believe will end the terrifying descent.
Deconstructing the Crisis: The Four Faulty Instruments
This “Faulty Cockpit” paradigm allows us to synthesize the key theories of suicide into a single, cohesive model.
The suicidal state is not a monolithic feeling; it is a cascade of specific system failures.
By examining each “faulty instrument,” we can understand the data being fed to the pilot and, in turn, understand the seemingly incomprehensible messages recorded in the “black box” note.
Instrument 1: The Broken Altimeter (Perceived Burdensomeness & Psychache)
The altimeter is the instrument that measures altitude, giving a pilot a sense of their position, value, and safety relative to the ground.
In a suicidal crisis, this instrument is broken.
It is not just inaccurate; it is screaming a catastrophically false reading.
It tells the pilot that the plane—the self—is a dangerous liability.
It insists that their very existence is a net negative, a weight dragging others down, and that the world would be safer and better if the plane were simply removed from the sky.
This is a direct illustration of two core concepts in suicidology.
First, it maps perfectly to Thomas Joiner’s concept of “Perceived Burdensomeness,” the painful and often distorted belief that “my death is worth more than my life”.16
This is not a simple feeling of being a nuisance; it is a profound conviction of being a toxic burden on loved ones and society.
Second, this false reading from the broken altimeter is the primary source of what
Edwin Shneidman called “Psychache,” which he defined as unbearable psychological pain.
Shneidman argued that suicide is caused by psychache, and psychache is caused by frustrated psychological needs.14
The false belief that one is a burden is one of the most acute frustrations of the need to be valued and to contribute.
When we view the note through this lens, the most common themes snap into focus.
The pervasive expressions of “apology/shame/guilt” are no longer just vague feelings.
They are the pilot’s direct response to the faulty data from their altimeter.
They are apologizing for being the burden the instrument tells them they are.
Instrument 2: The Dead Radar (Thwarted Belongingness)
The radar system is designed to detect other aircraft, to show connection, support, and the presence of others in the sky.
In the suicidal cockpit, this radar is dead.
It shows a blank, empty screen.
This convinces the pilot that they are utterly and irrevocably alone, even if loved ones—spouses, children, friends—are flying in perfect formation right beside them, trying desperately to make contact.
The pilot’s lived experience is one of total isolation.
This is a powerful metaphor for Joiner’s second key component: “Thwarted Belongingness”.15
Humans have a fundamental need to belong, to feel connected to others in a network of reciprocal care.
When this need is thwarted, it creates a pain as real as any physical injury.
The person feels disconnected, alienated, and alone, regardless of their objective social situation.
This explains one of the most painful paradoxes found in suicide notes: the simultaneous expression of deep love for others alongside the act of ultimate departure.
The note is a message being transmitted from a cockpit whose instruments are screaming that no one can hear it.
The “I love you” is not a contradiction; it is a testament to the fact that love can still exist in the pilot’s heart even when the feeling of connection—the radar signal—has been completely obliterated by the illness.
It is a final, desperate broadcast into an empty sky.
Instrument 3: The Locked Autopilot (Cognitive Constriction)
The combination of a screaming altimeter (unbearable psychache from feeling like a burden) and a dead radar (profound isolation) triggers a catastrophic system-wide failure: the autopilot locks into a nosedive.
The pilot’s field of vision narrows pathologically until they can only see what is directly in front of them: the terrifying, accelerating ground.
All peripheral options vanish.
This is what Shneidman termed “Cognitive Constriction,” which he identified as the defining cognitive state in suicide.10
The mind loses its flexibility and capacity for creative problem-solving.
It becomes rigid and dichotomous, seeing only two choices: either continue this terrifying, painful, and inescapable dive, or pull the one lever that promises “cessation.” There is no third option.
The possibility of pulling up, of the instruments being wrong, of help being on the way, is no longer mentally accessible.
This state of cognitive constriction explains why suicide notes are often devoid of any consideration of alternative solutions or future possibilities.4
The writer is not willfully ignoring other options; from their constricted perspective, no other options exist.
The note becomes a justification for taking the only “solution” visible on their malfunctioning console.
It is the logical conclusion to a set of catastrophically flawed premises.
Instrument 4: The Unlocked Ejection Seat (Acquired Capability)
Every pilot has a powerful, innate survival instinct to stay with the plane, to fight for control until the very last moment.
To take the final step of leaving the aircraft—of ending one’s life—goes against this deeply wired imperative.
For this to happen, the ejection seat mechanism, which is normally locked down by our fear of death and pain, must be unlocked.
This represents Joiner’s third and final component: the “Acquired Capability for Suicide”.15
This capability is not something people are born with.
It is acquired through repeated exposure to painful and provocative life experiences.
Events like childhood trauma, engaging in self-harm, surviving past attempts, or exposure to combat can habituate a person to fear and pain.
Each exposure acts like a key, slowly turning the lock on the ejection seat.
It lowers the fear of death and raises pain tolerance, making it physically and psychologically possible to take the final step.
This is the crucial component that separates suicidal desire from suicidal action.
Many people may experience the pain of a broken altimeter and a dead radar, but they never act on it because their “ejection seat” remains safely locked.
The note itself is a product of the pain and constriction, but the act of suicide, which allows the note to be found, is only possible because this capability has been acquired.
The note is the record of the pilot’s decision; the unlocked seat is what allowed them to carry it O.T.
Part III: Applying the Paradigm – A Guide for Survivors and Helpers
Reading the Black Box Data: A New Interpretation
Understanding the “Faulty Cockpit” paradigm is not an academic exercise; it is a practical tool for compassion.
For survivors grappling with a final note, this framework can transform the process of reading it from a source of guilt and confusion into an act of profound, albeit painful, understanding.
The goal must shift from a futile search for a “reason” to a compassionate decoding of the person’s internal struggle.
When approaching a note, instead of asking, “Why did they do this?” one can ask, “What malfunctioning instrument is this phrase a symptom of?” This reframing is the key.
It allows the survivor to see the note not as a letter about them, but as a tragic data log from inside the cockpit.
- Acknowledge the note is a record of pain, not a rational verdict. The words were written under conditions of extreme psychological distress and cognitive distortion.6
- Reframe guilt-inducing statements. When a note says, “I’m sorry for being a burden,” or “You’ll all be better off without me,” the new reading is not “They believed I saw them as a burden.” The compassionate reading is, “This is a tragic and direct quote from their broken altimeter. It is a symptom of their unbearable psychache, not a reflection of my love or their value.”
- Reframe expressions of love. When a note says, “I love you all so much,” the old reading might be, “Then how could you leave?” The new reading is, “This is a powerful testament to a love that persisted even when their radar of belongingness had completely failed. This is proof of their love, not a contradiction of it.”
By viewing the note as “black box data,” survivors can begin to separate the person they loved from the illness that led to their death.
This is the critical step toward mitigating the intense guilt and self-blame that so often define suicide bereavement.
The anger and confusion can be redirected from oneself or the deceased toward the “system failure”—the illness itself.
This opens a path not to closure, but to compassion.1
| Table 2: The Two Readings of a Suicide Note | |
| Common Phrase in Note | Surface Reading (Leads to Pain & Guilt) |
| “You’ll be better off without me. I’m such a burden.” | “They thought I didn’t love them enough, or that I saw them as a burden. I failed them.” |
| “I love you all so much. Please don’t be sad.” | “If they truly loved us, they wouldn’t have done this. Their words feel like a lie.” |
| “This is the only way. There’s no other choice.” | “They gave up on us. They didn’t even try to find another solution.” |
| “Forgive me.” | “They knew this would destroy me and they did it anyway. What am I supposed to forgive?” |
Navigating the Wreckage: Rebuilding After the Crash
The grief that follows a suicide is qualitatively different from other forms of bereavement.3
The trauma is often described by experts as “catastrophic,” comparable to the psychological impact of a concentration camp experience.2
To navigate this unique landscape of pain, survivors need a language that honors its intensity.
The “Shattered House” or “Shattered Foundation” analogy powerfully captures this experience.23
A death by suicide doesn’t just create a hole in a family; it shatters the very foundation of belief—the belief in safety, in predictability, in the meaning of relationships.
Life as you knew it is a pile of rubble.
The work of grief is the slow, arduous, “brick by brick” process of rebuilding that foundation.
It involves creating a new life that can hold the reality of the loss.
The new house will have scars and cracks, but it can be built to be strong again.
Survivors often ask, “How long will this last?” The truth is that one never truly “gets over” a loss like this.2
The
“Ball and the Box” analogy provides a compassionate framework for this reality.23
Imagine grief is a large ball inside a box, and inside that box is a “pain button.” In the beginning, the ball is huge, filling the entire box.
Every movement causes the ball to hit the pain button.
Grief is constant and all-consuming.
Over time, the ball of grief doesn’t shrink, but the box—your life—begins to grow around it.
As you rebuild, make new connections, and find new meaning, the box gets bigger.
The ball is still there, and when it hits the pain button, the pain is just as intense.
But it happens less frequently.
This analogy validates the enduring nature of the pain while offering a tangible vision of hope: a life that can become large and meaningful enough to hold the grief without being constantly dominated by it.
A Culture of Care: Speaking Safely and Compassionately
How we talk about suicide matters immensely.
It is not a matter of political correctness, but of public health.
Research has shown that certain types of reporting and communication can increase the risk of suicide in vulnerable individuals, a phenomenon known as suicide contagion.26
Creating a culture of care requires us to adopt safe and compassionate communication practices.
This report, for instance, has deliberately used only thematic and composite examples from notes, never quoting a real note directly, in adherence with these principles.
Based on recommendations from leading organizations like the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention (AFSP) and ReportingOnSuicide.org, the following guidelines are essential for everyone, from journalists to individuals talking with a friend 26:
- Use Safe Language: Use phrases like “died by suicide” or “took their life.” Avoid the word “committed,” which implies a crime, and terms like “successful” or “failed” attempt, which are value-laden and inappropriate.26
- Do Not Share Details: Never share the contents of a suicide note or specific, graphic details about the method or location of the death. This is one of the strongest risk factors for contagion.26
- Frame as a Public Health Issue: Talk about suicide as a complex health issue that is preventable. Avoid sensationalizing or romanticizing the death, or describing it as an inexplicable mystery.27 Suicide is almost always the result of multiple contributing factors, including underlying mental health conditions.27
- Focus on Hope and Help: Shift the narrative from the details of the death to the importance of mental health, the warning signs of suicide, and the resources available for help. Stories of hope and recovery are powerful tools for prevention.29
Part IV: Resources for Hope and Healing
Global Lifelines: A Directory of Support
Knowing where to turn in a moment of crisis—for yourself or for someone you are worried about—is a critical first step toward safety and healing.
The following is a directory of free, confidential, 24/7 crisis support services in the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand.
These services are staffed by trained listeners who can provide immediate support.
| Table 3: International Crisis Support Helplines & Resources | ||
| Region | Service | Contact Information |
| United States | 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline | Dial or Text 988 |
| Crisis Text Line | Text HOME to 741741 | |
| The Trevor Project (for LGBTQ Youth) | Call 1-866-488-7386 | |
| Veterans Crisis Line | Dial 988, then Press 1 | |
| NAMI (National Alliance on Mental Illness) HelpLine | Call 1-800-950-6264 | |
| United Kingdom | Samaritans | Call 116 123 (free, 24/7) |
| Shout Crisis Text Line | Text SHOUT to 85258 | |
| Campaign Against Living Miserably (CALM) | Call 0800 58 58 58 (5pm-midnight) | |
| Papyrus HOPELINEUK (for under 35s) | Call 0800 068 4141 (24/7) | |
| National Suicide Prevention Helpline UK | Call 0800 689 5652 (6pm-midnight) | |
| Australia | Lifeline Australia | Call 13 11 14 (24/7) |
| Suicide Call Back Service | Call 1300 659 467 (24/7) | |
| Beyond Blue Support Service | Call 1300 22 4636 (24/7) | |
| Kids Helpline (for people aged 5-25) | Call 1800 55 1800 (24/7) | |
| MensLine Australia | Call 1300 78 99 78 (24/7) | |
| New Zealand | 1737 – Need to talk? | Call or Text 1737 (free, 24/7) |
| Lifeline Aotearoa | Call 0800 543 354 (24/7) | |
| Suicide Crisis Helpline | Call 0508 828 865 (0508 TAUTOKO) | |
| Youthline | Call 0800 376 633 or free text 234 | |
| Samaritans | Call 0800 726 666 (24/7) |
Works cited
- Grief after suicide | Better Health Channel, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/health/conditionsandtreatments/suicide-family-and-friends
- A Handbook for Survivors of Suicide – Crisis Support Services of Alameda County, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.crisissupport.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/SOS_handbook.pdf
- Suicide bereavement and complicated grief – PMC, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3384446/
- Mysore study: A study of suicide notes – PMC, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4711238/
- Suicide note themes and suicide prevention – PubMed, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15152783/
- To Describe the Unspeakable: On Suicide Notes & Their Cultural Context | Article, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://culture.pl/en/article/to-describe-the-unspeakable-on-suicide-notes-their-cultural-context
- Bereavement due to suicide: suicide notes – Healthtalk, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://healthtalk.org/experiences/bereavement-due-suicide/suicide-notes/
- Suicide notes written by child and adolescent suicide victims: A qualitative textual analysis, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://psykologisk.no/sp/2018/12/e9/
- Cognitive networks detect structural patterns and emotional complexity in suicide notes, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.917630/full
- (PDF) A Thematic Analysis of Suicide Notes – ResearchGate, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12748208_A_Thematic_Analysis_of_Suicide_Notes
- The suicide note – StandBy Support After Suicide, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://standbysupport.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/12.-The-suicide-note-support-pack.pdf
- Lived Experiences of Suicide Bereavement within Families: A Qualitative Study – PMC, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9602926/
- Edwin S. Shneidman on Suicide – Suicidology Online, accessed on August 9, 2025, http://www.suicidology-online.com/pdf/SOL-2010-1-5-18.pdf
- Shneidman – Suicide as psychache.pdf – Cipra, accessed on August 9, 2025, http://cipra.cl/biblioteca/suicidio/Shneidman%20-%20Suicide%20as%20psychache.pdf
- The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of a Decade of Cross-National Research – PubMed Central, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5730496/
- Interpersonal theory of suicide – Wikipedia, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpersonal_theory_of_suicide
- The Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of Suicidal Behavior: Current Status and Future Directions | Request PDF – ResearchGate, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26892701_The_Interpersonal-Psychological_Theory_of_Suicidal_Behavior_Current_Status_and_Future_Directions
- Thomas Joiner – (Abnormal Psychology) – Vocab, Definition, Explanations | Fiveable, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/key-terms/abnormal-psychology/thomas-joiner
- (PDF) Shneidman’s Contributions to the Understanding of Suicidal Thinking., accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232585121_Shneidman’s_Contributions_to_the_Understanding_of_Suicidal_Thinking
- Suicide: Psychache and Alienation – Psychiatric Times, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/suicide-psychache-and-alienation
- Suicide as Psychache: A Clinical Approach to Self-Destructive Behavior, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://confidentchangemanagement.com/book-reviews/psychology-neurology-philosophy/suicide/influences/suicide-as-psychache/
- The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3130348/
- 3 Analogies of Grief That Have Helped Me — Get rid of anxiety for …, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.meganhillukka.com/blog/analogies-of-grief
- An Analogy on Grief : r/tfmr_support – Reddit, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/tfmr_support/comments/1c15kgj/an_analogy_on_grief/
- Coping with Grief: How the Ball and the Box Analogy May Help – Psych Central, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://psychcentral.com/blog/coping-with-grief-ball-and-box-analogy
- Ethical reporting guidelines for media – AFSP, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://afsp.org/ethicalreporting/
- RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REPORTING ON SUICIDE – The Trevor Project, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://www.thetrevorproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Reporting-Suicide.pdf
- Safe Reporting | BHDD Office of Mental Health | Suicide Prevention Program, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://osp.scdmh.org/safe-reporting/
- Recommendations – Reporting on Suicide, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://reportingonsuicide.org/recommendations/
- Communicating about suicide – Mindframe, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://mindframe.org.au/suicide/communicating-about-suicide
- Reporting on Suicide, accessed on August 9, 2025, https://reportingonsuicide.org/
