Table of Contents
Part 1: The Tyranny of the Timer: My Search for a Time Tracker That Didn’t Steal My Focus
For over a decade, my professional life has been lived inside a Linux terminal.
As a freelance developer and systems consultant, the command line isn’t just a tool; it’s my office, my workshop, and my sanctuary.
It’s an environment of pure efficiency, where thought translates to action with minimal friction.
Yet, for years, one simple task consistently threw a wrench into my carefully optimized workflow: tracking my time.
The irony was maddening.
The very act of measuring my productivity was actively destroying it.
My search for the perfect Linux time tracker became a long, frustrating odyssey through a sea of applications that, despite their promises, seemed fundamentally at odds with the way I worked.
The core conflict was a paradox: to be a responsible freelancer, I needed to meticulously log my billable hours.
But every tool I tried demanded I step out of my focused state—my “flow”—to interact with it.
My journey began, as many do, with feature-rich GUI applications.
They boasted colorful charts, project management integrations, and slick interfaces.
I’d download one, full of optimism.
For a few days, I would diligently click the little “play” button, categorize my tasks, and feel a sense of professional accomplishment.
But soon, the cracks would appear.
The application, living in its own window, became another destination.
I’d be deep in a complex debugging session, finally holding all the variables in my head, only to realize I’d forgotten to start the timer.
The process of Alt-Tabbing away from my code, navigating to the app, finding the right project, and clicking “start” was more than just a minor inconvenience; it was a cognitive sledgehammer, shattering my concentration.
The time I was supposed to be tracking was being spent managing the tracker itself.
This cycle of enthusiasm, frustration, and eventual abandonment repeated itself with several different applications.
Some were bloated and slow, others were unstable, but they all shared a common philosophical flaw: they demanded I enter their world, rather than integrating into mine.
The breaking point came on a Tuesday afternoon.
I was up against a tight deadline for a client, and I’d been logging hours in a popular, cross-platform GUI tracker that promised seamless syncing and robust features.
I had just finished a grueling six-hour coding marathon.
Feeling a sense of relief, I went to stop the timer and log my work.
The application was frozen.
A forced restart revealed my worst fear: the local data file was corrupted.
The entire day’s work—every billable minute—was gone.
It wasn’t just about the lost revenue; it was the profound sense of betrayal by a tool that was supposed to provide security and order.
That failure was a catalyst.
It forced me to question everything about how we approach time tracking in a technical environment.
There had to be a better way—a system that respected focus, embraced the Linux philosophy of simple, powerful tools, and didn’t treat me like a user to be managed, but a craftsman to be empowered.
Part 2: The Epiphany: Discovering Mise en Place for Digital Productivity
The solution didn’t come from a tech blog or a productivity forum.
It came, unexpectedly, from a documentary about the world of high-end restaurant kitchens.
I watched, fascinated, as chefs moved with an almost supernatural calm and efficiency amidst the fire and fury of a dinner rush.
They weren’t scrambling or panicking.
They were executing.
The source of their power, the documentary explained, was a philosophy known as mise en place.
Mise en place is a French culinary term that literally translates to “everything in its place”.1
But it’s far more than just a fancy phrase for preparation.
It’s a comprehensive system and mindset that governs how a professional kitchen operates.
Before a single customer arrives, every ingredient has been washed, chopped, and portioned into small bowls.
Every tool, pan, and plate is gathered and arranged.
The workspace is meticulously organized and cleaned.2
This state of total readiness is the foundation of culinary excellence.
It transforms the chaotic, high-pressure act of cooking into a smooth, efficient flow, allowing the chef to focus entirely on the craft of cooking, not the logistics of preparation.4
As I watched, a powerful analogy clicked into place.
The chaos of a disorganized kitchen was my own digital workspace when I was frantically switching between my editor, the terminal, and a separate time-tracking App. The chef desperately searching for a missing ingredient mid-sauté was me, breaking my concentration to find a clunky GUI and start a timer.
The chef’s station, a masterpiece of ergonomic efficiency with everything in its place, was the ideal state I craved for my own work.
This was the epiphany.
The best time tracker for a power user isn’t an “application” you have to visit; it’s a capability that is seamlessly integrated into your pre-existing workspace.
It should be as natural and thoughtless as a chef reaching for a bowl of pre-diced onions, an action that supports the workflow without ever interrupting it.6
This new paradigm, this digital mise en place, gave me a powerful framework for evaluating tools.
It wasn’t about the number of features anymore.
It was about the “flow disruption score.” How much does this tool pull me out of my primary task? The choice of a time tracker, I realized, is a philosophical one.
It reflects a fundamental decision about how you value focus, workflow, and data ownership.
The market is broadly divided between two camps:
- The Destination Platforms: These are the all-in-one services that want you to live inside their ecosystem. They offer invoicing, team management, payroll, and more.7 They are powerful, but they are a destination you must travel to.
- The Integrated Components: These are tools, often command-line utilities, designed to be small, sharp components in a larger, user-defined system. They don’t try to be your whole office; they aim to be the perfect knife in your kitchen drawer.10
The philosophy of mise en place argues unequivocally for the second approach.
A chef doesn’t leave the line to go to a separate “invoicing station” to record that a steak has been cooked.
The process is integrated.
With this new lens, I could finally map the landscape of Linux time trackers in a way that made sense.
Table 1: The Linux Time Tracker Landscape: A “Mise en Place” Evaluation
| Tool Name | Primary Model | Open Source? | Core Features | Pricing (Typical) | “Mise en Place” Score (1-5) |
| Timewarrior | CLI | Yes | Tagging, Reporting, JSON Export, API | Free | 5 |
| Timetrap | CLI | Yes | Timesheets, Natural Language, Custom Formatters | Free | 5 |
| ActivityWatch | Automated | Yes | Local-first, Privacy-focused, Categorization | Free | 5 |
| Toggl Track | Web + GUI | No | Generous Free Tier, API, Invoicing, Teams | Free for 5 users; Paid from $9/user/mo 13 | 3 |
| Clockify | Web + GUI | No | Unlimited Free Users, Invoicing, Kiosk | Free; Paid from $3.99/user/mo 14 | 3 |
| TMetric | Web + GUI | No | Team Dashboards, Payroll, Integrations | Free for 5 users; Paid from $50/user/yr 14 | 2 |
| Hubstaff | Web + GUI | No | Productivity Monitoring, Payroll, Geofencing | Paid from $4.99/user/mo 14 | 1 |
Note: The “Mise en Place” Score is a subjective rating from 1 (high disruption) to 5 (seamless integration) based on how well the tool integrates into a focused, command-line-centric workflow without causing context switching.
Part 3: The “Mise en Place” Workspace: Command-Line-First Time Tracking
The ultimate expression of the mise en place philosophy for a Linux power user is the command-line interface (CLI).
Tools that live in the terminal are not separate applications to be visited; they are extensions of the native environment.
They are the pre-chopped ingredients, ready at a moment’s notice, allowing work to flow uninterrupted.
The diverse ecosystem of CLI trackers isn’t a sign of fragmentation but a testament to the Linux ethos of choice and specialization.
It allows a user to select a tool that perfectly matches their preferred language (C++, Ruby, shell script) and complexity needs, creating a truly personalized setup.
The Gold Standard: A Deep Dive into Timewarrior
If there is one tool that embodies the principles of a robust, dedicated, and perfectly integrated component, it is Timewarrior.
Written in C++, it is fast, reliable, and does one thing exceptionally well: it tracks time intervals with tags.12
It is the sharpest knife in the drawer.
Installation
Timewarrior is available in the official repositories of most major Linux distributions, making installation trivial.16
- On Debian/Ubuntu: sudo apt install timewarrior
- On Fedora/CentOS: sudo dnf install timew
- On Arch Linux: sudo pacman -S timew
For those who want the latest version or prefer to compile from source, the process is straightforward using cmake and make.16
A Practical Tutorial
Timewarrior’s power lies in its simple, logical command structure.
- Basic Usage: The core workflow is as simple as a stopwatch. To begin tracking, you use the start command. When you’re done, you use stop.17
Bash
# Start tracking a task
$ timew start
Tracking
Started 2025-02-23T10:15:00
Current 15:00
Total 0:00:00
# A while later, stop the timer
$ timew stop
Recorded
Started 2025-02-23T10:15:00
Ended 45:30
Total 0:30:30
Running timew by itself will show the status of the currently running timer.17 - Tagging and Context: This is where Timewarrior becomes truly powerful. By adding tags to your start command, you can categorize your time. This is the key to generating meaningful reports later.12
Bash
# Track time for a specific project and task
$ timew start ProjectX API “Fixing login bug”
# Switch to another task, which automatically stops the previous one
$ timew start Meeting “Client sync”
Recorded ProjectX API “Fixing login bug”
Started 2025-02-23T10:45:30
Ended 11:30:00
Total 0:44:30
Tracking Meeting “Client sync”
Started 2025-02-23T11:30:00
Current 30:00
Total 0:00:00 - Reporting: Timewarrior comes with built-in summary reports that provide a clear overview of where your time has gone. The summary command shows a daily breakdown, but you can also view reports by week or month.12
Bash
# Get a summary for the current day
$ timew summary
# Get a summary for the entire week
$ timew summary :week - Correcting Mistakes: No workflow is perfect. Forgetting to track time is a common issue. Timewarrior’s track command allows you to retroactively add a completed time interval, while other commands like modify, lengthen, and shorten let you easily correct mistakes.18
Bash
# I forgot to log the time I spent on documentation from 9am to 9:30am
$ timew track 9:00 – 9:30 ProjectX Docs “Wrote API guide”
The Mise en Place Integration
The final step to making Timewarrior a truly thoughtless part of the workflow is to create shell aliases in your .bashrc or .zshrc file.
This reduces the cognitive load to near zero.
Bash
# Example aliases for.bashrc
alias tin=’timew start’
alias tout=’timew stop’
alias tsum=’timew summary’
alias tweek=’timew summary :week’
With these aliases, starting a task is as simple as typing tin ProjectX and stopping is just tout.
It becomes a seamless, two-keystroke action that never requires leaving the terminal or breaking concentration.
The Elegant Alternative: Simplicity and Extensibility with Timetrap
For users who might find Timewarrior’s C++ architecture a bit rigid, or for those who live in the Ruby ecosystem, Timetrap offers a wonderfully elegant and scriptable alternative.11
It’s built around the concept of “timesheets,” which are like separate logbooks for different projects or clients.11
Its standout features are its simplicity and its powerful natural language date parsing, powered by the Chronic gem.
This makes correcting forgotten entries feel incredibly intuitive.11
Bash
# Switch to (or create) a timesheet
$ t sheet ProjectY
# Start the timer (check in)
$ t in “Designing new UI”
# Stop the timer (check out)
$ t out
# Forgot to log a meeting? No problem.
$ t in –at “2 hours ago” “Client call”
$ t out –at “1 hour and 30 minutes ago”
Timetrap’s true power for tinkerers lies in its custom formatters.
If you don’t like the default report formats, you can write your own simple Ruby class to output your time data in any format you can imagine—from a custom CSV to a complex JSON structure ready for another script.11
It’s worth noting that searching for “Timetrap” can often yield results for an unrelated science fiction film; the correct resources are its GitHub repository and technical documentation.11
The DIY Path: Building Your Own Tracker with Shell Scripts
For the ultimate minimalist and control freak, the core logic of a time tracker can be replicated with a surprisingly simple shell script.
This approach demystifies the entire process and embodies the Linux ethos of building your own tools to perfectly suit your needs.
An analysis of one such approach reveals the basic components: using date +%s to get the Unix epoch time, echo to write the start time and task name to a session file (e.g., ~/.tt_session), and then calculating the difference upon stopping.
The final log is simply appended to a text file, often in a CSV format.30
While this lacks the robust reporting and error-checking of a dedicated tool like Timewarrior, it’s a powerful demonstration of how little is truly required for a functional,
mise en place-friendly tracker.
Table 2: CLI Time Tracker Command Reference: Timewarrior vs. Timetrap
| Action | Timewarrior | Timetrap |
| Start a Task | timew start <tags…> | t in <note> |
| Stop Current Task | timew stop | t out |
| Switch Project | (Handled by tags) | t sheet <sheet_name> |
| View Daily Summary | timew summary or timew day | t display |
| Add a Past Entry | timew track <range> <tags…> | t in –at <time>; t out –at <time> |
| List Projects | timew tags | t list |
Part 4: The “Full-Service Kitchen”: Evaluating Web-Based Platforms with Linux Clients
While CLI tools represent the purist’s mise en place, many freelancers and teams require a more comprehensive solution—a “full-service kitchen” that handles not just timing, but also invoicing, project budgeting, and team collaboration.
This brings us to the world of web-based SaaS platforms.
The critical question, viewed through our new paradigm, is how well their Linux clients and APIs can integrate into a focused workflow, and what trade-offs are involved.
The evaluation of these platforms reveals a fundamental tension.
Their business models are often built on being a central hub, a destination.
This can introduce a hidden “focus tax”—the cognitive overhead of managing another complex system, receiving another stream of notifications, and being drawn into a feature-rich web interface.
This runs counter to the mise en place goal of reducing cognitive load and eliminating distractions.
Head-to-Head: Toggl Track vs. Clockify on Linux
Toggl Track and Clockify dominate this space, primarily due to their extremely generous “freemium” models that have made them the default choice for many individuals and small teams.13
- Toggl Track offers a free plan for up to 5 users and is widely praised for its simplicity and effortless real-time tracking. Its Linux desktop client is functional, and its browser extensions can integrate with hundreds of web apps. A key feature is that you can start a timer without pre-defining a project, reducing friction and allowing you to categorize the entry later.13 Toggl has also invested in its API and reporting features, and notably markets itself with an “anti-surveillance policy,” promising not to use screenshots or keyboard tracking, which is a significant point of trust.33
- Clockify takes the freemium model even further, offering unlimited users, projects, and tracking for free, which is its main competitive advantage.31 It provides a native Linux app (available as a
.deb or .rpm package) and also features an “auto tracker” that can monitor app and website usage to help you create time entries later.31 For CLI enthusiasts, Clockify gets bonus points for having several community-developed CLI clients that allow you to start timers and manage entries directly from the terminal, offering a potential bridge to a true
mise en place workflow.31
For both platforms, the value proposition is clear: you get a powerful, cloud-synced time tracking system for free.
The trade-off is that you are operating within a commercial ecosystem.
The most advanced features—like detailed profit and productivity analysis, timesheet approvals, and enhanced security—are reserved for paid plans.13
The “cost” of free is being part of a sales funnel.
The Enterprise Contenders: Hubstaff, TMetric, and the Monitoring Dilemma
Moving up the complexity scale, platforms like Hubstaff and TMetric are positioned not just for freelancers but for businesses that need to manage a workforce.
They offer a suite of tools that go far beyond a simple stopwatch, including payroll integration, advanced team dashboards, and detailed productivity monitoring.8
- TMetric focuses on providing real-time insights into team activity, project efficiency, and seamless invoicing. It integrates with a wide range of project management and accounting tools, making it a powerful hub for professional teams, especially software developers and consultants.8
- Hubstaff is even more focused on workforce management, with features like productivity metrics based on activity levels, optional screenshotting, and geofenced attendance tracking.9 While they emphasize their “privacy-first guiding principles” like not logging keystrokes, the very existence of these monitoring features represents a significant philosophical shift.9
This is where the mise en place comparison becomes stark.
These tools are not designed for personal workflow optimization; they are designed for organizational oversight.
They represent a top-down management philosophy, the polar opposite of the bottom-up, self-directed mise en place approach.
The tool is no longer a simple instrument you command; it’s a platform that monitors you.
For many Linux power users, who value autonomy and privacy, this is a line that cannot be crossed.
The “feature” of productivity monitoring comes at the steep price of personal agency.
Part 5: The “Automated Pantry”: Passive Tracking for Auditing and Awareness
The greatest weakness of any manual time tracking system, whether CLI or GUI, is that it relies on a fallible human brain.
You have to remember to start it, and you have to remember to stop it.
This is where a third category of tools comes in: automated, passive trackers.
They run quietly in the background, logging your activity without any manual input.
This introduces a critical distinction between two modes of time.
A manual tracker is for logging Intentional Time—the work you plan to do, which is essential for billing and project management.
An automated tracker is for capturing Actual Time—an unfiltered, ground-truth record of where your attention actually goes.
A 30-minute block logged to “ProjectX” with Timewarrior might be your billable time, but an automated tracker might reveal that 10 of those minutes were spent on a news site.
These two types of tools are not competitors; they are complementary parts of a complete system.
The ultimate mise en place for time management uses a frictionless manual tracker for intent (the “chef’s hand”) and a private, automated tracker for auditing and self-improvement (the “kitchen camera”).
The Open-Source, Privacy-First Champion: ActivityWatch
For the privacy-conscious Linux user, there is no better automated tracker than ActivityWatch.
Its philosophy aligns perfectly with the open-source ethos.
It is free, open-source, cross-platform, and, most importantly, all data is stored locally on your device.34
It never sends your activity logs to a third-party server.
ActivityWatch runs as a background service, monitoring your active application and window titles.
With browser extensions for Chrome and Firefox, it can also track the active tab, giving you a detailed timeline of your digital day.34
You access your data through a local web server running on your machine (
localhost:5600), where you can view dashboards, categorize your activities (e.g., grouping “VS Code” and “Terminal” as “Coding”), and analyze your habits.
The ideal use case is to pair it with a tool like Timewarrior.
You use Timewarrior to log your billable, intentional hours.
Then, at the end of the week, you review your ActivityWatch dashboard to get an honest assessment of your focus.
It provides the data needed for self-awareness and improvement without compromising privacy.
Cloud-Based Alternatives: Convenience vs. Data Privacy
For users who prioritize a polished user experience and cross-device synchronization over data locality, several commercial services offer automated tracking.
Tools like RescueTime, Memtime, and ManicTime provide similar functionality to ActivityWatch but store and process your data in the cloud.13
- RescueTime is one of the oldest and most well-known, offering powerful reports on productivity trends.13
- Memtime is a newer player that emphasizes its AI-powered categorization and minimalist interface.13
The value proposition of these services is convenience.
Their dashboards are often more sophisticated, and they can sync your activity across multiple computers and even mobile devices.
The trade-off, however, is significant.
You are sending a detailed, second-by-second log of your digital life to a private company.
For the typical Linux user who values control and privacy, this is a major consideration that depends entirely on their personal comfort level with the convenience-versus-privacy spectrum.
Part 6: Conclusion: Assembling Your Perfect Time-Tracking System
The long journey from the frustration of a crashed GUI app to the clarity of a culinary philosophy has revealed a simple truth: the best time tracking tool is not a tool at all.
It’s a system.
It’s a carefully arranged workspace where the act of tracking time is so deeply integrated that it becomes an invisible, frictionless byproduct of the work itself.
The goal is not to find the application with the most features, but to assemble a system that fiercely protects your focus and respects your workflow.
The mise en place paradigm provides the map to build that system.
My own workflow, once a source of constant friction, is now a model of efficiency.
It is built on the principles I’ve outlined.
Timewarrior, with a handful of simple aliases (tin, tout, tsum), is my trusted companion for logging intentional, billable hours.
It lives in my terminal and never asks me to break my concentration.
Running silently in the background, ActivityWatch serves as my private auditor, providing a weekly, no-judgment look at where my time truly went.
This combination gives me everything I need: accurate data for my clients and honest feedback for myself.
Time tracking is no longer a chore; it’s a source of control and insight.
The Decision Framework: What Kind of “Chef” Are You?
Your perfect system will depend on your specific needs.
The final step is to choose the components that best fit your role in the kitchen.
- The CLI Purist: You are a developer, a sysadmin, a writer. You live in the terminal, and your primary goal is to protect your state of flow. Your ideal mise en place is built on control, privacy, and minimalism.
- Recommendation: A combination of Timewarrior for intentional, manual tracking (using shell aliases for zero friction) and ActivityWatch for passive, private auditing. This setup provides maximum power and data ownership with zero financial cost and minimal cognitive overhead.
- The Freelance Consultant: You value the efficiency of the command line, but you also have to manage the business side of things—invoicing clients and creating professional reports.
- Recommendation: A hybrid approach. Use Timewarrior or Timetrap as your primary, day-to-day tracking interface. Then, use its JSON export feature or a custom script to push your data into the free tier of a platform like Toggl Track or Clockify. This gives you the best of both worlds: the frictionless workflow of the CLI and the business-friendly features of a web platform when you need them.
- The Team Leader: Your responsibility extends beyond your own productivity to coordinating a team. A centralized platform is a practical necessity for project management and resource allocation.
- Recommendation: Adopt a platform like Toggl Track or TMetric. They offer a strong balance of team features, integrations, and reporting without resorting to the most intrusive forms of monitoring. The key is to implement it with a mise en place mindset: encourage your team to use the desktop clients and browser extensions to minimize context switching, and be transparent about how the data is used, always prioritizing the team’s focus and autonomy.
Works cited
- Mise en Place: Everything You Need to Know This French Culinary Phrase – Everyday Uniforms, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://everyday-uniforms.com/blogs/chefs-magazine/mise-en-place
- The Meaning of Mise-en-Place | Gastronomy Blog – Boston University, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://sites.bu.edu/gastronomyblog/2016/02/15/the-meaning-of-mise-en-place-2/
- Mise En Place – the Professional Culinary Philosophy that will Change the Way You Cook, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://acmesaltco.com/cooking-tips/mise-en-place-the-professional-culinary-philosophy-that-will-change-the-way-you-cook/
- The Art of Mise En Place: How Organization Elevates Your Cooking Skills, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.palatesensations.com/blog/the-art-of-mise-en-place-how-organization-elevates-your-cooking-skills
- Mise en Place: How a Chef’s Philosophy Can Transform Your Business, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.secondwindcoaching.com/articles/mise-en-place-how-a-chefs-philosophy-can-transform-your-business
- Mise-en-Place: How Chefs Organize Their Work | Art of Manliness, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.artofmanliness.com/character/advice/mise-en-place-how-chefs-organize/
- 10 Best Time Tracking Linux Solutions to Try in 2025 – actiTIME, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.actitime.com/software-collections/time-tracking-linux
- TMetric: Time Tracking Software for Professional Teams, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://tmetric.com/
- Hubstaff: Time Tracking and Productivity Monitoring Tool, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://hubstaff.com/
- 8 Great Linux Time-Tracker Apps to Keep You on Task – LinuxInsider, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.linuxinsider.com/story/8-great-linux-time-tracker-apps-to-keep-you-on-task-85896.html
- samg/timetrap: Simple command line timetracker – GitHub, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://github.com/samg/timetrap
- Tracking time with Timewarrior at the command line – Red Hat, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/timewarrior-command-line
- The 5 best time tracking apps in 2025 – Zapier, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://zapier.com/blog/best-time-tracking-apps/
- Top 7 Time Trackers for Software Developers in 2024 – WebWork Blog, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.webwork-tracker.com/blog/top-7-time-trackers-for-software-developers-in-2024
- Timewarrior 1.0.0 Released – Taskwarrior, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://taskwarrior.org/news/news.20160821/
- How To Install Timewarrior, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://timewarrior.net/docs/install/
- Timewarrior – Simple Time Tracking – Timewarrior, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://timewarrior.net/tutorial/simple/
- Precise Time Tracking – Timewarrior, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://timewarrior.net/tutorial/precise/
- Timewarrior – Documentation, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://timewarrior.net/docs/
- Timewarrior – Show me the Data! – Timewarrior, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://timewarrior.net/tutorial/summary/
- Timewarrior – Tutorial – Timewarrior, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://timewarrior.net/tutorial/
- timew(1) – Arch Linux manual pages, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://man.archlinux.org/man/timew.1.en
- Best commandline time tracking application? [closed] – Stack Overflow, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/398344/best-commandline-time-tracking-application
- Time Trap – Where to Watch and Stream – TV Guide, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.tvguide.com/movies/time-trap/2000155838/
- Time Trap – Hidden Objects – Full walkthrough – YouTube, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_R4-iijsikg
- ‘Time Trap’ proves that time travel can be done cheap – Hilltop Views, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.hilltopviewsonline.com/15038/life-and-arts/time-trap-proves-that-time-travel-can-be-done-cheap/
- Time Trap Movie Explained: A Sci-Fi Adventure | TikTok, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.tiktok.com/@duanjvmovie20/video/7523639694014319927
- Time Trap, movie (2017) – Film review by Kadmon – Alkony, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://alkony.enerla.net/english/the-nexus/arts/film/time-trap-movie-2017-film-review-kadmon
- Time Trap streaming: where to watch movie online? – JustWatch, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://www.justwatch.com/us/movie/time-trap
- Building a command-line time tracker, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://strdr4605.com/building-a-command-line-time-tracker
- FREE Linux Time Tracker – Clockify, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://clockify.me/linux-time-tracking
- Clockify™ – FREE Time Tracking Software, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://clockify.me/
- Toggl Track: Time Tracking Software for Any Workflow, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://toggl.com/
- ActivityWatch – Open-source time tracker, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://activitywatch.net/
- Which Time Tracker application do you recommend? – Ask Ubuntu, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://askubuntu.com/questions/4113/which-time-tracker-application-do-you-recommend
- ever-works/awesome-time-tracking: Time Tracking – Software, Methodologies and Practices – https://timetrack.works – GitHub, accessed on August 12, 2025, https://github.com/ever-works/awesome-time-tracking
